Original source · versioned page text
Ecological Assessment Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (19.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Ecological Assessment Report
Table 3: Summary of desktop and site assessment results.
Legislative / Compliance Element Desktop Assessment Results Field Survey Results and Assessment
Australian Legislation
Environmental Protection and Biodiversity •
Three (3) listed threatened ecological communities No species or communities listed under the EPBC Act
Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (TEC): were found to be present within the development
footprint area. However, the property does contain
• Coastal Swamp Oak (Casuarina glauca) Forest of New
forest that could be identified as Coastal swamp
South Wales and South East Queensland ecological
sclerophyll forest of NSW and SEQ and the property
community (Endangered);
does contain suitable habitat for some of the listed 76
• Lowland Rainforest of Subtropical Australia (Critically threatened species in the area, including koalas.
Endangered);
The development will not impact on any vegetation or
• Coastal swamp sclerophyll forest of NSW and SEQ habitat areas on site for listed threatened species.
Seventy six (76) threatened species; and The development does not warrant an EPBC referral.
Forty eight (48) migratory species.
Refer to Appendix 1
Queensland Legislation
Coastal Protection and Management Act The site is mapped within the Coastal Management The site inspection confirmed that the development
1995 District and is within a Coastal area subject to erosion footprint area is outside of the coastal area subject to
and storm tide inundation. However, the proposed erosion and storm tide inundation. The development
development footprint area is outside of the Coastal area is still within the Coastal Management District.
area subject to erosion and storm tide inundation. The ‘State Code for Accepted Development for Tidal
works, or work completely or partly in a coastal
management district’ (August 2017) is not applicable
to this application, because the application does not
PR22098_EA_36 Riverpark Drive, Ringtail Creek Page 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.