Council archive · source document
Decision Notice - 010.2007.00000762.001 [As Published] · 142007.762
Form 6 - Decision Notice
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, S3.5.15, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
File No: 2007/762 Date of Decision: 22 May 2007
1. APPLICANT DETAILS
Name: Michael Minto Griffiths
Postal address: CARE Noosa Jetty Builders
PO Box 299
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
Phone no: 5479 3131 Fax no: 07 5474 3480
2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Street address: 62 Saltwater Avenue, Noosaville
Real property Lot 516 RP 880344, County of March, Parish of Weyba
description:
3. OWNER DETAILS
Name: Michael Minto Griffiths & Kathy Margaret Griffiths
Postal address: PO Box 696
MAROOCHYDORE QLD 4558
4. REFERRAL AGENCIES
Referral Agency Address Basis
Nil
5. APPLICATION TYPE
Development Development Details Preliminary Development
Approval Permit
Operational Works Transport Type 5 - Domestic Marine No Yes
(Boatlifting Device)
6. DECISION DETAILS
Council decided to approve the application and grant a Development Permit, subject to conditions.
7. APPLICABLE CODES
The developer must comply with the following codes for self-assessable development related to the development
approved under this Development Permit:-
Not applicable.
8. SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
9. CONDITIONS
The approval is subject to conditions. Noosa Council’s conditions are attached.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 5 pages
Page 2
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 2 of 6 10. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED Type of Development Permit required Subject of the required Development Permit Nil 11. RIGHTS OF APPEAL Rights of appeal in relation to this application are attached. 12. ASSESSMENT MANAGER Name: Noosa Council Signature: Date: 23/05/07 A c:\docume~1\tblogg\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@9802c034\@[email protected]
Page 3
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 3 of 6
Noosa Council Conditions
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
1. Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans
of development. The approved plans are numbered 07/42-1 prepared by John Norden and Associates
and dated March 2007and as may be amended by these conditions and annotations made on the plans.
2. The structure should be designed and constructed such that it is free standing within the waterway and is
not connected to or behind the revetment wall.
3. The boat lifting device is to be located in conjunction with the approved jetty and shall not extend beyond
the end of the approved jetty and with an overall width no greater than 4.0m.
4. The boat lifting device shall be located generally perpendicular to the revetment wall.
5. There shall be no electrical reticulation system carrying electricity in excess of 24 volts beyond the
revetment wall.
6. Lighting associated with the use shall be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance
with Section 3 of AS4282 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
7. Rock scour protection, wrapped in geotextile, extends 3000mm from the face of the revetment wall in this
locality. Prior to driving piles, the rocks are to be removed to expose the geotextile and the geotextile cut
neatly to allow it to be turned back. During pile driving, care is to be taken to ensure the geotextile is not
damaged. At the completion of pile driving, the fabric is to be turned down around the pile and the rocks
replaced around the piles.
8. The boatlifting device is to be used for private purposes only with no commercial operations to be
undertaken.
9. Boat repair activities will not be permitted on site.
10. Wastewater and sullage shall only be disposed of at approved pumpout facilities.
11. Any construction and post construction activity is not to impact on the condition of the waterway, and is to
be conducted so as not to breach the Environmental Protection Act EPA (1994) and the Environmental
Protection (Water) Policy 1997.
12. The approval or conditions do not constitute a ruling on structural safety and the applicant must make
their own arrangement to ensure adequacy of design and work. Also any approval granted does not
warrant that such plans and specifications have been checked in detail, nor does not warrant that such
plans and specifications have been checked in detail, nor does it absolve the owner of the land from
complying with all the conditions of this approval and/or relevant Council By-Laws and Policies and/or
relevant statues and/or statutory regulations in the execution and/or performance of said works. The
Council does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of such plans and specifications as approved.
13. Certification by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland that states that the boatlifting device is
constructed in accordance with best practice methods and is structurally sound shall be submitted to
Council prior to the return of any bond monies held by Council. A final inspection and approval of the
structure by Council’s Inspector is also required prior to the return of any bond monies held by Council.
Please contact Council’s Land Development Section to arrange the inspection.
14. The boatlifting device shall be licensed with the Council upon completion of the work and shall be licensed
annually thereafter.
15. The Development Permit for a operational works of use of premises lapses if the use has not happened
by 22 May 2009, unless an application to extend the currency is approved by Council.
A c:\docume~1\tblogg\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@9802c034\@[email protected]
Page 4
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 4 of 6
Local Laws, Policies & State
Regulation Requirements
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
THE FOLLOWING ADVICES ARE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND DO NOT FORM
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Should any changes or modifications to the approved plans be required as a result of construction
constraints, a Change to an Existing Approval Application under the Integrated Planning Act must be made.
Amended plans clearly indicating the changes must be lodged with this application along with the
appropriate fees.
2. The requirements of the Environmental Protection Amendment Regulation (No. 2) 1999 and Local Law No.
12, prevents a builder or building contractor carrying out building work on a building site in a way that makes
or causes audible noise to be made from the building work:-
2.1. On a Sunday or public holiday, at any time; or
2.2. On a Saturday or a business day, before 7.00am or after 6.30pm.
A maximum penalty of $1,500 applies to an offence under this legislation.
3. Pursuant to the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) 1991 Act if the cost of
operational works exceeds $80,000, then a portable long service leave levy is required to be paid. In
accordance with Section 77.(1) of the Act, Council is required to sight the approved form issued by the
Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Authority that confirms that the
requirements of the Act have been satisfied. A statutory declaration outlining the cost of the operational
works must be submitted to Council prior to the commencement of any works over the site.
A c:\docume~1\tblogg\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@9802c034\@[email protected]
Page 5
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 5 of 6
Appeal Rights
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
The following is an extract from the Integrated (6) If an application involves assessment against
Planning Act (Chapter 4). a concurrence agency code, appeal rights for
submitters for the application are not available
Division 8 - Appeals to court relating to against the part of the approval that represents the
development applications concurrence agency’s response for the code.
Appeals by applicants Appeals by advice agency submitters
4.1.27.(1) An applicant for a development application 4.1.29.(1) An advice agency may, within the limits of
may appeal to the court against any of the following- its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about the giving of
(a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of a a development approval for a development
development application; application if-
(b) a matter stated in a development approval, (a) the development application involves impact
including any condition applying to the assessment; and
development, and the identification of a code (b) the advice agency told the applicant and the
1
under section 3.1.6; assessment manager to treat its response to the
(c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a application as a submission for an appeal.
development permit was applied for; (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
(d) the length of a currency period; days after the day the decision notice or negotiated
decision notice is given to the advice agency as a
(e) a deemed refusal. submitter.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) to (d) must Appeals for matters arising after approval given
be started within 20 business days (the “applicant’s (co-respondents)
appeal period”) after the day the decision notice or
negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant. 4.1.30.(1) For a development approval given for a
development application, a person to whom any of
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be the following notices have been given may appeal to
started at any time after the last day a decision on the the court against the decision in the notice-
matter should have been made.
(a) a notice giving a decision on a request for
Appeals by submitters extension of the currency period for an approval;
4.1.28.(1) A submitter for a development application (b) a notice giving a decision on a request to make a
may appeal to the court about- minor change to an approval.
(a) the giving of a development approval, including (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
any conditions (or lack of conditions) or other days after the day the notice of the decision is given
provisions of the approval; or to the person.
(b) the length of a currency period for the approval. (3) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if the
approval resulted from a development application
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business (superseded planning scheme) that was assessed as
days (the “submitters appeal period”) after the day if it were an application under a superseded planning
the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is scheme.
given to the submitter.
(4) Also, a person who has made a request
(3) If a person withdraws a submission before the mentioned in subsection (1) may appeal to the court
application is decided, the person may not appeal the against a deemed refusal of the request.
decision.
(5) An appeal under subsection (4) may be
(4) If an application involves both impact started at any time after the last day the decision on
assessment and code assessment, appeal rights for the matter should have been made.
submitters are available only for the part of the
application involving impact assessment. Division 9 - Appeals to court about other matters
(5) If an application is processed under section Appeals for matters arising after approval given
6.1.28(2), appeal rights for submitters for the (no co-respondents)
application are available only for the aspects of the
development that would have required public 4.1.31.(1) A person to whom any of the following
notification under the repealed Act. notices have been given may appeal to the court
against the decision in the notice-
(a) a notice giving a decision on a request to change
or cancel a condition of a development approval.
1
Section 3.1.6 (Preliminary approval may override local planning
instrument)
A c:\docume~1\tblogg\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@9802c034\@[email protected]
Page 6
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 6 of 6
2
(b) a notice under section 6.1.44 giving a decision to
change or cancel a condition of a development
approval.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
days after the day the notice of the decision is given
to the person.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request
mentioned in subsection (1)(a) may appeal to the
court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be
started at any time after the last day the decision on
the matter should have been made.
Appeals against decisions to change approval
conditions under the repealed Act
4.1.33A.(1) A person who is dissatisfied with a
decision made on an application to change the
conditions attached to an approval given under
section 2.19(3)or section 4.4 of the repealed Act may
appeal to the court against-
(a) the decision; or
(b) a deemed refusal of the application.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) must be
started within 20 business days after the day notice of
the decision is to be given to the person.
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(b) may be
started at any time after the last day a decision on the
matter should have been made.
Appeals against local laws
4.1.33B.(1) An applicant who is dissatisfied with a
decision of a local government or the conditions
applied under a local law about the use of premises
or the erection of a building or other structure
permitted by the planning scheme may appeal to the
court against the decision or the conditions applied.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
days after the day notice of the decision is given to
the applicant.
2
Section 6.1.44 (Conditions may be changed or cancelled by
assessment manager or concurrence agency in certain
circumstances)
A c:\docume~1\tblogg\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@9802c034\@[email protected]
Used in these records
Decision Notice - 010.2007.00000762.001 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 30 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.