Council archive · source document
Administrative Action Complaint Process
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
COUNCIL POLICY – ADMINSTRATION ACTION COMPLAINTS PROCESS
Note 1: In those cases where a complaint is received verbally which relates to a staff matter, the
complainant is to be advised that the complaint must be lodged in writing.
Note 2: In informing the complainant of the action taken, the branch manager shall explain that, if the
complainant is unhappy with the manner in which the complaint has been handled or the
result, a review may be lodged either internally (by writing to the Council) or to either the
Office of the Ombudsman or the Crime and Misconduct Commission.
Anonymous Complaints
Affected persons are able to make a complaint anonymously either in writing, via email or by telephone.
In doing so it is important to provide as much information and supporting documents for the complaint to
be investigated. As a consequence, it will not be possible to advise the complainant of council’s
decision.
Second-tier Review Process
If a complainant is not satisfied with the manner in which a complaint was handled or the remedial
action taken, a review may be lodged. This may be by an appointed complaints officers or a more
senior officer.
Who will conduct internal reviews?
The following positions are responsible for reviewing complaints as a result of an appeal:
Complaints relating to investigation by Review officer
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mayor
Director or Branch Manager CEO or Executive Manager
How will an internal review be conducted?
The reviewing officer will investigate the manner in which the complaint was originally
handled and the remedial action taken.
If, after investigation, the reviewing officer is satisfied with the process and the
remedial action taken, he/she will inform the complainant accordingly.
If the reviewing officer is not satisfied with the manner in which the complaint was
handled or the remedial action taken, he/she will:
o counsel the officer who initially handled the complaint;
o institute action to achieve the desired result;
o inform the complainant of the outcome of his/her review.
In the case of reviews undertaken by the CEO or Executive Manager, he/she will inform
the Mayor.
Note 1: If the complainant remains dissatisfied, further consideration should be given to options that
may be available to achieve a settlement. This may include conciliation, mediation, or further
direct negotiations over remedying the grievance.
Note 2: In replying to the complainant, the reviewing officer shall explain that, if the complainant is
unhappy with the manner in which the complaint has been handled or the result, an
appeal may be lodged with either the Office of the Ombudsman or the Crime and
Misconduct Commission.
Third-tier External Reviews
If a person feels that the Council has not properly dealt with a complaint internally, that person may
wish to refer the matter to any of the following Appeal Agencies:
Noosa Council Page 3 of 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Administrative Action Complaint Process.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
Administrative Action Complaint Process.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
About this file
- File size
- 321 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.