Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

Appendix 2 - Caravan Parks v Rockhampton Regional Council & Anor [2018] QPEC 52 · MCU19/0117

Attached to the e-mail MCU19/0117 - Response to Information Request - Visitor Accommodation Type 3 – Rural (Guest House and Private Lagoon).

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                              16

[68]   CPAQ has established RV accommodation does not support the park in the manner
       contemplated by the above definition. It is a separate use of the land. The existing use
       of the land comprises two separate planning units.

Power to grant enforcement orders

[69]   The Originating Application seeks enforcement orders under s.180(3) of the PA. This
       remedy is discretionary.

[70]   Section 180 of the PA provides the court’s power to grant an enforcement order. An
       “enforcement order” is defined in Schedule 2 of the PA, relevantly in this case, by
       reference to s.180(2) which is in the following terms:

                “(2)   An enforcement order is an order that requires a person to do either
                       or both of the following –

                       (a)     refrain from committing a development offence;

                       (b)     remedy the effect of a development offence in a stated way.”

[71]   The court’s power to grant an enforcement order (as defined) is enlivened where
       s.180(3) of the PA is satisfied. This provision is in the following terms:

                “(3)   The P&E Court may make an enforcement order if the court
                       considers the development offence –

                        (a)    has been committed; or

                        (b)    will be committed unless the order is made.”

[72]   The power to grant an enforcement order under s.180(3) of the PA is not contingent
       upon a declaration being made about the commission, or likely commission, of a
       development offence under s.11 of the PECA. The court need only be satisfied that
       one of two pre-conditions to the exercise of the power is satisfied. The relevant pre-
       conditions are expressed in the alternative limbs of s.180(3)(a) and (3)(b) of the PA.
       CPAQ relies upon subsection (3)(a), namely that a development offence has been
       committed.

[73]   A “development offence” is defined in Schedule 2 of the PA by reference to s.161 of
       that Act. Section 161 of the PA is contained in Chapter 5, Part 2 and is in the
       following terms:

                “161   What part is about
                       This part creates offences (each a development offence), subject to
                       any exemption under this part or to chapter 7, part 1.”

[74]   Five development offences are created in Chapter 5, Part 2 of the PA. This part of the
       PA took effect on 3 July 2017.

[75]   CPAQ alleges two development offences in Chapter 5, Part 2 of the PA have been
       committed to enliven the court’s jurisdiction to grant enforcement orders. The
       specific development offences relied upon are contained ss.163 and 165(a) of the PA.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
398 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Appendix 2 - Caravan Parks v Rockhampton Regional Council & Anor [2018] QPEC 52.pdf · 398 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.