Response to amended plans - John Cochrane - MCU21/0110

 A lack of sustainability and energy   1. The addition of additional solar
 efficiency                               generation is welcome. However, it
                                          will probably be required in order
                                          to satisfy NCC/BCA requirements.
                                          It does not fully mitigate the poor
                                          room orientation and power and
                                          water consumption requirements of
                                          the resort pool.

 The development does not accord       1.    I am a part of the community and I
 with reasonable community                  say it does not.
 expectations for the site             2.   Despite the claims by the
                                            applicant, a hotel can be built on
                                            the TAZ. It is achievable - I can
                                            prove this fact.
                                       3.   It is avoidable for a hotel to extend
                                            into the ROSZ. The intrusion by
                                            65% of the hotel floor area is
                                            excessive by any measure.
                                       4.   The presence of Parkridge is only
                                            relevant in terms of the impact this
                                            development will have on the
                                            residents’ peaceful enjoyment of
                                            their property.
                                       5.   There is no argument that the
                                            collective weight of the planning
                                            scheme would support the
                                            proposal. The suggestion that the
                                            hotel -will have minimal impacts is
                                            an outrageous understatement.
                                       6.   The community have expressed
                                            their reasonable expectations by
                                            submission.




Yours sincerely,
John Cochrane Architect QLD Rn 5857 NSW/ACT Rn 4759




314/61 Noosa Springs Drive
Noosa Heads
Qld 4567



JC-NSH-amended plans– Issue A           6                                      22 June-22


[OCR of page images]
 

 

A lack of sustainability and energy
efficiency

The addition of additional solar
generation is welcome. However, it
will probably be required in order
to satisfy NCC/BCA requirements.
It does not fully mitigate the poor
room orientation and power and
water consumption requirements of
the resort pool.

 

The development does not accord
with reasonable community
expectations for the site

 

 

Iam a part of the community and I
say it does not.

Despite the claims by the
applicant, a hotel can be built on
the TAZ. It is achievable - I can
prove this fact.

It is avoidable for a hotel to extend
into the ROSZ. The intrusion by
65% of the hotel floor area is
excessive by any measure.

The presence of Parkridge is only
relevant in terms of the impact this
development will have on the
residents’ peaceful enjoyment of
their property.

There is no argument that the
collective weight of the planning
scheme would support the
proposal. The suggestion that the
hotel -will have minimal impacts is
an outrageous understatement.

The community have expressed
their reasonable expectations by
submission.

 

Yours sincerely,

John Cochrane Architect QLD Rn 5857 NSW/ACT Rn 4759

/
314/61 Noosa Springs Drive
Noosa Heads
Qld 4567

JC-NSH-amended plans- Issue A

22 June-22