Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

1002JS.lp GIAW Ltr · 132003.221132.8

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Sunshine Coast Office
| Innovation Parkway, Birtinya, PO Box 149,Wurtulla QLD Australia 4575
T +61 7 5436 7888 F +61 7 5493 6630 E [email protected] W rpsgroup.com.au

Our Ref: PR119919-1.1002JS.Ip
Your Ref: App. No. 132003.221132.8 (23616 DA)

Date: 25" November 2013

Attn: Glen Conforti

Sunshine Coast Regional Council
Locked Bag 72

SCMC QLD 4560

Via mail

Dear Glen

RE: REQUEST FOR GENERALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS -
“DOONELLA NOOSA” - LOT 800 ON SP251599 AND LOT 7 ON RP80412.
SEA EAGLE DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE

We act on behalf of QM Properties Pty Ltd regarding a ‘Change to an Existing Approval’ notice
approved by Council on 14" August 2013, for the abovementioned land. This Development
Approval is for the following aspects of development:

= Development Permit for a Material Change of Use of Premises (181 Dwelling Houses,
Group Housing Development of 43 Dwelling Units and Estate Sales Office); and
= Development Permit to Reconfigure a Lot (185 Residential Lots and 43 Group Title Lots)

As you are aware, since the Development Approval was issued, the previous owner, Stockland,
has sold the subject land. The new owner and our client, QM Properties Pty Ltd., has requested
that we make minor changes to the road layout in Stage C to shorten the length of four of the cul-
de-sacs. As currently approved, these four roads, running west to meet Sea Eagle Drive without
providing a trafficable thoroughfare, are longer than they need to be; shortening them will not only
save on unnecessary construction costs, it will result in an improved lot configuration at the end
of each cul-de-sac, whilst maintaining a pedestrian link to Sea Eagle Drive. The revised layout is
little different from that currently approved, as shown on revised Plan No. 6812-58L and Plan
Ref. 6812-61T (Sheets 1-2); these plans, upon approval, will supersede Plan No. 6812-58K and
Plan Ref. 6812-61S and a copy of each is located at Attachment A of this letter.

The proposal has been discussed with Council’s Planning Officer, Glen Conforti, who is seemed
to be generally amendable to the revised road layout, provided it accommodated the proposed
pedestrian pathway links at the end of each of the cul-de-sac roads located within Stages C2
through to Stage C5. To this end, we are seeking to formalise discussions by way of a request for
Council to consider these changes to be ‘Generally In Accordance With’ the existing approval
and approved Plan of Development (PoD) referred to therein.

As noted above, it is proposed to reduce the length of (4) four cul-de-sac roads located within
Stage C2 through to Stage C5 to accommodate pedestrian pathways and facilitate connection
through to Sea Eagle Drive. In addition, the revised road layout is intended to provide for a better
design outcome, and will also assist in directing overland flow from Sea Eagle Drive. The
proposed roads to be changed are as follows:

= Mulberry Close — Stage C2;
«  Twigrush Court — Stage C3;

England | Wales | Scotland | Northern ireland | Ireland | Netherlands | USA | Australia

RPS Australia East Pty Ltd ABN 44 140 292 762 A member of the RPS Group Plc
Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

Re

«  Agathis Place — Stage C5; and
" Carissa Place — Stage C4.

It should be noted that as a result of the road layout changing, the configuration and size of
sixteen (16) lots — the last pair of lots on either side of the cul-de-sac head in each case — will
change, with most of them increasing slightly in area; this is best depicted on Sheet 2 of revised
Plan Ref. 6812-61T. In addition, we have also taken this opportunity to make minor administrative
changes to the ‘Key Requirements’ table shown on the PoD - through the re-arrangement of
some ‘dot points’ - for visual presentation purposes only; none of the text has been altered.

As a result of the layout amendments, changes to the plan references will need to be reflected in
the conditions of approval, where applicable. We therefore request that Council update
Conditions 1, 66, 81, 95 and Advice Notes 1 and 4 (the Table headings) of the Development
Approval to reference revised Plan No. 6812-58L and Plan Ref. 6812-61T, as appropriate, to
ensure consistency between each of the Development Approvals.

In light of the above, we are of the view that the proposed changes are ‘generally in accordance’
with the approved PoD and we seek Council’s written confirmation of this. In support of our
request please find attached a cheque for the amount of $414.00 being the prescribed fee for this
review.

We trust this information is sufficient for your purposes, however should you require any further
details or clarification, please contact me directly and | look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely
RPS

Jeremy Scriven
Principal — Survey

enc: Plan No. 6812-58L and Plan Ref. 6812-61T (Sheets 1-2)
Cheque for $414.00
SCRC eDevelopment Application Form

cc: QM Properties Pty Ltd

Page 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.4 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

1002JS.lp GIAW Ltr.pdf · 1.4 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.