Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

RFI - Appendix E Traffic Engineering Assessment to Council Information Request by TTM · MCU21/0175

of 10

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 cross-utilization would reduce parking demands. In that regard, while a customer is within a specific
 tenancy, it is generating a parking space associated with that tenancy, and if that patron moves to
 another tenancy, it is then generating a parking demand associated with that other tenancy. If that
 customer spends 15 minutes in each tenancy, it simply means that the associated parking demand for
 that customer occurs for twice as long while the customer visits both tenancies, compared with it the
 customer visited only a single tenancy. That is, the same customer visiting two tenancies has the same
 parking demand as two separate customers each only visiting a single tenancy.

 7. Provide on-site parking provisions consistent with the requirements of the Driveways and Parking
 Code.

 Main Access Aisle Width

 The 5.8m wide parking aisle adjacent to the street is too narrow to function as the main site access and
 to also accommodate service vehicle movements.

 8. Widen the aisle width to 6.5m in accordance with the requirements of Australian Standard AS 2890.2-
 2002.

 Access Configuration

 The main site access configuration requires further resolution, and for satisfactory operation is likely to
 required modification. In that regard, with the proposed arrangements, it is proposed that vehicles
 accessing the new parking area from the street will travel in the wrong direction for a short distance
 along the existing exit from the service area. – see diagram in related IR.

 9. Demonstrate how it is proposed to satisfactorily manage priority of the multitude of traffic
 movements at the off-set cross intersection created by the new carpark access, including identification
 of line-marking.


In response to the Information Request, the development plans have been amended. The development
plans are included as Attachment 1.




                                                                                                               2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

RFI - Appendix E Traffic Engineering Assessment to Council Information Request by TTM.pdf · 2.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.