RESPONSE TO FURTHER ADVICE -response to information request 20 william · MCU25/0054

 10. Provide an arborist report and detailed design plans that demonstrate that
     the proposal can be accommodated without compromising the health of the
     tree. Alternate design (wall and footings) / construction methodologies
     should be investigated to reduce the amount of works required within the
     structural root zone of the tree.

The planter garden with associated block wall and footings adjoining the Russel St
frontage has been removed. These were previously in close proximity to the existing tree
in the foot path area. All footings are now set back 1.4m from the street boundary and
1.8m from the centre of the tree as surveyed. Acknowledging the tree includes a highly
invasive root system and is not suitable for narrow frontages, we have designed the
building and fencing for the trees retention, however, seek the flexibility in the conditions
for the replacement for 2 x 200L suitable street tree varieties (similar to native plantings in
Noosa Pde).




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to the Development Assessment Rules, the applicant has given the assessment
manager the information requested. Please proceed with the processing of the application
at your earliest convenience.

If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
myself.

Regards,




Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago RPIA
Planner/Director
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227




                                                                                                      Page 5 of 5