NPM Submission Object (Late) - Rosie De'Athe - MCU18/0019

 

Notice of Submis

  

To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that

be made to the assessment manager

be in writing

be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period

ST Pah

As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, ere owblished on Council's websi
and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are pudismec. rrespective of whether o1
they are properly made.

1. Application details

File No. MCU18/ 0019

Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville

Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Neecs (Aged Care Facility)

 

 

Full name of Submitter Ros ea De’ Ox he.
Postal address Lyle Goo ocnrar ST

Suburb Noosqy MWe State NSLS Posicose 4S 64
Oe

Signature(s)

 

| (We), make the following submission:

1. | object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding meaghbourhood wh
Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which is basically ome continuous buildi
taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.

2. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature as 2 resuit of the development.

3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is in direct conflict v
the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects
the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the propos
development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 Ic
which is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature.

4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site

5. | understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they should be lo
in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such e development.

6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under 2 lot of strain in terms of c:
parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility direct
across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this prot
with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.

     

   
 

  

 

 

aA
RECEIVED
Privacy Box: SHS feck Rech | 28 JUN 2018
Council will use any personal information p r remaining in contact
this information in accordance with the Local Goverment Act 2009 and other Local Goverment Acts. Your p

Anca A
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy policy. ; ecor 57