Original source · versioned page text
Att 3 - Design Response Comments on Peer Review
Attached to the e-mail Council Road Upgrade, Attachments inc Waste Mgmt Plan & Geotech (Email 2 of 3).MCU17/0054.
REPORT
g) It is suggested that the additional low level vegetation be included in the proposals carpark
and around the building perimeters. In accordance with O19 of Division 17 (Landscaping
Code) of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan this will e) visually reduce the building bulk, and h)
provide screening along perimeters of the development. Commented [JL16]: Landscaping plan complies
4. SAFETY
4.1 Loading and Storage Areas
Concern is raised regarding the proposal’s consistency with S22.2 of Division 3 (Business use Code)
of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan. Specifically with regards to the loading area and public safety. Commented [JL17]: Traffic plan demonstrates compliance
with the loading requirements.
4.2 Toilet User safety
Concern is raised regarding the proposal’s consistency with S24.4 and O29 of Division 3 (Business
use Code) of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan. Specifically with regards to:
a) The presence of a door recess at the entrance to the female toilets
b) The toilets being located in a concealed corridor which cannot be protected through
means of passive surveillance.
c) The rear service path Commented [JL18]: Recesses have been removed near
toilets and include lockable gates at either end of the toilet
4.3 Minimising Vandalism areas.
There are a number of walls that are visible from a public street which are open to potential
vandalism.
Specifically:
a) The wall on the eastern side of the kitchen to restaurant 2.
b) The wall on the western side of the restaurant 1 kitchen
Section S27.1 of Division 3 (Business use Code) of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan sets out solutions to Commented [JL19]: Can be conditioned to comply.
minimise this risk of vandalism.
4.4 Pedestrian Safety
Concern is raised over the proposal’s compliance with section 14.110 b) of Division 13 – Driveways
and
Car parking Code. Currently pedestrians entering the site from Earl Street or Ernest Street will be
required Commented [JL20]: A coherent walkway is provided
through the site to avoid conflict with cars.
Page 6 of 6
Y:\22001C17 Hilton Terrace Tewantin\2.0 Email ‐ Correspondence\2.1 Architect\2.1.09 Reports\1.09.1 Predesign\PF 16 Peer Review Report ‐ Issue A.doc Noel Robinson Architects Pt Ltd
Issue…… Created 24 July 2013 ABN 62 323 175 502
ACN 010 011 720
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.