Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Att 3 - Design Response Comments on Peer Review

Attached to the e-mail Council Road Upgrade, Attachments inc Waste Mgmt Plan & Geotech (Email 2 of 3).MCU17/0054.

of 9

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

REPORT
                                  g)     It is suggested that the additional low level vegetation be included in the proposals carpark
                                         and around the building perimeters. In accordance with O19 of Division 17 (Landscaping
                                         Code) of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan this will e) visually reduce the building bulk, and h)
                                         provide screening along perimeters of the development.                                                                                         Commented [JL16]: Landscaping plan complies



  4.                       SAFETY
                4.1                      Loading and Storage Areas

                           Concern is raised regarding the proposal’s consistency with S22.2 of Division 3 (Business use Code)
                           of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan. Specifically with regards to the loading area and public safety.                                                               Commented [JL17]: Traffic plan demonstrates compliance
                                                                                                                                                                                        with the loading requirements.
                4.2                      Toilet User safety

                           Concern is raised regarding the proposal’s consistency with S24.4 and O29 of Division 3 (Business
                           use Code) of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan. Specifically with regards to:
                               a) The presence of a door recess at the entrance to the female toilets
                               b) The toilets being located in a concealed corridor which cannot be protected through
                                   means of passive surveillance.
                               c) The rear service path                                                                                                                                 Commented [JL18]: Recesses have been removed near
                                                                                                                                                                                        toilets and include lockable gates at either end of the toilet
                4.3                      Minimising Vandalism                                                                                                                           areas.


                           There are a number of walls that are visible from a public street which are open to potential
                           vandalism.
                           Specifically:
                               a) The wall on the eastern side of the kitchen to restaurant 2.
                               b) The wall on the western side of the restaurant 1 kitchen

                           Section S27.1 of Division 3 (Business use Code) of Part 14 of the Noosa Plan sets out solutions to                                                           Commented [JL19]: Can be conditioned to comply.
                           minimise this risk of vandalism.

                4.4                      Pedestrian Safety

                           Concern is raised over the proposal’s compliance with section 14.110 b) of Division 13 – Driveways
                           and
                           Car parking Code. Currently pedestrians entering the site from Earl Street or Ernest Street will be
                           required                                                                                                                                                     Commented [JL20]: A coherent walkway is provided
                                                                                                                                                                                        through the site to avoid conflict with cars.




Page 6 of 6




Y:\22001C17 Hilton Terrace Tewantin\2.0 Email ‐ Correspondence\2.1 Architect\2.1.09 Reports\1.09.1 Predesign\PF 16 Peer Review Report ‐ Issue A.doc   Noel Robinson Architects Pt Ltd
Issue…… Created 24 July 2013                                                                                                                                     ABN 62 323 175 502
                                                                                                                                                                   ACN 010 011 720
Log in to download the original file

Att 3 - Design Response Comments on Peer Review.pdf · 2.5 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.