Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - John Hare - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
I make reference to these observations as the Scanlon proposal appears to run
counter to these aspirations-
Specificalty:
It appears that this application contravenes the curent Noosa Plan and will
destroy the cunent point of differene that Peregian Beach ofiers to both
resklents ard to visitors- The carayan park arnenfty whic;fi was the real
esserroe of Pereghn village wilf be replad by r"rrban density of an
inappropriate level. The accommodation proposdd is completely out of
character with tte local environment
Msitor accornmodation. *'hictr I thor.lght was to be fte ssence of any
proposd dene@rercmt, appears nw to be only a srnaltr proeortiori of ffiie
development. The provision of low cost housing to meet the needs of the
Peregian mmmunity and the wider Noosa community appears to have given
way to housirg in the $725.m0 to $850"0fi) range- Hardly knr cost! Low cmt
housirrydanenilbs ftat nrcet tre rrce*s of mnpers ard recrstional vehides
is a mucfi more acceptabb solution, allowing v*sitors to erperbnce the
quintessentia! beach side holiday.
The proposed developrnent uouH cornprornbe the aesthetics and planned
developrneflt of fte Rubus Sfee{ cunmunity hr6..
Parking b already a srgnificant isue at Perqia* Eeacfr- Tlle Scantrn
proposal does little to alleviate the situation and is likely instead to exacerbate
rt. 1M private car parks are provided for within the permarrent reskJences and
secure parking under the hoteUmdel- There appear to be only 11 ar parks
fion yisitors" Thb wr? cater for tfie proeosd preci&cils- lnadeq{rab parkirry
will lead to even more competition for parking. An already dinncuft situation will
be even worse.
ln conclusion" this proposal conflids wiB! the ornmuniS ralues of all those rfirtlo
have chmen to lle in Peregian Beach arxC dose bcafilies- Livirq at htarcr.rs El#r,
Peregian Beach is very much the low impact village servicing the needs of my, and
surrounding, klcalitbs- Whib sqne development of the area b recognised, it needs
to reflect ttrc vilhge Teel'that cunenfiy exisb
Yours sincerely
i
NW
-'-
John Hare
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - John Hare - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - John Hare - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 986 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.