Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

6 - LEGAL ADVICE ABOUT COVENANT - Christopher Hughes QC Advice

Attached to the e-mail RESPONSE TO DEFERRAL MOTION - MCU12/0184 - Chicken farm application.

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Christopher Hughes Q.C. Michael Williamson

Barrister-at-Law

Level 8 Byth Chambers
Inns of Court Level 8
107 North Quay Quay Central
BRISBANE QLD 4000 95 North Quay
Phone: (07) 3210 0788 BRISBANE QLD 4000
[email protected] Phone: (07) 3236 2888

[email protected]

21 May 2015

Gantt Legal

Level 22

69 Ann Street
BRISBANE QLD 4000

Attention: Cliff Wirz

Dear Cliff,

RE: _W DONALD MILLIGAN PTY LTD ~ 136 TOP FORESTRY ROAD,
RIDGEWOOD

We refer to your email transmission received on 14 May 2015.

Your client has made a development application to the Noosa Shire Council for the purposes
of obtaining an approval to develop its land at 136 Top Forestry Road, Ridgewood with a
poultry farm.

In your email transmission of 14 May 2015, you note that a query has been raised by the
Council in its assessment of your client’s development application. The query relates to the
ability to utilise a covenant by registration under s.97A of the Land Title Act 1994 to manage
odour impacts of the development for land which is not the subject of your client’s
development application, but is controlled by it and will function (cither in whole or part) as
an odour buffer for the proposed poultry farm.

It is a well recognised principle of town planning that when a particular land use causes, or
has the potential to cause amenity impacts on surrounding land uses (particularly residential
uses) then there should be not merely appropriate mitigation measures at the source of the
impact (be it noise, light, odour of visual impact) but that an appropriate buffer in terms of
distance ought to be provided. Traditionally, it is regarded as reasonable, if not essential, that
the buffer be provided on the land the subject of the proposed use, or on land otherwise
controlled by the intended user.

In this case, happily, your client controls land in a location suitable for preservation as a
buffer.

Liability limited by a Scheme approved under professional standards legislation
Log in to download the original file

6 - LEGAL ADVICE ABOUT COVENANT - Christopher Hughes QC Advice.pdf · 169 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

Michael Williamson Page 2 21 May 2015
Barrister-at-Law

 

The query raised by the Council with respect to the proposed covenant is in the following
terms:

“You have previously indicated that the odour issues for the properties currently
owned by the applicant may be addressed by a covenant. I would appreciate further

advice on how a covenant is intended to work in this scenario.”

To assist in responding to the Council’s query we provide the following for your
consideration.

The covenant contemplated is one which would attach to land that is not the subject of the
development application before the Council, but will function as a buffer in respect of odour
to surrounding sensitive land uses. The purpose of the covenant is to ensure that such a buffer
will remain in place for the life of the poultry farm and will not be compromised by existing
and future land uses inconsistent with that purpose. The land to which the convenant would
attach must be owned and controlled by your client or a related entity.

Section s. 97A of the Land Title Act 1994, contemplates that a covenant by registration may
be appropriate in specific circumstances. The relevant circumstance here emerges from
s.97A, in particular the following sub-sections:

“97A Covenant by registration

(1) A lot may be made the subject of a covenant by the registration of an
instrument of covenant under this division.

(2) An instrument of covenant may be registered under this division only if the
covenantee under the instrument is the State or another entity representing the

State, or a local government.

(2A) An instrument of covenant may be registered even if the covenantor under the
instrument is the same entity as the covenantee.

(3) The covenant must -
(a) _ relate to the use of —
fi the lot or part of the lot; or

(ii) a building, or building proposed to be built, on the lot; or

(4) The covenant -
(a) may be a positive covenant or a negative covenant; and

(b) is binding on the covenantor and the covenantor’s successors in title.

Page 3

Michael Williamson Page3 21 May 2015
Barrister-at-Law

 

(7) For subsection (3)(a), the covenant relates to the use of the lot, a part of the
lot, a building on the lot or a building proposed to be built on the lot, only if it
provides for -

(a) a purpose for which the lot, the part or the building must be used; or

Examples of covenants for paragraph (a) -

* that a building on the lot must be used for educational purposes
* that the lot must be used for noise attenuation purposes

...” (our emphasis added)

Section 97A of the Land Title Act 1994 makes is clear that a covenant may be registered in
relation to the use of a lot, or part thereof. It is also clear from one of the examples given in
sub-section (7), that a covenant registered in relation to the use of land may be for attenuation
purposes, or in other words, as an impact mitigation measure.

The proposed covenant would need to identify for each relevant lot or part thereof which is to

function as an odour buffer and be preserved for that purpose during the life of the poultry

farm. This may require an odour expert to identify, with particularity, what steps are required
preserve land as a buffer. By way of examples, the covenant may address the following:

(a) the land which functions as a buffer must not be developed with a sensitive receptor,
such as new dwelling;

(b) the land ought not to be developed for purposes associated with the poultry farm,
where those purposes are likely to emit odour, or for other purposes likely to have an
impact on the amenity of nearby receptors in terms of, at the very least, odour, but
probably also other amenity impacts such as noise, lighting and visual amenity
impacts;

(c) the land may however be suitable for other pursuits such as non-intensive animal
husbandry.

These types of controls would need to be specified in the covenant.

In addition to the covenant, the Council may also wish to consider imposing a condition of
approval which requires your client to provide evidence that the covenants have been
registered on the titles of the buffer allotments before commencing the use.

Naturally if you have any queries concerning the above please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours sincerely

 
   

~~) IQ LoL SS

MICHAEL WILLIAMSON

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.