Council archive · source document
Response to Info Request - Attachment 6b - Ecological Assessment Part 2 MCU18-0015 & RAL18-0001 · MCU18/0015
Ecological Assessment – Attunga Heights
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
erosion, rill erosion, sheet erosion, tunnel or less than those prior to the proposed
erosion, stream bank erosion, wind erosion, development. OR
or scalding; and
AO20.2 The local government is the Not applicable.
2. any associated loss of chemical, physical assessment manager for the development
or biological fertility – including, but not application.
limited to water holding capacity, soil
structure, organic matter, soil biology, and Note: For guidance on developing a sediment and erosion n/a
control plan, please refer to the Best Practice Erosion and
nutrients, within or outside the land the Sediment Control Document, IECA, 2008.
subject of the development application.
Salinity (public safety and relevant infrastructure activities, coordinated project, extractive industry, high value agriculture clearing, irrigated high value agriculture
clearing, necessary environmental clearing, fodder harvesting)
PO22 Clearing does not contribute to or AO22.1 Clearing does not occur within 100 Clearing will not occur in or within 200 metres of
accelerate land degradation through metres of a salinity expression area. a discharge area or recharge area.
waterlogging, or through the salinisation
of groundwater, surface water or soil.
Essential habitat (public safety and relevant infrastructure activities, coordinated project, extractive industry, high value agriculture clearing and irrigated high value
agriculture clearing, fodder harvesting)
PO24 Clearing maintains the current extent AO24.1 Clearing does not occur in essential While the site is mapped as containing essential
of essential habitat. habitat. habitat for the Wallum froglet and Wallum
rocketfrog, site inspections have determined that
OR the habitat present on the site is not suitable for
these species. It is therefore not considered that
any impact on essential habitat for these species
will be incurred.
The proposed development will result in the
removal of 0.39 ha (34%) of Essential habitat (i.e.
12.2.5) for the Glossy black cockatoo.
Job No: Q12038/RW3 JWA Pty Ltd 91
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Response to Info Request - Attachment 6b - Ecological Assessment Part 2 MCU18-0015 & RAL18-0001.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.