Original source · versioned page text
Appendix A - SDAP - State Code 1 - Development in a state controlled road environment response template
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment
Table 1.1 Development in general
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings, structures, infrastructure, services and utilities
PO1 The location of the development does not AO1.1 Development is not located in a state- Complies – there is no new building work.
create a safety hazard for users of the state- controlled road.
controlled road.
AND
AO1.2 Development can be maintained without
requiring access to a state-controlled road.
PO2 The design and construction of the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – the proposed expansion of the landfill will
development does not adversely impact the provide for improved safety for the general public by
structural integrity or physical condition of the providing for greater separation within the Resource
state-controlled road or road transport Recovery Area and will not result in an increase in
infrastructure. traffic generation.
PO3 The location of the development does not No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – there is no change to the location of the
obstruct road transport infrastructure or development or the existing access.
adversely impact the operating performance of
the state-controlled road.
PO4 The location, placement, design and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – there is no change to the existing
operation of advertising devices, visible from advertising signage.
the state-controlled road, do not create a
safety hazard for users of the state-controlled
road.
PO5 The design and construction of buildings AO5.1 Facades of buildings and structures Complies – no new buildings are being proposed.
and structures does not create a safety hazard fronting the state-controlled road are made of
by distracting users of the state-controlled non-reflective materials.
road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 16 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO5.2 Facades of buildings and structures do
not direct or reflect point light sources into the
face of oncoming traffic on the state-controlled
road.
AND
AO5.3 External lighting of buildings and
structures is not directed into the face of
oncoming traffic on the state-controlled road.
AND
AO5.4 External lighting of buildings and
structures does not involve flashing or laser
lights.
PO6 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges AO6.1 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges N/A
over a state-controlled road are designed and over the state-controlled road include throw
constructed to prevent projectiles from being protection screens in accordance with section
thrown onto the state-controlled road. 4.11 of the Design Criteria for Bridges and
Other Structures Manual, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2020.
Landscaping
PO7 The location of landscaping does not AO7.1 Landscaping is not located in a state- Complies – no new landscaping is being proposed.
create a safety hazard for users of the state- controlled road.
controlled road.
AND
AO7.2 Landscaping can be maintained without
requiring access to a state-controlled road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 17
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO7.3 Landscaping does not block or obscure
the sight lines for vehicular access to a state-
controlled road.
Stormwater and overland flow
PO8 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – the stormwater management for the
the development site does not create or development is to be provided in accordance with an
exacerbate a safety hazard for users of the updated Stormwater Management Plan and will not
state-controlled road. affect a state-controlled road (refer Attachment 5).
PO9 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – Refer above.
the development site does not result in a
material worsening of the operating
performance of the state-controlled road or
road transport infrastructure.
PO10 Stormwater run-off or overland flow from No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – Refer above.
the development site does not adversely impact
the structural integrity or physical condition of
the state-controlled road or road transport
infrastructure.
PO11 Development ensures that stormwater is AO11.1 Development does not create any new Complies – Refer above.
lawfully discharged. points of discharge to a state-controlled road.
AND
AO11.2 Development does not concentrate
flows to a state-controlled road.
AND
AO11.3 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 17
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO11.4 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of
discharge to the state-controlled road.
Flooding
PO12 Development does not result in a AO12.1 For all flood events up to 1% annual Complies – The issue of flooding has been considered
material worsening of flooding impacts within a exceedance probability, development results in the updated Stormwater Management Plan and will
state-controlled road. in negligible impacts (within +/- 10mm) to not result in a material worsening of flooding within a
existing flood levels within a state-controlled state-controlled road.
road.
AND
AO12.2 For all flood events up to 1% annual
exceedance probability, development results
in negligible impacts (up to a 10% increase) to
existing peak velocities within a state-
controlled road.
AND
AO12.3 For all flood events up to 1% annual
exceedance probability, development results
in negligible impacts (up to a 10% increase) to
existing time of submergence of a state-
controlled road.
Drainage Infrastructure
PO13 Drainage infrastructure does not create a AO13.1 Drainage infrastructure is wholly N/A
safety hazard for users in the state-controlled contained within the development site, except
road. at the lawful point of discharge.
AND
AO13.2 Drainage infrastructure can be
maintained without requiring access to a state-
controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 17
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO14 Drainage infrastructure associated with, No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
or within, a state-controlled road is
constructed, and designed to ensure the
structural integrity and physical condition of
existing drainage infrastructure and the
surrounding drainage network.
Table 1.2 Vehicular access, road layout and local roads
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road or within 100 metres of a state-controlled road intersection
PO15 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
new or changed access to a state-controlled
road does not compromise the safety of users of
the state-controlled road.
PO16 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
new or changed access does not adversely
impact the functional requirements of the state-
controlled road.
PO17 The location, design and operation of a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
new or changed access is consistent with the
future intent of the state-controlled road.
PO18 New or changed access is consistent with No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
the access for the relevant limited access road
policy:
1. LAR 1 where direct access is prohibited; or
2. LAR 2 where access may be permitted,
subject to assessment.
PO19 New or changed access to a local road No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-
controlled road does not compromise the safety
of users of the state-controlled road.
PO20 New or changed access to a local road No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-
controlled road does not adversely impact on the
operating performance of the intersection.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 17
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Public passenger transport and active transport
PO21 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
safety of users of public passenger transport
infrastructure, public passenger services and
active transport infrastructure.
PO22 Development maintains the ability for No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
people to access public passenger transport
infrastructure, public passenger services and
active transport infrastructure.
PO23 Development does not adversely impact the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
operating performance of public passenger
transport infrastructure, public passenger
services and active transport infrastructure.
PO24 Development does not adversely impact No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
the structural integrity or physical condition of
public passenger transport infrastructure and
active transport infrastructure.
Table 1.3 Network impacts
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO25 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – There is no increase in the intensity of
safety of users of the state-controlled road the use on the land and therefore will not
network. compromise the safety if users of the state-
controlled road network.
PO26 Development ensures no net worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – Refer above.
the operating performance of the state-controlled
road network.
PO27 Traffic movements are not directed onto a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – There is no proposed change to the
state-controlled road where they can be current access arrangement or the existing traffic
accommodated on the local road network. generation.
PO28 Development involving haulage exceeding No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – There is no increase in the intensity of
10,000 tonnes per year does not adversely impact the landfill operation as a result of the change with
the pavement of a state-controlled road. more useable are being provided.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 17
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO29 Development does not impede delivery of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development will not
planned upgrades of state-controlled roads. impede any planned upgrades of state-controlled
roads.
PO30 Development does not impede delivery of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development will not
corridor improvements located entirely within impede delivery of any corridor improvements and
the state-controlled road corridor. is removed from the frontage.
Table 1.4 Filling, excavation, building foundations and retaining structures
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO31 Development does not create a safety No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – All earthworks are internal to the site,
hazard for users of the state-controlled road or with the majority of fill material to be sourced from
road transport infrastructure. within the landfill site.
PO32 Development does not adversely impact the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed earthworks for the
operating performance of the state-controlled development is not likely to impact the operating
road. performance of the state-controlled road, with the
majority of the fill required to be sourced from
within the landfill site.
PO33 Development does not undermine, damage No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – Refer above.
or cause subsidence of a state-controlled road.
PO34 Development does not cause ground water No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development will not
disturbance in a state-controlled road. affect ground water within a state-controlled road.
PO35 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting and fill No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed excavation and filling
compaction do not adversely impact the physical works will not adversely impact a state-controlled
condition or structural integrity of a state- road.
controlled road or road transport
infrastructure.
PO36 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The existing access is to remain
construction of new or changed access do not unchanged with the filling and excavation works
compromise the operation or capacity of existing proposed being well removed from the state-
drainage infrastructure for a state-controlled controlled road.
road.
Table 1.5 Environmental emissions
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 17
Page 8
Statutory note: Where a state-controlled road is co-located in the same transport corridor as a railway, the development should instead comply with Environmental emissions in State code 2:
Development in a railway environment.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Reconfiguring a lot
Involving the creation of 5 or fewer new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO37 Development minimises free field noise AO37.1 Development provides a noise barrier or N/A
intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO37.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
where it is not practical to provide a noise barrier
or earth mound.
OR
AO37.3 Development provides a solid gap-free
fence or other solid gap-free structure along the
full extent of the boundary closest to the state-
controlled road.
Involving the creation of 6 or more new residential lots adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 17
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO38 Reconfiguring a lot minimises free field AO38.1 Development provides noise barrier or N/A
noise intrusion from a state-controlled road. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item 2.1);
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO38.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic levels in reference table 2 (item
2.1) by alternative noise attenuation measures
where it is not practical to provide a noise barrier
or earth mound.
Material change of use (accommodation activity)
Ground floor level requirements adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO39 Development minimises noise intrusion from AO39.1 Development provides a noise barrier or N/A
a state-controlled road in private open space. earth mound which is designed, sited and
constructed:
1. to achieve the maximum free field acoustic
levels in reference table 2 (item
2.2) for private open space at the ground
floor level;
2. in accordance with:
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 17
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO39.2 Development achieves the maximum free
field acoustic level in reference table 2 (item
2.2) for private open space by alternative noise
attenuation measures where it is not practical to
provide a noise barrier or earth mound.
PO40 Development (excluding a relevant AO40.1 Development (excluding a relevant N/A
residential building or relocated residential building or relocated building)
building) minimises noise intrusion from a state- provides a noise barrier or earth mound which is
controlled road in habitable rooms at the designed, sited and constructed:
facade. 1. to achieve the maximum building façade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item 1.1)
for habitable rooms;
2. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 17
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020.
OR
AO40.2 Development (excluding a relevant
residential building or relocated building)
achieves the maximum building façade acoustic
level in reference table 1 (item 1.1) for habitable
rooms by alternative noise attenuation
measures where it is not practical to provide a
noise barrier or earth mound.
PO41 Habitable rooms (excluding a relevant No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials to
achieve the maximum internal acoustic level in
reference table 3 (item 3.1).
Above ground floor level requirements (accommodation activity) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor
PO42 Balconies, podiums, and roof decks include: No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
1. a continuous solid gap-free structure or
balustrade (excluding gaps required for
drainage purposes to comply with the Building
Code of Australia);
2. highly acoustically absorbent material
treatment for the total area of the soffit above
balconies, podiums, and roof decks.
PO43 Habitable rooms (excluding a relevant No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials
to achieve the maximum internal acoustic level in
reference table 3 (item 3.1).
Material change of use (other uses)
Ground floor level requirements (childcare centre, educational establishment, hospital) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor
PO44 Development: No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 17
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
1. provides a noise barrier or earth mound that
is designed, sited and constructed:
a. to achieve the maximum free field
acoustic level in reference table 2 (item
2.3) for all outdoor education areas and
outdoor play areas;
b. in accordance with:
i. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier
design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice:
Volume 1 (Road Traffic Noise),
Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013;
ii. Technical Specification-MRTS15
Noise Fences, Transport and Main
Roads, 2019;
iii. Technical Specification-MRTS04
General Earthworks, Transport
and Main Roads, 2020; or
2. achieves the maximum free field acoustic
level in reference table 2 (item 2.3) for all
outdoor education areas and outdoor
play areas by alternative noise
attenuation measures where it is not
practical to provide a noise barrier or earth
mound.
PO45 Development involving a childcare centre No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
or educational establishment:
1. provides a noise barrier or earth mound that
is designed, sited and constructed:
2. to achieve the maximum building facade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item
1.2);
3. in accordance with:
a. Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design
of the Transport Noise Management
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 17
Page 13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic
Noise), Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013;
b. Technical Specification-MRTS15 Noise
Fences, Transport and Main Roads,
2019;
c. Technical Specification-MRTS04 General
Earthworks, Transport and Main Roads,
2020; or
4. achieves the maximum building facade
acoustic level in reference table 1 (item
1.2) by alternative noise attenuation
measures where it is not practical to provide
a noise barrier or earth mound.
PO46 Development involving: No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
1. indoor education areas and indoor play
areas; or
2. sleeping rooms in a childcare centre; or
3. patient care areas in a hospital achieves the
maximum internal acoustic level in reference
table 3 (items 3.2-3.4).
Above ground floor level requirements (childcare centre, educational establishment, hospital) adjacent to a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor
PO47 Development involving a childcare centre No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
or educational establishment which have
balconies, podiums or elevated outdoor play
areas predicted to exceed the maximum free
field acoustic level in reference table 2 (item 2.3)
due to noise from a state-controlled road are
provided with:
1. a continuous solid gap-free structure or
balustrade (excluding gaps required for
drainage purposes to comply with the Building
Code of Australia);
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 17
Page 14
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2. highly acoustically absorbent material
treatment for the total area of the soffit above
balconies or elevated outdoor play areas.
PO48 Development including: No acceptable outcome is provided. N/A
1. indoor education areas and indoor play
areas in a childcare centre or educational
establishment; or
2. sleeping rooms in a childcare centre; or
3. patient care areas in a hospital located
above ground level, is designed and
constructed to achieve the maximum internal
acoustic level in reference table 3 (items 3.2-
3.4).
Air, light and vibration
PO49 Private open space, outdoor education AO49.1 Each dwelling or unit has access to a N/A
areas and outdoor play areas are protected private open space which is shielded from a
from air quality impacts from a state-controlled state-controlled road by a building, solid gap-
road. free fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
OR
AO49.2 Each outdoor education area and
outdoor play area is shielded from a state-
controlled road by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 17
Page 15
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO50 Patient care areas within hospitals are AO50.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed
protected from vibration impacts from a state- to ensure vibration in the patient treatment area
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. does not exceed a vibration dose value of
0.1m/s1.75.
AND
AO50.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed
to ensure vibration in the ward of a patient care
area does not exceed a vibration dose value of
0.4m/s1.75.
PO51 Development is designed and sited to No acceptable outcomes are prescribed. N/A
ensure light from infrastructure within, and from
users of, a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor, does not:
1. intrude into buildings during night hours (10pm
to 6am);
2. create unreasonable disturbance during
evening hours (6pm to 10pm).
Table 1.6: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO52 Development does not impede delivery of a AO52.1 Development is not located in a future N/A
future state-controlled road. state-controlled road.
OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:
AO52.2 Development does not involve filling and
excavation of, or material changes to, a future
state-controlled road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 17
Page 16
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO52.3 The intensification of lots does not occur
within a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO52.4 Development does not result in the
landlocking of parcels once a future state-
controlled road is delivered.
PO53 The location and design of new or AO53.1 Development does not include new or N/A
changed access does not create a safety hazard changed access to a future state-controlled
for users of a future state-controlled road. road.
PO54 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
retaining structures do not undermine, damage
or cause subsidence of a future state-controlled
road.
PO55 Development does not result in a material No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
worsening of stormwater, flooding, overland flow
or drainage impacts in a future state-controlled
road or road transport infrastructure.
PO56 Development ensures that stormwater is AO56.1 Development does not create any new N/A
lawfully discharged. points of discharge to a future state-controlled
road.
AND
AO56.2 Development does not concentrate flows
to a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO56.3 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 17
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO56.4 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge
to the future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 17