Council archive · source document
Appendix H - SDAP Response · REC15/0011
Attached to the e-mail REC15/0011 - Development Application for Reconfiguration of a lot - 1 lot into 11 lots plus balance lot - Appendices F, G, H & I email 2 of 2.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
public safety or permanent structures. cannot reasonably be relocated or abandoned.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal AND
protection work must be supported by a report
certified by an RPEQ that demonstrates how AO8.2 Coastal protection work to protect private
the engineering solution sought by the work structures is undertaken on private land to the maximum
will be achieved.
extent reasonable.
AND
AO8.3 Coastal protection work does not increase
the coastal hazard risk for adjacent areas or
properties.
PO9 Development avoids adverse AO9.1 Development: The proposal will not adversely impact on matters on state
impacts on matters of state (1) is set back from matters of state environmental environmental significance. The site is subject to regulated
environmental significance, or where this significance vegetation (Category B). The presence of environmental
is not reasonably possible, impacts are (2) avoids interrupting, interfering or otherwise adversely constraints is predominantly located on the balance of the
minimised and an environmental offset is impacting underlying natural ecosystem components site and as such, this half of the site will be dedicated for the
provided for any significant residual or processes and interactions that affect or maintain purposes of reserve (environmental park) in accordance
impacts to matters of state environmental the matters of state environmental significance, such with pre-lodgement discussions with Noosa Council.
significance that are prescribed as water quality, hydrology, geomorphology and
environmental matters. biological processes, or
(3) incorporates measures as part of its location and
design to protect and retain matters of state
environmental significance and underlying ecosystem
processes within and adjacent to the development
site to the greatest extent practicable.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify any
threatened species or their habitats, or threatened ecosystems
that may be affected by the proposal. In particular, applications
should identify and describe how the development avoids
adverse impacts on any critical life stage ecological processes
within or adjacent to the development area.
AND
AO9.2 An environmental offset is provided for any N/A Refer above. The proposal will not adversely impact on
significant residual impact on matters of state matters of state environmental significance and as such an
environmental significance that are prescribed environmental offset will not be required.
environmental matters caused by the development.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
anticipated losses, and outline what actions are proposed to be
undertaken to offset the loss in accordance with the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district state code
20 June 2014 V1.4 Page 9 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix H - SDAP Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 87 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.