Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Stormwater management (flood report)
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (10.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
The existing drainage capacity of Pavilion Street is approximately equivalent to the 10% AEP
storm event, with flow greater than this overtopping the verge and entering the site. To
account for this, the peak flow for SUB1-Ex was determined for the 10%, 5%, 2% and 1% AEP.
The portion of flow greater than the 10% AEP was converted into a ratio, which was then
applied to the catchment area as detailed below in Table 2-1. This ensured that flows from
SUB1-Ex greater than the 10% AEP were routed through the site.
Table 2-1: Summary of Existing Catchment Parameters
Sub-catchment Area (ha) Imperviousness (%)
SUB1 3.407 11
SUB1-Ex 0.287 50
SUB1-Ex (<10% AEP) 0.0* -
SUB1-Ex (5% AEP) 0.047* 50
SUB1-Ex (2% AEP) 0.095* 50
SUB1-Ex (1% AEP) 0.138* 50
* area factored based on flow rate for events greater than 10% AEP
The WBNM model has been run for events from 1 to 100-year ARI and for durations of 20
minutes to 3 hours. A WBNM catchment lag factor of 1.6 was applied which is within the
recommended range. An initial and continuing loss of 10mm and 2.4mm/hr has been
applied refer to Rational Method Check). The resulting peak flows for the critical duration are
provided in Table 2-2 for each event at the outlet reporting locations.
Table 2-2: Existing Catchment Peak Flows
Event AEP 63.2% 50% 20% 10% 5% 2% 1% 1%CC
SUB1 (m3/s) 0.34 0.42 0.64 0.80 0.95 1.12 1.27 1.59
2.1.2. Rational Method Check
Pre-development peak flows have been checked against peak flows determined using the
Rational Method (RM) for SUB1, as shown in Table 2-3. A time of concentration of 20.6
minutes was determined for SUB1 rational method. It can be seen there is less than ten
percent difference across all assessed events, indicating that the WBNM model flows are
suitable for use. Refer to Appendix B for a summary of rational method parameters used.
Table 2-3: Comparison of WBNM and Rational Method Peak Flows
Event AEP 63.2% 50% 20% 10% 5% 2% 1% 1%CC
Rational (m3/s) 0.34 0.40 0.61 0.75 0.89 1.12 1.29 1.52
WBNM (m3/s) 0.34 0.42 0.64 0.80 0.95 1.12 1.27 1.59
Difference (%) 2.3 3.0 4.4 6.3 6.3 0.1 -0.9 -0.7
21-0166SMP01-V1 | Stormwater Management Plan | 25 Pavilion Street, Pomona |7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.