Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Stormwater management (flood report)
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (10.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
2.2.2. Existing Scenario (E03)
The existing case model has been setup and run for the 1% (2100) AEP flood event. The
results of this have been used as the basis for assessing the potential impacts that may result
from the development.
Appendix C details the existing flood extent in relation to the development site. It can be
seen that there is a small amount of break flow occurring through the showgrounds (to south)
that enters the building envelop of Lot 10. Flow depths in this area are quite shallow and up
to 55mm deep (approx. 0.1m3/s).
2.2.3. Proposed Scenario (P03a)
The proposed case model has been setup and run for the 1% (2100) AEP flood event, which
incorporates the proposed development site. Appendix D details the proposed flood extent
in relation to the development site. An indicative site plan is overlaid on this figure to
highlight how the development relates to the flood extent.
2.2.3.1. Afflux
Afflux mapping has been undertaken for the 1% (2100) AEP events to identify whether there
are any impacts resulting, and if so, whether an alternative development arrangement
needs to be investigated.
Appendix E details the afflux map which compares the existing and proposed case for the
1% (2100) AEP flood levels. It is noted that based on the current development arrangement
there are no increases in flood levels noted either upstream or downstream as a result of the
development site itself.
2.2.3.2. Peak Flow
The assessment found the peak discharge at the site boundary are predicted to decrease
slightly. This is shown in Table 2-9 which compares the Existing and Proposed peak discharge
at the site boundary. As such it is considered that non-worsening is achieved, and the
development does not impact peak flow rates in the regional flood event.
Table 2-9: Existing and Proposed Peak discharge at the Site Boundary.
Design Event Existing Peak Discharge Proposed Peak Discharge Difference
(AEP) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s)
1% (2100) 304.00 303.99 -0.01
2.2.3.3. Flood Storage
A flood storage assessment has been completed over the site to ensure there is no loss of
flood plain storage has resulted from the development. The assessment found that there was
some loss of flood plain storage due to the development, with some additional cut provided
in the Lot 10 to offset the loss of flood plain storage.
For the existing flood storage calculation, the existing peak 1% (2100) AEP flood surface was
compared to the existing model terrain. Similarly with the proposed flood storage
calculation, the proposed (no cut) peak 1% (2100) AEP flood surface was compared to the
proposed model terrain. The proposed (with cut) scenario incorporates an area of free
draining cut approximately 0.1m deep over 1,250m2 to achieve the flood storage balance.
Details of the flood plain storage in the existing, proposed and mitigated cases is summarised
below in Table 2-10.
21-0166SMP01-V1 | Stormwater Management Plan | 25 Pavilion Street, Pomona | 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.