Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 4 - Cost Benefit Analysis for Noosaville Inundation Options

of 19

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

(Table 1) demonstrate that option 1 (Protect – Levee and stormwater infrastructure modifications)
provides the greatest net benefit to the community. This is driven by greater protection from
inundation leading to:

• avoided loss of tourism revenue

• avoided loss of benefits from access to recreational areas along the foreshore

• reduced road damage

• reduced damage to the stormwater network.

Option 2 (Accommodate – Road raising) has a similar discounted cost to option 1. However, it does
not provide as extensive protection from inundation and therefore delivers fewer benefits than option
1. The costs of option 2 may also be understated, as substantial modifications and community
inconvenience would be required to address matters such as driveway crossovers, grading of
intersections and pedestrian movements, which have not been included in the current costs.

Sensitivity analysis, which is included on pages 7-8 of the report, also demonstrates that option 1 is
the preferred option under a range of different assumptions.

Table 1: Present value results (discounted at 2.3 per cent, costs and benefits assessed for period
         2020-2100)

                                              Option 1 – Levee and      Option 2 – road   Confidence
                                              stormwater modification   raising

 Net Present Value (NPV)                      $21.5m                    -$3.9m

 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)                     2.11                      0.80

 Costs                                        $19.4m                    $19.2m

 Levee costs                                  $8.9m                                       Medium

 Stormwater modification costs                $10.5m                                      Medium

 Road raising costs                                                     $19.2m            Medium

 Benefits                                     $40.9m                    $15.3m

 Recreational benefits                        $6.5m                     $0.1m             Low

 Avoided property damage                      $0.1m                     $0.1m             Low

 Avoided road damage                          $1.1m                     $0.6m             Medium

 Tourism benefits                             $27.1m                    $10.8m            Low

 Avoided damage to stormwater                 $3.0m                     $0.6m             Medium
 network

 Residential nuisance benefits                $3.1m                     $3.1m             Low



Assumptions
All input assumption values used in the cost benefit analysis have been included in technical appendix
A.




REPORT | Noosa Shire Council CHAP – Phase 7                                                              3
Log in to download the original file

2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 4 - Cost Benefit Analysis for Noosaville Inundation Options(PDF, 651KB).pdf · 667 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.