Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 4 - Cost Benefit Analysis for Noosaville Inundation Options
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
in the Noosaville area by tidal waters, maintenance of the stormwater network will need to occur on a more regular basis to overcome the damage caused by frequent inundation. Under the proposed adaptation options the frequency of inundation by tidal waters is reduced, thereby reducing the damage to stormwater assets and mitigating the costs of maintenance for council. Assumptions on the expected maintenance costs and the different lifespan of the stormwater assets under different levels of inundation have been provided by Noosa Shire Council and are provided in Appendix A. Avoided property damage Although the inundation caused by sea level rise is not expected to be of a depth or velocity to cause significant property damage in the region, there may be minor damages caused by increased salinity from frequent inundation or saline groundwater intrusion. Under the base case properties close to the river, creeks and lake are potentially affected by low-level inundation which may lead to increased maintenance costs for property owners (for example of gardens and driveways). A report on dryland and urban salinity costs across the Murray-Darling Basin (S Wilson, 2004) provides expected yearly property repair costs due to increased salinity. Whilst these are driven by dryland and urban salinity impacts there is limited data on the impacts of coastal salinity damage. These costs have been used to approximate the potential damage costs to residential properties and tourist accommodation in relevant areas, however these costs are low confidence, and should therefore be investigated further. Under the project options the extent of inundation is reduced thereby mitigating the expected property damage caused in comparison to the base case. Recreational and amenity benefits Publicly accessible open space provides amenity benefits to the local community. Amenity benefits can include both tangible benefits such as recreation, or non-tangible benefits such as aesthetic appreciation. These open spaces in Noosaville, in particular those along the river foreshore, are at greater risk of being affected by the increased inundation as a result of sea level rise. Under the base case the local community is restricted from accessing these areas whilst they are inundated, and therefore the amenity value of these assets is reduced. There are also likely to be additional costs associated with maintaining and restoring recreational areas affected by inundation, however due to limited information available these costs have not been included at this stage of the analysis. Under the project options the extent of recreational areas inundated is reduced and the recreational and amenity benefits associated with access to these public open spaces are therefore greater compared to the base case. These benefits have been quantified based on average yearly household willingness to pay for public open space (Ambrey and Fleming, 2014), and the amount of additional time these spaces are accessible. Tourism benefits Tourism is a key benefit to the region. It is assumed that low-level inundation, especially of areas along the foreshore and other popular visitor locations, will have a negative effect on the number of visitors to the Noosaville area. The reduction in visitation is assumed based on the amount of time that key areas of Noosaville are expected to be inundated each year. REPORT | Noosa Shire Council CHAP – Phase 7 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.