Original source · versioned page text
Attachment E - Assessment Env Values Report
Callaghan & Toth Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd ACN No. 140292324 8/41 Sunshine Beach Road Noosa Junction P.O Box 6/41 2305 Noosa Sunshine Beach Heads 4567 Junction Road Noosa www.callaghanandtoth.com.au P.O Box 2035 Noosa Heads 4567 Callaghan & Toth www.callaghanandtoth.com.au Ph: 07 5474 9081 Fax: 07 54749041 Civil, Environmental & Hydraulic Engineers Ph: 07 54749081 Fax 07 54749041 10th February 2020 File No.: 2001 Mitch Turner Noosa Council. Via Email: [[email protected]>] RE: ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES – LOWER MILL CARPARK EXTENSION Callaghan and Toth undertook a review of the proposed Lower Mill Carpark Extension which included reviewing: Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Playground by Noosa District Landcare+ IWMP by Callaghan & Toth Pty Ltd Cooroy Hinterland Park Flood Assessment by Hydrology and Water Management Consulting Pty Ltd Noosa Council Drawings 0000583-C00 to C14 Revision B. 1.0 SITE ASSESSMENT A site visit was undertaken on 29th January 2020 and site conditions were assessed. The photos below show the current site conditions and vegetation that will be affected by the proposed development. Generally, the proposed development will occur mostly within existing informal carparking areas, which consist of a number of surfaces from gravel, concrete and grassed areas. The existing native vegetation that will be subject to removal is impacted by weeds, and is mostly grasses or weeds. 1.1 Proposed Works Proposed Works include: Sealing areas of informal carparking and formalizing areas adjacent to existing buildings – 22 new carparks, Creating a new carpark adjacent to the creek with 30 new carparks, A new access road and pathways associated with the new carpark, and Connection concrete pathway to creek crossing pathway. The works will encroach into mapped Category R vegetation and Council’s mapped Riparian Buffer Areas and Environmental Protection Areas. 1.2 Desktop Assessment The site of works is partly within Lot 5 SP213104 and Lot 7 SP173771. Lot 5 contains historical and new buildings associated with past mill activities in Cooroy, with new enterprises around woodworking occurring on site. These communities uses are connected to the community use lots to the south of Cooroy Creek by a small pedestrian footbridge that crosses Cooroy Creek and can be opened to traffic in emergencies. Cooroy Creek flows into Six Mile Creek approximately 2.8km downstream of the site, which then flows into the Mary River approximately 60km downstream (to the north). On review of mapping and legislation the following is relevant for the site: COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATION 1. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999): Protected Matters Search Tool identified the following may occur in, or may relate to the area of works: a. 1 wetland of International Importance (Ramsar) i. Great sandy strait (including great sandy strait, tin can bay) b. 1 Threatened Ecological Communities i. Lowland Rainforest of Subtropical Australia c. 39 listed Threatened Species d. 15 Listed Migratory Species X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Attachment E - Assessment Env Values Report.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 63 pages
Page 2
STATE LEGISLATION
The following state legislation and mapping occurs over or adjacent to the proposed work locations on the Lower Mill site:
1. Vegetation Management Act (1999):
Lot 5 contains:
o Category R (Reef regrowth watercourse vegetation) – over the riparian area of Cooroy Creek:
Endangered RE’s 12.9-10.1/12.9-10.16 (80/20):
i. RE 12.9-10.1 - Tall open forest often with Eucalyptus resinifera, E. grandis, E. robusta, Corymbia
intermedia on sedimentary rocks. Coastal
ii. RE 12.9-10.16 - Araucarian microphyll to notophyll vine forest on Cainozoic and Mesozoic
sediments
Lot 7 contains:
o Category B (Remnant vegetation) – Endangered RE 12.3.1
RE12.3.1 – Gallery rainforest (notophyll vine forest) on alluvial plains.
o Category R (Reef regrowth watercourse vegetation) – over the riparian area of Cooroy Creek:
Endangered RE’s 12.9-10.1/12.9-10.16 (80/20):
iii. RE 12.9-10.1 - Tall open forest often with Eucalyptus resinifera, E. grandis, E. robusta, Corymbia
intermedia on sedimentary rocks. Coastal
iv. RE 12.9-10.16 - Araucarian microphyll to notophyll vine forest on Cainozoic and Mesozoic
sediments
o Essential Habitat mapping over the Category B remnant vegetation for:
Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) - Vulnerable
Tusked Frog (Adelotus brevis) – Vulnerable
2. Fisheries Act (1994):
a. Fisheries mapping shows Cooroy Creek to be a High (red) Waterway.
3. Environmental Protection Act (1994); Environmental Protection Policy (Water) (2009):
a. Cooroy Creek is part of the plan; Mary River including all tributaries of the Mary River (Basins 138) EPP
(Water) 2009 Plan WQ1381:
i. The area is located in a Lowland freshwater area.
4. Nature Conservation Act 1992:
a. Lot 5 SP213104 is not mapped as a High Risk Area under the Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger map;
however Lot 7 SP173771 does have protected plants mapping.
b. Wildlife Online lists three EVNT species that have been located within 1km of the site:
i. Tusked frog (Adelotus brevis) – Vulnerable
ii. Red Goshawk (Erythotriorchis radiatus) – Endangered
iii. White throated needletail (Hirundapus caudacutus) – Vulnerable
LOCAL LEGISLATION
Zone:
Lot 5 – is zoned as Industry
Lot 7 – is zoned as Community Services
Biodiversity Overlay
Riparian Buffer Area – completely over Lot 7 and most of Lot 5
Environmental Protection Area – over part of Lot 7
Environmental Enhancement – over part of Lot 5
Heritage Overlay
Heritage – Qld register – Lot 5 ?
Flood Hazard Overly
Most of Lot 5 and all of Lot 7 are mapped as Flood Hazard
Koala Habitat Areas – schedule 7
Remnant Habitat on Lot 7
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill
Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 2
Page 3
Habitat Regrowth on Lot 5 FIGURE 1: Existing parking and northern edge of proposed extension adjacent buildings. FIGURE 2: Looking from north towards new area X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 3
Page 4
FIGURE 3: New area proposed north of buildings and adjacent riparian vegetation FIGURE 4: New area proposed north of buildings and turnaround X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 4
Page 5
1.3 Summary of Environmental Values
A Flora and Fauna Survey has not been undertaken specifically for this project involving the extension of the carpark areas on
the Lower Mill site. A Flora and Fauna survey was undertaken by Noosa District Landcare in September 2019 for the
proposed Hinterland Playground to the south of Cooroy Creek, and as such the species identified during this survey are
relevant for the Lower Mill site as well. Environmental values attributed to the site include:
Amenity:
Scenic amenity – green space, waterway, riparian vegetation, etc.
Adjacent Parkland – green space, corridor for fauna movements, watercourse.
Water:
Cooroy Creek and its riparian vegetation form the south, eastern and northern boundary to the site.
Water quality of standing water appeared good – water was clear, no algal growth, presence of macroinvertebrates.
Overland flow paths / rainwater tank overflows through retained vegetation and grass to the creek.
Two biobasins exist which treat stormwater prior to discharge to Cooroy Creek.
Fauna:
A total of two mammal species, thirty bird species, one amphibian species, one fish species and one invertebrate
species (see Attachment A), were found during the survey.
Fish habitat - DAF mapping shows tributary to be a High (Red) Risk waterway.
Mature Eucalypt trees in the survey area are considered “habitat trees” and provide roosting, perching and foraging
resources.
Leaf litter, hollow logs, log piles and wood debris present provides good habitat for small reptiles and litter foraging
invertebrates.
Cooroy Creek has ponded water which may provide fish-free breeding habitat for EVNT listed frog species.
Ponded water also supported the short fin eel activity observed on site.
Presence of weeds and ornamentals in the retained vegetation impacts on the quality of fauna habitat values.
Flora:
A total of 87 native plant species and 31 non-native species were recorded during the survey period (see
Attachment A).
o Two weeds of national significance were detected on site, Basket asparagus (Asparagus aethiopicus cv.
Sprengeri) and Lantana (Lantana camara var. camara)
The edges of the retained vegetation is subject to disturbance including nutrient runoff and weed encroachment.
The edge of the retained vegetation closer to the creek is relatively intact retaining a higher degree of floristic
diversity and integrity across all strata, with fewer weed species encroaching into the creek banks.
One listed flora species was identified in riparian vegetation on Cooroy Creek in Lot 2 RP47020 – Toothed kamala
(Mallotus megadontus) which is listed as Vulnerable under the NCA 1992.
Soil:
Elevation slopes gently to the south and east, falling from approximately 106 metres to 103 metres above sea level
(asl.)
The site is generally stable with close to 90% cover with grass, mulch and native vegetation.
Some very minor soil erosion along drains.
Cultural Heritage:
Kabi Kabi First Nation are traditional owners in this region.
Site near waterway – may have been used by indigenous people for access to food sources and may have cultural
significance.
Connection to the native fauna and flora in the area.
No cultural heritage site points or polygons recorded for this area. (See Attachment C).
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill
Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 5
Page 6
2.0 BIODIVERSITY OVERLAY ASSESSMENT A response to the Biodiversity Overlay Code in relation to the proposed development is provided below in Table 1. TABLE 1: Response to Noosa Council’s Biodiversity Overlay X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 6
Page 7
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions (if Response
applicable)
13.9 Vegetation retention and conservation
Environmental Protection Area &
Environmental Enhancement Area The proposed carpark area on Lot 7 SP173771 is within
vegetation & Riparian Buffer Area S1.1 An Ecological Assessment Report prepared in Council’s mapped Riparian Buffer Area and partly
accordance with Planning Scheme Policy 18 – encroaches into the Environmental Protection Area
O1 Vegetation of local origin on premises Ecological Assessment Guidelines demonstrates that adjacent to Cooroy Creek.
identified as – the flora on the premises does not constitute
a) Environmental Protection Area or Environmental Protection Area or Environmental The proposed carpark and associated access driveway do
Riparian Buffer Area on the Enhancement Area vegetation. not require clearing as the proposed hardstand areas are
Biodiversity Overlay maps OM1.1 to located within existing clear areas.
OM9.1, is retained and conserved in OR
its present form or improved to
ensure its ongoing contribution to the S1.2 Where constructing a Detached House; or
natural resources and biological Community residence interference with vegetation
diversity of the Noosa Shire; and does not extend beyond –
b) Environmental Enhancement Area a) 30m of a building or 10m of a structure on lots
on Biodiversity Overlay Maps greater than 10ha; or
OM1.1-OM9.1, is protected from the b) 10m of a building or structure on lots 10ha or
impacts of development by- less but more than 0.3ha; or
i. avoiding edge effects; c) 3m of a building or structure on lots 0.3ha or
ii. avoiding fragmentation; and less.
iii. maintaining vegetation in
manageable and viable S2.1 Where clearing vegetation on the premises is
configurations. for the purposed of Reconfiguring a Lot -
a) new boundaries to lots do not transect and
AND fragment existing vegetation;
b) new lots are created to allow for suitable house
O2 For the purpose of Reconfiguring a Lot site areas or other future buildings and works to
new lots are only created where they be located within existing cleared areas or areas
minimise the fragmentation and maximise of low ecological value; and
the retention of the existing vegetation. c) building envelopes are designated for each lot.
O3 Clearing vegetation only occurs where S3.1 No solution provided No vegetation clearing is proposed.
–
a) no other suitable cleared or partially
cleared area is available on the
premises;
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 7
pg. 7
Page 8
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
b) the development minimises the total
footprint within which all activities,
buildings, structures, driveways and
other works are contained; and
c) the development is located in areas of
low ecological value over other areas,
to the greatest extent practicable.
O4 Wetlands are protected from removal S4.1 A minimum separation distance of 100m is The works are within 20m of Cooroy Creek which is east
or degradation and any adverse impacts provided between a wetland and any adjacent of the proposed new carpark and access road on Lot 7
on wetlands are prevented, minimised or development or use. SP173771.
mitigated by-
a) maintaining adequate separation There will be no changes to flows for Cooroy Creek as
between the wetland and any adjacent shown in the Flood Study by Hydrology and Water.
development or use;
b) minimising any modification of the There will be no access into the retained vegetation
natural characteristics of the wetland, following completion of works or changes to the surface
including the topography, surface and levels in the retained vegetation areas.
groundwater hydrology, water quality
and flora and fauna species; As a result of the proposed new hardstand areas, the
c) preventing any new development existing biobasins are to be refurbished with new filter
within wetlands; media and outlet pit to ensure they are to current best
d) minimising access to the wetland; practice design standards and removing nutrients and
e) minimising impacts associated with pollutant loads prior to stormwater entering Cooroy Creek.
pest insect control and invasion by
undesirable plant species; and The existing biobasins have been in place for a minimum
f) providing for the rehabilitation and of 14 years and are not to the current best practice design
replanting of degraded wetlands. standards. As such by improving the design and
functionality of the biobasins, this will improve the water
quality of stormwater runoff into Cooroy Creek, with the
overall health of this waterway being improved.
Riparian Zones The site falls within the Riparian Buffer Areas on the
O5 The biodiversity and ecosystem S5.1 No new development occurs on, or partly on, Biodiversity Overlay.
values of watercourses, drainage lines, premises indicated as Riparian Buffer Area on
wetlands and adjacent riparian zones are Biodiversity Overlay Maps OM1.1 to OM9.1, except The proposed works will not require clearing as the new
protected by – for- carpark and access road are located within existing clear
a) avoiding any new development in the a) temporary use of the land; or areas.
riparian buffer area; b) infrastructure which provides access to a
b) retaining aquatic and terrestrial habitat watercourse for recreational purposes; The Cooroy Creek riparian vegetation has been subject to
in riparian zones; a long-term revegetation program by Noosa District
c) maintaining wildlife corridors along OR Landcare on behalf of Council to improve connectivity of
watercourses and drainage lines for S5.2 Where constructing a Detached house or vegetation communities both upstream and downstream
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 8
pg. 8
Page 9
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
native fauna movement; Community residence and on an allotment situated of the Lower Mill site. This riparian zone does provide a
d) avoiding edge effects and wholly within the Riparian Buffer Area, wildlife corridor along Cooroy Creek and down to Six Mile
incompatible uses in riparian zones; a) fronting the Noosa River – development is Creek.
e) maintaining bank stability by setback a minimum of 40m from mean high water
minimising bank erosion and spring or as otherwise prescribed by the As part of the proposed development water quality will be
slumping; Environmental Protection Agency’s Erosion prone managed as per the attached Stormwater Quality
f) maintaining water quality by filtering Area Maps; Management Plan (SWQMP) by Callaghan and Toth Pty
sediments, nutrients and other b) not fronting Noosa River – Ltd. The existing biobasins (refurbished) and some
pollutants; and development is located outside the riparian zone existing and new swales will treat sediment and nutrients
g) removing undesirable plant species and setback a suitable distance from the loads in the stormwater flows, to protect the water quality
and replacing them with vegetation of watercourse having regard to the development of the adjacent watercourse.
local origin; constraints of the property and the need to protect
environmental and riparian values;
OR
S5.3 For Animal husbandry on premises in the
Rural Zone –
a) stock proof fencing is installed along watercourses
at a distance of no less than 10m from the top of
the bank;
b) stock watering points are located no less than
15m away from the top of the bank of
watercourses; and
c) stock crossing points across watercourses are
defined and controlled with stock proof fencing, to
prevent stock from damaging riparian vegetation
or banks to watercourses;
OR
S5.4 Recreational facilities (including playgrounds,
pergolas, barbeques etc) are setback a minimum of
30m from the top of the bank of a watercourse and
10m from the top of the bank of a drainage line;
OR
S5.5 For Forestry uses the cultivated area is
separated from watercourses by a distance not less
than the distances identified below, measured from
high water mark or the top the bank, whichever is the
greater distance –
Feature Distance
Stream order 1 or 2 5m
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 9
pg. 9
Page 10
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
Stream order 3 or 4 10m
Stream order > 4 20m
AND
S5.6 Where Forestry is carried out on that part of
premises indicated as Riparian Buffer Area and
outside the separation distances specified in S5.5 –
a) species planted are of local origin and are
harvested through sustainable harvesting;
and
b) any undesirable plant species are replaced by
vegetation of local origin.
Managing public access and edge The proposed carparks and new access roads and
effects S6.1 Development adjacent to waterway or wetland pathways will not affect any existing public access to
O6 Development on land adjacent to a provides that- Cooroy Creek.
waterway or wetland maintains an a) no new lots directly back onto the riparian area,
appropriate extent of public access to and
waterways and wetlands and minimises b) new public roads are located between the riparian
edge effects. buffer and the proposed development areas.
Koala Habitat Areas S7.1 development avoids removing and fragmenting The area lies within a Koala Assessable Development
O7 development is designed, constructed koala habitat and includes koala sensitive design Area and is categorised as part Low Value Bushland
and operated to – measures consistent with the Nature Conservation Habitat and part Low Value Rehabilitation (see Appendix
a) avoid adverse impacts on koalas and (Koala) Conservation Plan 2006-2016 and Koala B). As such it is not subject to the provision of the South-
koala habitat; Sensitive Design Guideline 2012. East Queensland SPRP for conservation of Koala
b) provide measures to assist the S7.2 Where clearing of non-juvenile koala habitat bushland habitat.
survival of koala populations in the trees is unavoidable in an area shown as bushland
area to mitigate any potential threats habitat, high value rehabilitation habitat or medium The Noosa District and Landcare environmental
or risks to koalas; value rehabilitation habitat on the map called ‘Map of assessment did not find signs of Koalas in the area.
c) provide for safe and appropriate koala Values’ such clearing is minimised and biodiversity
movement across the landscape; and offset is provided in accordance with the Queensland Essential Habitat mapping shows the remnant vegetation
d) provide for a net gain in mature and Environmental Offset Policy. along Cooroy Creek (within Lot 7) to be koala habitat.
actively regenerating koala habitat.
The works do not require clearing of any vegetation and
as such no koala trees should be cleared as a result of
works. If clearing of any koala trees occurs during works,
planting to offset this loss of koala trees will be in
accordance with the Queensland Environmental Offsets
Policy, in particular:
Establish three new koala habitat trees for every
one ‘non juvenile’ tree removed.
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 10
pg. 10
Page 11
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
Open space networks & ecological S8.1 Vegetation and ecological linkages are The community use lots adjacent to Cooroy Creek allow
linkages enhanced through vegetation, rehabilitation and for the open space network and corridors to be maintained
vegetation maintenance in areas indicated in along the creek.
O8 Open space networks and ecological Schedule 5 on Map 3 – Open Space Networks in
linkages are maintained and enhanced to such a way as to-
provide for safe movement of fauna and a) ensure protection of wildlife refuges;
viable connectivity between ecologically b) facilitate the dispersal and movement of native
important areas by protecting and wildlife; and
replanting vegetation of local origin- c) maintain vegetation in patches of the greatest
a) along and around watercourses, possible size and with the smallest possible edge-
wetlands, drainage lines and to-area ratio.
ridgelines; and AND
b) as linkages between areas of remnant
vegetation, including – S8.2 Development is sited and designed to –
i. across property boundaries; a) maximise the ecological connectivity of vegetation
ii. to areas of national park, within the site and to adjacent sites;
conservation park, State forest or b) to avoid creating physical barriers and safety
reserve; and hazards (such as roads, pedestrian access and
iii. into adjoining local government in-stream structures) to the movement of fauna
areas. along and within the ecological linkage; and
c) provide mitigation measures such as wildlife
movement infrastructure, fauna exclusion and
directional fencing, underpasses, overpasses and
traffic calming devices, signage and lighting.
Scenic amenity The native vegetation on Cooroy Creek will not impacted
O9 The scenic amenity and vegetated S9.1 and S10.1 Vegetation is retained and enhanced by the proposed new carparks, road access and pathways
character of the locality and its – on the Lower Mill site. There is no proposal to clear
watercourses, drainage lines, sloping land a) within 30m pf prominent ridgelines and hill slopes; vegetation to construct these new hardstand areas. The
and ridgelines is retained and enhanced; b) in gullies; siting of the new carpark is within an existing cleared area
AND c) along watercourses and drainage lines; and on Lot 7 SP173771, which partly covers an area of
O10 Vegetation which makes a positive d) within 10m of road reserves. contaminated land previously capped.
contribution to the streetscape or major
road network is retained. The existing riparian buffer will be maintained along
Cooroy Creek.
Habitat trees S11.1 No clearing of koala habitat trees greater than No clearing of Koala habitat trees is required for these
O11 Habitat trees (including dead trees) 4m in height or with a diameter greater than 100mm works.
and recruitment habitat trees are at 1.3m above the ground;
protected for native fauna habitat, where AND
practicable. S11.2 No clearing of other habitat trees or
recruitment habitat trees.
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 11
pg. 11
Page 12
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
Lake Macdonald N/A
O12 Vegetation within 400m of the full No solution provided.
ponded water within Lake Macdonald is
retained.
Steep slopes N/A
O13 Vegetation on steep slopes is No solution provided.
retained and managed to avoid erosion
and landslide and to protect natural
resources and values.
Engineering and site works The proposed new carpark and road are located in
O14 Development is sited and designed S14.1 Works, including roads, driveways, fences, existing cleared areas and are located west of the existing
to – sewer lines and other infrastructure – riparian vegetation along Cooroy Creek.
a) provide adequate separation distance a) do not transect areas of vegetation; or
between the vegetation to be b) are co-located within a combined utility corridor; During construction the retained vegetation will be clearly
protected and the development to and marked to ensure the retained vegetation is protected.
avoid disturbing, destabilising and c) provide for fauna underpasses, speed reduction
deoxygenating any tree or altering the devices and associated fencing, lighting and The CEMP for the works will detail vegetation protection
drainage; warning signs, where appropriate; requirements including stockpiling around retained
b) avoid traversing or fragmenting AND vegetation, access requirements, machinery access
vegetation or habitats for significant S14.2 Development within or adjacent to areas of requirements etc.
flora or fauna species; and vegetation, incorporate fauna friendly fences;
c) avoid creating barriers to faunal AND
movement. S14.3 Vegetation is protected from interference
resulting from clearing or construction activities by-
a) clearly marking vegetation to be retained with
flagging tape;
b) installing protective fencing around the dripline of
the vegetation and avoid filling and excavation in
these fenced areas; and
c) ensuring stock piling, storage and vehicle parking
occur outside the identified vegetation areas;
AND
S14.4 Low impact construction techniques are used
around vegetation to minimise interference with the
vegetation.
Filling and excavation The proposed extension will require filling to ensure that
O15 Vegetation is not adversely impacted No solution provided. there is no excavation into capped contaminated materials
upon by earthworks and changes to the on site. Or the SMP for the site is followed if excavation is
hydrological regime, including changes to required.
ground water levels, flooding levels, run-
off and tidal hydraulics. Hydrology and Water Management Consulting has
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 12
pg. 12
Page 13
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
undertaken a flood study to ensure the proposed works on
the Lower Mill site and the proposed Hinterland
Playground do not affect flooding levels.
13.10 Vegetation management
Replanting and rehabilitation There is no proposed clearing on site.
O16 development provided for S16.1 Landscaping and rehabilitation complements
ecologically important areas to be and supports ecologically important habitats by-
restored and enhanced through the a) utilising native plans of local origin;
following measures- b) utilising suitable plant species identified in PSP3 –
a) siting landscaped areas to landscaping Plants and Guidelines;
complement and enhance existing c) replicating adjacent remnant habitats, including
vegetation; understorey vegetation;
b) removal of all species likely to displace d) creating or enhancing linkages between existing
native flora species or degrade fauna habitats;
habitat; e) avoiding the use of undesirable plant species
c) replanting and rehabilitating degraded listed in table 9.1 of PSP3 landscaping Plans and
habitat; and Guidelines; and
d) replacing any vegetation removed with f) planting riparian zones to filter stormwater run-off
suitable replacement vegetation of and provide for wildlife habitat;
local origin.
AND
S16.2 Vegetation removed is replaced with –
a) plantings of equivalent area that replicate the
floristic structure of the vegetation removed; or
b) where this is not possible due to the
characteristics of the site and the development,
plantings twice the number of the removed trees
and plants of local origin.
Fire management N/A
O17 Fire management measures are No solution provided.
adopted based on ecological principles,
which-
a) maintain and enhance biodiversity;
b) minimise threat of fire to the natural
environment, life and property; and
c) provide for effective use and
maintenance of buildings and
structures.
Clearing protected vegetation in the No clearing proposed.
protected vegetation overlay area No solution provided.
O18 Clearing protected vegetation does
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 13
pg. 13
Page 14
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
not involve –
a) the removal of vegetation in
ecologically important areas;
b) removal of vegetation or habitat for
fauna identified or referred to as
requiring protection in State or
Commonwealth legislation;
c) removal of vegetation located on a
prominent hillside, slope or ridgeline;
d) vegetation within 400 metres of the full
level of ponded water within lake
Macdonald;
e) removal of riparian vegetation;
f) vegetation which is or is capable of
forming or contributing to a buffer
between different land uses;
g) vegetation which is or is capable of
forming or contributing to a visual
buffer or a buffer against pollution,
light spillage or noise;
h) vegetation which contributes to scenic
amenity or landscape quality;
i) vegetation the clearing of which may
cause or contribute to erosion or
slippage.
O19 Clearing protected vegetation does No clearing proposed.
not increase the likelihood of or result in No solution provided.
adverse impacts on-
a) remnant vegetation of local origin,
classified as remnant of concern
regional ecosystem or remnant
endangered regional ecosystem or is
vegetation located in a wetland;
b) the diversity of flora and fauna species
supported or likely to be supported by
the vegetation community;
c) a flora or fauna community or
individual species which has
conservation status in State or
Commonwealth legislation;
d) hydrology of an area or upon a
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 14
pg. 14
Page 15
Callaghan and Toth Consulting Engineers______________________________________________________
Biodiversity Overlay
hydrologically-sensitive plant
community such as heathland,
sedgeland, melaleuca forest or
mangrove forest;
e) a water catchment area or water
quality;
f) vegetation which has cultural heritage
values;
g) vegetation required to support, protect
and maintain biodiversity values within
the Noosa Shire, whether these be of
local, regional, state or national
significance;
h) a person or industry reliant on
maintaining the vegetation; or
i) neighbouring land, scenic amenity and
environmental values.
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\Biodiversity Overlay_LowerMillCarparkExtension.docx pg. 15
pg. 15
Page 16
3.0 SUMMARY
In summary:
The retained vegetation provides good habitat values with existing impacts from historical uses, contaminated land,
weed incursion and proximity to industrial areas.
Due to the presence of ponded water and vegetation type, it is expected the adjacent riparian vegetation is able to
support listed frog species: Tusked Frog (Adelotus brevis), which has previously been found near the site.
The presence of Toothed kamala (Mallotus megadontus) a Vulnerable listed plant species adjacent to Cooroy
Creek highlights the environmental values of the riparian vegetation. It is noted if any clearing of native vegetation
is proposed within 100m of this plant, a Protected Plants clearing permit is required and a supporting Impact
Management Plan needs to be developed in accordance with the guidelines.
The proposed development will not result in clearing any existing native vegetation on site. It is noted, that if clearing is
required following detailed design, requirements under the VMA 1999 should be checked, as well as determining if any
koala trees fall within any proposed clearing areas.
Although no cultural heritage sites are listed for the Gubbi Gubbi traditional owners, the proximity to a creek means
there are cultural heritage values for this site. Duty of care guidelines should be followed in undertaking these works.
The works do not impact on vegetation, but encroach into mapped areas of Riparian Buffer and encroach slightly into
areas of Environmental Protection as per the Biodiversity Overlay Code of the Noosa Plan.
Overall the works are located in existing clear areas which are currently being used for informal carparking on site and will not
require removal of any vegetation.
The resulting new hardstand areas could have an adverse impact on water quality of Cooroy Creek, however it is proposed to
remediate the existing biobasins which are not currently functioning as per current design standards. This will result in an overall
improvement in the quality of stormwater entering Cooroy Creek, which will improve the water quality in the creek, which in turn
will contribute to improving riparian values and habitat values.
If you require any further information, please contact me on 5474 9081 or 0401 570 753.
Yours faithfully,
Callaghan & Toth
Jane Davissen BE Environmental
Senior Environmental Engineer
Please view www.callaghanandtoth.com.au for all information on our company profile and terms and conditions for services rendered.
X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill
Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 16
Page 17
ATTACHMENT A: NDLC Flora and Fauna Survey Report X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 17
Page 18
Ecological Assessment Report for
Proposed Hinterland Adventure
Playground
Lower Mill Site
Cooroy
Noosa Shire Council
Page 19
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland
Adventure Playground
September 2019
This document has been prepared by Noosa & District Landcare Inc.
Disclaimer:
Conclusions drawn in this report are based on available information at the time of writing. Any additional
information may alter such conclusions and the author reserves the right to do so if such information becomes
available. This report has been made as at the date of the report and should be reviewed consistently
throughout construction of the proposed development or if there are any changes in circumstance. The views
expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the participating organisations. Changes to available
information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date
information.
To the extent permitted by law Noosa & District Landcare does not accept liability for any loss or damage which
any person may suffer arising from any negligence or breach of contract on its part. This report was prepared
for the benefit of the party to whom it is directed only and for the purpose identified within. Noosa & District
Landcare does not accept responsibility to any other person for the contents of the report.
Document Tracking
Revision Date Description Author/s Reviewed by:
A 21st August 2019 Prepared draft Raphael O’Flynn Phil Moran
report Rachel Lyons
B 4th September 2nd Draft with Raphael O’Flynn Rachel Lyons
2019 additional client
requirements
C 26th September Draft edition for Raphael O’Flynn Rachel Lyons
2019 client review
D Final Report
All photographs within this document are taken by Raphael O’Flynn unless otherwise stated
2
Page 20
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................. 5
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 6
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 8
1.1 Purpose and scope of the report ................................................................................................................. 8
1.2 Survey team ...................................................................................................................................................... 9
1.3 Survey area description ................................................................................................................................. 9
1.3.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
1.3.2 Regional Ecosystems Present ............................................................................................................... 9
1.3.3 Current landuse and background history ........................................................................................ 10
2. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................... 11
2.1 Desktop survey .............................................................................................................................................. 11
2.2 Field Survey..................................................................................................................................................... 11
2.2.1 Plant Survey ............................................................................................................................................ 11
2.2.2 Vertebrate Survey ................................................................................................................................. 11
2.2.3 Equipment Used Across Methods ..................................................................................................... 14
3. Results..................................................................................................................................................................... 15
3.1 Matters of National Environmental Significance ................................................................................... 15
3.1.1 Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC) ..................................................................................... 15
3.1.2 Threatened Flora ................................................................................................................................... 15
3.1.3 Threatened fauna .................................................................................................................................. 15
3.1.4 Weeds of National Significance ......................................................................................................... 16
3.2 Matters of State Environmental Significance ......................................................................................... 16
3.2.1 Threatened Flora ................................................................................................................................... 16
3.2.2 Threatened Fauna ................................................................................................................................. 17
3.3 General Observations ................................................................................................................................... 17
3.3.1 Bird............................................................................................................................................................ 17
3.3.2 Reptile ...................................................................................................................................................... 18
3.3.3 Amphibian ............................................................................................................................................... 18
3.3.4 Small Mammals ..................................................................................................................................... 18
3.3.5 Other Species ......................................................................................................................................... 20
3.4 Watercourse and drainage features ......................................................................................................... 21
3.5 Fauna habitat and potential breeding places ......................................................................................... 21
4. Legislation Assessment for Proposed Development.................................................................................... 23
4.1 EPBC Act 1999 ................................................................................................................................................ 23
4.2 Vegetation Management Act 1999 ........................................................................................................... 23
3
Page 21
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
4.3 Nature Conservation Act 1992 ................................................................................................................... 24
4.4 Water Act 2000 .............................................................................................................................................. 24
5.0 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................. 26
6.0 References ........................................................................................................................................................... 27
7. Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................ 29
7.1 Appendix A - Map of the area with notable points indicated ............................................................. 29
7.2 Appendix B Complete species list resulting from Flora Survey .......................................................... 30
7.2.1 Endemic species .................................................................................................................................... 30
7.2.1 Introduced Plant species ..................................................................................................................... 33
7.3 Appendix C Complete species list compiled from bird survey of transect 1&2 .............................. 35
7.4 Appendix D Lower Mill Site, Category R – Regrowth Water Course Vegetation mapping – Qld
Globe ....................................................................................................................................................................... 37
7.5 Appendix C Lower Mill Site, High Ecological Significant Wetland mapping – Qld Globe.............. 38
Appendix E Lower Mill Site Protected Plants Trigger – Qld Globe............................................................ 39
4
Page 22
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
List of Abbreviations
ADVCC - Accepted Development Vegetation Clearing Code
Biosecurity Act – Biosecurity Act 1994
Category R – Reef Regrowth Watercourse Vegetation area under the Regulated Vegetation
Management Map
DES – Department of Environment & Science
DNRME – Department of Natural Resources, Mines & Energy
EPBC Act – Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
LMS – Lower Mill Site
LUNKERS – Little Underwater Neighbourhood Keepers Encompassing Rheotactic Salmonids.
MNES – Matters of National Environmental Significance
MSES – Matters of State Environmental Significance
NC Act – Nature Conservation Act Queensland 1992
NDLG - Noosa & District Landcare Group
PMST – Protected Matters Search Tool
RE – Regional Ecosystem
RV – Recreational Vehicle
RVMM - Regulated Vegetation Management Map
SQW – Skilling Queensland for Work Program
SUV – Sport Utility Vehicle
TEC – Threatened Ecological Communities
VMA – Vegetation Management Act 1999
Water Act – Water Act 2000 Queensland
WoNS – Weed of National Significance
5
Page 23
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Executive Summary
This report provides a description of the ecological survey undertaken for the Lower Mill Site,
Cooroy, Queensland in the Noosa Shire Council. The survey was conducted by Noosa & District
Landcare in August 2019.
The key findings of the ecological survey are summarized as:
Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES)
No mapped remnant or regrowth Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC) as defined
under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 2000 (EPBC Act) were
detected, however the rehabilitated vegetation at the site is considered to be consistent
with recovering Regional Ecosystems 12.3.1, which is included within the ‘Lowlands
Rainforest of Subtropical Australia’ TEC.
No Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act) listed threatened
flora or fauna were detected.
Two Weeds of National Significance (WoNS) were detected:
- Asparagus aethiopicus cv. Sprengeri (Basket asparagus)
- Lantana camara var. camara (Lantana)
Matters of State Environmental Significance (MSES)
No mapped remnants of ‘Endangered’ or ‘Of Concern’ Regional Ecosystems (RE) under
the Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VMA) were detected at the LMS.
It should be noted however that directly upstream of the site is remnant RE 12.3.2
(VMA – ‘Of Concern’) and directly downstream of the site is remnant 12.3.1 (VMA –
‘Endangered’).
Portions of the Lower Mill Site is deemed as ‘Category R – Reef Regrowth Watercourse
Vegetation’ under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VMA).
One specimen was detected on site, Mallotus megadontus (Toothed Mallotus), which is
listed as Vulnerable under Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NCA)
The Cooroy Creek is listed as a ‘Major Water Course’ under the Water Act 2000
assessment, and is part of the Upper Mary River Subcatchment.
No lakes, springs or significant wetlands were detected.
The construction of viewing platforms on the Cooroy Creek involving the clearance of existing
vegetation and excavation of the creek bed, is only possible if an exemption is granted under
schedule 21 of the Planning Regulation 2017 or through an Accepted Development Vegetation
Clearing Code (ADVCC) under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the Planning Act 2016. The
reserve tenure and freehold tenure have different requirements for exemptions to be granted and
are outlined in the relevant sections of this report.
6
Page 24
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Under the Water Act 2000, the construction of two viewing platforms over Cooroy Creek (requiring
removal of a small amount of vegetation and excavation within the bed and bands of a water
course), will require an application of a permit to Department of Natural Resources, Mines & Energy
(DNRME) by the owner of the property. The required permit is a ‘Riverine Protection Permit’ (RPP).
Through the assessment undertaken for this report, NDLG has determined that this project will not
impact on any remnant TEC’s, internationally or nationally important wetlands, lakes and springs.
The project will not significantly impact any documented EPBC and or NCA listed threatened species
populations or their habitats within the proposed work areas, however precautionary actions are
recommended to alleviate impact to species during construction.
It should be taken into consideration that the aim of the long term revegetation of this site over the
last 20 years is to connect threatened Ecological Communities both upstream (12.3.1) and
downstream (12.3.2) of the site, and to improve freshwater aquatic habitat values. Therefore
appropriate caution and buffers need to be set in place before construction begins to manage the
impact of development on environmental values. NDLG recommends best practice management,
including but not limited to the construction of exclusion barriers and installation of appropriate
sediment control methods to limit the disruption of the revegetated riparian zone of Cooroy Creek.
7
Page 25
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose and scope of the report
This report provides a description of an ecological observational assessment undertaken for Noosa
Shire Council for the proposed site of the Hinterland Adventure Playground, Cooroy, Queensland.
The present site is currently known as the Lower Mill Site (LMS).
The results of the assessment are based on initial desktop assessment followed by field survey(s) to
confirm the flora and fauna species on site. The purpose of the report is to provide a description of
potential ecological constraints and values that may fall within the site area.
Noosa & District Landcare Group (NDLG) was requested to undertake the following assessments for
Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) and Matters of State Environmental
Significance (MSES) within the proposed LMS area, central to the township.
NDLG concentrated survey effort to establish the impact of the proposal on Matters of National and
State Significance. The following items were specifically requested by Council:
MNES:
Assess the presence or absence of any listed Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC);
Provide location and description of any threatened flora listed under the Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act);
Record the occurrence of any Weeds of National Significance (WoNS); and,
Assess the likelihood of occurrence of threatened fauna listed under the EPBC Act.
MSES:
To describe and identify each regional ecosystem (RE) present;
Provide location and description of any threatened flora listed under the Nature
Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act);
Provide location and description of any Special Least Concern plants (SLC plants) or fauna
(SLC fauna) as listed under the Nature Conservation (Wildlife Management) Regulation 2006
(NC Mgt Reg);
Record the occurrence of any invasive weeds scheduled as restricted biosecurity matter
under the Biosecurity Act 2014 (Biosecurity Act);
Assess the likelihood of occurrence of threatened fauna listed under the NC Act;
Provide location and characteristics of representative fauna habitat features and breeding
places; and,
8
Page 26
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Comment on the presence, nature and location of watercourses (as defined by the Water
Act 2000), referable wetlands and springs.
Subsequent request was made by Council to assess any legislative requirements for the
construction of the Facility in accordance with plan 180410_Cooroy Hinterland
Playground_Tender update_Nov18 pp43&44 with particular attention to the construction of
viewing platforms 1&2, the removal of planted sedges from a constructed drainage line and the
construction of a carpark at the rear of the Ritek site.
1.2 Survey team
The field survey team was led by Phil Moran of NDLG (vegetation) and Raphael O’Flynn (fauna) with
the assistance of Skilling Queensland for Work (SQW) trainees Conor Adams and Josie Stephenson.
1.3 Survey area description
1.3.1 Location
The survey area is located in the hinterland township of Cooroy, South East Queensland, within the
Noosa Shire Council (Figure 1) Lot and plan numbers include: 7SP173771, 5SP213104, 2RP47020,
1RP153299, 2RP153299 and 3SP230055. Central latitude and longitude point is -26.4146, 152.9103.
The site is bounded by Mary River Road/Maple Street in the west and Marara Street to the east.
Cooroy Creek flows through the site approximately from south to north. Figures 1 and 2 show the
proposed development area.
Figure 1: LMS looking towards Cooroy Figure 2: LMS. Cooroy Creek riparian zone
Township and the Council library with Mary River Road in the top left corner.
1.3.2 Regional Ecosystems Present
The survey area is identified by Department of Environment & Science (DES) Regional Ecosystem
mapping as ‘non-remnant vegetation, cultivated or built environment’.
9
Page 27
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
The LMS however is mapped as a ‘Category R – Reef Regrowth Watercourse Vegetation’ zone.
Bordering the northern edge of the site is remnant Regional Ecosystem (RE) 12.3.2 Wet Eucalypt
Open Forest, which is listed as ‘Of Concern’ (VMA) and at the southern tip of the site is remnant RE
12.3.1 Complex Notophyll Vine Forest which is listed as ‘Endangered’ (VMA).
1.3.3 Current landuse and background history
The site is a recreational parkland. There are large areas of open lawn used by local residents for
walking and pet exercise, with limited day-use SUV and RV parking.
The area is used intermittently by market garden stalls and small festivals.
Over the last decade the riparian zone of the Cooroy Creek has undergone revegetation and weed
management activities to restore the RE 12.3.1 Complex Notophyll Vine Forest habitat. One such
project included recreating overhang habitat
along the creek bank called LUNKERS. (Little
Underwater Neighbourhood Keepers
Encompassing Rheotactic Salmonids). Refer to
Figure 3. It is an adaptation of recreated fish
habitat to suit the breeding needs of the
Endangered (EPBC) Giant Barred Frog, Myxophyes
iterates. The LMS is at its northern most range of
this species but has been known to be found in
many areas of the Mary River. The LUNKERS site
became the focal point of several community
plantings and provided an opportunity for
education and investigation for school groups and
community groups such as the local scouts. The
location of the LUNKERS is shown on the map in
Appendix A.
Figure 3: LUNKERS site accessed off Marara St, Cooroy
10
Page 28
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
2. Methodology
2.1 Desktop survey
Desk top assessment was conducted prior to field survey which included investigation of the
following datasets:
Regional Ecosystems and Remnant Vegetation – biodiversity status (DSITI 2017a)
Essential Habitat Mapping (DNRM 2017);
Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger Map (DEHP 2017b);
Referable Wetlands Mapping (DEHP 2017c);
Wildlife Online fauna and flora records (DSITI 2017c);
Ordered Stream Mapping (DNRM 2010);
The searches were conducted using online spatial layers (through Queensland Globe predominantly)
through searches using lot/plan details as a reference or the coordinates -26.4139, 152.9103 which
correspond to the approximate centre point of the Survey Area with a 10 km buffer. These datasets
provided a baseline for subsequent field assessment.
2.2 Field Survey
2.2.1 Plant Survey conducted by Phil Moran
A complete walk-through of the entire site was conducted to establish a plant species list with a note
of natural regeneration and recruitment, compared to planted tube stock from the revegetation of
the site.
A particular note of EPBC & NCA listed plant species was taken, from least concerned through to
endangered status, with GPS point of identified plants listed vulnerable and above recorded.
A detailed list of all plant species present was also generated including weed species and is
contained in Appendix B.
2.2.2 Vertebrate Survey conducted by Raphael O’Flynn accompanied by SQW trainee.
Vertebrate surveys were conducted for both diurnal and nocturnal species.
Diurnal survey
Bird:
2 x 100m transect survey sites completed by 2 observers.
Walk through the transect site, stopping every 25m for 10 minute time frame to observe –
fly overs were included in the count, as were calls and sightings.
11
Page 29
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Hand held audio recorder was used for accurate identification.
2 complete surveys completed at optimal spotting time: 4:00pm-5:00pm – Bird transect 1
6:00am-8:00am – Bird transect 1&2
All opportunistic calls and sightings were noted.
Nocturnal birds noted during nocturnal survey.
Reptile:
Opportunistic observation only – no trapping undertaken.
Slow walk through of entire site noting particular habitat with some slight disturbance of
vegetative material, ie moving logs and mulch material where appropriate.
Time: 1 hour walk through from 9:30am (please note the timing of the survey is winter and
cooler so is not be optimal time for reptile activity).
Nocturnal survey
Amphibian
Walk through the site concentrating on particular habitats.
Hand held recording device deployed to aid identification of calls in conjunction with
observation techniques to identify species.
Technique includes use of torch beam and triangulation of call.
Photographs taken where possible to aid in identification.
Time: 2 hours 5-7pm
Small Mammal
1) Spotlighting
Spotlighting survey was completed over an approximate 2 hour time frame for opportunistic
recording.
Use of Reconyx Infrared remote camera set up at sand plot to capture night activity.
Careful walk through entire site over the time frame.
Time: 6pm - 7:15pm
2) Sand plots (without bait)
A record of tracks was set up overnight on a recognised fauna trail in an attempt to record
tracks of night time foragers. Footprints are most identifiable in firm, slightly damp sand (a
12
Page 30
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
clay component helps hold the footprint). Store bought fine paver sand was used in this
instance.
Track identification was undertaken early the following morning with the sun behind the
observer - when tracks are fresh, before the sand has dried and before the wind has blurred
the imprint.
Identification of footprints also took into account the gait, including the position of the front
feet relative to the back feet and the locomotion type (quadrupedal, bipedal; hop, bound or
stride).
Measurements were taken with a tape measure or ruler and recorded to the nearest
millimetre.
All tracks were photographed.
Figure 4 depicts the setup of the sand plots with the infrared camera focused at this area.
Generic fine grain paver sand was used for the sand plots.
Figure 4: Setup of sand plots on the creek bank by Conor Adams SKQ trainee.
Nocturnal bird
Relevant bird species were noted at this time, using call back play on a phone app and
connected amplifier. Any responding calls were noted and recorded using the hand held
Zoom® recorder if possible.
13
Page 31
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Pre-recorded nocturnal bird calls were played 3 times at 10 min intervals recording any
response. Particular species calls used included Ninox strenua (Powerful Owl), Tyto alba
(Barn owl), Aegotheles cristatus (Owlet-nightjar) and Podargus strigoides (Tawny
frogmouth).
2.2.3 Equipment Used Across Methods
Binoculars
Hand held recorder x 2
SD cards
Reconyx camera
Reconyx camera lock and security
chain
Phone camera
Bird call back facility on mobile phone
Amplifier for call back
Sand and marker for sand plot(s)
Record sheets
High beam torch with red filter
Personal head lamp
Flagging tape
Ruler
14
Page 32
3. Results
3.1 Matters of National Environmental Significance
3.1.1 Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC)
As predicted in the Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST), there was no mapped remnant TEC found
at this site, however it is identified as a TEC (‘Lowlands Rainforest of Subtropical Australia’) that is
regrowth or rehabilitating. As such, the ‘Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1’ of the EPBC Act would
deem the development proposal to not require referral to the EPBC Act.
The riparian zone of Cooroy Creek has over the past two decades, been the focus of several funded
projects to undertake revegetation and weed management. The aim of these projects was to move
towards regeneration of the Endangered RE 12.3.1 (‘Lowlands Rainforest of Subtropical Australia’
TEC) which was present on site before land clearance.
3.1.2 Threatened Flora
Under the Regional Ecosystem 12.3.1 classification there is potential for Xanthostemon oppositifolius
(Southern Penda), Fontainea rostrata (Deep Creek fontainea) , Macadamia integrifolia (Macadamia
Nut) and M. ternifolia (Small-fruited Queensland Nut), to occur on site. However, no individuals of
these species were found on this site
3.1.3 Threatened fauna
There are a number of fauna species that are listed within the EPBC that could potentially be found
at this site on an intermittent basis or have been sighted anecdotally in the past few years. Table 1
lists these species.
Table 1: Potential Species for LMS
Scientific Name Common Name EPBC status
Mixophyes iterates Giant Barred Frog Endangered
Pteropus poliocephalus Grey-headed flying-fox Vulnerable
Phascolarctos cinereus Koala Vulnerable
At the time of the survey none of these species were observed. However the survey was undertaken
in winter when detection of Mixophyes iterates (Giant Barred Frog), or any frog species, is difficult.
15
Page 33
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
3.1.4 Weeds of National Significance
Weeds of National Significance (WoNS) detected on site are listed in table 2.
Two WoNS plants were detected on site: Asparagus aethiopicus cv. Sprengeri and Lantana camara
var. camara with a number of introduced species with restricted classification under Biosecurity Act.
A number of introduced plant species were also detected on the site. For a detailed list of flora
species on site please refer to Appendix B.
Table 2: WoNS detected on LMS
Botanical name Common name Biosecurity risk
Asparagus aethiopicus cv. Sprengeri Basket asparagus WoNS
Restricted -Biosecurity
Lantana camara var. camara Lantana WoNS
Restricted - Biosecurity
3.2 Matters of State Environmental Significance
3.2.1 Threatened Flora
Mallotus megadontus (Toothed mallotus), shown in Figure 5 is listed as ‘Vulnerable’ under the NC
Act. One specimen was located on the site at coordinates -26.4145, 152.9107. Please refer to map in
Appendix A for exact site location.
Figure 5: Mollotus megadontus, detected on LMS.
16
Page 34
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
3.2.2 Threatened Fauna
Potential species given the vegetation and landscape position, that are considered threatened under
the NC Act are listed in table 3
Table 3: Potential species listed under NC Act
Scientific Name Common Name NC status
Ornithoptera richmondia Richmond Birdwing Butterfly V
Litoria pearsoniana Pearson’s Frog/Cascade Frog V
Adelotus brevis Tusked Frog V
Calyptorhynchus lathami Glossy Black-Cockatoo (Eastern) V
At the time of the survey no individuals of the species in Table 3 were observed, however due to the
survey being held in winter, detection of frogs and the Ornithoptera richmondia (Richmond Birdwing
Butterfly) is unlikely and/or difficult.
It needs to be outlined that these species have been sighted in past observations at LMS and
absence during this survey could be due to seasonal timing.
3.3 General Observations
3.3.1 Bird
A number of bird species were observed during the survey with no listed threatened species
identified. A pair of Calyptorhynchus funereus (Yellow-tailed Black Cockatoo), listed as ‘Secure Least
Concern’ under the NCA, were observed feeding on Banksia robur (Swamp Banksia) seed capsules
outside of the Bird transect (Figure 6)
17
Page 35
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Figure 6: A pair of Yellow-tailed Black Cockatoo feeding on Banksia robur.
No Nocturnal bird calls were recorded.
For a detailed list of avian species on site please refer to Appendix C.
3.3.2 Reptile
No reptiles were observed on site. This could be due to seasonal timing as the temperature was cool
at the time of survey.
3.3.3 Amphibian
The single species of Litoria peronii (Peron’s Tree Frog/Emerald Spotted Tree Frog) was heard calling
but not sighted.
Please note that it is recommended further amphibian surveys be undertaken during the months of
December through to March after rain period, as this is the peak calling and breeding season with
environmental conditions at an optimum for frogs.
3.3.4 Small Mammals
A fore-paw print identified as a Trichosurus caninus (Short Eared Possum) was imprinted on the sand
plot. The infrared camera captured a Short Eared Possum (presumably the same individual) around
the sand plot (Figures 7,8, & 9).
18
Page 36
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Figure 7: Fore print of Short Eared Figure 8: The sand plot with the fore print circled.
Possum found in sand plots Other tracks were quite confused and unidentifiable.
Figure 9: The Reconyx® infrared camera shot to identify the Short Eared Possum at the sand plots.
A single Hydromys chrysogaster (Rakali or Water Rat), was observed feeding under the Mary River
Road Bridge during the bird observation of transect 2.
Whilst at the creek edge of the LUNKERS site just on dusk, unidentified species of microbat were
observed on their fly out to feed.
19
Page 37
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Scat of what has been identified as Lepus europaeus (European Hare), was located on the grassed
area adjacent the car park near the library (Figures 10 & 11)
Figure 10: Scat identified as hare located on the Figure 11: Hare scat location
mown grassland opposite the library carpark circled in red
3.3.5 Other Species
Whilst not included in the survey parameters it is noteworthy to comment on other species
observed at the LMS.
Eels in the creek near the LUNKERS site have been identified as possibly Anguilla obscura (Pacific
Shortfin Eel).
A well-established hive of Apis mellifera (European Bee) was located within a large eucalypt tree
(Figure12). For exact location please refer to the map in Appendix A.
Figure 12: European bee hive on western side of Cooroy Creek
20
Page 38
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
3.4 Watercourse and drainage features
The LMS has a ‘major water course’ as defined by the Water Act 2000 of Cooroy Creek running
through the centre of the site and is a section of the Upper Mary River subcatchment (Figure 13).
In times of extreme heavy rainfall events the site can become inundated.
No listed wetlands, lakes or springs were detected on site.
Figure 13: The Cooroy Creek runs centrally through the LMS
3.5 Fauna habitat and potential breeding places
Potential habitat breeding examples can be found in hollow bearing logs, log piles, and hollow
bearing trees (Figures 14, 15 &16). Present was a Pseudocheirus peregrinus (Common Ringtail
Possum) drey in the edge of the park area (Figure 17). Also present are a number of potential
breeding sites for reptiles and insects including butterfly larvae attracting plant species.
Past surveys of the creek water habitat indicated a good creek quality with a reasonable abundance
and diversity of macroinvertebrates, with average low turbidity. This reading varies dramatically
during rain periods or rain events. A macroinvertebrate survey and water quality survey was not
required as part of this project undertaking however NDLG recommends this to occur as a means of
monitoring construction work impacts.
21
Page 39
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Figure 15: Old tree stump on forest
floor is potential habitat for a number
Figure 14: Potential habitat tree with of species.
future hollows along western side of creek
bank.
Figure 16: Rocks and leaf litter mulch is potential habitat for a number of
species including frogs, skinks and a large number of invertebrate species.
Figure 17: Common Ringtail Possum drey.
22
Page 40
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
4. Legislation Assessment for Proposed Development.
4.1 EPBC Act 1999
Under the Commonwealth EPBC Act, in conjunction with the Approval Bilateral Agreements
Queensland, self-assessment by the proponent or representatives would deem the proposal
(including the installation of 2 x viewing platforms) to NOT pose a Significant Impact to Threatened
species, Ecological Community or other Matter of National Significance such as a Heritage Place, or
Wetlands of National Significance. Therefore the proposal does not require referral to the
Commonwealth Environment Department.
4.2 Vegetation Management Act 1999
Under the VMA, the area of Cooroy Creek in the Lower Mill Site is identified to contain ‘Category R’
area vegetation on the Regulated Vegetation Management Map (RVMM). This category of
vegetation is known as: native woody vegetation on freehold land, Indigenous land or leasehold land
granted for agriculture or grazing purposes, located within 50 metres of a watercourse in the
Burdekin, Mackay, Whitsunday and Wet Tropics Great Barrier Reef catchments.
The construction of viewing platforms on the Cooroy Creek involving the clearance of existing
vegetation (and regrowth) and excavation of the creek bed, is only possible if an exemption is
granted under schedule 21 of the Planning Regulation 2017 or through an Accepted Development
Vegetation Clearing Code (ADVCC) under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the Planning
Act 2016. The reserve tenure and freehold tenure have different requirements for exemptions to be
granted.
In regards to land held by Council as trustee, the Cooroy Creek is mapped as non-tidal boundary
watercourse under the Land Act and clearing for the platforms will require authorisation from the
Chief Executive administering the Land Act as per schedule 21, part 2, section 7(a) of the Planning
Regulation 2017 and then clearing could occur under schedule 21, part 2, section 7(b) (iv) of the
Planning Regulation 2017.
Noosa Council will be required to submit a request for exemption which can be made to:
[email protected]
Clearing native vegetation for the platforms in ‘Category R’ areas on the adjacent freehold land
owned by Noosa Shire is likely to be able to occur under the routine management exemption—
23
Page 41
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
schedule 21, part 2, section 2(h)(i) of the Planning Regulation 2017. For confirmation mapping
regarding this legislation please refer to Appendices D – E.
It is the opinion of NDLG that the car park construction on the Ritek site will not impede on any
regrowth vegetation or effect any Ecological Communities in any way, providing suitable barriers are
installed to prevent damage or sediment runoff into the water way.
Further, clearing of planted sedge vegetation within the constructed drainage line through the
centre of the site, will also not trigger any approvals required under State VMA legislation.
4.3 Nature Conservation Act 1992
The protection of NCA vulnerable fauna species and plant species such as Mallotus megadontus
(Toothed Mallotus) is required under the NCA 2000.
Protection of the single Mallotus megadontus plant is compatible with the proposed development,
being located outside of the footprint of the works.
Protection of potential fauna species such as Adelotus brevis (Tusked Frog) which may present itself
in a summer period survey within the impact area, is possible through the use of Spotter Catchers
prior to and during construction and vegetation clearing within riparian areas. Spotter Catchers can
locate and translocate any individual frogs. Please note that it is recommended further amphibian
surveys be undertaken during the months of December through to March after a rain period, as this
is the peak calling and breeding season with environmental conditions at an optimum for frogs.
4.4 Water Act 2000
Under the Water Act 2000, the construction of two viewing platforms over Cooroy Creek (requiring
removal of a small amount of vegetation and excavation within the bed and banks of a water
course), will necessitate a permit to be issued by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines &
Energy (DNRME) to the owner of the property. The required permit to be sought is a ‘Riverine
Protection Permit’ (RPP).
RPP’s are of no charge but may take 30 business days or more to process. Applications can be made
via the following link
https://www.dnrme.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1394436/w2f008-riverine-
protection-permit.pdf
24
Page 42
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
The following is an excerpt of the Water Act 2000 applicable to the above application:
Part 4 Riverine protection
Division 1 Granting permits for destroying vegetation, excavating or placing fill in a watercourse, lake or spring
218 Applying for permit to destroy vegetation, excavate or place fill in a watercourse, lake or spring
(1) A person may apply to the chief executive for a permit (a riverine protection permit) to do any or all of the following
activities—
(a) destroy vegetation in a watercourse, lake or spring;
(b) excavate in a watercourse, lake or spring;
(c) place fill in a watercourse, lake or spring.
(2) Subsection (3) applies if the applicant is neither of the following in relation to land that wholly contains the watercourse,
lake or spring or the part of the watercourse, lake or spring where the activity is to take place—
(a) the registered owner of the land;
(b) the holder of a mineral development licence or a mining lease under the Mineral Resources Act for the land.
(3) The application must include the written consent of the registered owners of land—
(a) wholly containing the length of the watercourse in which the activity is to take place or the part of the lake or
spring where the activity is to take place; or
(b) adjoining the watercourse, lake or spring where the activity is to take place.
(4)The application must—
(a) be made to the chief executive in the approved form; and
(b) state the proposed activity and the purpose of the activity; and
(c) be accompanied by the fee prescribed by regulation.
Additional information may be required on submission of the permit application including, a
statement of environmental effects, quantity and type of vegetation to be removed and a time
frame of intended works. Additional information that may be required includes: general knowledge
of the seasonal behaviour of the water course; any perceived impacts on the flow of the
watercourse; and, a valid reason for the intended works.
25
Page 43
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
5.0 Recommendations
The following is a list of recommendations to protect the Cooroy Creek riparian zone and
surrounding environmental values:
Best Management Practice implemented for the protection on in-stream habitat values,
including sediment barriers such as silt traps, coir logging and sediment traps.
Macroinvertebrate survey and water quality monitoring upstream and downstream of work
areas to assess water quality throughout the construction of the project.
Minimal disturbance of the revegetated Riparian zone of Cooroy Creek through exclusion
fencing and demarcation of areas of value.
Due to the timing of the survey conducted for this report, it is recommended another
amphibian and reptile survey to be carried out any time during the period of October
through to February at peak activity times where species occurrence is more readily
confirmed.
If a permit for vegetation removal is granted, fauna spotters are to be in place to aid in
removal and relocation of ALL present native species (protected under the NCA) during
riparian clearing and construction works, in particular Adelotus brevis (Tusked Frog) and
Mixophyes iterates (Giant Barred Frog).
26
Page 44
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
6.0 References
Australian Museum 2019 FrogID app for Android mobile phone
BOOBOOK (2017). Ecological Assessment Report. Western Surat Gas Project: Glenora-Eos Expansion
Project Phase 3. Rev 0, dated 31/8/2017. Unpublished consultancy report to Senex.
Commonwealth of Australia (2013), Matters of National Environmental Significance: Significant
impact guidelines 1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Canberra.
Department of Environment & Energy Australian Government 2015 Protected Matters Search Tool:
Interactive Map < https://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/protected-matters-search-tool>
Department of Environment and Science Queensland State Government 2019 What are wetlands?,
WetlandInfo,, Queensland, viewed 5th August
2019, <https://wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/what-are-wetlands/>.
Department of Environmental Science 2018 Queensland State Government 2018 Environment
plants-animals species list/Request a list viewed 5th August 2019
<https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/species-list>
Department of Environmental Science Queensland State Government 2018 Request a map of
Biodiversity Status or Broad Vegetation Group viewed 5th August 2019
<https://apps.des.qld.gov.au/map-request/re-broad-veg-group/>
Department of Environmental Science Queensland State Government 2019. Regional Ecosystem
Description Database (REDD). Version 11.1 Queensland Herbarium, Department of Science,
Information Technology and Innovation, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
<https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/ecosystems/descriptions/download>
Department of Natural Resource and Mines Queensland 2016-2019 Queensland Globe- layers:
Biota/Boundaries/Elevation/Environemnt/Farming/Imagery/Inland Waters/Location/Planning
Cadstre/Transportation viewed 5th August 2019 powered by Esri
<https://qldglobe.information.qld.gov.au/qldglobe/private/nc-lower-mill-site-playground>
Environmental Biodiversity Protection Act 1999 Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
Heavy, J and MacDonald, S 2013 Weeds of the Sunshine Coast Noosa Integrated Catchment
Association Inc., Queensland.
27
Page 45
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
MacDonald, S and Haslam, S 2009 Grasses: Native & Introduced Grasses of the Noosa Biosphere
Reserve & Surrounding Regions. Noosa Integrated Catchment Association Inc., Queensland.
Menkhorst, P and Knight, F 2011 A Field Guide to the Mammals of Australia. 3rd Edition. Oxford
University Press, Sydney.
Nature Conservation Act 1992 Queensland Government (current updated reprint May 2019)
Pizzey & Knight Birds of Australia Digital Edition 2019 Gibbon Multimedia Australia app for android
mobile phone
Slater, P, Slater, P, and Slater, R 2012 The Slater Field guide to Australian Birds. 2nd Edition.
Landsdowne Publishing, Sydney.
Swanson, S 2012 Field Guide to Australian Reptiles. 2nd Edition. Pascal Press, Glebe, NSW.
Water Act 2000 Queensland Government current May 2019
28
Page 46
7. Appendices
7.1 Appendix A - Map of the area with notable points indicated
29
[OCR of page images]
7. Appendices
7.1 Appendix A - Map of the area with notable points indicated
Lower Mill Site, Cooroy
Ecological survey for Noosa Shire Council
WATE G TSS E Ey EG AaFE
ey 8 Bird transect 2
discard pel eV toto
WF Ft SIG eae WBP SSG tere
A product of Logeed lbowted on reat page N
Queensland Globe A
al — eee
‘ Gcrbx 11570
‘ Printed et AB
$a Printdete: ap
Inchidps motectal © fesse of vd 2080, Yeu for PBieden Sk Mertere ORGS Men
Pa ieee ie a a Po nr nec ESC Aare
Isrery totes corgi, A presage ter gm sets 32825 Queensland
ie’ Government
ass
De peteert of Natu ese ueres bing s end Enegy
29
Page 47
7.2 Appendix B Complete species list resulting from Flora Survey
7.2.1 Endemic species
Botanical name Common Name Class –
NCA/ EPBC
Acacia bakeri Marblewood C
Acacia disparrima subsp. Disparrima Hickory Wattle C
Acacia melanoxylon Black Wattle C
Acmena smithii Creek Lily Pily C
Agathis robusta Kauri Pine C
Allocasuarina littoralis Black Sheoak C
Alocasia brisbanensis Cunjevoi C
Alphitonia excelsa Red Ash C
Alphitonia petriei White Ash C
Alpinia caerulea Native Ginger C
Araucaria cunninghamii var. Hoop Pine C
cunninghamii
Archontophoenix cunninghamiana Piccabeen Palm C
Austromyrtus dulcis Midyim C
Baeckea virgata Twiggy Myrtle C
Banksia robur Swamp Banksia C
Baumea articulata Jointed Rush C
Callicarpa pedunculata Velvet Leaf C
Callicoma serratifolia Callicoma C
Callistemon salignus var. salignus Cream Bottlebrush C
Callistemon viminalis Weeping Bottlebrush C
Cayratia clematidea [V] Slender Grape C
Cissus antarctica [V] Kangaroo Vine C
Commersonia bartramia Brown Kurrajong C
Cordyline rubra Red Fruited Palm Lily C
Cryptocarya glaucescens Jackwood C
Cupaniopsis anacardioides Tuckeroo C
Diploglottis australis Native Tamarind C
Dysoxylum mollissimum subsp. Molle Red Bean C
30
Page 48
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Ehretia acuminata Koda C
Elaeocarpus grandis Blue Quandong C
Elaeocarpus obovatus Hard Quandong C
Eucalyptus grandis Flooded Gum C
Eucalyptus tereticornis Qld Blue Gum C
Euroschinus falcatus var. falcatus Ribbon Wood C
Ficus coronata Creek Sandpaper Fig C
Ficus obliqua Small Leaf Fig C
Ficus virens White Fig C
Flindersia australis Crow’s Ash C
Flindersia schottiana Bumpy Ash C
Glochidion ferdinandi Button Cheese Tree C
Glochidion sumatranum Umbrella Cheese Tree C
Gmelina leichhardtii White Beech C
Grevillea robusta Silky Oak C
Guioa semiglauca Guioa C
Harpullia pendula Tulip Wood C
Hovea acutifolia Hovea C
Hymenosporum flavum Native Frangipani C
Jagera pseudorhus Foam Bark C
Lepironia articulata Grey Sedge C
Litsea leefeana Brown Bolly Gum C
Livistona australis Cabbage Palm C
Lomandra longifolia Matt Rush C
Lophostemon confertus Brush Box C
Lophostemon suaveolens Swamp Box C
Ludwigia octovalvis Willow Primrose C
Macaranga tanarius Macaranga C
Maclura cochinchinensis Cockspur C
Mallotus megadontus Toothed Mallotus Vulnerable -
NCA
Mallotus mollissimus Soft Kamala C
Melaleuca quinquenervia Paperbark C
31
Page 49
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Melicope elleryana Pink Euodia C
Mischarytera lautereriana Corduroy Tamarind C
Morinda jasminoides [Vine] Sweet Morinda C
Neolitsea dealbata White Bolly Gum C
Oplismenus undulatifolius Rainforest Beard Grass C
Ottochloa nodosa Ottochloa C
Pandorea pandorana [V] Wonga Vine C
Parsonsia straminea [V] Silk Pod C
Persicaria strigosa Spotted Knotweed C
Petalostigma triloculare Quinine Berry C
Pilidiostigma rhytispermum Plum Myrtle C
Pittosporum revolutum Hairy Pittosporum C
Pittosporum undulatum Native Daphne C
Psychotria loniceroides Hairy Psychotria C
Rhodosphaera rhodanthema Deep Yellow Wood C
Rubus rosifolius var. rosifolius Native Raspberry C
Smilax australis [V] Barb Wire Vine C
Stenocarpus sinuatus Wheel Of Fire C
Stephania japonica [V] Snake Vine C
Symplocos thwaitesii Hazlewood C
Syzygium luehmannii Riberry C
Syzygium oleosum Blue Lily Pily C
Tabernaemontana pandacaqui Banana Bush C
Toona ciliata Red Cedar C
Tristaniopsis laurina Water Gum C
Trophis scandens subsp. Scandens [V] Burny Burny C
Waterhousea floribunda Weeping Lily Pily C
32
Page 50
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
7.2.1 Introduced Plant species
Botanical name Common Name Biosecurity risk
Ageratina riparia Mist Flower Invasive -Biosecurity
Ageratum houstonianum Billy Goat Weed
Asparagus aethiopicus cv. Sprengeri Basket Asparagus WoNS
Restricted -Biosecurity
Baccharis halimifolia Groundsel Bush Restricted - Biosecurity
Bidens pilosa Cobblers Pegs
Celtis sinensis Chinese Elm
Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Laurel Restricted - Biosecurity
Corymbia torelliana Cadaghi
Cuphea carthagenensis Colombian Waxweed
Desmodium uncinatum Silver Leaf Desmodium
Euphorbia cyathophora Painted Spurge
Ipomoea indica [V] Morning Glory Invasive -Biosecurity
Lantana camara var. camara Lantana WoNS
Restricted - Biosecurity
Ligustrum sinense Small Leaf Privet Restricted - Biosecurity
Macrotyloma axillare var. axillare Perennial Horse Gram
Murraya paniculata Mock Orange Invasive -Biosecurity
33
Page 51
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Nephrolepis cordifolia Fishbone Fern
Passiflora suberosa [V] Corky Passionfruit Invasive -Biosecurity
Psidium cattleianum var. cattleianum Cherry Guava
Schefflera actinophylla Umbrella Tree Invasive -Biosecurity
Schinus terebinthifolius Broad Leaf Pepper Restricted - Biosecurity
Senna pendula var. glabrata Easter Cassia Invasive -Biosecurity
Setaria sphacelata Setaria
Sida rhombifolia Paddy’s Lucerne
Solanum americanum Blackberry Nightshade
Solanum mauritianum Tobacco Bush Invasive -Biosecurity
Solanum seaforthianum [V] Climbing Nightshade
Typha ssp Bullrush Invasive -Biosecurity
Verbena bonariensis Verbena
34
Page 52
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
7.3 Appendix C Complete species list compiled from bird survey of transect 1&2
Diurnal Birds
Scientific Name Common Name Status comments
NCA/EPBC
Alectura lathami Australian Brush Turkey C
Cracticus tibicen Australian Magpie C
Geopelia humeralis Barred Shouldered Dove C
Coracina maxima Black Face Cuckoo Shrike C
Macropygia amboinensis Brown Cuckoo-Dove C
Gerygone mouki Brown Gerygone C
Acanthiza pusilla Brown Thornbill C
Myzomela sanguinolenta Dusky Honeyeater C
Eopsaltria australis Eastern Yellow Robin C
Malurus sp Fairy Wren C spp unknown
female sighted
Ailuroedus crassirostris Green Cat Bird C
Rhiidura fuliginisa Grey Fantail C
Dacelo novaeguineae Laughing Kookaburra C
Meliphaga lewinii Lewins Honeyeater C
Manorina melanotis Noisy Minor C
Cracticus nigrogularis Pied Butcher Bird C
Strepera graculina Pied Currawong C
Oriolus sagittatus Olive Backed Oriole C
Trichoglossus haematodus Rainbow Lorikeet C
Cacatua galerita Sulphur Crested Cockatoo C
Corvus orru Torresian Crow C
Smicrornis brevirostris Weebill C
Sericornis frontalis White Brow Scrubwren C
Rhipidura leucophrys Willy Wag Tail C
Observed outside the transect but within LMS
Threskiornis molucca Australian White Ibis C
Chenonetta jubata Australian Wood Duck C
35
Page 53
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Philemon citreogularis Little Friar Bird C
Cacatua tenuirostris Long Billed Corella C
Vanellus miles Masked Lapwing C
Calyptorhynchus funereus Yellow-tailed Black Cockatoo C
36
Page 54
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
7.4 Appendix D Lower Mill Site, Category R – Regrowth Water Course Vegetation
mapping – Qld Globe
37
Page 55
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
7.5 Appendix C Lower Mill Site, High Ecological Significant Wetland mapping – Qld
Globe
38
Page 56
Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Hinterland Adventure Playground – Noosa Shire Council
August 2109 by Noosa & District Landcare
Appendix E Lower Mill Site Protected Plants Trigger – Qld Globe
39
Page 57
ATTACHMENT B: Koala SPP mapping X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 18
Page 58
Map requested: (04/02/2020 15:27:54) Lot: 7 Plan: SP173771 [OCR of page images] Map requested: (04/02/2020 15:27:54) Lot: 7 Plan: SP173771 152°9950°E 182540 152°5010 182°5¢20°E s52°5430°E 152°5¢50E 152°5510E i f i i 2 I — zi |e | Sel Drv® - La MA . ta cour, F A g erdwooe Drive : y 4 \ , \ € 2 f % 5 2 ¢ ‘i n & 2 B | L mg g S ] ry &, # s s Ye 8 a \ Wren Py ! _— eon ie . \ * 3 | : % e 5 é 2 | é : 2/2 g fa SAL y ae 2 7 i. é oot : oy cree Cours e oot I sbhnson Court a } : NOOSA SHIRE GIDE, g io 2 B é f git z 5 = } Th BOR rs 8 hiro Street ¢ ok & SG f Pear Street s of 3 “ Peart Lane £ 2 i et * 2 i é j hans 8 eel LE & Eine = 8 Tp eeeee Diamond Lane | Garnet str Wom ®@COOROY = rane Opal Street 2 t 3 % ‘pat Lane gh # ete Se auby Svet : mee fd iS t 2 9 = 2 HeAOY 3S & Aahgro® ¥ * 1825080 162840 182 58106 162°6420°E 152°5430°E 182°5440°E 152°5050"E 182°550'E 182610 Koala Habitat in South East Queensland (| Lot and Plan Koala SPP - Habitat Values Bushland Habitat While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this data, : LOCALITY DIAGRAM the State of Queensland makes no representations or warranties ME High Value Bushland about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability i for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility MM Medium Value Bushland and all liability (including without limitation, liability in Low Value Bushland negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs which you might incur as a result of the data being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason. Due to varying sources of data, 5 spatial locations may not coincide when overlaid. Medium Value Rehab ilitati In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you Pow Value even ator acknowledge and agree that the State gives no warranty Other Areas of Value N in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, : completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no High Value Other liability (including without limitation, liability in Medium Value Other negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including consequential damage) relating to any use of the data Low Value Other Data must not be used for direct marketing or be used in Generally not suitable breach of the privacy laws. Water Based on or contains data provided by the South East Queensland Koala Habitat Values western SEQ ee eee aces Ms Bushland Habitat Note - These maps are not regulatory. Regulatory maps and Suitable f hab! requirements can be downloaded from the DES website. Further uitable for rehal information in relation to regulatory requirements for Other areas of value development and planning activities should be sought from ., the relevant Local Government Authority or the Generally not suitable Department of Environment and Science. Water o 130 260 390 520 650m Cadastral Boundaries . . . 1 Local Government Boundaries This product is projected into GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56 © The State of Queensland, 2020
Page 59
Map requested: (04/02/2020 15:27:53)
Lot: 7 Plan: SP173771
[OCR of page images]
Map requested: (04/02/2020 15:27:53)
Lot: 7 Plan: SP173771
182°53'50°E ss2's40"e 1825030" 1825040" 182°50'50°E 152°5510°E
\ ! 1 2
& &
“sinaton ‘Dene
: 2 cul :
& f Cordwood py &
rive
Caruthers cou, é +
é ¥
5 %
! é x
: Sete cum cau =
g —#s
s Bug B
& i “
street ron a. g
2
% &
&
| é
9 2 2
g te
= z =
® £ &
2 oe
Agate Street
2 es 2
8 &é g
g we 3 S
: sopomresint “ey :
3 a8
-
rs
Pear Stroot
2
3 PeartLane o
8 % 8
8 AG Diamond Streat e
R & nm Rg
Diamond Lane
£— 3
Opal Street 28
gs
Opaitane
g g Ruby Street
g | @ .
& (Lee
i
i Topaz See
g! %
= ae:
Stee,
fe ea e
g 3 8
g of rs
& e7) &
%
&
%
srsbsoe ese 12500 se ska0e se 5k30e sesh4oe 125150 152 350% 2sbi08
Koala Conservation in South East Queensland State Planning Regulatory Provisions
[J Lot ang Pian While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this data,
Priority Koala Assessable Development Areas LOCALITY DIAGRAM the State of Queensland makes no representations or warranties
Ria hie Becl tA about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability
‘oala Assessable Development Areas for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility
[___] Outside SPRP Koala Assessable Development Areas and all liability (including without limitation, liability in
i negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages (including
Koala SPRP - Identified Broad-Hectare Areas indirect or consequential damage) and costs which you might
(ZZ) Koala SPRP - Identified Broad-Hectare Areas incur as a result of the data being inaccurate or incomplete
= : in any way and for any reason. Due to varying sources of data,
Koala SPRP - Habitat Values spatial locations may not coincide when overlaid.
Bushland Habitat In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you
HE High Value Bushland acknowledge and agree that the State gives no warranty
: in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability,
MM Medium Value Bushland completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no
Low Value Bushland liability (including without limitation, liability in
7 aaa negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including
Suitable for Rehabilitation consequential damage) relating to any use of the data.
: . Data must not be used for direct marketing or be used in
(High Value Rehabilitation breach of the privacy laws,
Medium Value Rehabilitation
cee Based on or contains data provided by the
Low Value Rehabilitation State of Queensland 2010
Other Areas of Value
: Note - These maps are not regulatory. Regulatory maps and
High Value Other requirements can be downloaded from the DES website. Further
Medium Value Other information in relation to regulatory requirements for
development and planning activities should be sought from
Low Value Other the relevant Local Government Authority or the
: Department of Environment and Science.
Generally not suitable
Water 0 130 260 390 520 650m
: |
Cadastral Boundaries
i. _ 1 Local Government Boundaries This product is projected into GDA 1894 MGA Zone 56 © The State of Queensland, 2020
Page 60
ATTACHMENT C: Cultural Heritage Search Report X:\JOBS\CT Projects in progress\2001 env reports for cooroy playground carparks\Correspondence\Reports\ENV\Lower Mill Carpark\EnvironmentalValues_BiodiversityOverlay_Report_LowerMillCarparkExtension_10thFeb2020.doc pg. 19
Page 61
Lot on Plan Search Reference Number: 65172 Lot: 2 Plan: RP47020 LGA: Noosa Shire Buffer Distance: 100 metres There are no Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage site points recorded in your specific search area. There are no Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage site polygons recorded in your specific search area. 3 Feb 2020 15:15
Page 62
Lot on Plan Search
Cultural heritage party for the area is:
QC Ref Number QUD Ref Number Party Name Contact Details
QC2018/007 QUD20/2019 Kabi Kabi First Nation Andrea Olsen
Traditional Owners Native Queensland South Native Title Services
Title Claim Group Limited
Level 10, 307 Queen Street
BRISBANE QLD 4000
Phone: (07) 3224 1200
Fax: (07) 3229 9880
There is no cultural heritage body recorded in your specific search area.
There are no cultural heritage management plans recorded in your specific search area.
There are no Designated Landscape Areas (DLA) recorded in your specific search area.
There are no Registered Study Cultural Heritage Areas recorded in your specific search area.
Regional Coordinator:
Name Position Phone Mobile Email
Andrew Rutch Cultural Heritage 07 3003 6446 0459 840 294 [email protected]
Coordinator Southern
Region
Disclaimer: Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships is the custodian of spatial data provided
by various third parties for inclusion in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage online portal. This
includes spatial data provided by the National Native Title Tribunal and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander parties.
Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships is not responsible for the accuracy of information
provided by third parties or any errors in this search report arising from such information.
3 Feb 2020 15:15
Page 63
Lot on Plan Search
I refer to your submission in which you requested advice regarding Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage
recorded at your nominated location.
The Cultural Heritage Database and Register have been searched in accordance with the location description provided,
and the results are set out in the above report.
Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage which may exist within the search area is protected under the
terms of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 and the Torres Strait Islander Cultural Heritage Act 2003, even if the
Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships has no records relating to it.
Under the legislation a person carrying out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the
activity does not harm Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage. This applies whether or not such places are
recorded in an official register and whether or not they are located on private land.
Please refer to our website https://www.datsip.qld.gov.au/people-communities/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-
cultural-heritage for a copy of the gazetted Cultural Heritage Duty of Care Guidelines, which set out reasonable and
practicable measure for meeting the cultural heritage duty of care.
In order to meet your duty of care, any land-use activity within the vicinity of recorded cultural heritage should not
proceed without the agreement of the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Party for the area, or by developing a
Cultural Heritage Management Plan under Part 7 of the legislation.
If your proposed activity is deemed a Category 5 activity pursuant to the Duty of Care Guidelines, there is generally a
high risk that it may harm cultural heritage. In these circumstances, the activity should not proceed without cultural
heritage assessment.
Where a category 5 activity is proposed, it is necessary to notify the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Party and seek:
a. Advice as to whether the area is culturally significant;
b. If it is, agreement on how best the activity may be managed to avoid or minimise harm to any cultural heritage
values.
The extent to which the person has complied with Cultural Heritage Duty of Care Guidelines and the extent the person
consulted Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Parties about carrying out the activity – and the results of the
consultation – are factors a court may consider when determining if a land user has complied with the cultural heritage
duty of care.
3 Feb 2020 15:15
Page 64
Lot on Plan Search Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Search Approval Officer on 1300 378 401. Kind regards The Director Cultural Heritage | Community Participation | Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships 3 Feb 2020 15:15