Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU22/0051 APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE HARDWARE & TRADE SUPPLIES AT 178 EUMUNDI NOOSA ROAD, NOOSAVILLE (Referred from Planning & Environment Committee dated 10 October 2023 - Item 5.2). · ATTACHMENT 2 – ACTING COORDINATOR PLANNING REPORT

of 14

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

 ATTACHMENT 2 – (MCU22/0051) – ACTING COORDINATOR PLANNING REPORT


REPORT
1.    PROPOSAL
This application seeks approval to establish a hardware and trade supplies yard on a vacant area
to the north of the existing Bunnings Warehouse at Noosaville. The applicant advises the trade
yard will provide for timber and trade supplies primarily to professional builders and trades
customers, rather than being targeted to retail customers, and is expected to operate
independently of the existing bunnings store on the southern portion of the site. The applicant
proposes no changes to the existing Bunnings Warehouse store which has an area of 7,592m2.
The proposed built form will comprise 2 levels, set into the site’s slope with parking for 57 cars
provided in an under croft level beneath the enclosed trade yard for ‘walk in’ customers. A short
term parking area (6 light loading bays) for customers collecting large quantities or bulky items is
also proposed to the building’s rear to enable customers to load from the upper level of the building.
A separate entry and exit are proposed to and from Gateway Drive.
The proposed trade yard will have a gross floor area of 1087m2 and has been designed along a
similar theme to the existing bunnings store, with concrete panels, and upper and lower levels
distinguishable through the white and green colour scheme. The proposed building comprises 2
storeys and is 12.125 metres in height measured to the roof pitch. The trade yard is proposed to
operate Monday to Sunday, 6am to 6pm.




                                          Figure 1 – Locality
Log in to download the original file

ATTACHMENT 2 – ACTING COORDINATOR PLANNING REPORT.pdf · 4.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

Full text of the other 13 pages

Page 2

Figure 2 – Site Plan

ite =" \roe \ tees
5	1	1	1	2	3	1053	556	165	107	19	mH
5	1	1	1	2	4	1322	556	77	15	47	1:20RAMP
5	1	1	1	2	5	1403	548	25	32	92	|,
5	1	1	1	2	6	1441	556	32	15	92	8000
5	1	1	1	2	7	1553	548	46	32	93	15550
5	1	1	1	2	8	1655	556	22	77	47	1
5	1	1	1	2	9	1997	578	40	103	0	f
5	1	1	1	2	10	2063	611	1	32	41	|
5	1	1	1	2	11	2094	554	28	126	21	ti
5	1	1	1	2	12	2179	573	124	103	13	ie
5	1	1	1	2	13	2421	573	59	75	13	—
5	1	1	1	2	14	2742	575	6	10	22	>
5	1	1	1	2	15	2832	582	15	7	93	A
4	1	1	1	3	0	540	732	2305	126	-1	
5	1	1	1	3	1	630	740	6	42	0	|)
5	1	1	1	3	2	693	741	85	59	29	NW
5	1	1	1	3	3	1987	776	26	19	88	o
5	1	1	1	3	4	2047	754	119	57	39	Nf
5	1	1	1	3	5	2693	732	63	126	0	f
5	1	1	1	3	6	2835	776	10	27	34	:
4	1	1	1	4	0	540	781	2305	89	-1	
5	1	1	1	4	1	540	781	873	84	37	he
5	1	1	1	4	2	1430	820	296	50	32	ee;
5	1	1	1	4	3	1987	796	26	55	0	o
5	1	1	1	4	4	2377	822	15	35	20	nite
5	1	1	1	4	5	2601	837	89	21	15	Tee
4	1	1	1	5	0	540	815	2628	201	-1	
5	1	1	1	5	1	540	843	59	101	39	a
5	1	1	1	5	2	633	910	3	25	93	|
5	1	1	1	5	3	686	834	73	124	29	i
5	1	1	1	5	4	810	867	271	77	29	phe
5	1	1	1	5	5	1318	853	164	163	22	ait
5	1	1	1	5	6	1270	887	51	13	71	=
5	1	1	1	5	7	1711	856	15	72	56	:
5	1	1	1	5	8	1987	852	26	111	0	:
5	1	1	1	5	9	2135	815	502	201	56	—,
5	1	1	1	5	10	2681	883	80	89	18	ral
5	1	1	1	5	11	2895	914	97	70	35	sess
4	1	1	1	6	0	561	916	2298	190	-1	
5	1	1	1	6	1	561	942	16	63	47	2
5	1	1	1	6	2	671	929	31	147	35	\
5	1	1	1	6	3	758	924	60	182	41	I
5	1	1	1	6	4	970	934	29	77	37	|
5	1	1	1	6	5	1100	950	28	124	25	Ht
5	1	1	1	6	6	1276	990	41	61	0	=
5	1	1	1	6	7	1480	916	145	100	27	Whe
5	1	1	1	6	8	1987	964	26	43	55	s
5	1	1	1	6	9	2082	1008	11	29	0	,
5	1	1	1	6	10	2187	974	2	2	30	g
5	1	1	1	6	11	2361	935	80	47	36	rn
5	1	1	1	6	12	2403	962	173	121	0	ATTN
5	1	1	1	6	13	2813	1029	2	2	37	|
5	1	1	1	6	14	2856	968	3	3	14	:
4	1	1	1	7	0	803	1016	2006	78	-1	
5	1	1	1	7	1	803	1016	11	64	68	‘
5	1	1	1	7	2	1173	1027	55	49	0	JeED
5	1	1	1	7	3	1567	1073	10	18	79	|
5	1	1	1	7	4	1741	1032	16	42	7	:
5	1	1	1	7	5	2564	1084	20	4	34	en
5	1	1	1	7	6	2612	1034	36	71	33	we
4	1	1	1	8	0	524	1014	2718	212	-1	
5	1	1	1	8	1	524	1082	38	86	46	g
5	1	1	1	8	2	613	1064	196	101	15	NMI
5	1	1	1	8	3	963	1082	8	44	22	|
5	1	1	1	8	4	1137	1073	129	80	35	cite
5	1	1	1	8	5	1501	1014	194	192	19	th
5	1	1	1	8	6	1809	1083	16	70	0	i
5	1	1	1	8	7	1904	1085	35	79	0	2
5	1	1	1	8	8	2377	1108	3	3	14	:
5	1	1	1	8	9	2651	1080	86	146	18	|,
4	1	1	1	9	0	524	1140	2276	159	-1	
5	1	1	1	9	1	524	1171	38	65	32	2
5	1	1	1	9	2	610	1153	3	72	89	|
5	1	1	1	9	3	693	1157	5	131	93	|
5	1	1	1	9	4	806	1140	246	159	5	aE
5	1	1	1	9	5	1114	1150	37	55	0	E
5	1	1	1	9	6	1448	1173	59	33	34	fb
5	1	1	1	9	7	1523	1173	35	33	43	La
5	1	1	1	9	8	1680	1167	15	71	45	3
5	1	1	1	9	9	1809	1154	16	42	0	,
5	1	1	1	9	10	1911	1165	28	66	49	3
5	1	1	1	9	11	2071	1173	29	71	14	/)
5	1	1	1	9	12	2377	1244	3	3	48	——
5	1	1	1	9	13	2412	1221	48	16	34	11000
5	1	1	1	9	14	2558	1212	42	36	13	THM
5	1	1	1	9	15	2667	1183	22	66	31	IM
5	1	1	1	9	16	2744	1236	18	15	12	*
5	1	1	1	9	17	2778	1207	22	44	58	£
4	1	1	1	10	0	524	1223	2281	158	-1	
5	1	1	1	10	1	524	1236	86	81	59	=
5	1	1	1	10	2	671	1272	17	45	46	i
5	1	1	1	10	3	1004	1264	300	35	47	—
5	1	1	1	10	4	1911	1241	28	81	56	2
5	1	1	1	10	5	2068	1223	33	121	49	|
5	1	1	1	10	6	2376	1260	78	94	40	= ‘> 4 2 | Jeo at pit ae J mi ’ Ty} | 9 | ey, E | If ets a —+ , a) oe Ts == ee | E aS | | , | | = ail — UU inp fa a pt | =| | | | = Ea aie | ~S ! : | / —— N00 nna ‘ £ We | | H 1} 1! 4 Ni XS aI . * La : ’ i (Ui |. Le | | J) SS ae | | 2 | | | 1 D> ® 4 | J |} — * \ or

Page 3

Figure 3 – Floor Plan

\\ \ EE} © | lle, a ‘ 7 ln! ale | ow ome | ue Tels 7 >) pth oe TS 5 igs pe | Mie Ie | TW Alec — : Ct —— > | rH ee eT — 7 = Hi ( oe
5	1	1	1	8	7	2842	1432	145	158	10	by
5	1	1	1	8	8	3103	1510	29	40	2	iz
4	1	1	1	9	0	395	1524	2509	238	-1	
5	1	1	1	9	1	395	1559	41	110	16	t
5	1	1	1	9	2	868	1550	7	111	50	3
5	1	1	1	9	3	1255	1528	76	230	10	4
5	1	1	1	9	4	1330	1524	95	238	10	|;
5	1	1	1	9	5	1555	1574	22	73	64	|
5	1	1	1	9	6	1921	1561	85	117	35	2
5	1	1	1	9	7	2428	1543	69	136	39	SE
5	1	1	1	9	8	2640	1547	264	125	46	ess
5	1	1	1	9	9	2981	1562	24	106	46	|
4	1	1	1	10	0	345	1591	2777	246	-1	
5	1	1	1	10	1	345	1754	1	38	72	|
5	1	1	1	10	2	392	1632	47	150	0	h
5	1	1	1	10	3	1007	1670	242	104	49	=
5	1	1	1	10	4	1357	1602	119	185	54	ha
5	1	1	1	10	5	1514	1727	29	62	63	£
5	1	1	1	10	6	1869	1723	1	14	93	|
5	1	1	1	10	7	1931	1650	72	173	40	E
5	1	1	1	10	8	2561	1591	160	246	2	SI
5	1	1	1	10	9	2811	1593	98	238	74	J
5	1	1	1	10	10	2951	1767	9	26	60	|
5	1	1	1	10	11	3119	1677	3	40	59	|
4	1	1	1	11	0	340	1750	2750	220	-1	
5	1	1	1	11	1	340	1836	3	54	81	|
5	1	1	1	11	2	388	1750	51	209	6	H
5	1	1	1	11	3	483	1875	7	66	53	!
5	1	1	1	11	4	953	1763	462	207	27	eS,
5	1	1	1	11	5	1477	1790	53	36	49	‘Oc
5	1	1	1	11	6	1867	1826	3	77	93	|
5	1	1	1	11	7	1917	1783	93	144	35	‘a
5	1	1	1	11	8	2474	1823	88	25	23	nnn
5	1	1	1	11	9	2727	1800	78	60	0	wuntuitt
5	1	1	1	11	10	2916	1790	9	26	13	)
5	1	1	1	11	11	3018	1845	29	25	0	.
5	1	1	1	11	12	3074	1845	16	25	17	if
4	1	1	1	12	0	382	1833	2728	208	-1	
5	1	1	1	12	1	382	1872	31	87	65	\
5	1	1	1	12	2	567	1962	9	7	0	:
5	1	1	1	12	3	980	1892	31	68	45	.
5	1	1	1	12	4	1210	1892	31	68	1	l.
5	1	1	1	12	5	1402	1963	6	7	79	|
5	1	1	1	12	6	1488	1833	69	173	17	S|
5	1	1	1	12	7	1912	1879	39	93	76	H
5	1	1	1	12	8	2416	1888	5	9	4	:
5	1	1	1	12	9	2497	1924	9	26	23	Vi
5	1	1	1	12	10	2745	1924	7	26	45	I
5	1	1	1	12	11	2780	1841	187	200	69	>
5	1	1	1	12	12	3043	1877	67	69	47	5
4	1	1	1	13	0	309	2122	2790	123	-1	
5	1	1	1	13	1	309	2146	9	99	93	|
5	1	1	1	13	2	1889	2136	58	109	0	|T
5	1	1	1	13	3	2466	2131	65	101	0	\|
5	1	1	1	13	4	2557	2122	459	123	18	SESE
5	1	1	1	13	5	2978	2118	28	163	42	'

Page 4

02:4 QYYA 30vuL WINe G3sodoud (- NOILD3S TWNIGNLIONOT TWIIdAL 0/7 HOLS SONINNNG ONLLSIXG OLN! dU ONINIOOY 40 NT ‘N11 ONNOYS TWHNLYN ose 0000 009 Ae eee © ETT TTT TTT ee en a UE are y ~ y —_— ~ 7 a mcme[ 1) geet ano Fil aU ae t 1 — ‘ONDIMYd 14089430NN. RSS Se ——— eee eet re | ‘ ¢ 5 AVMALYS : = SSS SS mame oe | te Bs SSS SSS SSS SSS 41S¥I3d HOIH wiu9g —————~ re a | /_——| OYVA 30V¥L WIng aos aah 5 | ee E a | 1 | swe —EEEESE>FFE~_S>E>_>>__p>p>EE_—_== it : wut see | AdONVO SER SCYMNI $4009 i) mB : 5! | I | 2| ¥I . oO 2: | | | Zl Sl a a a, =; Fr] | | wl ol = 8 z: zi Voi Bi a &| i ‘NISVE ‘JNM 393A WGN “| 00C co | = 3A — ___— | a i AVMGLYS. wae, Es tebe) I ty ‘i Fah DTT TATA AT Se TTT | . ee — : : : h 1 dwaneneerariritin i" cannon i : : : 1 = = Lee Lo ** cuvasovanmnd — | 1 | meee i | tot I gl =e 1 EE —onne-an ano i it i i zi 1 1 gl gl ees Sle! fp ii gg i i $i Gi 2 | tet} 8 Aum cent. eouCws IWC awe womans 108 3TNG3HOS SSHSINIS NOILVA313 = usr “ woz -{-\ I ot lot sae venmors cusss Il aio tt = | AYMGLVO i Je, oe it nee i PE, peeve i / pameeag TT SHAT TTHT AP TRI ALTTT HT ul omen 8 i pease rover anon acne voc oscars L_yuw Taaye cuTneM comme = i ic | ii ii ee ii ig ig i 4 ii is |g ii iz ii i i i ee | i wrt Soweto 9 = wrt -(-\ | sven rece iom smo tomar cues | | ! ; sass ood SS [— : _ ! Leeper ne ‘ ‘on _— Lae Oo OD _ pi ee iat ETI Ft EE Gey rae i i ls See ese | 6|CU Se oF Perey CS bo es TTY | ae | no tais INTE SE ava 30vuL IN : i i oom eee “SOYA SOY NG \ i i i i ! ! ! ! ! | ! ! ! ! ! ! zi zi iz iz

Page 5

                                 Figure 4 – Elevations & Section Plans

2.    SITE DETAILS
2.1. Background
A development approval to Reconfigure 1 lot into 2 lots (REC14/0005) was issued on 4 July 2014.
An application to extend the currency period of this approval was approved on 27 September 2018
extending the currency period to 25 September 2020. An application to further extend the currency
period was approved on 18 September 2020 to 25 March 2023, which included the first 6 month
extension for an applicable event under section 275R (applicable event – Covid 19) of the Planning
Act 2016. This ROL approval remains current due to the further Covid extensions (18 months) and
if enacted, would permit the proposed bulk trade store to be located on a separate lot to the existing
Bunnings store. Figure 5 provides a plan of the approved subdivision layout.
A pre-lodgement meeting was held with the applicant regarding the proposed bulk trade store. At
this meeting concerns were raised that the proposal constituted an expansion of the existing
Bunnings store and an Other Change - impact assessable application, ought to be lodged. A
number of design requirements were also discussed including, car parking, building and landscape
setbacks, building height, building articulation and finishes. These issues as well as stormwater
were similarly raised in the information request to the applicant.

Page 6

                              Figure 5 – Approved Reconfiguring a Lot Plan

2.2. Site Description
The site has an area of 2.6635ha and is zoned Medium Impact Industry. The bulk trade yard
building is located on the northern portion of the site, which is vegetated, though notably this
vegetation is not mapped by the planning scheme’s Biodiversity, waterways and wetlands overlay,
nor the State’s Vegetation mapping.
2.3. Surrounding Land Uses
The site is located in an industrial area with the existing Bunnings Warehouse store fronting
Gateway Drive and Eumundi Noosa Road which is part of the major road network. Land in the
area has been developed for a range of uses, consistent with the planning scheme’s zoning pattern
at the time, including industrial uses, warehouses, service industries, office works, gym, self-
storage and a commercial car wash.
The site directly to the north of the site currently contains two industrial buildings that are accessed
off Vision Court.
3.    ASSESSMENT
3.1. Instruments for Statutory Assessment
Under the Planning Act 2016 the application must be assessed against each of the following
statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the development:
•     State Planning Policy;
•     South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017;
•     Planning Regulation 2017;
•     Noosa Plan 2020.

Page 7

3.2. State and Other Statutory Instruments
State Planning Policy
Noosa Plan 2020 is generally consistent with the State Planning Policy July 2017 (SPP) and the
SPP raises no further issues relevant to the proposed development.
South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan 2017
The site is located within the Urban Footprint of the SEQ Regional Plan. The proposal is consistent
with the regional policies of the SEQ Regional Plan.
Planning Regulation 2017
The following assessment benchmark from the Planning Regulation 2017 applies to the
application:
•     SEQ Development Area
The proposal is for urban activity within the Urban Footprint and is consistent with the assessment
benchmark contained in the Planning Regulation 2017 for the SEQ Region.
3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The site is located in Noosaville and is zoned Medium Impact Industry. The proposed use is
defined as Hardware and trade supplies and is required to follow a code assessable application
process. Accordingly, the application must be assessed against each of the following codes to the
extent they are relevant to the development:
•     Noosaville Local Plan Code;
•     Medim Impact Industry Zone Code;
•     Business Activities Code
•     Works Codes
•     Acid Sulfate Soils Overlay Code
•     Landslide Hazard Overlay Code
•     Regional Infrastructure Overlay Code
3.3.1 Local Plan Code
The site is located within the Noosaville Local Plan, and the following overall and performance
outcomes are most applicable to the proposed development.
(e)   Development design and siting responds to the relatively flat topography of Noosaville by
      creating visual interest and differentiation in built form through design and the application of:
          i.   a range of textures, colours, styles and finishes;
         ii.   a range of architectural elements within the context of a sub-tropical architectural
               theme;
        iii.   varied roof heights, that cumulatively make a positive contribution to an interesting
               skyline;
        iv.    varied setbacks which create opportunities for both landscaping and design variety;
               and
         v.    retention of mature trees and the provision of new landscaping which create attractive
               spaces between buildings.
(o)   Development in the Low Impact Industry zone and the Medium Impact Industry zone
      accommodates a broad range of industry and business uses, avoiding negative impacts on
      the amenity of nearby residential areas.
(p)   Activities in industry zones provide important services and products to the community and
      provide a range of employment types.
PO15
Development in the Low Impact Industry zone and the Medium Impact Industry zone:
a) provides a range of enterprises that contribute to the economic diversity of the Shire and local
   employment options;

Page 8

b) provides important industries and service-related functions to the whole of Noosa Shire but
   particularly the coastal area;
c) offers a range and diversity of employment types;
d) does not accommodate uses better located in a centre zone
e) does not detract from the safe function or amenity of Eumundi Noosa Road, Walter Hay Drive
   or Eenie Creek Road; and
f) does not accommodate uses that would harm the environment, including Eenie Creek, Lake
   Doonella and Lake Weyba, through excessive pollutants.
The proposed use is industrial in nature, providing bulk quantities of construction material for the
construction industry requiring an industrial scale building. The proposed use is not expected to
generate fumes, odour or excessive noise beyond vehicle movements and loading/unloading of
goods, operating predominantly within the building and is well separated from the residential area
to the west. Some further design elements though are needed to create further visual interest to
the street, with the building presentation relatively ‘bland’ comparable to the existing Bunnings
store building.
3.3.2 Zone Code
The site is zoned Medium Impact Industry and is located outside the Gateway Drive West Makers
Precinct under the Noosa Plan. The following overall outcomes from the Medium Impact Industry
Zone Code are most applicable to the proposal:
(a)   development facilitates the efficient use of land for medium impact industries and
      supporting ancillary uses;
(e)   new uses are located, designed and managed to be compatible with surrounding uses and
      development;
(f)   retail sales more appropriately located in business centres, such as shops, showrooms and
      retail-based hardware supplies are avoided, except on land fronting Eumundi Noosa Road
      or Eenie Creek Service Road Noosaville where showrooms may locate;
(k)   buildings are well designed, safe and visually attractive;
(l)   development is low rise building and does not present bulky to the street frontages;
(n)   Building setbacks incorporate attractive landscaped areas to road frontages with greater
      landscape setbacks provided to Eumundi Noosa Road;
The trade yard is consistent with the intent of the zone for industrial uses to locate, with the
applicant advising that no changes are proposed to the Bunnings Warehouse with the store
continuing to operate in accordance with the original approval. The applicant further advises that
in this regard Bunnings Warehouse stores and Bunnings Trade stores are targeted at different
markets/different customer groups and the goods and services are carefully tailored accordingly.
The two types of stores are noted as having a different external appearance and signage with the
trade store design being trade focused. Each store type provides a ‘one-stop shop’ to ensure a
trade customer does not also have to visit a warehouse store and product lines that are likely to
be required by both retail and trade customers are therefore duplicated across both stores.
Ordinarily trade centres are located separately from the retail warehouses, whereas the Noosaville
site will be an exception in that land which happens to be available adjoins the retail warehouse.
The above aspects are considered an important consideration of assessment given that Council
in approving the original Bunnings store, found that the store, while containing a significant retail
component and nursery, also included a significant hardware component and timber sales area
which was consistent with the industrial zoning of the site. The proposed trade store is considered
to provide an industrial use consistent with the intent of the zone.
The following table provides an assessment of the proposal against the key acceptable outcomes
for built form for the Medium Impact Industry zone.

Page 9

 Criteria                           Planning Scheme                        Proposal                 Complies

 Building height
 •   storeys                        2 storeys max                          2 storeys                
 •   metres                         10 metres                              12.12 metres             X

 Site cover/Gross Floor Area Of a compatible scale with Comparable scale 
                             surrounding development    with surrounding
                                                        buildings

 Boundary setbacks
 • Frontage                         6 metres min                           9-11 metres              
 • Side                             0 metres min                           7.2 metres               

 Articulation,   materials     & Well articulated             Limited              X
 finishes                                                     articulation, use of
                                    Mix of external building
                                                              materials, variation
                                    materials
                                                              in roof form, with
                                    Varied Roof Form          colours reflective
                                    Colours      are    muted of the Bunnings
                                    environmental tones       branding

 Landscaped open space              15% of the site, with a 15.7% and 60% 
                                    minimum of 60% forward of (inclusive    of
                                    the building line         biodetention
 Landscaping Setbacks                                         basin)
                                    6 metres min
                                                              9-12.5 metres    



 Carparking                         22 min                                 57 covered               
                                                                           6 light loading bays

 Bicycle Spaces                     12 bicycle spaces                      2 bicycle spaces         X
 End of Trip Facilities*            1 locker per 2 bicycle spaces Nil                               X
                                    and;
 *(required only where 5 +
 spaces are required)               1 shower cubicle with ancillary Nil                             X
                                    change room per 10 bicycle
                                    spaces

The table demonstrates that the proposal meets the key acceptable outcomes, apart from building
height, articulation, materials and finishes and bicycle spaces and end of trip facilities. These
aspects are further discussed below.
Building Height

 Performance Outcome                                        Acceptable Outcome
 PO8
 Buildings and other structures—                            AO8.1
 a) are low rise and have a visual bulk and architectural   Buildings and structures are no more than 10 metres in
      scale consistent with structures on adjoining and     building height..
      nearby land;
 b) have a maximum building height of two storeys;          AO8.2
                                                            Where excavation is required, the maximum portion of

Page 10

    c)    do not visually dominate the street or surrounding     the exposed external façade of the building cannot
          spaces;                                                exceed 10 metres in building height..
    d)    preserve the amenity of surrounding residential
          development including privacy, views and access to
          sunlight; and
    e)    respond to the topography of the site and minimise
          cut and fill where on a sloping site; and
    f)    are well articulated with strong horizontal and
          vertical elements to provide interest to the street.

The proposed building exceeds 10 metres in building height, being 12.12 metres at the roof pitch.
The applicant submits that the proposal meets PO8 as:
•        The subject site is located in a medium impact industry area and adjoins lots that are within the
         Venture Drive Precinct, which promotes medium scale industrial land uses. Uses of this nature
         typically require large, bulkier built form to accommodate industrial activities.
•        Previously the design incorporated parapet walls that extended up beyond roof edges. This
         concealed the roof form. The design has been revised to introduce eaves, and a pitched roof
         is now visible. The effect of this twofold: -
            - The revised design is now consistent in form with the surrounding development, including
               with the form of the development which immediately adjoins at 11 to 13 Vision Court.
            - This has also reduced the height of the building at the northern and southern elevations
               and reduces the apparent mass and bulk of the building when viewed from the street.
•        The proposed development is in context of the development at 11 to 13 Vision Court. This
         adjoining development is now complete and operational. With the introduction of eaves and a
         pitched roof to the proposal, building height is consistent with that of the existing adjoining
         development. A streetscape elevation is provided below.




•




                                        Figure 6 – Applicant’s streetscape elevation

Page 11

•   Front setback is now between 9m to 12m from the street frontage (not including the land
    dedication for road reserve widening). This is up to double the minimum 6m setback sought by
    planning scheme acceptable outcomes.
•   To further soften appearance of the development from the street, the increased front setback
    will incorporate a landscape buffer to the Gateway Drive frontage. The buffer will be ‘three
    tiered’ and consist of a variety of species including canopy trees, feature shrubs and ground
    covers. This approach will ensure the proposed building is screened by vegetation from
    Gateway Drive which will further contribute to reducing any potential visual dominance.
•   Articulation will be provided by demarcating the upper and lower levels through paint colour.
    Upper level will be painted in Bunnings traditional green colour. Lower level will be white.
    Grooves in and between the concrete panels will be expressed to provided finer level detail,
    texture and variation.
Buildings in the area range in height as follows:
    • Office Works – opposite the site – 10 metres
    • Existing Bunnings Store - 12 metres from natural ground level and 9.5m from finished ground
       level
    • 11 to 13 Vision Court - conditioned to 10 metres.
    • Gateway Drive frontage buildings - 10 metres or less in height.
The proposed building façade to Gateway Drive exceeds the height of the buildings in the
surrounding area, but is considered to be in context with development in the area as partly
illustraded in figure 6 above.
The site generally sits lower than 11-13 Vision Court and the existing Bunnings Store noting that
significant earthworks including filling and excavation and ramping were undertaken to develop
these surrounding sites. The proposed building is to be set into the site, with a wide landscape
setback area available to street to undertake planting that will assist it in integrating with the
existing streetscape. The proposed height is considered acceptable.




             Figure 7 – Frontage of site and adjoining development accessed off Vision Court

Page 12

Articulation, materials & finishes

 Performance Outcome                                     Acceptable Outcome
 PO11
                                                         AO11.1
 Buildings are designed and sited to provide visual
                                                         Development provides interest to the street with a
 interest        and         amenity          by—
                                                         well-articulated    facade,       a      mix      of
                                                         external building materials and a varied roof form.
 a) providing well-articulated buildings with strong
    horizontal and vertical design; elements to          AO11.2
    provide interest to the street;                      Buildings visible from the street are articulated and
 b) using a variety of external building materials for   use a mix of materials and appropriate design
    external walls where such walls are visible from     techniques to soften the bulk and scale of
    the street; and                                      the building.
 c) providing an interesting and varied site layout
    and roof design;                                     AO11.3
 d) articulating the roof with a, pitched or skillion    Buildings are finished in colours of muted
    design and complements the low rise character        environmental tones. Broad expanses of a single
    of the area and surrounding development; and         colour are avoided with walls broken up by natural
 e) incorporate materials, finishes and colours that     tones       or     by       design      elements.
    complement the natural environment.
                                                         Editor’s Note— Shades in the violet, blue, green
                                                         and yellow-green side of the spectrum, as well as
                                                         greys or browns, should be appropriate with whites
                                                         or bright colours restricted to trimmings.

The applicant submits that the proposal complies with the acceptable outcomes as
the upper and lower levels of the building will be expressed and distinguishable through the white
on green colour scheme, to provide articulation. Refer Figure 6 above.
The applicant has attempted to address the design concerns by incorporating some elements of
interest with higher level windows, changes in paint colour, grooves and roof pitching, however the
building’s presentation could be further improved through the provision of a wide eave overhang
to this front façade and rear. Conditions have been included accordingly.
Bicycle Spaces & End of Trip Facilities
The applicant submits that due to the generally bulky nature of goods sold at Hardware and Trade
stores, customers travelling to and from the proposed development are unlikely to be by bicycle
and therefore no customer bicyle parking spaces are practically required. The applicant anticipates
staff demand for bicycle parking to be low and based on an anticipated maximum of 10 staff,
provision of 2 bicycle parking spaces is considered appropriate.
While no bicycle parking spaces or end of trip faclities are shown on the plans, there appears
adequate space for inclusion of 2 parking spaces with provision also able to be made for 2 lockers
and a shower. Conditions have been included accordingly.
3.3.3 Business Activities Code
The proposal is consistent with the code’s requirements with the use compatible and consistent
with the type of activity, scale and intensity intended for the zone.
3.3.4 Stormwater
The application has been reviewed by Councils external consultant who has indicated that the
proposed Stormwater Management Plan appropriately takes a conservative approach to mitigate
peak discharges from the site. Conditions are recommended to be included as part of any approval.
3.3.5 Traffic Impacts
Councils Development Engineer has reviewed the proposal and noted that the impact to the
external traffic network (Eumundi Noosa Road/ Gateway Drive intersection) is between 1.5% to
3.1% of existing traffic volumes and is considered acceptable and consistent with the expected
land use.

Page 13

It was also noted that the traffic report accompanying the report detailed that 20 to 30% of trips to
the trade yard may also attend the existing Bunnings Warehouse store which equates to around
3-5 trips during peak weekend hours. Councils development engineer and external consultant
agreed that given the access arrangements, vehicles will be able to travel between the two
carparking areas via Gateway Drive if required without additional traffic impacts to the existing
intersections.
Councils external traffic consultant also reviewed the application and agreed that the proposed
access arrangement were acceptable on the basis that the trade component of the existing
Bunnings Warehouse store was maintained.
3.3.6 Overlay Codes
The site mapped as having the potential to contain Acid Sulfate Soils, with very small areas
identified as subject to potential landslide hazard and a water main running along the site’s frontage
to Eumundi Noosa Road.
As a condition of approval an investigation can be undertaken into Acid Sulfate Soils and a
management plan implemented where required. In terms of the Landslide Hazard Overly, the size
of the area mapped as moderate landslide hazard is negigible wit the applicant advising the detail
design will ensure stability of the site and surrounding land is maintained. The proposed works are
located well clear of the water main.
4.    CONSULTATION
4.1. Referral Agencies
Not applicable
4.2. Internal Council Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers:
•     Coordinator Engineering
•     Senior Environment Officer
4.3. Other Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following external experts for review and/or comment:
•     Hydraulic engineer – Switchback Consulting
•     Traffic specialist – Holland Traffic Consulting
•     Council’s planning solicitor – Thynne Macartney
4.4. Public Notification
The application was not required to be publicly notified for comment, given the application is
identified as code assessable by the Noosa Plan 2020.
5.    CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
It is concluded that the proposal meets the outcomes sought for the medium impact industry zone,
serving the construction industry in the area. The applicant has also demonstrated that no changes
are proposed to the Bunnings Warehouse store, and will continue to function as approved having
a significant hardware component and timber sales area.
The proposed built form is similar to other buildings in the area, with the increased building height
in context with the streetscape and assisted by the wide landscape setback. A further design
element though is required to be incorporated to provide more visual interest to the building’s
presentation to Gateway Drive as required by the Noosa Plan 2020. Similarly, conditions are
recommended for some bicycle parking spaces and end of trip facilities be provided on site for
staff’s use.

Page 14

Departments consulted:
    Office of the CEO, Mayor &               Community Services          Corporate Services
            Councillors
    Mayor & Councillors                   Director                    Director
    Chief Executive Officer               Community Development       Financial Services
    Executive Officers                    Sport & Active Lifestyles   Fleet
    Community Engagement                  Arts & Culture              Revenue Services
    People & Culture                      Community Connection        ICT
    Governance                            Customer Experience         Commercial Property
    Strategy & Environment &              Development & Regulation     Infrastructure Services
    Sustainable Development
    Director                          x   Director                    Director
    Strategic Land Use Planning       x   Development Assessment      Infrastructure Planning, Design
                                                                      and Delivery
    Economic     Development      &       Local Laws                  Civil and Asset operations
    Destination Management
    Environmental Services                Environmental Health        Asset Management
    Innovation & Digital Hub              Building & Plumbing         Building & Facilities
                                          Property / Permits          Disaster Management
                                                                      Waste

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.