Council archive · source document
Further information in regard to Application for a Jetty Finger · OPW11/0172
Mervyn & Pamela Tebbutt 3 Sails Royale MLR a) mot Noosa Waters Cole tarslale Me tolola) 61 07 5474 4435 0419 466 845/ 0448 960 064 [email protected] (ATTENTION: MARK LEWIS) Further to our application for a finger jetty at our complex (Sails Royale, 26 Sunseeker Close, Noosa Waters) I would supply additional information to show cause as to why we will not clutter the water course. A. REASON FOR APPLICATION Our complex consists of 6 townhouses. Hence there is the potential, and expectation of the owners, for 6 boats. Currently there are 4 boats and 4 berths. One unit owner, who resides in Sydney, but spends several | month stints per year in their unit, rent a boat whilst they are here. ie 5 boats and 4 berths. One of the other unit owners kindly removes his boat from the water on a temporary basis to overcome any berthing problems. The other remaining unit holder has advised he retires in August and will be living in his unit permanently. He has purchased a boat which is currently in storage until August. This will mean there will be 5 boats and 4 berths on a continuing basis and on occasions 6 boats and 4 berths. The Body Corporate and individual unit owners are supportive of the needs for sensible controls on the management and developments associated with Noosa Waters canal system, but believe that access to safe mooring facilities is one of the benefits of purchasing canal properties. We strongly believe that the application for the construction of a second finger jetty be approved as it will provide the safest least waterway restriction and aesthetically pleasing option, for mooring six boats, for the six owners of the “Sails Royale” complex. Hence — The situation is becoming extremely critical and I would request Council give serious consideration to the approval of this application — without setting precedent. B. REASON FOR REJECTION OF PREVIOUS APPLICATION (2007) Concern over “CLUTTERING THE WATER COURSE” C. REASONS WHY “CLUTTERING THE WATER COURSE” SHOULD NOT BE OF CONCERN. 1. Our complex (6 Townhouses) is located at 26 Sunseeker Close, Noosa Waters on the Northern side of the canal. To the immediate SE is Public Open Space occupying approx. 50 m of canal wall. To the immediate NW is a drainage easement occupying approx. 5 m of canal wall. This is immediately adjoined by “The Entrance” Resort which has continuous_.can frontage to where it meets Gibson Rd — approx. 500m. 2.9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 10 pages
Page 2
> In this distance they have 4 jetties. Our property has | jetty and | finger. The next jetty location to the SE is approx. 65 m away and would be approx. 60 m away from our proposed application 5. So, in an overall distance of between 600 and 700 m there are 6 jetties and | finger. We are requesting the addition of 1 more finger. 6. There would be no loss of visual amenity THERE ARE MANY EXAMPLES AROUND THE CANAL WHERE THE DENSITY OF JETTIES IS MUCH GREATER THAN THIS. SEE PHOTOS ATTACHED. (Showing just a few examples) 9. Our complex is located on a section of the canal where the width of the canal is 70 m, probably wider than any other part of the canal. 10. We currently have no jetties directly opposite us. (2 vacant blocks plus one house). Even if all 3 sites eventually have jetties, due to the width of the canal there should be no cause for concern re: Congestion or visual amenity. 11. At other sections of the Estate the canal is narrower and have jetties on both sides of the canal that are closer together — yet, Council has approved all of these jetties. 12. If we are unsuccessful with our Application, 2 boats may well be moored in such a way as to create a water hazard. 13. I stress that our site is unique on the Noosa Waters Canal Estate in that: a. Weare on the widest part (70m) of the canal b. We have 50m P.O.S. frontage on one side c. We have a 5m easement on the other side immediately adjoined by “The Entrance” Resort with approx. 500m frontage. = % Therefore Congestion of the Water Course and Visual Ammenity would not be of concern AGAIN, WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST COUNCIL GIVE EVERY CONSIDERATION TO APPROVING OUR APPLICATION FOR A JETTY FINGER (Note: We are not applying for a full blown jetty — simply a finger) WHICH WILL ENABLE OUR COMPLEX TO OVERCOME OUR MOORING SITUATION. QD yaoi GERALDINE DADDOW
Page 3
= Sire of PRctosed Fins’ TA Ken Frere VAC AT BLock /W LEES IDE CT L4E0KIWE WK Tom WOE CrnnL AT P.O.S, OR Com(un, EASEMEX T. PHOTo )
Page 4
TAKEN FAEMP.0.S, SE of evACEMMEL Fellowes B4 LEnsemewT DAWN 4 “THE EWTHAME” PHoTo 2
Page 5
THE EWTRANCE FASEMENT — — OOK Cone tEY
Pe a)
=
TAKEN FAoM VACrin7e Beocik (nN LEESIDE CF, Sows nl “THE Eu TRacte" EASEVTENT, COR Coie, PO.S. Ress FO wt WIDE CAnAe .
,
TiHtee 1S Wo evidente ef “ClurrEéin WATE CovkSé PY OTC3 Cconstesire)
: ‘© mA Pos iTE
Page 6
TAKEN FR0oM VACANT BLOCK WV AEESIDE COOKRT ACOKIVE ACROSS Tlur Cf CAVA’ AT SUNSEEKER CL, IMEIEDIATELY SE ef P.O.S ADTorwWVE OIR PROPERTY, 5 JETTIES tN APPR, BSC 1. Pore 4.
Page 7
TAIKEN FROM MERMAD PARK LOOKING TFowRED C/BS0Nn bed BADLE TETTIES ON RIVEKEREEZE NE ww AfPRe% 35D,, . Pete $
Page 8
8 RRS Oe Canes oe ‘BeAr - NE Crewe OF, UP TC SALT WORTER OA Dee Semmes /Nt3ZOO0 m4 Puozt &
Page 9
TAKEN FROM VACANT BECER IN SHeRETHIVEN DRIVE Spowing 8 Terres (N APR, J5E ny PHOTO 7
Page 10
TAKEN FRO11 SHOKRENAVEN DRIVE LOOKING AT THE PEV/NVS ULAR —T - * TDETTIES (0 PCFKO% 40019, Cite bOI DTI ATFLOX, SO, PHovtvo &
Page 11
FTAKEW FROM Bear The Aw CHeta Ce mo) fa LD ATEKS AE CRT. TeTHt DIST. 2 hoow
Used in these records
Further information in regard to Application for a Jetty FingerRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.8 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.