Council archive · source document
OPW25/0012 - Arborist Report & Vegetation Management Plan
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (12.2 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Original PDF page 8, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● [OCR of page images] Arborist Report 3 &7 Serenity Close, Noosa Heads and landscape assessment criteria (Institute of Australian Consulting Arboriculturists 2010). Tree vigour represents the ability of a tree to sustain its life processes, characterised by an assessment of crown cover, crown density (including potential accelerated growth due to seemingly beneficial changes to its growing environment), resistance to predation, evidence of dormancy (deciduous trees). Tree vigour was thus categorised as normal, high, low or dormant. Tree condition represents a tree’s crown form and growth habitat, as modified by its environment (aspect, suppression by other trees, soils, previous pruning), the stability and viability of the root plate, trunk and structural branches, including defects such as wounds, cavities or hollows, crooked trunk or weak trunk / branch junctions and the effects of predation by pests and diseases. Tree condition was categorised as good, fair, poor or dead. In general, trees assessed as being of low vigour and/or poor condition are generally marked as ‘removed’ as any remedial work or improvement to the growing environment of such trees is unlikely to render them viable in the long term. The assessment included visual assessment of tree hazard and risk in accordance with the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) Tree Risk Assessment Manual (Dunster et a/. 2013). Physical methods and/or exploratory techniques were not used in undertaking the assessment. Arboricultural data recorded as part of the assessment included: e Identification of risk targets, e Tree dimensions, e Site conditions, e Overall condition and vigour, e Canopy structure and form, disease and any other significant features, e Trunk condition and form, e Roots and root collar condition and form, and, e Habitat features. For each combination of tree hazard and risk target, risk categorisation was carried out in accordance with the Tree Risk Assessment Manual (Dunster et al. 2013). The TPZ and SRZ of the trees was calculated in accordance with Australian Standard AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites (Standards Australia 2009). The TPZ is the principal means of protecting trees on development sites and is a combination of the root area and crown area requiring protection (Standards Australia 2009). Whilst it is possible to encroach into or make variations to the nominal TPZ for excavation, fill or trenching, disturbances should generally be restricted to less than 10% of the TPZ area (Standards Australia 2009). Such encroachments are considered minor. Where more substantial encroachments are proposed or where proposed encroachment includes areas within the SRZ, root investigations may be required (Standards Australia 2009). Where encroachments are proposed, the area lost to encroachment should be offset with additional area elsewhere contiguous with the TPZ. Assessment of the potential impacts of encroachment could require an assessment of potential mitigating or site-specific factors including inter alia (Standards Australia 2009): e Physical location of roots, LTORIAS 6|20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
OPW25/0012 - Arborist Report & Vegetation Management PlanRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.2 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.