Attachment B - Decision Notice 2005

NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice is

kas NOOSA Concurrence Agency Conditions —

   

 

Environmental Protection Agency
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

 

 

ecoaccess

envwonmentel oances and permits
Notice

Concurrence Agency Response

Reasons for inclusion of development conditions

In accordance with Section 3 3 18(7) of the integrated Planning Act 1997 and Section 278 of the Acts

Interpretation Act 1954, the reasons for a refusal or for the clusion of development conditions are

° The Environmental Protection Agency ts recognised as a concurrence agency under the Integrated
Planning Regulation 1998 for coastal management, other than amenity and aesthetic significance or
value Development conditions placed on the development approval for the application are in accordance
with section 106 of the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995

The Activity for which this development approval ts issued 1s simply a restatement of the activity as prescnbed in

the legislation at the time of issuing this development approval Where there 1s any conflict between the above

descnption of the Activity for which this development approval ts issued and the conditions as specified in this

development approval as to the scale, intensity or manner of carrying out of the Activity, then such conditions

prevail to the extent of the inconsistency

This development approval authonses the Actrvity It does not authorise environmental harm unless a
concurrence agency condition within this development approval explicitly authonses that harm Where there is
no condition, or the development approval ts silent on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be
construed as authorising harm As part of the concurrence agency response the following development
conditions are to be attached to the development approval

Conditions:

Agency Interest. Coastal
The proposed development shall be in accordance with the plan numbers specified in this permit

Please note that the following Plans also apply to this approval:

Plans.
P 02 DA 03 B Powell House — Site Plan Dated May 2005

This concurrence response pursuant to the /ntegrated Planning Act 1997 and assessed against section 104 of
the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995 does not remove the need to obtain any further approval for
this development which may be required pursuant to this or other legislation, both State and Commonwealth
Applicants are advised to check with all relevant statutory authorities for such approvals as may be required

It1s a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 that if the owner or occupier of this site becomes
aware a Notifiable Activity (as defined under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994) 1s being
camed out on this land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must, within thirty
(30) days after becoming aware the activity is being cared out, give notice to the Environmental Protection
Agency A list of Notifiable Activities 1s provided within Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994

Yours sincerely

 

Page 2 of 3 » 09/03 Version 14 Environmental Protection Agency

SEP p.\civica\documents\dd\010\from000\010-2005-00000901-001\0006decnotice.doc