Council archive · source document
Decision Notice - 010.2005.00001508.001 [As Published] · 132005.1508
Form 6 - Decision Notice
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, S3.5.15, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
File No: 2005/1508 Date of Decision: 12 July 2007
1. APPLICANT DETAILS
Name: P S Madigan
Postal address: PO Box 306
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Phone no: 5447 7023 Fax no:
2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Street address: 133 Blanckensee Road Black Mountain
Real property Lot 3 RP 193730
description:
3. OWNER DETAILS
Name: P S Madigan
Postal address: PO Box 306
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
4. REFERRAL AGENCIES
Referral Agency Address Basis
N/A
5. APPLICATION TYPE
Development Development Details Preliminary Development
Approval Permit
Material Change of Use Home Based Business Class 4 (Kick No Yes
Boxing Centre)
6. DECISION DETAILS
Council decided to refuse the application.
7. APPLICABLE CODES
The developer must comply with the following codes for self-assessable development related to the development
approved under this Development Permit:-
Nil.
8. SUBMISSIONS
Eight properly made submissions were received.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 2 of 5
9. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED
Type of Development Permit required Subject of the required Development Permit
Nil
10. REASONS FOR REFUSAL
1. The proposed development will impact on the amenity of the neighbourhood from the noise and
dust created by increased traffic generation.
2. The scale of the proposed development will create traffic impacts, which are not normally expected
in quiet rural setting.
3. The proposed development is inconsistent with the required hours of operation detailed in the
Schedule to the Planning Scheme, which may cause further adverse impacts upon neighbouring
residents.
4. Submissions were received opposing the development that raise valid planning grounds relating to
traffic including noise and dust impacts on the amenity of the surrounding area.
5. The development is inconsistent with The Noosa Plan Specific Outcomes 32, 33, 37 & 38 of the
Business Uses Code, and should not be supported.
11. RIGHTS OF APPEAL
Rights of appeal in relation to this application are attached.
12. ASSESSMENT MANAGER
Name: Noosa Council Signature: Date: 16 July 2007
AOP2 c:\docume~1\aop2\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@8c052080\@[email protected]
Page 3
List of Submitters
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Name Address 1 Address 2
Freda Bull 156 Blanckensee Road COOROY QLD 4563
Bob Bull 156 Blanckensee Road COOROY QLD 4563
DR Blaik PO Box 637 COOROY QLD 4563
Paul Ingamells 139 Blanckensee Road COOROY QLD 4563
Gary Dolton PO Box 900 TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Paul & Vicki Frederiks 40 Blanckensee Road BLACK MOUNTAIN QLD
4563
Ian Betts PO Box 413 COOROY QLD 4563
Ray Johnson PO Box 203 COOROY QLD 4563
Page 4
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 4 of 5
Appeal Rights
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997, IDAS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
The following is an extract from the Integrated (6) If an application involves assessment against
Planning Act (Chapter 4). a concurrence agency code, appeal rights for
submitters for the application are not available
Division 8 - Appeals to court relating to against the part of the approval that represents the
development applications concurrence agency’s response for the code.
Appeals by applicants Appeals by advice agency submitters
4.1.27.(1) An applicant for a development application 4.1.29.(1) An advice agency may, within the limits of
may appeal to the court against any of the following- its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about the giving of
(a) the refusal, or the refusal in part, of a a development approval for a development
development application; application if-
(b) a matter stated in a development approval, (a) the development application involves impact
including any condition applying to the assessment; and
development, and the identification of a code (b) the advice agency told the applicant and the
1
under section 3.1.6; assessment manager to treat its response to the
(c) the decision to give a preliminary approval when a application as a submission for an appeal.
development permit was applied for; (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
(d) the length of a currency period; days after the day the decision notice or negotiated
decision notice is given to the advice agency as a
(e) a deemed refusal. submitter.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) to (d) must Appeals for matters arising after approval given
be started within 20 business days (the “applicant’s (co-respondents)
appeal period”) after the day the decision notice or
negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant. 4.1.30.(1) For a development approval given for a
development application, a person to whom any of
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be the following notices have been given may appeal to
started at any time after the last day a decision on the the court against the decision in the notice-
matter should have been made.
(a) a notice giving a decision on a request for
Appeals by submitters extension of the currency period for an approval;
4.1.28.(1) A submitter for a development application (b) a notice giving a decision on a request to make a
may appeal to the court about- minor change to an approval.
(a) the giving of a development approval, including (2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
any conditions (or lack of conditions) or other days after the day the notice of the decision is given
provisions of the approval; or to the person.
(b) the length of a currency period for the approval. (3) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if the
approval resulted from a development application
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business (superseded planning scheme) that was assessed as
days (the “submitters appeal period”) after the day if it were an application under a superseded planning
the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is scheme.
given to the submitter.
(4) Also, a person who has made a request
(3) If a person withdraws a submission before the mentioned in subsection (1) may appeal to the court
application is decided, the person may not appeal the against a deemed refusal of the request.
decision.
(5) An appeal under subsection (4) may be
(4) If an application involves both impact started at any time after the last day the decision on
assessment and code assessment, appeal rights for the matter should have been made.
submitters are available only for the part of the
application involving impact assessment. Division 9 - Appeals to court about other matters
(5) If an application is processed under section Appeals for matters arising after approval given
6.1.28(2), appeal rights for submitters for the (no co-respondents)
application are available only for the aspects of the
development that would have required public 4.1.31.(1) A person to whom any of the following
notification under the repealed Act. notices have been given may appeal to the court
against the decision in the notice-
(a) a notice giving a decision on a request to change
or cancel a condition of a development approval.
1
Section 3.1.6 (Preliminary approval may override local planning
instrument)
AOP2 c:\docume~1\aop2\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@8c052080\@[email protected]
Page 5
NOOSA COUNCIL IDAS Development Application Decision Notice 5 of 5
2
(b) a notice under section 6.1.44 giving a decision to
change or cancel a condition of a development
approval.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
days after the day the notice of the decision is given
to the person.
(3) Also, a person who has made a request
mentioned in subsection (1)(a) may appeal to the
court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4) An appeal under subsection (3) may be
started at any time after the last day the decision on
the matter should have been made.
Appeals against decisions to change approval
conditions under the repealed Act
4.1.33A.(1) A person who is dissatisfied with a
decision made on an application to change the
conditions attached to an approval given under
section 2.19(3)or section 4.4 of the repealed Act may
appeal to the court against-
(a) the decision; or
(b) a deemed refusal of the application.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1)(a) must be
started within 20 business days after the day notice of
the decision is to be given to the person.
(3) An appeal under subsection (1)(b) may be
started at any time after the last day a decision on the
matter should have been made.
Appeals against local laws
4.1.33B.(1) An applicant who is dissatisfied with a
decision of a local government or the conditions
applied under a local law about the use of premises
or the erection of a building or other structure
permitted by the planning scheme may appeal to the
court against the decision or the conditions applied.
(2) The appeal must be started within 20 business
days after the day notice of the decision is given to
the applicant.
2
Section 6.1.44 (Conditions may be changed or cancelled by
assessment manager or concurrence agency in certain
circumstances)
AOP2 c:\docume~1\aop2\locals~1\temp\bcl technologies\easypdf 5\@bcl@8c052080\@[email protected]
Used in these records
Decision Notice - 010.2005.00001508.001 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
00157B83.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
About this file
- File size
- 23 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.