Council archive · source document
REFERENCED DOCUMENT - Weed Management & Vegetation Rehabilitation Plan - MCU13/0064
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
3.0 LEGISLATION / OTHER GOVERNMENT INFORMATION 3.1 State Government 3.1.1 Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 Under the Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002, a list of declared species has been targeted for control due to their potential negative impacts. The species have been designated under three (3) classes, each possessing differing management obligations. Where a relevant species has been identified on a parcel of land, the land holder is legally obliged to control the declared plant in the following manner: Class 1 pests — Landowner must take reasonable steps to keep the land free of Class 1 pests. Class 2 pests — Landowner must take reasonable steps to keep land free of Class 2 pests. Class 3 pests — Landowners are not required to control Class 3 pests unless the land is adjacent an environmentally sensitive area. Ecological Assessment of the subject site (Refer ACO7631ECO) has identified the following declared plants within the study area: Bryophylium sp. (Mother of Millions) - Class 2 pest. Baccharis halimifolia (Groundsel Bush) — Class 2 pest. Asparagus aethiopicus (Asparagus Fern) — Class 3 pest. Lantana camara (Lantana) — Class 3 pest. Sphagneticola trilobata (Singapore Daisy) — Class 3 pest. 3.1.2 Fisheries Act 1994 Under the Fisheries Act 1894 the subject site is located within a Fish Habitat Area (FHA) and as such all marine plants (alive or dead) are protected. Vegetation or communities relevant to this legislation and identified in the Ecological Assessment Report (Ref: DE07631ECO dated May 2007) include: Sporobolus virginicus closed grassland Closed mangrove forest Casuarina glauca/Melaleuca quinquenervia open forest Regrowth vegetation with Eucalypt spp. emergents. Landscaped areas with scattered Eucalypts. Any interference to the communities (or native vegetation) associated with the proposal will require a Permit to Damage Vegetation under the Act. For further details refer to Duke Environmental Ecological Assessment Report (DE07631ECO) dated May 2007. Additionally, rehabilitation and weed management is to generally conform to provisions provided under the following Fisheries Guidelines documentation: « Fisheries Guidelines Ref: FHGO03 (2000) (Fish Habitat Buffer Zones) AD07631REHAB May 2007 SHijs
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
REFERENCED DOCUMENT - Weed Management & Vegetation Rehabilitation Plan - MCU13/0064Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.