Original source · versioned page text
2017-09-12 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (16.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
AGENDA
Services & Organisation
Committee Meeting
Tuesday, 12 September 2017
commencing at 1.30pm
Committee Room, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Committee: Crs Frank Pardon (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Tony Wellington, Frank Wilkie
“Noosa Shire – different by nature”
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 69 sections
Section 2
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES -
PRESENTATIONS -
REPORTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMITTEE 3
1 COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE 2018 3
2 STRATEGIC ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 6
3 1718T021 ROAD SURFACING AND REHABILITATION - TENDER ACCEPTANCE 22
4 INCLUSION OF LAKE COOROIBAH IN GARDEN WASTE RECYCLING AREA 39
REPORTS FOR NOTING BY THE COMMITTEE 43
5 NOOSA RESULTS FOR 2016 RURAL AND REGIONAL WELLBEING SURVEY 43
6 JULY 2017 RATE LEVY OVERVIEW 66
CLOSED SESSION -
Page 2 of 70
Section 3
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
REPORTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMITTEE
1 COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE 2018
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Executive Assistant to the CEO, Kylie Harris
CEO’s Office
Index ECM/ Subject/ Council Meetings General
Attachments 1. Council Meeting Schedule 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Personal Assistant to the CEO to the Services & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2017 and approve the Council meeting dates for 2018
as set out in Attachment 1 to the report.
REPORT
At the Post Election Meeting on 5 April 2016, Council adopted its Council meeting structure
incorporating three Standing Committees and an Ordinary meeting. The meeting structure has
remained unchanged since that time with meetings being held on a monthly cycle.
In consultation with the Mayor and CEO, a draft Council Meeting Schedule for 2018 has been
prepared for Council’s consideration (refer to Attachment 1). No changes have been proposed to
the existing arrangements.
As per previous years, the first meeting round of the year (January) will only consist of a General
Committee Meeting (15 January) and an Ordinary Meeting (18 January). There won’t be a
Planning & Environment Committee or Services & Organisation Committee meeting held in
January. This is due to the timing of report deadlines conflicting with the Christmas/ New Year
period and the availability of staff over this time.
Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting, 20 October 2016, Item 7, Page 8
That Council note the report by the Personal Assistant to the CEO to the Services & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 11 October 2016 and approve the Council meeting dates for 2017 as
set out in Attachment 1 to the report.
Finance & Risk
Nil.
Page 3 of 70
Section 4
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil.
Internal Consultation
Attachment 1 has been drafted in consultation with the Mayor and CEO.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
X Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
X Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services Environment & Sustainable Development Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 4 of 70
Section 5
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
Page 5 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
KENT MOOD
ma MEETING CALENDAR 2018
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
M T WwW T F Ss s M T WwW T F Ss Ss M T WwW T F Ss Ss
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
2 3 4 5 6 7} | 5 7 8 9 10 11} | 5 7 8 9 10 11
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 14°15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18
16 7, ane 21 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
22 23 24 25 27 28 26 27 28 26 27 28 29
29 30 31
APRIL MAY JUNE
M T Ww T F Ss Ss M T Ww T F Ss Ss M T Ww T F Ss Ss
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9 1112 13 14 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 13 14 15 16 17
17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24
23 24125 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30
30
JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
M T WwW T F Ss RS M T WwW T F SS s M T Ww T F Ss Ss
1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7) 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6'°7 8 9Q
9 1112 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 12 13 14 15 16
17 18°19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
30 31
OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
M T Ww T F Ss Ss M T Ww T F Ss Ss M T WwW T F s Ss
2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 2
8 10 11 12 13 14] | 5 7 8 9 10 11}; |3 4 5 6 7 8 9
16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 12 13 14 15 16
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 18 19 21 22 23
29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 24 27 28 29 30
31
Membership:
Planning & Environment Committee: Cr Jurisevic (Chair), Cr Jackson, Cr Stockwell, Cr Wellington
Services & Organisation Committee: Cr Pardon (Chair), Cr Glasgow, Cr Wellington, Cr Wilkie
General Committee All Councillors (Chair — Cr Wilkie)
9.30am Planning & Environment Committee Public Holidays
1.30pm Services & Organisation Committee y
DH 10am General Committee
| | 6pm Ordinary Meeting
Page 5 of 70Section 6
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
2 STRATEGIC ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Asset Planning Manager, Bryan O’Connor
Infrastructure Services Department
Index ECM/Strategic Asset Management Plans
Attachments 1. Draft Strategic Asset Management Plan - 2017-2027
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Noosa Council adopted the Asset Management Roadmap in September 2016 which highlighted
a number of organisational and governance initiatives in further improving asset management
across the organisation. A priority initiative of the asset management roadmap was to develop a
strategic asset management plan to define the organisations plan for implementing good asset
management practices across Council.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Asset Planning Manager to the Services & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2016 and adopt the Strategic Asset Management Plan
(as provided at Attachment 1 to the report) in continuing with the implementation of the Asset
Management Improvement Plan (roadmap).
REPORT
The purpose of this report is to present Council with a Strategic Asset Management Plan for
adoption. A Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) is the overarching guiding document for
an organisation. The SAMP includes information that is specific to Noosa Council and how the
organisational governance is relevant to the asset management objectives.
The SAMP is the reference for organisational decisions that relate to the assets. Without the
SAMP there is little relevance or structure to the development of detailed Asset Management
Plans for specific asset classes. The majority of the initial tasks defined in the roadmap relate to
the development of the SAMP.
The SAMP states the approach to implementing the Noosa Council asset management policy’s
principles and objectives to establish and maintain good asset management practices. The
SAMP also pulls together all the organisational activities for assets, services, people and
provides relevance to Council’s asset management journey.
Previous Council Consideration
Ordinary Meeting Minutes 15 September 2016, Item 2, Page 10
That Council note the report by the Asset Planning Coordinator to the Services & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 6 September 2016 providing an update on the asset management
capability assessment and:
A. Adopt the asset management roadmap (as provided at Attachment 1 to the report) as the
asset management improvement plan for staff to commence implementation, and
B. Support the implementation of the asset management initiatives and activities across the
organisation, including those defined in the Noosa Council asset management roadmap.
Page 6 of 70
Section 7
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Finance & Risk
The funding for consultancy services to assist in the development of strategic documents and
detailed asset management plans has been made available in the 2017/18 operational budget,
with asset and capital planning activities to be funded by the capital works budget.
Council’s strategic risk register identifies poor asset planning as a high risk that can impact on
poor decision making, community services and ultimately Council’s financial sustainability and
reputation.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil
Internal Consultation
The development of the draft strategic asset management plan was undertaken in consultation
with membership of the Asset Management Coordination Team and the Asset Management
Steering Committee.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
X Chief Executive Officer X Community Services X Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
X Executive Services Environment & Sustainable Development X Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 7 of 70
Section 8
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
Page 8 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
a eee e_—™ neni aa
ps ICO INCONCI e |
NOOSA COUNCIL
STRATEGIC ASSET
MANAGEMENT PLAN
2017 - 2027
Prepared by:
CH2M-Hill & Noosa Council
September 2017
Page 8 of 70Section 9
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 9 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
Contents
Page 9 of 70Section 10
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 10 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
1. INTRODUCTION
Noosa Council is the custodian of a diverse and extensive range of community
assets which represents a major investment over many years. In order to fulfil its
obligations in delivering a variety of services to the community, Council must
ensure that the assets supporting these services are managed in a way that
guarantees optimum performance for the most sustainable "whole of life" cost.
Major assets for which the Noosa Council is responsible include:
¢ Roads & Bridges
¢ Buildings & Facilities
¢ Stormwater Drainage infrastructure
¢ Pathways and Boardwalks,
e Parks & Playgrounds
* Coastal, Canals and Waterways
° Car parks
¢ Plant and equipment
¢ Waste Management Facilities
The importance of these assets to the community and their significance to the
budget means that asset management must be a critical part of the Council's long
term planning and service delivery approach.
This Strategic Asset Management Plan recognises and supports the need to
manage assets effectively as part of Council’s service delivery. Ultimately,
Council’s service delivery areas will be responsible for managing assets that are
associated with their service areas, under the framework described in this Plan.
Consistent and optimised planning of the development, replacement and
maintenance of new assets will ensure not only that endorsed asset "levels of
service" are met by Council, but also that there is high level of confidence in the
capabilities and resources available to achieve them.
The primary objective of this Strategic Asset Management Plan is to outline how
the Council will meet its asset management objectives, as detailed in Council’s
Asset Management Policy and documented in the Corporate Plan. The framework
described in this document also provides the platform for development of future
Asset Management Plans, targeted to meeting these objectives.
. 1.
Page 10 of 70Section 11
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 11 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
2. ASSET MANAGEMENT AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Under the Local Government Act 2009 (the Act) and the Local Government
Regulation 2012 Noosa Council has a wide range of responsibilities related to the
provision and management of infrastructure. The Act provides the legal framework
to assist Local Governments in providing an efficient and effective infrastructure
system.
The fact that Local Government customers are levied a fee for provision of
community services and that these services are often provided via infrastructure
assets, means that the asset management practices of Local Governments are also
of interest to economic regulators. Consistency and transparency of the planning
processes and management approach Local Governments take to infrastructure
assets is necessary to ensure that the investment decisions made are both prudent
and efficient.
The provision of infrastructure is considered one of the most important roles of
Local Governments, as they strive to provide a safe, liveable and functional
environment for their communities. A key consideration in this role, is the
assurance that important community infrastructure is managed in the most effective
and efficient manner and continues to meet the needs of the community, in both
the short and long-terms.
3. PURPOSE OF THE STRATEGIC ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
The purpose of the Strategic Asset Management Plan is to:
¢ Present a set of actions aimed at improving the asset management practices of
the "whole" organisation through:
- Improved stewardship and accountability for assets;
- Improved communication and relationships with asset stakeholders and
customers;
- Improved identification and management of risk;
- More effective utilisation of assets; and
- Improved financial effectiveness.
¢ Ensure that asset management practices are applied consistently across the
organisation and supported by an asset management roadmap to enable Council
to more effectively manage its assets now and into the future;
* Enable Council to more effectively plan and fund its asset investment
programs;
¢ Enable Council to competently deliver services to the community and other
asset stakeholders;
* Enable Council to maintain its assets to the desired and stakcholder-tested
"level of service"
* Bea “live” document that is reviewed and improved on a regular basis
Asset Management is a cyclic process, covering the full life of an asset. It seeks to
put in-place, a practical and financially responsible means of managing assets
Page 11 of 70Section 12
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 12 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
through the specification, creation, acquisition, maintenance, operation,
rehabilitation and disposal of assets (where required) to provide for current and
future stakeholder and community needs.
The key elements of successful infrastructure asset management are:
¢ Ensuring appropriate use and maintenance;
* Optimised utilisation of assets to ensure their full potential is realised;
¢ Considering the full life cycle cost implications of asset decisions at every stage
of the life-cycle;
¢ Pursuing reduction or optimisation and integration of those assets not achieving
the most productive outcome;
¢ Defining clear responsibilities for asset accountability and reporting; and
¢ Recognising that infrastructure assets must support the Council in the delivery
of services to its community.
Development of this document demonstrates Council’s commitment to a "rational
and realistic" approach to achieving maximum value from the investments made in
Council assets.
Having a corporate focus on asset management also ensures that the benefits and
costs of asset investment proposals are critically examined, taking into account the
overall needs of Noosa Council and the community.
4. ASSET MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
The generic Asset Management Framework, based on the international Asset
Management Standard: ISO 55000 is presented in the figure below:
Aligned process for managing assets Process support and systems
Bea eel
tussle bee ito 44 . s
Organisational plans and . rs
: porate =o tT ee od
a FSS |
. management <9
, Strategic Asset Management a pencils z
ue E ume atic ys “
= : Pees e
=| Asset management plans : :
s © Asset a
> . management .
s te Eye Cues] 4
> hit iiele ee menos a4 = a chhealds 4
. management plans — Support ®
a Pst :
. psi
a portfolio
: Performance evaluation and J
Adapted from 18055000 improvements
Page 12 of 70Section 13
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 13 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
Noosa Council is developing its Strategic Asset Management Framework based on
the three essential asset management components, as follows:
¢ The Asset Management Policy
* The Strategic Asset Management Plan
¢ Asset Management Plans
These are described for the Noosa Council business environment in the following
sections:
4.1 Asset Management Policy
Council’s “Asset Management Policy" (adopted November 2016) provides
strategic direction for future asset management practices. This Policy recognises
that asset managementis at the centre of its overall long-term financial and strategic
planning processes. The Policy also states that effective asset management will be
achieved through:
1. Governance
e Support at the leadership level to promote the importance of asset
management throughout the organisation; and
e Clear accountability for asset condition and performance with a
whole-of-council approach to the continued improvement and
development of asset management activities.
2. Asset Plannin
e A focus on risk, demand, community benefit and whole-of-life costs
in the management of assets:
e The allocation of sufficient resources for the development and
ongoing review of asset strategies and plans; and
e The establishment of an asset management framework that provides
inputs directly into Council’s budget and financial forecasts.
3. Decision Making
e Effective asset management decision-making across the
organisation through a robust and endorsed asset management
governance framework.
e Decisions are evidenced-based and utilise appropriate asset
information to ensure consideration of the asset risks and life-cycle
benefits for the community:
e Council’s assets are managed in a systematic and sustainable
manner based on agreed levels of service; and
e Agreed minimum asset sustainability targets are met, in keeping
with Council’s Financial Sustainability Policy.
Page 13 of 70Section 14
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 14 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
4. Capital Plannin
¢ Opportunities are maximised in the utilisation of asset management
systems through cost benefit analysis; and
e An integrated approach is applied to the acquisition, disposal and
renewal of assets that ensures transparency and evaluates asset life
cycle implications.
42 Strategic Asset Management Plan
Noosa Council’s Strategic Asset Management Plan (this document) articulates how
Council will execute Council’s Asset Management Policy to achieve its asset
management objectives. This Strategic Asset Management Plan documents
Council’s Asset Management development strategy and how it will be continually
improved.
43 Asset Management Plans
Noosa Council is developing Asset Management Plans (AMPs) for each facility or
class of asset within the Council asset portfolio. These Plans will become a key
resource for the transparent justification and management approval of asset
investments, going forward.
In general, the Asset Management Plans will:
° Describe the assets (physical, financial, condition state);
¢ Describe the objective/purpose of the assets (or each key component of it);
° Describe future demand requirements for service delivery;
° Define the service levels that apply to the asset;
° Define the intended time frame for replacement or renewal of the asset or
key asset components;
° Describe the opportunities and risks associated with assets;
° Document how asset service potential reduces with time (deterioration
profiles) and the factors that contribute to this reduction;
° Identify and track key asset performance measures;
° Present financial information related to asset status, development,
maintenance and operation;
° State all current assumptions and confidence levels;
° Document the continual improvement approach, linked to the opportunities
and risks identified; and
° Outline an improvement program for the asset class / facility to improve
confidence levels and manage risks.
AMPs are dynamic documents and therefore must be updated regularly to remain
current and be effective as a management tool. The Plans should reflect: changes
in Council objectives/policies; current stakeholder/customer expectations, the
implementation of new approaches/technologies; and improvements in AM
systems or data in general.
Page 14 of 70Section 15
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 15 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
The level of detail provided in each Plan will depend on the complexity, scale and
criticality of the asset class or facility that it covers. It is important for good
decision-making, that all AMPs are relevant, practical, readily understood and
useable documents.
5; LINK WITH CORPORATE & EXTERNAL DOCUMENTATION
CORPORATE DOCUMENTATION
A principle concept in Asset Management best practice is “Line-of-Sight”. This
concept drives integration of planning documents from the highly strategic through
to the highly tactical. When line of sight is achieved, tactical asset decisions are
aligned to and driven by strategic business objectives.
Council’s current Corporate Planning framework is depicted in the Figure below:
Our Staff
dale gait Lele ed 1)
Branches / Sections
Nie Leste tie lt let
Council Operations
Pte eS) ctr ier Bal ie ale matte
Council vision, values, goals and strategic priorities
Ors eeee lem a
It can be seen from this diagram that the Corporate Planning framework already
promotes line of sight. The following sections describe how current corporate
documentation links with the asset management function:
Page 15 of 70Section 16
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 16 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
Corporate Plan
The Corporate Plan presents Noosa’s Vision and purpose. It frames Council’s
purpose in terms of several business objectives, as follows:
1. Provide excellence in customer service;
2. Engage with our community using best practice;
3. Provide quality local government services to the Noosa community;
4. Provide good governance and act ethically;
5. Be transparent in all our dealings;
6. Look after community and natural assets;
7. Manage community funds wisely;
8. Beas one with our community.
This Strategic Asset Management Plan and the Roadmap initiatives presented
herein, have been developed and prioritised to support achievement of the business
objectives defined in the Corporate Plan.
The Corporate Plan also documents the strategies that will be put in-place to
advance Council’s vision and business objectives over a five-year time horizon.
Many of the objectives and strategies in the current Corporate Plan are already
linked to asset management outcomes, but it is anticipated that these links will be
strengthened in the future as the Asset Management Framework matures.
Currently, the Corporate Plan sets out 44 strategies, under the following five key
themes:
1. The Noosa environment
2. The Noosa community
3. The Noosa economy
4. Long-term planning for Noosa Shire
5. Excellence as a Council
Council Adopted Strategies and Branch Plans
These are the planning documents that capture the details of the objectives,
approach, resource requirements and expected outcomes of the strategies defined
in the Corporate Plan.
The Corporate Plan specifically references the development of Asset Management
Plans as a key focus area for Council. In addition, it includes Strategies and Plans
that may have an influence on future asset planning, as follows:
° The Zero Emissions Strategy
° The Environment Strategy and supporting Plans
° The Noosa Social Strategy and supporting Plans
° The Town Planning Scheme and supporting Plans
Page 16 of 70Section 17
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 17 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
° The Noosa Local Economic Plan
° The Noosa Design Principles
In time and to improve alignment, future Corporate Plans may include other
specific Asset Management development / improvement initiatives.
Annual Operational Plan
The Annual Operational Plan presents details of the significant activities, projects
or programs that will be delivered over each financial year. The program of work
documented in this Plan supports achievement of the eight business objectives
defined in the Corporate Plan and/or addresses specific corporate risks that have
been identified.
The Annual Operational Plan includes the following programs that will ultimately
be supported and enhanced by the Asset Management Framework, via dedicated
Asset Management Plans:
. The Asset Renewal Program;
° The Periodic Maintenance Program (comprising cyclic maintenance and
regular asset monitoring activities); and
° The Reactive Maintenance Program (providing estimates of unplanned
maintenance, based on historic breakdown records).
The Operational Plan feeds into Council’s Annual Budget.
Annual Branch Plans
The Annual Branch Plans document the activities and resources required for each
Branch to deliver objectives and Projects specifically set for the Branch over the
next 12-month period. Depending on the responsibilities of the Branch, these “run
the business” tasks could include delivery of specific Asset Management
improvement initiatives or undertaking the tasks necessary to sustain the Asset
Management System, including:
° Involvement in an Asset Management Working Groups;
° Stewardship, review and upkeep of key Asset Management documents;
° Collection and management of asset data and decision-support systems;
° Governance of Asset Management processes.
The Annual Branch Plans collectively feed into Council’s Annual Budget.
EXTERNAL DOCUMENTATION
A common sense approach to asset management development is to utilise existing
resources such as industry standards and practices. The ISO55000 asset
management standard is the overarching framework for best practice asset
management practices for any organisation. In addition to the Standard, there are
many tools, reference documents and publications that will assist Noosa Council
in gaining asset management maturity that provide valuable information, resources
Page 17 of 70Section 18
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 18 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
and technical advice. The Institute of Public Works Engineering Australasia
(IPWEA) have taken a lead role in the development of asset management across
Australia and New Zealand over past 20 years and have produced a suite of
reference documents for Council to utilise. Noosa Council specifically utilises two
IPWEA documents on a day to day basis- the International Infrastructure
Management Manual (IIMM) and the Australian Infrastructure Financial
Management Manual (AIFMM) Glossary in the establishment of best practice
asset management across Council. In addition, the IPWEA has produced asset
specific practice notes and technical publications to assist in the decision making
processes for our asset and service managers.
International Infrastructure Management Manual (IIMM)
The IIMM is a detailed reference document that is similar to technical standards
and guideline documents: - this document provides a practical guide to developing
asset management practices within any organisation. The IIMM has detailed case
studies and provides asset specific examples to assist in getting asset management
practices started. Noosa Council has utilised this document in the development of
defining our condition rating system for assets, initial development of levels of
service for asset classes and general referencing tool for asset management related
issues that are yet to be determined or refined by Noosa Council. The IMM should
continue to be referenced and utilised to ensure there is no reassessment or
duplication of past asset management related issues that are clearly defined within
this document.
Mh AIFMM
=x NEW
lem ae ease biiel
/ 7s ii. fc a
Hf Uns | A
Reamer) Te BRA...
Ke et 2/2: f=
Ce = i pod Ages
taenenenneete Ta Da : —_
Australian Infrastructure Financial Management Manual (AIFMM)
Glossary
The AIFMM Glossary document is the current reference document for terminology
and definitions in the absence of Noosa Council establishing its own Glossary of
terms and definitions. The AIFMM Glossary has been utilised in the past for
defining capital expenditure definitions for the capitals works program.
6. RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management is an integral part of good business practice and works in tandem
with strategic and financial planning. It is the formal process of identifying,
assessing and controlling the effect of uncertainty on the achievement of an
organisation’s business objectives. An enterprise wide Risk Management
Page 18 of 70Section 19
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 19 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
Framework considers all facets of an organisation’s activities and aims to identify
and deal with risks the organisation may face, both strategically and in its day to
day operations.
Risk Management allows for systemic change and continuous improvement in
planning, resource allocation, decision making and processes and delivers
outcomes such as:
* Improved asset management
° Improved planning, performance and effectiveness
° Providing a basis for higher standards of accountability and sound
governance
¢ Protecting the organisation from legal liability
¢ Reducing insurance premiums
° Protecting the Council’s corporate image as a professional, responsible and
ethical organisation and an employer of choice
° Capacity to respond to new opportunities
< Improved prioritisation of activities and projects
° Improved project outcomes and reporting by documenting objectives and
key actions in Councils Risk Register
Noosa Council’s Asset Management Framework will apply risk management in
accordance with Council’s Risk Management Policy, following the guidance
provided in the corporate Risk Management Workbook. Key initiatives have been
identified in the Asset Management Roadmap to ensure that asset-related risks are
assessed, escalated and addressed in the same manner as other business risks.
Residual risks (risks assessed after any current controls are considered) related to
implementation of the Council’s Asset Management System or any aspect of the
asset life-cycle, will be rated according to the following matrix:
Likelihood Consequence Level
Certain 5
Possible :
Unlikely
The following table from the Workbook defines the required action, based on the
assessed residual risk:
Page 19 of 70Section 20
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 20 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
Any asset-related risks identified will be escalated through the Asset Management
Steering Group to Council’s Risk Committee for consideration and action in
accordance with the corporate Risk Management Policy and procedures.
i ASSET MANAGEMENT GOVERNANCE
The current asset management governance framework was endorsed by Council’s
Asset Management Steering Committee (AMSC) at the December 2016 meeting
and is presented in the figure below:
Noosa Council Asset Management Governance Framework
Asset Management
Se eae ae oe es Steering Committee
ond
a
8
<j
= |
3
-------------~ >» ee E
o
oordination leam WU
Pa
=
f ra
Vultee es eee (PL del lacus tate | te Lidl
Implementation of Council’s Asset Management Policy and responsibility for all
asset management decision-making rests with the Asset Management Steering
Committee (AMSC). The AMSC will provide direction to the Asset Management
Coordination Team, whose role will be to manage the individual Asset
Management Work Teams. The Asset Management Work Teams comprise
Council staff with appropriate Policy, ICT, Process or Asset knowledge, sourced
from various Council Business Areas. The Asset Management Branch facilitates
all levels of the Asset Management Governance structure.
While Council’s Asset Management System is being developed, the Asset
Management Work Teams may be tasked with implementation of the Asset
Management Improvement Plan initiatives. In the longer-term responsibility for
various Asset Management Framework deliverables may be transferred to these
Teams. The annual branch plans and asset management road map identifies the
asset management initiatives and performance targets in delivering asset
management across Council on a cyclic basis.
Page 20 of 70Section 21
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 21 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Noosa Council
Strategic Asset Management Plan
8. ASSET MANAGEMENT GAP ANALYSIS AND ROADMAP (AM
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM)
Noosa Council has developed an asset management “Roadmap” to inform future
asset management improvement initiatives. Development of the Roadmap was a
fundamental first step in implementing Council’s future Strategic Asset
Management Framework.
The Noosa Council Roadmap development was facilitated by consultancy services
and is underpinned by an asset management capability assessment and gap
analysis, based on the Institute of Asset Management (IAM) Self-Assessment
methodology.
The gaps identified and the improvement initiatives developed to address these
gaps were focused on:
e Embedding consistent asset management practices across Council,
aligned to the International Asset Management Standard: ISO 55000;
e Ensuring full understanding of Council asset status, at a level of detail
commensurate with the level of service they provide to customers and
stakeholders; and
e Improving the prudency and efficiency of both financial and operational
asset decision-making.
These initiatives will be continually reviewed by Council to reflect progress and
to address any changes in Council’s business or operational environments. The
Roadmap initiatives and their current status is presented in Appendix A:
9. REVIEW AND CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
Council’s Asset Management Steering Committee (AMSC) will be responsible
for reporting progress made and any changes necessary to the Asset Management
Roadmap to Council. This will include identification of any barriers to achieving
defined asset management objectives and proposed solutions or alternative
actions. The AMSC will meet regularly on a 6 weekly cycle and be empowered
to identify and escalate any improvement to the Asset Management System at
any time, based on:
¢ Changes in the Council business / operating environment;
e Stakeholder feedback on the effectiveness of specific Asset Management
Framework components;
e Adjustments to the priorities of the initiatives being undertaken; and
e Risk assessments undertaken at both the asset system and asset class
level.
It is recommended to review the Strategic Asset Management Plan every 3 years to ensure
it remains updated and relevant to the initiatives being delivered across the organisation.
Noosa Council’s risk management strategy will also guide future initiatives and assist in
their prioritisation should the need be identified.
Page 21 of 70Section 22
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
3 1718T021 ROAD SURFACING AND REHABILITATION - TENDER ACCEPTANCE
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Civil Operations Technical Officer, Cameron Shields
Infrastructure Services Department
Index ECM/1718T021 Road Surfacing & Rehabilitation/Tender Acceptance
Attachments 1. 2018-20 Resealing & Rehabilitation Programme
2. 1718T021 – Final Evaluation – Portion A
3. 1718T021 – Final Evaluation – Portion B
4. 1718T021 – Final Evaluation – Portion C
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Civil Operations Technical Officer to the Services and
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2017 and:
A. Award tender 1718T021 Road Surfacing and Rehabilitation to the following contractors:
1. Portion A – Asphalt Surfacing, Rehabilitation & Construction Programme: Allroad
Surfaces Pty Ltd
2. Portion B – Mill and Fill Pavement Repairs: Allen’s Asphalt Pty Ltd, Allroad Surfaces,
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd, RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd and Tropic Asphalt Pty Ltd.
3. Portion C – Bitumen Sealing: RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd; and
B. Award the Contracts for an initial term of up to three (3) years, with an option to extend for
two (2) further periods of up to twelve (12) months each. The option to extend will be at
Council’s discretion and subject to the Contractor’s demonstrated ability to meet the
requirements under the Contract.
REPORT
Council has a core responsibility for the maintenance of the sealed road network across the
Noosa Shire area. Roads for resealing and rehabilitation are selected annually in order to
achieve or extend the working life of the asset. These selected roads are then inspected and
prioritised.
The aim is to ensure that all works will be completed with limited impact on residents and road
users. A comprehensive list of the roads included for treatment in the tender for 2018-20 can be
found in “Attachment 1.” The list of projects may change depending on Council’s capital works
program.
1. Tender Process
A request for quote under LocalBuy arrangement BUS 242-1013 Civil Construction and Road
Resurfacing was distributed to all Tier 1 and Tier 2 Department of Transport and Main Roads
prequalified contractors. The quote consisted of three separable portions as shown below:
1. Portion A – Asphalt Surfacing, Rehabilitation & Construction;
2. Portion B – Mill and Fill Pavement Repairs;
3. Portion C – Bitumen Sealing.
Page 22 of 70
Section 23
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
2. Tender Assessment
The tender evaluation panel carried out an assessment of the five conforming tender
submissions from:
1) Allen’s Asphalt Pty Ltd;
2) Allroad Surfaces;
3) Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd;
4) RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd Pty Ltd; and
5) Tropic Asphalt Pty Ltd.
The five conforming tenders all tendered on the three portions of the contract.
The tenders were then evaluated using the following criteria:
Capability and Resourcing
Track Record
Methodology
Quality
Safety
Environment Sustainability
Contribution to Local Economy
Price
The evaluation methodology considered non-price elements (65% of the score) and a price
component (35% of the score).
3. Portion A – Asphalt Surfacing, Rehabilitation and Construction Programme
Portion A is the main component of Council’s road surfacing, rehabilitation and construction
programme. This portion is associated with asphalt surfacing. The majority of these projects are
high order roads that are severely cracked and require the existing surface to be removed and
then replaced at the same level.
Five conforming tenders were evaluated for Portion A of the contract; Allen’s Asphalt Pty Ltd,
Allroad Surfaces, Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd, RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd and Tropic Asphalt Pty
Ltd.
Allroad Surfaces demonstrated as the most advantageous tender to Council, with Allen’s Asphalt
Pty Ltd scoring the second highest during the evaluation process.
Following on from the 2016-17 resurfacing program which used high proportions of recycled
materials, contractors were asked to supply prices for using Recycled Asphalt Profiling’s (RAP) in
the asphalt. It was hoped that this would achieve better value for money and be a sustainable
outcome. While all five contractors offered this approach, pricings offered were higher than
anticipated; therefore the continued use of virgin asphalt mix is the most cost effective (refer
Finance & Risk).
Allroad Surfaces is recommended as the preferred contractor for Portion A.
4. Portion B – Mill and Fill Pavement Repairs
Portion B is associated with asphalt pavement repairs. The pavement repairs are a vital part of
preparation works prior to asphalt overlays and spray sealing as well as general maintenance of
the road surface. Pavement repairs ensure that the pavement is structurally sound prior to
resurfacing.
Page 23 of 70
Section 24
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Five conforming tenders were evaluated for Portion B of the contract; Allen’s Asphalt Pty Ltd,
Allroad Surfaces, Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd, RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd and Tropic Asphalt Pty
Ltd. All five contractors have been deemed highly capable in delivery of Portion B under the
contract. Under the terms of this contract, it is recommended that Council exercise its right to
award separable portions to multiple contractors, while not guaranteeing any quantities.
There are two main advantages to awarding Portion B to all five conforming tenderers:
1) Contractor Capacity and Availability – Provides Council with greater flexibility to engage
one or more contractors, including simultaneously, to respond to Council requirements in a
timely manner.
2) Diverse Supplier Base – Given the low risk nature of Mill and Fill services, having multiple
supplier options will provide the Council with the opportunity to increase supplier exposure
to this type of work including for suppliers who may not have had the opportunity to work
for Council previously.
Allen’s Asphalt, Allroad Surfaces Pty Ltd, Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd
and Tropic Asphalt are all recommended as the preferred contractors for Portion B.
5. Portion C – Spray Sealing
Portion C is for spray sealing of rural roads. Spray sealing utilises different plant and equipment
than asphalt paving. Five conforming tenders were evaluated for Portion C of the contract; Allen’s
Asphalt Pty Ltd, Allroad Surfaces, Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd, RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd Pty Ltd
and Tropic Asphalt Pty Ltd.
RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd demonstrated as the most advantageous tender to Council during the
evaluation process, with Allen’s Asphalt Pty Ltd scoring second highest. Noosa Council have
used RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd to perform this portion of the contract in the past and have
performed well.
RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd also offer the option to use ‘Tonerseal’ which exceeds 20% recycled
content of the spray binder. This binder is offered to Council at a 23% more expensive rate than
the standard binder (refer Finance & Risk).
RPQ North Coast Pty Ltd is the recommended preferred contractor for Portion C.
6. Programme
Once the contract is awarded, a programme will be scheduled and works will commence as soon
as practical. In the interim all preparatory works including some of the pavement repairs have
been completed or programmed to allow coordination with limited delays.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil
Finance & Risk
The current adopted budget for the Road Resurfacing and Rehabilitation programme is $4.0m.
The tendered price has increased from the 2016-17 year by 15%. Based on last year’s prices the
program scheduled for this year would have allowed Council to treat 15.6km of road in 2017-18,
20.3 km of road in 2018-19 and 38.1 km of road in 2019-20. As a result of the increased costs
(including the potential use of RAP and ‘Tonerseal’), the program will be monitored to track
progress with alternative delivery methods, treatments and possible budget review.
Page 24 of 70
Section 25
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
20
18
16
Length (Km)
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2018 2019 2020
Spray Sealing (Km) 10.5 12 18.8
Asphalt (Km) 3.5 7.2 18.9
Rehabilitation (Km) 1.6 1.1 0.4
Year
Spray Sealing (Km) Asphalt (Km) Rehabilitation (Km)
Graph 1. 2018-20 Resurfacing lengths by treatment
This contract is required to start at the earliest opportunity to ensure the successful contractor
has time to complete the 2017-18 road resurfacing program. There is a high risk if this contract is
not awarded as soon as possible, that not all of the projects will be completed.
Additionally, if significant rainfall occurs during the term of this contract this could inhibit the
contractor completing this financial year’s projects by a preferred completion date of March 2018.
Council has utilised the Local Buy Panel Arrangement for the procurement of services under this
contract.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Council held an industry pre tender briefing on 21 July 2017 to all interested contractors.
Council will be in consultation with members of the public, businesses and organisations that will
be directly affected by road works once the contract has been awarded.
Internal Consultation
Finance, Procurement, Environment, Civil Operations and Asset Planning Schemes.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services Environment & Sustainable Development X Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 25 of 70
Section 26
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 26 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
ATTACHMENT 1
Noosa Council
2018-20 Resealing and Rehabilitation Programme
Year Road uburb Extents Proposed
S Treatment
GYMPIE
2017/2018 | + peace NOOSAVILLE PROPERTY #111 TO PROPERTY #149 | MILLAND FILL AC14
HILTON EUMUNDI NOOSA RD. & GYMPIE
2017/2018 | + peace NOOSAVILLE <A BOLNDAEISUT MILL AND FILL AC14
2017/2018 | WEYBA ROAD NOOSAVILLE REEF ST TO LESLIE DR MILL AND FILL AC14
2017/2018 | NOOSA DRIVE NOOSAVILLE raidea TO ROUNDABOUT AT | wait AND FILLAC14
ELINMUIND EUMUNDI NOOSA RD. / GIBSON RD.
201772018 | anos ROAD NOOSAVILLE ROUNDABOUT TO HILTON TER. MILL AND FILL AC14
ROUNDABOUT
EUMUNDI EUMUNDI RD / GIBSON RD ROUND-
2017/2018 | \o95a ROAD NOOSAVILLE acur MILL AND FILL AC14
2017/2018 ae TEWANTIN SIDONI ST TO WERIN ST MILL AND FILL AC14
2017/2018 ST ANDREWS reNoANNTIN COOROY NOOSA RD TO LINKSLAND | 2-114,
DRIVE ST
2017/2018 lac TEWANTIN BECKMAN TO OUTLOOK REHAB
2017/2018 COORuY TEWANTIN GRIFFITH AVE TO GYNDIER DR MILL AND FILL AC14
NOOSA ROAD
COOROY GYNDIER DR TO END OF COUNCIL
2017/2018 | \oosaroap | TEWANTIN enegree: MILL AND FILL AC14
BLACK
2017/2018 | MOUNTAIN BLACK MOUNTAIN — | VARIOUS SEGMENTS a ene
(SAM)
ROAD
CRAWFORDS BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD TO END OF | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 ROAD BLACK MOUNTAIN | <4 (SAM)
EUNGELLA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 | pive BLACK MOUNTAIN — | BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD TO #24 (SAM)
EUNGELLA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 | pive BLACK MOUNTAIN — | #24 TO RADIO TOWER (SAM)
2017/2018 | BROWNS DRIVE | COOROY NANDROYA ROAD TO CUL-DE-SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
2017/2018 | FERRELLS ROAD | COOROY ROBERTS DRIVE TO #37 SAM), cecbenen
2017/2018 | FERRELLS ROAD | COOROY #37 TO TREE FROG LANE (caM), cee
2017/2018 | FERRELLS ROAD | COOROY TREE FROG LANE TO #141 ag caaaaneate!
2017/2018 | FERRELLS ROAD | COOROY #141 TO SILVER LEAF LANE ne aararan
Page 26 of 70Section 27
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 27 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Extents Proposed
Treatment
2017/2018 | FERRELLS ROAD | COOROY SILVER LEAF LANE TO END OF SEAL (say, COAT SEAL
COOTHARABA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 ROAD COOTHARABA #80 TO #135 (SAM)
COOTHARABA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 ROAD COOTHARABA #168 TO TOMKINSON ROAD (SAM)
COOTHARABA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 | pon COOTHARABA TOMKINSON ROAD TO #248 (SAM)
GWANDALAN FOREST ACRES DRIVE TO KAMALA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 ROAD LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE (SAM)
2017/2018 | LAUREL LANE LAKE MACDONALD romeo ROAD TO HAMMERSLEY (SAM), COAT SEAL
HAYWARD COOROY NOOSA ROAD TO END OF | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 ROAD LAKE MACDONALD SEAL, #15 (SAM)
LAKE RIDGE LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE TO CUL- SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 COURT LAKE MACDONALD DE-SAC (SAM)
LAKE
2017/2018 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD NOOSA SPRING WATER TO #322 REHAB
DRIVE
PINE TREE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 DRIVE LAKE MACDONALD GUMTREE DRIVE TO PINE TREE EAST (SAM)
TINBEERWAH COOROY NOOSA ROAD TO END OF SINGLE COAT SEAL
2017/2018 ROAD TINBEERWAH SEAL (SAM)
2018/2019 Way. Low CASTAWAY BEACH Po MILL AND FILL AC14
EENIE CREEK LANGURA STREET ROUNDABOUT
2018/2019 ROAD NOOSA HEADS TO LANGURA STREET ROUNDABOUT MILL AND FILL AC14
EENIE CREEK NOOSA CIVIC ENTRANCE TO
2018/2019 ROAD NOOSAVILLE WALTER HAY DR MILL AND FILL AC14
EENIE CREEK WALTER HAY DR TO NOOSA CIVIC
2018/2019 ROAD NOOSAVILLE ENTRANCE MILL AND FILL AC14
EENIE CREEK WALTER HAY DRIVE ROUNDABOUT
2018/2019 | oan NOOSAVILLE TO WALTER HAY DRIVE MILL AND FILL AC14
ROUNDABOUT
EENIE CREEK REEF STREET ROUNDABOUT TO
2018/2019 | pon NOOSAVILLE REEF STREET ROUNDABOUT MILL AND FILL AC14
2018/2019 | EUMUNDI NOOSAVILLE GOODCHAP ST TO GIBSON RD MILL AND FILL AC14
NOOSA ROAD
BELMORE
2018/2019 SUNSHINE BEACH BRYAN ST TO CARPARK MILL AND FILL AC14
TERRACE
2018/2019 BRYAN STREET SUNSHINE BEACH DUKE ST TO PARKEDGE RD MILL AND FILL AC14
2018/2019 | DUKE STREET SUNSHINE BEACH BRYAN ST TO HENDERSON ST MILL AND FILL AC14
EDWARDS
2019/2020 STREET ROAD SUNSHINE BEACH DEAD END TO ADONIS STREET BCC1 (MICRO)
EDWARDS ADONIS STREET TO WILDFLOWER
2019/2020 STREET ROAD SUNSHINE BEACH STREET BCC1 (MICRO)
2018/2019 one SUNSHINE BEACH PACIC AVE TO DUKE ST MILL AND FILL AC14
2018/2019 onetr SUNSHINE BEACH HILL ST TO DUKE ST MILL AND FILL AC14
Page 27 of 70Section 28
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 28 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Extents Proposed
Treatment
2018/2019 HILL STREET SUNSHINE BEACH DAVID LOW WAY TO END MILL AND FILL AC14
MAHER
2018/2019 SUNSHINE BEACH STEVENS ST TO END MILL AND FILL AC14
TERRACE
PACIFIC
2018/2019 AVENUE SUNSHINE BEACH EDWARD ST TO HILL ST MILL AND FILL AC14
STEVENS
2018/2019 | —oeey SUNSHINE BEACH BELMORE TCE TO MAHER TCE MILL AND FILL AC14
THE
2019/2020 | ESPLANADE SUNSHINE BEACH MAHER TERRACE TO CUL-DE-SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
ESPLANADE
BLACKHEATH LINKSLAND STREET TO FURNESS
2019/2020 | peive TEWANTIN DRIVE BCC1 (MICRO)
COOROY
2018/2019 NOOSA ROAD TEWANTIN STAGE 3 MILL AND FILL AC14
2018/2019 ERNEST STREET | TEWANTIN HILTON TCE TO GOODCHAP ST MILL AND FILL AC14
FAIRWAY COOROY NOOSA ROAD TO FURNESS
2019/2020 | ppive TEWANTIN DRIVE BCC1 (MICRO)
TROON COURT TO ST ANDREWS
2019/2020 FURNESS DRIVE | TEWANTIN DRIVE SOUTH BCC1 (MICRO)
GOLF COURSE COOROY NOOSA ROAD TO
2019/2020 DRIVE TEWANTIN CARRAMAR STREET BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 Sect TEWANTIN JOYCE STREET TO POINCIANA AVE | BCC1 (MICRO)
HILTON #1 HILTON TCE TO #153 HILTON TCE
2018/2019 TERRACE TEWANTIN (INCL ROUND A BOUT) AC14 OVERLAY
MUIRFIELD BLACKHEATH DRIVE TO FURNESS
2019/2020 CRESCENT TEWANTIN DRIVE BCC1 (MICRO)
POINCIANA DIYAN STREET EAST KERB TO
2019/2020 AVENUE TEWANTIN PELICAN ST, COUNCIL OFFICE BOCd OVERLAY
2018/2019 | ALBERT STREET COORAN creer. STREET TO CHARLES BCC1 (MICRO)
2018/2019 | COACH COURT | COOROIBAH CARRIAGE WAY TO DEAD END (Gant) COAT SEAL
JIRRIMA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 CRESCENT COOROIBAH #11A TO #6 (SAM)
JIRRIMA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 CRESCENT COOROIBAH #6 TO LAKE COOROIBAH ROAD (SAM)
SILVERDALE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 COURT COOROIBAH GLENRIDGE DRIVE TO CUL-DE-SAC (SAM)
CALLISTEMON SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 COURT COOTHARABA BORONIA ROAD TO DEAD END (SAM)
HEMPSALL SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 ROAD COOTHARABA KINMOND CREEK ROAD TO #58 (SAM)
HEMPSALL SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | pony COOTHARABA #58 TO DEAD END (SAM)
2018/2019 | KILDEYSROAD | COOTHARABA LAKE FLAT ROAD TO #56 (saMy, COAT SEAL
KINMOND START OF SEAL TO HEMPSALL ROAD SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 CREEK ROAD COOTHARABA (END OF SEAL) (SAM)
Page 28 of 70Section 29
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 29 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Proposed
Treatment
MANORINA LOUIS BAZZO DRIVE TO #24, END OF | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 COOTHARABA ROAD RESERVE (SAM)
BEDDINGTON SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 ROAD DOONAN WUST RD TO WATTLEBIRD (SAM)
2018/2019 Map CREEK FEDERAL #323 TO END SEAL, #376 REHAB
SKYRING CREEK OLD BRUCE HIGHWAY WEST TO END | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | pon FEDERAL OF SEAL (SAM)
2018/2019 STREET xmxn | MAIN STREET TO GRADY STREET (SAM)
BOWMAN SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | MAIN STREET fxm | ROUNDABOUT TO PALMER STREET BCC1 (MICRO)
2018/2019 | MAIN STREET PALMER STREET TO BOWMAN BCC1 (MICRO)
STREET
2018/2019 | MAIN STREET KIvKIN | WAHPUNGA ROAD BCC1 (MICRO)
BOWMAN STREET TO OLD
2018/2019 | MAIN STREET KIvKn | POMONA KIN KIN ROAD BCC1 (MICRO)
OLD WAHPUNGA ROAD TO
2018/2019 ROAD KIvKn | START OF SEAL TO END OF SEAL (SAM)
MORAN GROUP SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | PALMER STREET KInKN | INTERSECTION TO LOOP GAM), COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | PALMER STREET KINKIN | START LOOP TO END LOOP GAM), COAT SEAL
NOOSA NORTH CARAVAN PARK TO 300M PAST SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | BEACH ROAD SHORE CARAVAN PARK (SAM)
2018/2019 MAXIMILLIAN NOOSA NORTH TEEWAH BEACH ROAD TO WOODS SINGLE COAT SEAL
ROAD SHORE LANE (SAM)
MAXIMILLIAN NOOSA NORTH SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | pon SHORE WOODS LANE TO CH 1225 (SAM)
2019/2020 | BAZZO ROAD PINBARREN GRAHAMS ROAD TO END OF SEAL GAM), COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | CROZIERS ROAD | PINBARREN GRAHAMS ROAD TO END OF SEAL NM) COAT SEAL
IN AT SEA
UPPER
2018/2019 | PINBARREN CK PINBARREN POMONA KIN KIN ROAD TO #30 SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
UPPER
2018/2019 | PINBARREN CK | PINBARREN #30 TO #59 SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
AMBULANCE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 STREET POMONA MILL STREET TO END OF SEAL (SAM)
2018/2019 oeer POMONA START OF SEAL TO HILL ST REHAB
POMONA CONNECTION ROAD TO SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | BARINA COURT POMONA CUL-DE-SAC (SAM)
BLACK PINCH SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 ROAD POMONA LOUIS BAZZO DRIVE TO END OF SEAL (SAM)
GRAHAMS SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 ROAD POMONA END OF SEAL TO CROZIERS ROAD (SAM)
JACKEROO SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | out POMONA HIGHFIELD RISE TO DEAD END (SAM)
Page 29 of 70Section 30
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 30 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Suburb Extents Proposed
Treatment
2018/2019 | MCCABES ROAD | POMONA BLACK PINCH ROAD TO END OF SEAL (say, COAT SEAL
EXHIBITION STREET TO SANDY SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | SUMMIT ROAD POMONA STREET (SAM)
2018/2019 | SUMMIT ROAD POMONA SANDY STREET TO TREE STREET GAM), COAT SEAL
UNDERWOOD SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | 6 Goce POMONA SETTLERS RISE TO CUL-DE-SAC (SAM)
BRUSHTAIL HINTERLAND CLOSE TO SUNSET
2018/2019 TINBEERWAH VILLA BCC1 (MICRO)
2018/2019 | COVEYS ROAD TINBEERWAH #47 TOTINBEERWAH ROAD (SAM), COAT SEAL
START OF SEAL (#175) TO COOROY ‘| SINGLE COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | COVEYS ROAD TINBEERWAH NOOSA ROAD (SAM)
2018/2019 | SUNRISE ROAD TINBEERWAH SUGAR GLIDER LN TO WNDOMA CRT (sant) COAT SEAL
2018/2019 | SUNRISE ROAD | TINBEERWAH WENDOMA CRT TO BOUNDARY (sant) COAT SEAL
2019/2020 Close TINBEERWAH SUNRISE ROAD TO CUL DE SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | MAPLE STREET COOROY GARNET ST TO MARARA ST MILL AND FILL AC14
2019/2020 | MYALLSTREET | COOROY ELM ST TO GARNET ST MILL AND FILL AC14
2019/2020 | BROLGA LANE NOOSA HEADS ove DRIVE TO SLEEPY HOLLOW AC14 OVERLAY
ELANORA
2019/2020 TERRACE NOOSA HEADS COOYAR STREET TO NATURI STREET BCC1 (MICRO)
LANGURA COOYAR STREET TO 50M PAST # 14
2019/2020 | acer NOOSA HEADS AMBULANCE ENTRY BCC2 OVERLAY
2019/2020 | LANYANA WAY NOOSA HEADS COOYAR STREET TO END OF STREET BCC2 OVERLAY
2019/2020 | NOOSADRIVE | NOOSA HEADS STINGS BLVD TO ALLAMB AC14 OVERLAY
HASTIN VD TO ALLAMBI
TERRACE
2019/2020 NOOSA NOOSA HEADS BEND IN ROAD TO WALLUM LANE BCC1 (MICRO)
SPRINGS DRIVE
2019/2020 | PARK ROAD NOOSA HEADS UTTLE COVE ROAR TO HASTINGS BCC2 OVERLAY
STREET
2019/2020 | PARK ROAD NOOSA HEADS PARK ROAD TO CUL-DE-SAC MILL AND FILL BCC2
2019/2020 | PAUL STREET NOOSA HEADS SUNSET DRIVE TO LESLIE DRIVE BCC2 OVERLAY
2019/2020 WEYBA NOOSA HEADS COCKATOO LINK TO END OF STREET MILL AND FILL BCC2
ESPLANADE
2018/2019 MOORINDE TEWANTIN READ ST TO FERRY REHAB
STREET
2019/2020 wren DIL TEWANTIN GYMPIE STREET TO GEORGE STREET BCC2 OVERLAY
BEECHTREE #39 TO END OF ROAD RESERVE, SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | poap BLACK MOUNTAIN | 45 cg (SAM)
Page 30 of 70Section 31
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 31 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Extents Proposed
Treatment
BLACK
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN BLACK MOUNTAIN #36 TO BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD a COAT SEAL
RANGE ROAD
BLACK
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN BLACK MOUNTAIN BRIDLE LANE TO #200 SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
BLACK
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN BLACK MOUNTAIN — | #200 TO START AC GAM), COAT SEAL
ROAD
BLACK
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN BLACK MOUNTAIN #370 TO #413 SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
BLACK
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN BLACK MOUNTAIN #559 TO END OF SEAL SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
BOUGAINVILLEA BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD TO END OF | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | rove BLACK MOU SEAL (SAM)
K MOUNTAIN
2019/2020 Since EDGUM | BLACK MOUNTAIN | BLUEBERRY DRIVE TO #11 BCC2 OVERLAY
2019/2020 neve BLACK MOUNTAIN BLUEBERRY DRIVE TO CUL-DE-SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | ARNLYN COURT | COOROY EVANS ROAD TO BIRDWOOD STREET ‘ NM) RAV SEAE
IN COAT SEA
BAGNALLS SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD COOROY PINE #6 (START OF BRIDGE) (SAM)
BAGNALLS SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD COOROY #6 (START OF BRIDGE) TO #41 (SAM)
BAGNALLS SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | oan COOROY #41 TO CURRY CRT (SAM)
2019/2020 | CEDAR STREET COOROY RUBY STREET TO TOPAZ STREET MILL AND FILL AC14
COLONIAL SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 COURT COOROY OVERLANDER AVE TO CUL-DE-SAC (SAM)
COOROY BELLI
2019/2020 | Creek ROAD COOROY ROBERTS DRIVE TO #137 BCC1 (MICRO)
COOROY BELLI
2019/2020 | Corek ROAD COOROY #169 TO WUST ROAD BCC1 (MICRO)
COOROY BELLI SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 CREEK ROAD COOROY DONNELLYS ROAD TO #1465 (SAM)
COOROY
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN COOROY LUKES ROAD TO #353 BCC1 (MICRO)
ROAD
COOROY
2019/2020 | MOUNTAIN COOROY #164 TO #196 REHAB
ROAD
2019/2020 vee COOROY ASHGROVE DRIVE TO CUL-DE-SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
EMERALD
2019/2020 | —oeey COOROY MAPLE STREET TO WATTLE STREET | BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | FERRELLS ROAD | COOROY #37 TO TREE FROG LANE BCC1 (MICRO)
Page 31 of 70Section 32
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 32 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Suburb Extents Proposed
Treatment
2019/2020 | GARNET STREET | COOROY MAPLE STREET TO CUL DE SAC AC14 OVERLAY
TAYLOR COURT TO PROPERTY
2019/2020 | HOLTS ROAD COOROY GRAVEL ENTRANCE BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | HOLTS ROAD COOROY hoe GRAVEL ENTRANCE TO BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | HOLTS ROAD COOROY #102 TO OCEAN VIEW RD BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 Hoa PINE COOROY OCEAN VIEW ROAD TO DEAD END BCC1 (MICRO)
OVERLANDER AVENUE TO BELLI
2019/2020 | MAPLE STREET COOROY CREEK ROAD OVERPASS BCC2 OVERLAY
2019/2020 | MARTINS ROAD | COOROY NANDROYA ROAD TO END OF SEAL BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 von RIVER COOROY BRIDGE ABUTMENT (WEST) TO #142 | MILL AND FILL AC14
2019/2020 ven RIVER COOROY LAWNVILLE ROAD TO WURLI COURT | BCC1 (MICRO)
MARY RIVER WURLI COURT TO BRIDGE
2019/2020 | eoap COOROY ABUTMENT (WEST) BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 voaD ROYA COOROY #9 TO #43 BCC1 (MICRO)
NORTHEDEN BELLEDEN PLACE TO CUL-DE-SAC
2019/2020 | Court COOROY (NTH) BCC2 OVERLAY
OLD CEYLON COOROY BELLI CREEK ROAD TO
2019/2020 | eoap COOROY SPITFIRE LANE BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 AVENUE COOROY #30 TO FERRELLS ROAD MILL AND FILL AC14
PEARSONS ELM STREET TO CARRUTHERS
2019/2020 | pon COOROY COURT BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | PINE STREET COOROY MARY RIVER ROAD TO GARNET REHAB
STREET
2019/2020 | PINE STREET COOROY GARNETT ST TO #48 NM) COAT SEAL
IN AT SEA
2019/2020 | PINE STREET COOROY #48 TO BAGNALLS ROAD GAM), COAT SEAL
N T SEA
2019/2020 ORE COOROY BANGALOW COURT TO #24 BCC1 (MICRO)
PONDEROSA MARY RIVER ROAD TO BANGALOW SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 DRIVE COOROY COURT (SAM)
2019/2020 | ROBERTS DRIVE | COOROY COOROY BELLI CREEK ROAD TO #12 BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | ROBERTS DRIVE | COOROY #12 TO FERRELLS ROAD BCC1 (MICRO)
MAPLE STREET ROUNDABOUT TO
2019/2020 | TULIP STREET COOROY TULIP LANE MILL AND FILL AC14
2019/2020 | WATTLE STREET | COOROY BONNELL LANE TO VICTORY LANE MILL AND FILL AC14
2019/2020 | WATTLE STREET | COOROY VICTORY LANE TO GARNET STREET | MILLAND FILL AC14
Page 32 of 70Section 33
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 33 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Suburb Extents Proposed
Treatment
COOTHARABA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | poan COOTHARABA CHAINAGE POINT TO #1057 (SAM)
DANDALOO SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 DRIVE COOTHARABA JUNCTION ROAD TO END OF SEAL (SAM)
COOTHARABA ROAD TO END OF SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | DAVIS ROAD COOTHARABA SEAL (SAM)
JUNCTION SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | Roan COOTHARABA GREENFIELDS LANE TO #50 (SAM)
JUNCTION SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD COOTHARABA #50 TO LOUIS BAZZO DRIVE (SAM)
LAKE FLAT LOUIS BAZZO DRIVE/LAGUNA ST TO SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD COOTHARABA WOONGAR STREET (SAM)
LAKE FLAT CHAINAGE POINT TO CHAINAGE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD COOTHARABA POINT (SAM)
LOUIS BAZZO DRIVE TO END OF SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | NAPIER ROAD COOTHARABA ROAD RESERVE, #34 (SAM)
MIDDLE CREEK SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | roan FEDERAL #123 TO #163 (SAM)
MIDDLE CREEK SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD FEDERAL ANDERSONS ROAD TO #293 (SAM)
SKYRING CREEK START OF SEAL TO OLD BRUCE HWY SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | roan FEDERAL SOUTH (SAM)
PAULSENS GYMPIE KIN KIN ROAD TO END OF SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 fowD CREEK KvKn | #90 TO ARTHUR STUBBINS ROAD BCC1 (MICRO)
WILLIAMS BEND IN ROAD TO BLACK PINCH SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 BRE LAKE MACDONALD | COLLWOOD ROAD TO HILLTOP CRT | BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 SRE EW LAKE MACDONALD HILLTOP CRT TO #88 BCC1 (MICRO)
CLEARVIEW SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | Daive LAKE MACDONALD | #88 TO CUL-DE-SAC (SAM)
2019/2020 mony LAKE MACDONALD GUMBOIL ROAD TO END OF SEAL BCC1 (MICRO)
GREY GUM FOREST ACRES DRIVE TO CUL-DE- SINGLE COAT SEAL
GUMTREE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 DRIVE LAKE MACDONALD SWIFT DRIVE TO #15 (SAM)
GUMTREE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 DRIVE LAKE MACDONALD #15 TO PINE TREE DRIVE (SAM)
LAKE
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD #16 TO #29 MILL AND FILL AC14
DRIVE
LAKE
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD #29 TO BLUE WREN PLACE MILL AND FILL AC14
DRIVE
Lane BLUE WREN PLACE TO DIANELLA
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD MILL AND FILL AC14
COURT
DRIVE
Page 33 of 70Section 34
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 34 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Suburb Extents Proposed
Treatment
LAKE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD SWIFT DR TO #130
(SAM)
DRIVE
LAKE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD #130 TO LAKERIDGE COURT
(SAM)
DRIVE
LAKE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD _ | LAKERIDGE COURT TO HOY RD (SAM)
DRIVE
LAKE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD HOY RD TO NOOSA SPRING WATER
(SAM)
DRIVE
2019/2020 OLD TEWANTIN LAKE MACDONALD LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE TO #389 SINGLE COAT SEAL
ROAD (SAM)
PINE TREE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 DRIVE LAKE MACDONALD PINE TREE EAST TO END OF ROAD (SAM)
WHITE WOOD SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | guar LAKE MACDONALD | KAMALA DRIVE TO CUL DE SAC (SAM)
BINALONG SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD PINBARREN BINALONG LANE TO #49 (SAM)
BINALONG SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD PINBARREN #49 TO #89 (SAM)
CAMPHOR POMONA KIN KIN NORTH TO 'STEEP SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 ROAD PINBARREN CLIMB' SIGN (SAM)
CAMPHOR STEEP CLIMB' SIGN TO END OF
2019/2020 ROAD PINBARREN STEEP SECTION BCC1 (MICRO)
MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW ROAD TO DEAD SINGLE COAT SEAL
MOUNTAIN SINGLE COAT SEAL
(0) PINBARREN POMONA KIN KIN ROAD TO #
MOUNTAIN SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | ew roap 13 TO END OF SEAL, #71 (SAM)
PINBARREN #13 TOEN F SEAL, #7
BELLBIRD FLAT POMONA KIN KIN ROAD TO HAWK SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | ooap POMONA ROAD (SAM)
BELWOOD SOUTH LOOP START TO SOUTH
2019/2020 | oi ace POMONA LOOP END BCC1 (MICRO)
BELWOOD CUL DE SAC SOUTH TO ELANDRA
2019/2020 | oy ace POMONA TERRACE BCC1 (MICRO)
BELWOOD ELANDRA TERRACE TO CUL DE SAC
2019/2020 | py ace POMONA NORTH BCC1 (MICRO)
BELWOOD NORTH LOOP START TO NORTH
2019/2020 PLACE POMONA LOOP END BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 COOROORA POMONA PIONEER ROAD TO CUL-DE-SAC SINGLE COAT SEAL
RISE (SAM)
ELANDRA WINGARA PLACE TO BELWOOD
2019/2020 | - oeace POMONA PLAGE BCC1 (MICRO)
ELANDRA
2019/2020 POMONA EEWAH COURT TO DEAD END (EAST) | BCC1 (MICRO)
TERRACE
2018/2019 | EEWAH COURT POMONA ELANDRA TCE TO CUL DE SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
2018/2019 | EEWAH COURT POMONA CUL DE SAC TO END OF LOOP BCC1 (MICRO)
Page 34 of 70Section 35
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 35 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Year Road Suburb Extents Proposed
Treatment
PIONEER ROAD TO HAVENSIDE SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | HIGHFIELD RISE | POMONA COURT (SAM)
WYBALENA ROAD TO TANGLEWOOD | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | HIGHFIELD RISE | POMONA CLOSE (SAM)
2019/2020 | MILL STREET POMONA FACTORY STREET TO CHANGE IN BCC2 OVERLAY
SURFACE
2019/2020 | MILL STREET POMONA aA STREET TO SUMMIT BCC1 (MICRO)
MOUNTAIN SCHOOL/HOSPITAL STREET TO
2019/2020 | oeey POMONA CHURCH STREET BCC1 (MICRO)
PAVILION
2019/2020 | creer POMONA MILL STREET TO EXHIBITION STREET | BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 count POMONA HAWK ROAD TO CUL DE SAC BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | PINE STREET POMONA STATION ROAD TO DEAD END BCC1 (MICRO)
POTTERY RED STREET TO POTTERY STREET
2019/2020 | recy POMONA SOUTH BCC2 OVERLAY
RECTORY
2019/2020 | creer POMONA MEMORIAL AVENUE TO RED STREET | BCC1 (MICRO)
2019/2020 | RED STREET POMONA RECTORY STREET TO RAILWAY BCC1 (MICRO)
PARADE
SQUATTER SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | Court POMONA HIGHFIELD RISE TO DEAD END (SAM)
2019/2020 WOODCUTTER | ,oviona BUSHMAN COURT TO CUL-DE-SAC SINGLE COAT SEAL
RISE (SAM)
WYBALENA SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | roan POMONA HIGHFIELD RISE TO END OF SEAL (SAM)
COOROY
2019/2020 | NOOSASERVICE | TINBEERWAH SUNRISE ROAD TO #547 SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
COOROY
2019/2020 | NOOSA SERVICE | TINBEERWAH #547 TO DEAD END SINGLE COAT SEAL
(SAM)
ROAD
DATH COOROY NOOSA ROAD TO WORBA | SINGLE COAT SEAL
2019/2020 | HENDERSON TINBEERWAH LANE (SAM)
ROAD
Page 35 of 70Section 36
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 36 of 70
Final Evaluation ATTACHMENT 2
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet - Final Evaluation
*PORTION A - ASPHALT RESURFACING, REHABILITAITON & CONSTRUCTION*
[eames
PRICE
NAME OF TENDERER ee
(Conforming Tenders Only) — od .
supplier rates
1
2
3
4
5
5
7
BT
5 a
SS a
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS
Tabi Tab3 Tabs Tab2 Tab4
[eamta-sonacestomenss, | atone Sroces | MPEMTEETY Jatensaonae ry] Ee ee | CC
‘Tropic Asphalts Pt) Do er EDI Works PQ North Coast
Resultant Resultant Resultant Resultant Resultant Resultant
weighting weighting weighting weighting weighting weighting
esta nescucig | tem | | em | mm | rm | | om | wm | em | | sm | io | om | o | om] o | om | o | om | o | om |
fomectmetencencirety | am | mm | sm | o@ | cm | mo | om | im | rm | | sm] io [om] o | om] o | om] o fom] o | om |
Pmerossmey fm | cm | om | om | om | om | om | rm [| so | io [om [io | om] oo [om | o | om] o | om |
omy mm Tm | rm | | rm | om | om | i | co | @ | ow | o | om | o | om] o | om | o | om | o | om |
feornasetesy | mm | | rm | ows | os | ws | om | os | ro |» | om | o | om | © | om | o | om | o | om | o | om |
measeninatany || | am | wm | om | mm | om | om | smo | m | om | o [om] o | om] o | om] o | om] o | om |
constiontotecttcoomy sew | eo | coo | ws | ras | ws | a | ns | rs | vs [om | o | om | © | om | o | om | o | om | o | om |
ects mT sm ie ss em lm
LS Po
fotal Fees (Pc) 35% $3,249,958 $3,528,898 $3,702,061 $3,915,201 $4,097,934
erage Fees (Pav) Snncenenneneeneenee $3,698,810
Price Score 112 105 100 4 89
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 93 83 4 80
ghted Price Score (Pw)
a
a ee ee ee The Contract Administrator confirms the above scores
and weightings of this evaluation
| _ Assesment PanelMember2 | Works Coordinator
| Assesment Panel Members| Asset Planning Manager
| __ Assesment Panel Members | Technical Officer Civil Operations |
| Assesment Panel MemberS | Human Resources Officer - Workplace Health and Safety |
1718T021 - Evaluation Workbook - Portion A Page 1 28/08/2017Section 37
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 37 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Final Evaluation ATTACHMENT 3
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet - Final Evaluation
[ernie NO
(excl of GST)
[Calculated via:
NAME OF TENDERER Backlog pavement &
(Conforming Tenders Only) surfacing
requirements
x supplier rates -
tonne]
1 [Allroad Surfaces S295
2
3 [Tropic Asphalts Pty Utd S308]
4
S [Allen's Asphalt Ptyid 88
6
TTT
8 EEE
TT
10
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS
| PaatA=Henesenetemanme, | irooasurteces [MON ae | min Pw | CCC
primtmcie | ema fe | ee et el el el = el el
ting ! hing tin ting fe
Revstnyanevoucng | tome me | emo | | soo | m | rm | im | sm | me fem |e [om | o | om | o | om | o | om] o | om |
onract experience acanacty | some | ao | am | so | so | m | roo | m | rm | wo [sm | o | om | o | om | o | om] o | om] o | om |
Detedooey | tm we | cm | me | sw | mm | or | | rm | me | em | io | | o | om | o | om { o [om o | om |
omy mm | vm | wm | co | mm | rm | os | oso | mm | em | io | om] o | om | o | om o | om] o | om |
Peat asatety tome | | rm | | om | ors | os | os |r | ws | om | 0 | om | o | om | o | om | o | om | o | om |
necnment asutaatiy | se | | am | om | am | wm | oo | io | so | wm | am | io | om | o | om | o | om] o | om] o | om |
entibuontotecttconomy | sow | eo | soo | rs | om | us | ras | ws | ra | ws [ss | 0 | om | 0 | om | o | om | o | om | o | om |
sattachatscre fem | smitty eaten | ome le
ee ee ee ee
‘otal Fees (Pc) $295 $301 $308 $359 $382 $0
erage Fees (Pav) $............csesnee
Price Score 110 109 106 91 ty o
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 98 9% 82 76 o
jeighted Price Score (Pw)
aS
|___Contract Administrator & Assesment PanelMember1 | Civil Operations Manager| and weightings of this evaluation
|__ Assesment PanelMember2 | Works Coordinator
|__ Assesment Panel Members | Asset Planning Manager | | __ Contract Administrator's signature: | __Civil Operations Manager |
| _ Assesment PanelMembera | Technical Officer CivilOperations |
| Assesment Panel MemberS | Human Resources Officer - Workplace Health and Safety |
17187021 - Evaluation Workbook - Portion B Page 1 28/08/2017
Page 37 of 70Section 38
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 38 of 70
Final Evaluation ATTACHMENT 4
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet - Final Evaluation
*PORTION C - BITUMEN SEALING*
PRICE
NAME OF TENDERER ene )
(Conforming Tend ane
\ nae arr cay) 1718 Council Program
x supplier rates)
1
2 [Alen'sAsphanPyyutd CT «S83
3
4
5
C5 a (|
Dp
Bf
9S
Op
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS
Tabi Tab3 Tab2 Tab 4 Tabs
| ant tonaceneioments, | ag fens Aso reyes yg | Arona suoces [UT CC
PQ Nort! O Do Di Wo Topic Asphal
[Resultant score| Resultant score]
x weighting x weighting :
fromvamone | mm | fem [ew fem|w | em |» frm] m [rm] o fom] o [om] o [om] > [om] o | om |
fommcemimencmn fm || f~fm=[»|[m|~|[m|«lm|»[m,[ fm, >|m|e|m| ||
Petwdcloy | mm | | swe | me | sm [om | ir | i | ow | im | rm | oo [ow | io [oo | o {om | o | om] io | om |
avsnsy mm Tm | to | im | to | is | sso | rm | rm | im | rm | 0 | ow | o | oo | o | a | o | om | o | om |
femesey | | fom fost] =] ~|mpesfs|efm|el[m[»[]~][m]-|m|
Se OD
fomsinmiaionm —| —me | [on [os fam fotos | w fem foto]efewf fm] «fel fm] > ||
SD SO
a a
Paar rrcnetement Tag fates Asa rey Tag | Atowasutoces [UT | CT CE
PQ North Coast Pt Do DI Works Pt Topic Asphalts Pt
otal Fees (Pc) $233,949 $334,316 $338,590 $342,291 $389,652 $0 $o $0
erage Fees (PAV) $.....crscsesssseeerseeeee
Price Score 129 98 7 96 81 0 0 0
[Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 76 75 4 63 0 0 0
jeighted Price Score (Pw)
a a
| tattmmennrane) | Paatien tte
Position Title The Contract Administrator confirms the above scores
|___Contract Administrator & Assesment Panel Member1__|______—Civil Operations Manager| ‘and weightings of this evaluation
| Assesment PanelMember2_ | Works Coordinator
|___ Assesment Panel Members] Asset Planning Manager | Contract Administrator's signature:
|___ Assesment Panel Membera | Technical Officer Civil Operations |
[| __ Assesment Panel MemberS | Human Resources Officer - Workplace Health and Safety |
17187021 - Evaluation Workbook - Portion C Page 1 28/08/2017Section 39
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
4 INCLUSION OF LAKE COOROIBAH IN GARDEN WASTE RECYCLING AREA
Author Manager Waste and Environmental Health, Wayne Schafer
Community Services
Index ECM Waste Management/Garden Waste
Attachment 1. Map - Town of Lake Cooroibah - External boundary of the township
for garden waste services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Nil
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Manager Waste and Environmental Health to the Services &
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2017 and
A. Include the Lake Cooroibah urban area, as defined in Attachment 1 to the report, as an
area where Council will provide a garden waste recycling bin to residents, serviced
fortnightly; and
B. Advise owners of the proposed service and invite exemptions from service in accordance
with the current garden waste service policy, prior to delivery of bins and commencement
of service.
REPORT
1. Background
Council has agreed to implement a garden waste recycling service from 1 September 2017 to all
urban township areas excluding Kin Kin. The service areas are defined in 10 maps which outline
the boundary of the service areas. Premises within 5 kilometres of those areas are entitled to
request an optional garden waste service.
2. Current Services in Lake Cooroibah
The Lake Cooroibah locality includes an urban development that was not included in the current
defined garden waste service area.
Residents are encouraged to place garden waste into the red lidded general waste bin, instead of
transporting garden waste to a processing facility.
The locality:
is a significant distance from any approved green waste processing facility and most
properties contain heavy vegetation;
is an “optional garden service area” but only 22 of the 112 premises have taken up the
optional service;
can be provided with a garden waste service to all premises as Cleanaway currently
service about 20% of the premises.
Page 39 of 70
Section 40
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
3. Proposal for Lake Cooroibah to be a garden waste service area
It is suggested that the Lake Cooribah is no different to other urban township areas and should
have been provided with a 3 bin service. The proposed area for inclusion in the 3 bin service
area is defined in Attachment 1. Property owners would be provided with explanatory
correspondence about the service and be entitled to lodge an application for expemption prior to
roll out of the service.
4. Legislative process for inclusion of Lake Cooroibah in the garden waste service area
The Waste Reduction and Recycling Regulations 2011 provide that Council may by resolution
designate an area or areas of the region where it will undertake a waste (or garden waste)
collection service and nominate the frequency of collection. These requirements are fulfilled by
the proposed recommendation.
Previous Council Consideration
Council adopted the current defined garden waste service area during the acceptance of the
Waste Management Contract 1516T043 by Council resolution in December 2016.
Ordinary Meeting Minutes 15 December 2016, Item 7, Page 10
That Council note the report by the Manager Waste and Environmental Health to the General
Committee Meeting dated 12 December 2016 regarding the new 7 year waste management
contract 2017 - 2024, and:
A Award the Contract to Cleanaway Pty Ltd for performance of a Waste Management
Contract 2017 – 2024 as detailed in tender documents under Separable Portions A, B, and
C, for an initial period of 7 years (at an estimated contract value of $46 million)
commencing on Friday 1 September 2017, and including the ability to award a first
extension of contract for a period of two years and a further second extension of one year;
B The awarding of the Contract being subject to Cleanaway Pty Ltd paying the specified
Contract Performance Bonds for each Separable Portion A, B and C as detailed in the
tender documents;
C Accept the option provided in the tender documents for the introduction of a 3 bin waste
collection service to single unit domestic dwellings in the urban areas to include a third bin
for garden waste from September 2017 as detailed in the tender documents, Part E
Annexure 1, Schedule 1 “10 Maps detailing the external boundaries of Township Areas”
D Agree to the continued provision of an optional garden waste collection service to
commercial and multi-unit domestic premises and other premises within 5 kilometres of the
identified urban garden waste service area;
E Request that staff develop a Policy for the provision of the garden waste service and report
to a future meeting of Council;
F Engage King and Company to finalise the relevant contractual documents including
amendments resulting from contract negotiations and agreed contract departures, for
signing by the successful tenderer.
Finance & Risk
Expansion of the garden waste service area will generate increased revenue to offset the costs
of provision and collection of the bins by Cleanaway.
Inclusion of the area will overcome the fact that a significant but isolated urban area had not been
required to receive a 3 bin service area that has been provided to similar township areas.
Cleanaway already provides 22 garden waste services in the Lake Cooroibah area and has no
objection contractually to expanding the service to all properties shown in the attached map.
Page 40 of 70
Section 41
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Cleanaway have been consulted and support this proposal.
Prior to an expansion of the garden waste service staff will write to residents informing them of
proposed service. Owners will be invited to submit an application for service exemption if their
property is 400 square metres or less, or a contract gardener regularly removes all garden waste
from the property in accordance with current policy.
Internal Consultation
The extended area was discussed with the Director of Corporate Services and Director of
Community Services.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer X Community Services x Corporate Services
Executive Officer Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
x Waste & Environmental Health x Revenue Services
Executive Services Environment & Sustainable Development Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 41 of 70
Section 42
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
Page 42 of 70
MEETING A =
ICES & ORG ‘Section 43
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
REPORTS FOR NOTING BY THE COMMITTEE
5 NOOSA RESULTS FOR 2016 RURAL AND REGIONAL WELLBEING SURVEY
Author Community Development Manager, Alison Hamblin
Community Services
Index ECM/Subject/ 69.03 Community and Development
Attachments 1. Report on Noosa results from November 2016 Rural and Regional
Wellbeing Survey
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Community Development Manager to the Services &
Organisation Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2017 and the results for Noosa in the
University of Canberra’s Rural and Regional Wellbeing Survey November 2016.
REPORT
Background
In November 2016 the University of Canberra held the Regional Wellbeing Survey for the ninth
time. Noosa Council created the How happy is Noosa? campaign to encourage the community to
participate in this survey. Council became involved to firstly gauge how the community felt about
their personal and the community’s wellbeing. Secondly, Council was interested in finding where
Noosa people felt there were issues in liveability in the shire for further planning and decision-
making processes.
12,891 people from rural and regional Australia took part in the survey; 1,953 from regional
Queensland, with Noosa representing 320 of those responses. Other comparable areas received
a response rate of 45 (Sunshine Coast), and 105 (Gold Coast, Ipswich, Lockyer Valley, Logan,
Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim and Somerset), showing that Noosa offered a markedly
greater response as a result of the How Happy is Noosa? campaign.
Presentation of Noosa’s Results
Results from the University of Canberra were presented to Council in August 2017 as tables of
comparison between Noosa’s results and those of rural and regional Australia, rural and regional
Queensland, Southern Coastal Queensland (Gold Coast, Ipswich, Lockyer Valley, Logan,
Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim and Somerset), and the Sunshine Coast.
Attachment 1 - Noosa Results for Regional Wellbeing Survey 2016 - has been adapted from
those results, with focus specifically being on comparisons between the Noosa Shire results and
those of regional Australia and Queensland, as there was little response and consequently little
data from the Sunshine Coast and Southern Coastal Queensland that is comparable. Data was
sourced from the 2016 Regional Wellbeing Survey, QLD Southern Coastal and Sunshine Coast
region data tables, Version 1.01 July 2017. Results include community responses to survey
questions regarding: personal wellbeing, community wellbeing, personal financial wellbeing,
community economic wellbeing, health wellbeing, community leadership and collaboration, social
connectedness, access to services, crime and safety perceptions, landscape and aesthetics and
perceived environmental health.
Page 43 of 70
Section 44
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Results
The results show that the sense of wellbeing of Noosa residents exceeded that of regional
Australia and Queensland in the following areas:
Personal Wellbeing
Community Wellbeing
Personal Financial Wellbeing
Health Wellbeing
Community Wellbeing
Social Connectedness
Access to Services
Landscape and Aesthetics
Perceived Environmental Heath
The only area where Noosa fell behind was in our perceptions of crime and safety.
It should be emphasised that these are perceptions only. See Attachment 1 - Noosa Results for
Regional Wellbeing Survey 2016 for full results.
Where to From Here
While the comparisons between Noosa and regional Australia and Queensland are insightful, the
value of this data is in its ability to provide a baseline for further comparisons of Noosa residents’
sense of wellbeing, as the survey is performed annually. It is suggested that these results be
used as a mechanism to engage the Noosa community in participating in the survey again next
year and in subsequent years, with numbers of participants growing as community awareness of
the survey grows. The next survey is planned to be delivered in November 2017.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance & Risk
There was no cost for Noosa Council’s participation in the survey.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
The survey was facilitated by the University of Canberra. Staff in the Community Development
branch created the How happy is Noosa? campaign to encourage the community to participate.
Internal Consultation
Nil
Departments/Sections Consulted:
x Chief Executive Officer x Community Services Corporate Services
x Executive Officer x Community Development Financial Services
Executive Support Community Facilities ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Services Environment & Sustainable Development Infrastructure Services
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services Asset Management
Customer Service Development Assessment Buildings and Facilities
Governance Economic Development Civil Operations
People and Culture Environmental Services Disaster Management
Strategic Land Use Planning Infrastructure Planning,
Design and Delivery
Page 44 of 70
Section 45
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
Page 45 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Attachment 1
avo4l@l are] MUAAca iL ekel fata lOlAUen
Facilitated by University of Canberra
a r ¥ \ rl ¥ } mi ¥
re a | if Wl 7 wT. ¢ if fui ae ey ee aa if bd ale e
Poe eS Si. ARUN MELE FDO MO EN SL URN MOTE B,D AO RMON ONS Se MAMA AIRT IR, FER Ag om
a a Nae a: Wes AA. Oh a Ba ‘) We ate 3 a Oh a eH ys Nad a yee a ¥; ‘i a
y 7 ly P 3h: 4 ye ri y &% ose We rY (i 7 % ot We wm
ve Nas Vey: "bet aA Ves (1a 4 DD hae VES A: ype ee ss , Nag a et ae
a . os tel tl fe tad fe
re : 7 | ee YW ha | Wee Ye i | ee
te ee 8 a a te Re 8 % err 5 ote Bee # 4 (are "
Introduction: Noosa did well in response rate
In 2016 the University of Canberra held the Regional Wellbeing Survey for the ninth time. Noosa Council created
the How happy is Noosa? campaign to encourage the community to participate in this survey. The reason Council
became involved was firstly to gauge how the community felt about their personal and the community’s wellbeing.
Secondly, Council was interested in finding where Noosa people felt there were issues in liveability in the shire for
further planning and decision-making processes.
12,891 people from rural and regional Australia took part in the survey, 1,953 from regional Queensland, with
Noosa representing 320 of those responses. Comparable other areas received a response rate of 45 (Sunshine
Coast), and 105 (Gold Coast, Ipswich, Lockyer Valley, Logan, Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim and Somerset),
showing that Noosa offered a markedly greater response as a result of the How Happy is Noosa? campaign.
To demonstrate the success of the Noosa campaign, we can compare to the Bega Valley Shire in NSW that received
the most results the previous year, with 248 people responding to the survey, while Noosa achieved 320 responses
this year. Bega Valley Shire also invested $3,500 to achieve this result, while Noosa Council spent nothing. We did
good!
Results: Noosa did well in results too!
Results from the University of Canberra were presented as tables of comparison between Noosa’s results and those
of rural and regional Australia, rural and regional Queensland, Southern Coastal Queensland (Gold Coast, Ipswich,
Lockyer Valley, Logan, Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim and Somerset), and the Sunshine Coast. This document
has been adapted from those results, with focus specifically being on comparisons between the Noosa Shire results
and those of regional Australia and Queensland, as there was little response from and consequently little data from
the Sunshine Coast and Southern Coastal Queensland that is comparable. Data was sourced from the 2016 Regional
Wellbeing Survey, QLD Southern Coastal and Sunshine Coast region data tables, Version 1.01 July 2017. Results
include community responses to survey questions regarding:
° Personal Wellbeing ° Social Connectedness
° Community Wellbeing .
fi . | e Access to Services
° Personal Financial Wellbeing ; ‘
- bier ‘italia! e Crime and Safety Perceptions
. OmMUNIEY economic EEING: e Landscape and Aesthetics
° Health Wellbeing 4 ‘
. . . ° Perceived Environmental Health
° Community Leadership & Collaboration
The results show that Noosa residents’ sense of wellbeing exceeds those of regional Australia and Queensland in
most cases. The only incidence of Noosa falling behind other areas is in our perception of crime and safety. It
should be emphasised that these are perceptions only.
Where to from here?
While the comparisons between Noosa and regional Australia and Queensland are insightful, the value of this data
is in its ability to provide a baseline for further comparisons of Noosa residents’ sense of wellbeing as the survey is
performed annually. It is suggested that these results are used as a mechanism to engage the Noosa community in
participating in the survey again next year and in subsequent years, with numbers of participants growing as
community awareness of the survey grows.
jefe] NOOSA COUNCIL
Page 45 of 70Section 46
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 46 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Personal Wellbeing
1 of 1
The cemnnal Wellbeing Index measures a pHa WERDEWUr Indes
person’s wellbeing on a score from 0-100. This 2
score is calculated based on answers from 8 io
respondents to the question ‘How satisfied are 2 2
you with: (i) Your standard of living, (ii) Your i 76
health, (iii) What you are currently achieving in ©. x
life, (iv) Your personal relationships, (v) How i
safe you feel, (vi) Feeling part of your te a
community, and (vii) Your future security. F 5 =a
Scores were measured for each item on a scale Bn 718
from ‘completely dissatisfied’ (0) to : ,
= 1
‘completely satisfied' (10), each of which was 5
transformed to a scale of 0-100 prior to - ”
calculating the average score. =
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
This Personal Wellbeing Index above is made up from
responses to a number of questions, with the results to each
question presented below. Scores were measured for each
item ona scale from 'completely dissatisfied' (0) to ‘completely
satisfied (10), each of which was transformed to a scale of 0-
100.
Personal Wellbeing Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12891) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
90 a6
3 80 so 82
% 80 5 6
¢ I 74 7 75 75 »
3 68 68 68 70. 70 6
> 70 f 5
oe
33
2E 60.
6 F504
52
= § 40
en
Zo
s 830}
Eg
5 20
P tie i |
%
£ 10 ——
$
<
0
.. your standard of — ...your health ..what youare ..yourpersonal ...howsafe you _ ... feeling part of ... your future
living currently achieving _ relationships feel your community security
in life
How satisfied are you with ...
jefe] NOOSA COUNCIL
Page 46 of 70Section 47
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 47 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Community Wellbeing
1 of 2
The Community Wellbeing Index is the Community Wellbeing Index
average score of answers to five questions, 6a
each of which is measured on a 7-point scale g 60
from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to ‘strongly r
agree’ (7). The items included in the index nos
were: (i) My community is a great place to live, : _
(ii) This community copes pretty well when i
faced with challenges, (iii) | feel proud to live F”
in this community, (iv) This community has a 56
bright future, and (v) There's good community : os -* os
spirit around here. i
:
$53
3
* 52
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
The Community Wellbeing Index is made up from responses to
a number of questions, with the results to each question
presented below. The questions were measured on a 7-point
scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7), with
the results below showing percentages for those who scored 5,
6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Community Wellbeing Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ™@ Noosa (n=320)
100 +
91
90 + 87-87 8° a 88
83 -
81 81 81 81
so +
71 70 72
7o | 67
@
&% 60 |
2
3 so |
5
3 40 +
R
30 |
20 +
10 +
o | 1 1
My community is a great This community copes | feel proud to live inthis This community hasa_ There's good community
place to live pretty well when faced community bright future spirit around here
with challenges
fe) NOOSA COUNCIL
| @ |
Page 47 of 70Section 48
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 48 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Community Wellbeing
2 of 2
Changes in Community Liveability
Changes in community liveability is measured by asking respondents four questions on their views about how
the community they live in is changing: (i) The liveability of this community is ... (ii) The friendliness of this
community is ...’ (iii) The local economy is ..., and (iv) The local landscape and surrounds in this community
are ... Each was measured on a 7-point scale from ‘getting worse' (1) to ‘getting better' (7).
Changes in Community Liveability
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) ® Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) m™ Noosa (n=320)
6.0
51 5.2
50 49 50 5.0
g 5.0 + ay ay a7
= 44
2 4.2
e_ 40 + ao
53
3 = 3.0 +
£3
g “20 4
.
8 10 }
0.0 +
The liveability of this The friendliness of this The local economy is The local landscape and
community is ... community is ... surrounds in this community
Migration Intentions
Migration intentions were measured by asking respondents ‘How likely are you to shift to a new community in the
next 12 months? The responses were measured using a 5-point scale from 'very unlikely’ (1) to 'very likely’ (5).
Likelihood of Shifting in Next 12 Months
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
100.0
89.4
90.0 +
81.6 797
800 | .
70.0 +
é
8 60.0 +
=
2 50.0
3 40.0 +
3
* 30.0
20.0 5
10g _ 126
—lUC a
10.0 + 26 22 80
0.0 +
Unlikely to shift Neither likely or unlikely to shift Likely to shift
care s as
a NOOSA COUNCIL
Page 48 of 70Section 49
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 49 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Teo) ar-| molar laar Tm el el=l ial
i) i
Household financial wellbeing is measured based on self-rated financial wellbeing - Respondents were asked ‘given
your current needs and financial responsibilities, would you say that you and your family are...:’ (i) prosperous, (ii)
very comfortable, (iii) reasonably comfortable, (iv) just getting along, or (v) poor or very poor’.
Self-rated Financial Wellbeing
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
60.0. -—————————————————— _
_ 50.0 49.4 464 475
3
3 40.0
= 33.5
z 30.9
30.0
z 24.7
2
3 200 19.7
§ 14.0 43.1
* 82
10.0 eo 70 *
Poor or very poor Just getting along Reasonably comfortable Very comfortable or
prosperous
Financial Distress
The financial distress measure was calculated based on the response to the question ‘In the last year, did any of the
following happen to you because you didn’t have enough money?’: (i) Had to delay or cancel non-essential purchases
e.g holiday, going to a restaurant or movie, buying clothes; (ii) Could not pay bills on time e.g. electricity, rent, gas; (iii)
Went without meals, or was unable to heat or cool home; (iv) Asked for financial help from friends or family; or (v)
None of these.
Financial Distress
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
70.0
64.4
60.0 566
54.6
, 50.0
3 40.0
5
: 30.0 +
= 225 231 22.3
2 x00 20.2 20.9
15.4
10.0
00
none of the financial distress items 1 of the financial distress items 2,3 or 4 of the financial distress items
NOOSA COUNCIL
wea, 1
| @ |
Page 49 of 70Section 50
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 50 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Community Economic Wellbeing
i) i
The economic wellbeing of communities is C ity E ic Wellbeing Ind
measured by asking survey participants how ommunity Economic Wellbeing Index
much they agreed with the following four g 4
statements, from 'strongly disagree’ (1) to : ¥ 40
‘strongly agree' (7): (i) Living costs are 5 E 39
affordable here e.g. food, petrol, housing; (ii) i 3 38
This community is financially well-off; (iii) gz z 37
There are plenty of jobs available around here “ $3 a6
at the moment; and (iv) Local businesses in Es Es.
this town are doing pretty well at the moment. 52 i
Sa 34
Responses to these four statements were £3
averaged to form a single measure of § ; 337
community economic wellbeing, measured F 3 *
from 1 (low levels of community economic 4 34
. . . Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
wellbeing) to 7 (high levels of community (n=12981) (n=1953)
economic wellbeing).
The Community Economic Wellbeing Index is made up from
responses to a number of questions, with the results to each
question presented below. The questions were measured ona
7-point scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly
agree' (7), with the results below showing percentages for
those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Community Economic Wellbeing Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
0.0,
50.3
50.0 48.2
43.8
41.8
% 40.0
E 36.3
£ 30.3
3 29.5 9.4
2 30.0 - 2 29.1
oa
sz
3
2
3 20.0
14.0 12.6
10.0 if
0.0 ' '
Living costs are affordable = This community is financially There are plenty of jobs Local businesses in this town
here well-off available around here atthe are doing pretty well at the
moment moment
E MBN ROOLe Noe
Page 50 of 70Section 51
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 51 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
i) i
Respondents were asked to self-rate Health
on the question ‘How would you rate ea
your general health?” They were asked @ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
to select one of the following options: “00 380
excellent, very good, good, fair or poor. 350
The graph to the right shows the oT 347 324 319
responses. 300 a
; 25.0
2 195
= 200 tw? 187
i
a
$ ve 12.0 120 126
z
10.0
52 51
00
Poor health Fair health Good health Very good health Excellent health
Self-efficacy Index Self-effica cy
5.5
sa sa Respondents were asked to identify how much they
i agreed or disagreed with the following statements:
54
gs (i) |am confident | can achieve the things | want in
P ° life, and (ii) |am confident I can achieve the things |
Es "8 52 want in my work, using a 7-point response format
bP from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7).
FS 52 5a Responses to these statements were averaged to
* é 5a form a single measure of self-efficacy, scored from 1
“54 (low self-efficacy) to 7 (high self-efficacy) and are
50 shown in the graph to the left.
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
{n=12981) (n=1953)
The Self-efficacy Index is made up Self-efficacy Questions
from responses to two questions, m Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) m Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ™ Noosa (n=320)
with the results to each question 78.0 768
presented to the right. The questions 160 353
were measured on a 7-point scale, : .
from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 9 740 4
‘strongly agree’ (7), with the results & oo 17 71.9
below showing percentages for those g
who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing 2 700 |
agreement. 3 68.2
= 680 | 67.1
:)
® 66.0 >
64.0 4
62.0 +
| eam confident | can achieve the things | went in life 1am confident | can achieve the things | want in my work
ra . =
NOOSA COUNCIL
um
Page 51 of 70Section 52
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 52 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Community Leadership & Collaboration
1 of 3
Perceptions of community leadership and
collaboration is measured by asking survey Community Leadership and
participants how much they agreed with the Collaboration Index
following three statements, from ‘strongly me sa
disagree' (1) to 'strongly agree' (7): (i) People Eso
around here are good at getting help and ideas gz
from other communities; (ii) Whatever the 3 Bas
problem, someone in this community takes Fa
the lead in sorting it out; and (iii) Local groups i” 45
and organisations around here are good at er “s
getting things done. Responses to these three fe
statements were averaged to form a single < f
measure of community leadership and 4
collaboration, measured from 1 (low levels of 40 - . ’
. . . Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
leadership and collaboration) to 7 (high levels (n=12981) (n=1953)
of leadership and collaboration).
The Community Leadership and Collaboration Index is made up
from responses to three questions, with the results to each
question presented below. The questions were measured ona
7-point scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly
agree' (7), with the results below showing percentages for
those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Community Leadership and Collaboration Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
90.0
82.4
80.0
70.0 66.1
60.8 60.7
» 60.0 59.0
2
3
§ 500 | 47.0—46.7
2 42.1
s 39.4
® 40.0
2
a}
= 30.0
20.0 |
10.0 4
0.0 4
People around here are good at Whatever the problem, someone in Local groups and organisations
getting help and ideas from other this community takes the lead in around here are good at getting
communities sorting it out things done
fe) NOOSA COUNCIL
um
Page 52 of 70Section 53
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 53 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Community Leadership & Collaboration
2 of 3
Having a Say
The extent to which rural and regional Australians felt they could have a say in their community, and that they would
be heard if they did, is measured by asking survey participants how much they agreed with the following four
statements, from 'strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7): (i) My local government is able to help our community
face challenges; (ii) The people who make decisions for my community represent the whole community, not just part
of it; (iii) | can get involved in local decision-making processes if | want to; and (iv) Most people get a fair go around
here. Responses to these statements were averaged to form a single measure, from 1 (low feelings of having a say
and being heard) to 7 (high feelings of having a say and being heard).
‘Have a Say' Index
5.2 54
zs
& 5.0
ge
3 g 48
3 u
on™
= 2 46
E
g ® 44
2S a4 44
53
>
<5
B42
u
a
4.0 T v 1
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
The ‘Have a Say’ Index is made up from responses to a number questions, with the results to each question presented
below. The questions were measured on a 7-point scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7), with the
results below showing percentages for those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing agreement.
‘Have a Say' Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) & Noosa (n=320)
80.0
742 752
70.0
63.9
60.0 07 coo one 52.0
3 51.0
? 50.0 46.9 455
3 40.5
£ 40.0 +
3
2
5 300
a
20.0
10.0
0.0
My local governmentis able The people who make can getinvolved in local Most people get a fair go
to help our community face decisions for my community decision-making processes if around here
challenges represent the whole I want to
community, not just part of
it
fe) NOOSA COUNCIL
| @ |
Page 53 of 70Section 54
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 54 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Community Leadership & Collaboration
3 of 3
Equity and Inclusion
Equity and inclusion is measured by asking survey participants how much they agreed with the following three
statements, from 'strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree’ (7): (i) Some groups in this community keep to
themselves; (ii) Some groups who live in this community aren’t made to feel welcome; and (iii) There is a lot of
disagreement between people in this community. Responses to these statements were averaged to form a single
measure of equity and inclusion by (i) reversing the scoring of each, so that low scores indicated poor equity and low
inclusion, and high scores indicated high levels of equity and inclusion; and (ii) calculating the average score across
the three variables.
Equity and Inclusion Index
4.4
4.4
44 -
g 43 4
ae
= P43
§
3 nu 4.2
~
£24, |
g3 41
§ 24.1 4 .
23 41
5 re
% E 4.0 ~——— —____ —_______ ——_.
"
4.0 >
Bit
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) Queensland (n=1953)
The Equity and Inclusion Index is made up from responses to a number questions, with the results to each question
presented below. The questions were measured on a 7-point scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7),
with the results below showing percentages for those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Equity and Inclusion Questions
® Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) ® Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
60.0 56.0 553
49.3
50.0
oe
& 200
2 340393
g 30.0 21.9
z 22.8
2 a 19.2
5 20.0 -
x
10.0
0.0
Some groups in this community keep Some groups who live in this There isa lot of disagreement
to themselves community aren‘t made to feel between people in this community
welcome
jefe) NOOSA COUNCIL
mM
Page 54 of 70Section 55
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 55 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Social Connectedness
es
1 of 3
Informal social connectedness is measured by Social C cted ind
asking survey participants how often they did octal Connectedness index
the following, on a scale measured from “y 7
‘never' (1) to ‘all the time’ (7): 47
(i) | make time to keep in touch with my Ba.
friends; (ii) | chat with my neighbours; and (iii) ge 46
I spend time doing things with family members 5 i 46
who don’t live with me. The ‘friends and £3,;
family’ measure was calculated as the average § ;
of these three items, from 1 (low levels of Fe “ “
informal social connectedness) to 7 (high < Bas
levels of informal social connectedness). a
44
43
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
The Social Connectedness Index is made up from responses to
a number questions, with the results to each question
presented below. The questions were measured on a 7-point
scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7), with
the results below showing percentages for those who scored 5,
6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Social Connectedness Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
30.0
71.1
69.6
67.6
70.0 65.2
60.0 58.7
2 49.0
® 50.0 +
2 42.0
5 39.4 -
£400 —
o
zs
3
= 30.0 +
.
x
20.0 +
10.0
0.0 + r r
| make time to keep in touch with my | chat with my neighbours I spend time doing things with family
friends members who don’t live with me
E MBN ROOLe Noe
Page 55 of 70Section 56
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 56 of 70
Social Connectedness
2 of 3
Getting Involved Getting Involved Index
42
The extent of a person’s involvement in ii 4a
local community activities is examined Siar
by asking survey participants how i
frequently they took part in the : Bio
following types of activities, on a scale an
o> 39
from 'never or almost never' (1) to ‘all £2
the time' (7): (i) | go to arts or cultural 2 se =
events; (ii) | attend community events z=.
such as farmers markets, community <6 28)
festivals; (iii) | attend meetings/social a37
events of local clubs/groups e.g. Lions, af
CWA, and (iv) | take part in sports “ Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
groups or teams. (n=12981) {n=1953)
Getting Involved Questions The Getting Involved Index is made up
= Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) = Noosa (n=320) from responses to a number of questions,
800 with the results to each question
- presented to the left. The questions were
700 e908 measured on a 7-point scale, from
ws ‘strongly disagree' (1) to 'strongly
60.0 be : :
agree' (7), with the results in the graph
B soo pars showing those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as a
2 percentage.
5 40.0 37.7
32.9 394 33.3
5 30.0 ze 26.9
20.0
10.0 - "
0.0 7
| goto arts or cultural lattend community events | attend meetings/social | take part in sports groups
events such as farmers markets, events of local clubs/groups or teams
community festivals
Volunteering Volunteering
Respondents were asked how often @ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) ™ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) = Noosa (n=320)
they volunteer in their local 60.0
community e.g. for groups like fire soo Sis
brigades, sports clubs, school canteen, 2 42.4
: =
meals on wheels, festivals, on a 7- 2 400 -
: $
point scale from 'never or almost 2 31.0 30.5
never' (1) through to ‘all the time' (7). ge 265 4A 244 246
The results are shown in the graph to 3 ti
the right. =
=® 10.0
0.0
Never or almost never Occasionally volunteer Regularly volunteer
volunteer
jefe] NOOSA COUNCIL
Page 56 of 70Section 57
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 57 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Social Connectednesss
3 of 3
Sense of Belonging
A person’s sense of belonging is measured by asking survey participants how much they agreed with the following
three statements, from 'strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7): (i) | feel welcome here; (ii) | feel part of my
community; and (iii) | feel like an outsider here. The ‘belonging’ measure was calculated as the average score for
these three variables, after the scoring for ‘I feel like an outsider here’ was reversed, from 1 (low sense of belonging)
to 7 (high sense of belonging).
Sense of Belonging Index
6.0.
5.9
gz 5.9
?
i 5.58
&
3 £ 57
3
g 3 5.6 -
5 & 5.5
ag 5.4 5.4
ie 54
ow
Z § 53
S52
54
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
The Sense of Belonging Index is made up from responses to a number of questions, with the results to each question
presented below. The questions were measured on a 7-point scale, from 'strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree’ (7),
with the results below showing percentages for those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Sense of Belonging Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
908 85.0 83.6
80.0 | BS _ 75
71.9 715
70.0
w 60.0 +
5
= 50.0 }
5
B 400 +
2
3
F 30.0 |
20.0 +
12.8 12.6
0.0 +
| feel welcome here I feel part of my community | feel like an outsider here
fe) NOOSA COUNCIL
mM
Page 57 of 70Section 58
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 58 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
we) ee)
Access to Health, Education, Aged Care [ A witetioetel ]
; ccess to Services Index
and Child Care
5.8 a
Access to health, education, aged care and 5.6
child care is measured by asking respondents if ig
to rate their access to the following types of z 5
services in their local community, on a scale 3°20
ranging from 'very poor' (1) to 'very good' (7): £3 50
(i) General health services e.g. GP, general § Bae 48 i
health consultation services; (ii) Mental health a ,
services e.g. psychologist, psychiatrist; (iii) 246
Specialist health services (other than mental 4a
health); (iv) Education e.g. schools, distance b
education, vocational training; (v) Aged care Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
services e.g. retirement villages, in-home (es) (n-1953)
support; and (vi) Child care. A single measure
of overall access to health, education, aged
and child care was then constructed based on
the average score of a person’s responses to
these items, after excluding respondents who The categories represented by the Access to Services Index
were unsure whether there was access to a are presented below. The respondents scored each category
given service. ona 7-point scale, from ‘very poor’ (1) to ‘very good’ (7),
with the results below showing percentages for those who
scored the categories 5, 6 or 7 as showing belief that the
services were good.
Access to Services Categories
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
100.0 +
2228 90.3
90.0 +
83.6
3 80.6
g, 80.0 75.2 754 75.7 Fag
2
= 70.0 | — 68.8 68.9 69.3
g
2
$ 600 |
&
S$
3 500 4
=
o
& 400 |
=
2
S 300 |
=
g
SG 20.0 + -
xz
10.0 +
0.0 | + ; :
Health services Education Aged care services Child care
jefe) NOOSA COUNCIL
| @ |
Page 58 of 70Section 59
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 59 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
20f 5
Access to Roads and Public Transport Access to Roads and Public Transport Index
5.
Access to roads and public transport is . saa
measured by asking respondents to rate their : vs
access to the following types of services in i so : Bs
their local community, on a scale ranging from 3 i a
‘very poor' (1) to 'very good' (7): (i) Roads; and i i 30
(ii) Public transport (including taxis, buses, £525
trains). A single measure of overall access to 5 B20
roads and public transport was then # 5.5!
constructed based on the average score of a zs i
person’s responses to these two items. os
0.0
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) {n=1953)
The categories represented by the Access to Roads and Public
Transport Index are presented below. The respondents scored
each category on a 7-point scale, from ‘very poor’ (1) to ‘very
good’ (7), with the results below showing percentages for
those who scored the categories 5, 6 or 7 as showing belief
that the services were good.
Access to Roads and Public Transport Categories
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ®@ Noosa (n=320)
80.0
73.9
70.0
60.0
2}
o
& & 50.0
6 2 44.0
= ¢e
zy
2 ¥% 40.0 :
eo
se 32.0 3
3B E
2 : 30.0
6
e é
20.0
10.0
0.0 1
Roads Public transport
fe} NOOSA COUNCIL
mM
Page 59 of 70Section 60
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 60 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
30f 5
Access to Food and Retail Shops 3
P Access to Food and Retail Shops Index
Access to food and retail shops is measured by 38 57
asking respondents to rate their access to the a
following types of services in their local § 3
community, on a scale ranging from 'very 3 2 T T
poor' (1) to 'very good' (7): (i) Fresh fruit and 3 7
vegetables; (ii) Affordable food; and (iii) Retail 8
shops. A single measure of overall access to 3 go T 49
food and retail was then constructed based on SE ae
the average score of a person’s responses to 3 a
these three items. bg
44
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
The categories represented by the Access to Food and Retail
Shops Index are presented below. The respondents scored
each category on a 7-point scale, from ‘very poor’ (1) to ‘very
good’ (7), with the results below showing percentages for
those who scored the categories 5, 6 or 7 as showing belief
that the services were good.
Access to Food and Retail Shops Categories
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ® Noosa (n=320)
100.0 7 i,
90.0 + 85:1
80.0 + 74.0 72.0
3 70.0 + 66.2 —
a 65.2
£ 3 O82 Eis
oD
6 2 600 | SLO
=v
23
2 8 50.0 |
ay
3 3 40.0 +
Ss os
2 = 300 + ;
20.0 +
10.0 +
0.0 + 1
Fresh fruit and vegetables Affordable food Retail shops
fe) NOOSA COUNCIL
mM
Page 60 of 70Section 61
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 61 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
4o0f 5
Access to Professional Services i 3
f Access to Professional Services Index
Access to financial and professional services is mm
measured by asking respondents to rate their 60 oS
access to the following types of services in § z
their local community, on a scale ranging from 5°
‘very poor' (1) to 'very good' (7): (i) Banking i 5 rea 38 i
and financial services; and (ii) Professional ES 34
services e.g. accountants, lawyers. A single 5 3 3.0
measure of overall access to financial and 2 5 sacl
professional services was then constructed by 2c
taking the average score of responses to these 1.0
three items.
0.0 -
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) {n=1953)
The categories represented by the Access to Professional
Services Index are presented below. The respondents scored
each category on a 7-point scale, from ‘very poor’ (1) to ‘very
good’ (7), with the results below showing percentages for
those who scored the categories 5, 6 or 7 as showing belief
that the services were good.
Access to Professional Services Categories
m@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ™ Noosa (n=320)
100.0
90.0 86.5 83.9
80.0 a7 ma
3 3 70.0 - 66.3. 64.9 :
be &
§ # 600 -
= ¢
- =
2 3 50.0
3 e
3 3 40.0 |——— ——
SE
x 30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0 - - + - -
Banking and financial services Professional services e.g. accountants, lawyers
jefe) NOOSA COUNCIL
| @ |
Page 61 of 70Section 62
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 62 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
5o0f 5
Access to Telecommunications sat
Access to Telecommunications Index
Access to telecommunications is measured by “
asking respondents to rate their access to (i) 42 42
mobile phone coverage in their community, as 5
well as the following types of services in their = = :
home or property, on a scale ranging from ; 5 66
‘very poor' (1) to 'very good' (7): (ii) Mobile ES
72
phone coverage; (iii) Reliable internet (that § B39 se =
doesn't regularly drop out or slow down); (iv) f 5 sa
High speed internet; and (v) Affordable Za
internet. The average of a person’s responses 37
to these two items, which were highly
‘ 36
correlated, was used to construct the ‘access Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
to telecommunications’ measure. (n=12981) (n=1953)
The categories represented by the Access to
Telecommunications Index are presented below. The
respondents scored each category on a 7-point scale, from
‘very poor’ (1) to ‘very good’ (7), with the results below
showing percentages for those who scored the categories 5, 6
or 7 as showing belief that the services were good.
Access to Telecommunications Categories
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
70.0
63.7
60.0
60.0 = 564 56.2 56.6
50.6
50.0 +
3 3 46.0 45.1 443
® : 40.1 42.2
€s 40.0 + 35.9 346 201
# 3 32.5
o's.
3B 5 300 -
Ss
ts
& 20.0 |
10.0
0.0 + 1 + :
Mobile phone coverage in Mobile phone coverage at Reliable internet (that High speed internet at__—_ Affordable internet at
the community home or property doesn't regularly drop out home or property home or property
or slow down) at home or
property
7 a Sa =
| @ | NOOSA COUNCIL
Page 62 of 70Section 63
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 63 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Crime and Safety Perceptions
1 of 1
Crime and safety perceptions is measured by .
asking respondents the extent to which they Crime and Safety Index
agreed or disagreed with the following 5.0 as
statements, ona scale from 'strongly disagree Pas
(1) to 'strongly agree' (7): (i) This is a safe place gE 40- 37 23
to live; (ii) There is a high crime rate in this 3 E35
community; (iii) Many people in this 2 1 30
» . ant
community abuse drugs; and (iv) Many people E205
in this community drink too much alcohol. The ge 20
‘crime and safety’ scale was then calculated by if ate
taking the average score of these items. The § ¥, 4
scores for the second, third and fourth items < = ss
were reversed, so that for the scale as a whole a
an 00
score of 1 indicated low levels of safety, and a Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
score of 7 high levels of safety. (n=12981) (n=1953)
The Crime and Safety Index is made up from responses to a
number of questions, with the results to each question
presented below. The questions were measured on a 7-point
scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7), with
the results below showing percentages for those who scored 5,
6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Crime and Safety Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) ™® Noosa (n=320)
100.0
92.2
90.0
83.3
80.7
80.0 | 754
70.0 +
a
&
6 60.0 | 55.2
<=
=
2 500 46.4 A523
=
2 400 | 37.0
e ; 29.5 28.4 30-6
30.0 —— =
20.0 +
10.0 |
0.0 | 1 1
This isa safe place to live There isa high crime rate Many people in this Many people in this
in this community community drink too much + community abuse drugs
alcohol
fe} NOOSA COUNCIL
| @ |
Page 63 of 70Section 64
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 64 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Landscape and Aesthetics
i) i
The attractiveness of the landscape a person \
lived in is measured by asking respondents Landscape and Aesthetics Index
how much they agreed or disagreed with the 65 64
following statements, measured on a scale of oe
‘strongly disagree (1) to ‘strongly agree’ (7): (i) E : 63
°
| like the environment and surrounds | live in; 3 ge
(ii) There are attractive buildings / homes in 3 Bea
my community; and (iii) There are attractive £3 60
natural places in my community e.g. parks, 5 Es ° 59
bushland. The ‘landscape and aesthetics’ scale $3 ss
>
was then constructed as the average score of 3?
responses to these three items. : ”
56
55 + - -
Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
(n=12981) (n=1953)
The Landscape and Aesthetics Index is made up from
responses to two questions, with the results to each question
presented below. The questions were measured on a 7-point
scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly agree' (7), with
the results below showing percentages for those who scored 5,
6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Landscape and Aesthetics Questions
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
100.0 97.4 97.4
90.9 90.4 89.9 89.7
80.0 6
2 70.0
°
2 600 4
=
2 500 =
o
3
2 40.0 ~
3s
se 30.0 +
20.0 ~
10.0 +
0.0
| like the environment and There are attractive buildings / There are attractive natural places
surrounds | live in homes in my community in my community e.g. parks,
bushland
lefe} NOOSA COUNCIL
um
Page 64 of 70Section 65
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Page 65 of 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Perceived Environmental Health
i) i
Perceived environmental health is measured Perceived Envi I Health Ind
by asking survey participants the extent to erceived Environmental Health Index
which they felt any of the following were a ‘0 “0
problem in their local region, on a scale from ho
‘not a problem (1) to 'big problem' (7): (i) gi
Water quality problems other than salinity, in £ a
rivers, lake or waterways; (ii) Soil erosion; (iii) 7:
Poor soil health other than soil erosion e.g. soil E830)
compaction; (iv) Pest fish species e.g. carp; (v) 5 5 38
Loss of vegetation (trees, shrubs); (vi) S38 “
Declining numbers of some native animals or 38
birds; (vii) Invasive weeds; (viii) Salinity (in soil “38
or waterways); (ix) Environmental degradation
in general; (x) Feral animals eB. Pigs, goats, Rural & regional Australia Rural & regional Queensland Noosa (n=320)
i . i i 37
wild dogs, rabbits; and (xi) Declining numbers (n=12981) (n=1953)
of native fish. The average score of these
variables was calculated as a measure of
perceived environmental health. Scores for
each item were reversed before calculation of
the scale, so that a score of 1 represented The Perceived Environmental Health Index is made up from
poor environmental health, and a score of 7 responses to a number of questions, with the results to each
represented good environmental health. It question presented below. The questions were measured on a
should be noted that only approximately half 7-point scale, from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to 'strongly
of the respondents answered these questions. agree' (7), with the results below showing percentages for
those who scored 5, 6 or 7 as showing agreement.
Perceived Environmental Health Categories
@ Rural & regional Australia (n=12981) @ Rural & regional Queensland (n=1953) @ Noosa (n=320)
90.0
E 80.0 - 72
a 744 “33.8
8 71.2
2 70.0
5 64.44, 64.0
= 59. $1812
2 60.0 58.1
3 54.6
= 51.2 52.6
5 soo
é 43.7 43.2 pS
£ 414 41.0 40.0.4 1.3
§ 400 - 22 38.982 B77
2 B4.5 boa B4.0 33.7
3. bs
¥ 30.0
3 21.7
5 20.0
2
s
x 10.0
0.0 + ! :
Water quality Soil erosion Poor soil health Pest fish species Loss of Declining Invasive weeds Salinity (in soil or Environmental Feral animals Dediining
problems other other than soil vegetation numbers of waterways) degradationin e.g. pigs, goats, | numbers of
than salinity, in erosion e.g. soll some native general wild dogs, native fish
rivers, lake or compaction animals or birds rabbits
waterways
fe) NOOSA COUNCIL
um
Page 65 of 70Section 66
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
6 JULY 2017 RATE LEVY OVERVIEW
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Manager, Revenue Services, Kellie Seeleither
Corporate Services Department
Index ECM / Rates Management / Rateable Services
Attachments Nil
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Manager Revenue Services to the Planning & Organisation
Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2017 providing an overview of the July 2017 rate levy.
REPORT
Council issues rate notices to customers twice yearly (July and January). Rates and levies
represent 69% of Councils 2017/18 operating revenue budget. This report provides Council with
a summary of the July 2017 rate levy.
1. Levy Summary
Rate notices were issued on the 18 July, with a due date of the 18 August. The gross amount of
the levy was $36.6 million, which comprised of $33.5 million of Council rates and charges, and
$3.1 million for the State Emergency Management Levy (which Council passes on to the
Queensland Government). Between January 2017 and July 2017 the net increase in rateable
properties was 94 representing minimal growth of 0.3%.
In the weeks before the issue of the July levy, the waste management charges for 14,839 single
dwellings and duplex units were modified to reflect the new charging structure adopted for the
2017/18 financial year. Of these 4,749 properties had previously requested a garden waste bin,
and these properties were moved to the 3-bin service charge. A further 10,090 properties had
their charges altered to reflect the delivery of a garden waste bin in the current rollout. Further
charges were set up for the new 360 litre waste bins and the new bulk bin services and recycling
services now offered under the new contract.
Page 66 of 70
Section 67
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Rateable Valuation /
Levy/Charge Amount ($m) Properties
Services
General Rates $23.9 30,299 $8.029 billion
Separate Charges
Environment Levy $0.91 30,299 30,299
Sustainable Transport Levy $0.45 30,299 30,299
Heritage Levy $0.15 30,299 30,299
Special Rates and Charges
Tourism & Economic Levy $1.4 5,634 $1.385 billion
Noosa Main Beach Maintenance $0.28 2,096 $602 million
Hastings St Precinct Maintenance $0.16 2,096 $602 million
Hastings Street Safety Levy $0.08 834 834
Rural Fire Levy $0.08 6,333 6,333
Noosa Junction Levy $0.05 156 $39 million
Noosa Waters Lock & Weir Levy $0.03 592 $413 million
Noosa Waters Canal Maint. Levy n.a. n.a. n.a.
North Shore Electricity Charge $0.02 27 27
Utility Charges
Waste Management Charges $5.7 29,308 31,807
Holding Tank Charges $0.08 80 80
Backflow Device
$0.09 1,487 4,078
Registration Fees
Emergency Management, Fire and
$3.1 30,794 30,824
Rescue Levy (EMFRL)
Page 67 of 70
Section 68
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
1. General Rate Details by Category
Rateable Properties
Category Properties Valuation Amount on
($’000) Minimum
1 - Rural & Agricultural 225 $51,044 $155,379 134
2 – Commercial valued up to $175,000 892 $66,442 $486,165 825
3 – Commercial valued $175,001 - $400,000 416 $113,452 $402,478 38
4 – Commercial valued over $400,000 252 $237,341 $835,899 13
5 – Extractive (not in Cat. 31) 11 $2,696 $14,925 8
6 – Residential PPR valued up to $280,000 11,272 $2,123,844 $6,126,656 10,034
7 – Residential PPR valued $280,001 - $857,225
2,536 $1,769,822 920
$450,000
8 – Residential PPR valued $450,001 - $202,122
406 $413,570 120
$550,000
9 – Residential PPR valued $550,001 - $181,625
288 $367,475 99
$700,000
10 – Residential PPR valued $700,001 - $202,896
268 $399,722 217
$800,000
11 – Residential PPR valued $800,001 - $157,404
183 $296,431 131
$920,000
12 – Residential PPR valued $920,001 - $121,804
119 $221,161 59
$1,100,000
13 – Residential PPR valued $1,100,001 - $97,175
76 $162,255 39
$1,400,000
14 – Residential PPR valued $1,400,001 - $190,500
100 $305,626 1
$2,500,000
15 – Residential PPR valued over $2,500,000 19 $58,700 $90,238 11
16 – Residential Not PPR valued up to $975,873
4,478 $3,082,187 3,255
$420,000
17 – Residential Not PPR valued $420,001 - $116,866
255 $294,745 101
$500,000
18 – Residential Not PPR valued $500,001 - $242,081
388 $601,176 79
$750,000
19 – Residential NPPR valued over $750,000 539 $713,535 $1,755,528 86
20 – Vacant Land > $1M and area more than $24,510
10 $104,891 -
1,500m2
21 – Pump Stations, Stock Grazing Permits $45
and garages/small lots with an area less than 2 $194 1
20m2
22 – Vacant Land subject to developers $32,831
50 $42,024 -
concession
23 – Retirement Villages and Nursing Homes 12 $20,430 $70,443 -
24 – Shopping centre - gross floor area $18,510
6 $97,585 -
between 2,500 & 10,000m2
25 – Shopping centre - gross floor area $27,500
1 $198,894 -
greater than 10,000m2
26 – Shopping centre - gross floor area $5,927
4 $23,844 -
between 1,000 & 2,500m2
27 – Strata Units Not PPR 5,634 $929,661 $4,493,141 3,669
28 – Strata Units PPR 1,856 $257,472 $1,159,296 1,259
29 – Extractive Industries Quarries 1 $335 $1,733 -
Total 30,299 $8,029,846 $23,973,483 21,099
Page 68 of 70
Section 69
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
2. Rate Concessions
Details of the Council pensioner concessions granted on the July Levy are set out below.
Maximum Rebate
Type of Council Concession Properties Amount
(1/2 year)
Maximum/Sole Owner $115.00 1,208 $138,920
Maximum/Joint Owners $ 90.00 1,242 $106,736
Not Maximum/Sole Owner $57.50 680 $39,100
Not Maximum/Joint Owners $32.50 985 $31,299
Total 4,115 $316,055
Details of the pensioner concessions funded by the State Government are as follows: -
State Government Rebates # Properties Amount
General Rates & Charges 4,280 $419,861
State Emergency Management Levy 4,280 $ 71,145
In addition to pensioner concessions general rate concessions were provided for 52 properties
totalling $75,041.
3. Payment Preferences and Arrangements to Pay
BPay continues to be the most popular payment options by far, accounting for 60% of all money
received, followed by over the counter payments (including cheques mailed into Council) at 11%.
Payments at Australia Post offices account for a further 8%, with automated phone payments,
online payments and direct debit representing 7% each.
There are currently 417 properties that have made an arrangement to pay their current rates in
accordance with section 2.5.2 of the Revenue Statement, representing $283,520 of the
outstanding rates and charges.
4. BPay View
As of the July levy, Council now offers BPay View as an alternative delivery method to post and
email. BPay View enables a rate notice to be sent to the owner’s appropriate financial institution,
who then alerts the customer of a bill awaiting action within their internet banking platform. The
process for BPay View is as follows:
1. The customer logs on to their personal internet banking platform and registers to receive
their Council rate notice via BPay View.
2. They then receive a notification from their bank when they have a new Council bill, which
they can view in a secure online environment, and then make payment following the usual
BPay process.
Following a soft launch of this alternative delivery method, we have received 238 registrations to
date.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Page 69 of 70
Section 70
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 SEPTEMBER 2017
Finance & Risk
Finance
The successful issue of the levy is in line with budget and the receipt of over 80% of payments by
the discount due date ensures that sufficient cash flows are available for Council to continue
operations and deliver capital projects for the community.
Risk
There are no properties where the outstanding rates and charges are close to the rateable value
of the land, consequently there is no risk of any rates and charges becoming bad debts at this
time.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil
Internal Consultation
Director Corporate Services
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Community Services Planning & Infrastructure
Disaster Management & Public Order Building & Plumbing Services
Waste & Environmental Health DA Planning
Community Facilities Strategic Land Use Planning
Cultural Facilities Asset Design & Investigations
Asset Planning
Civil Operations
Environment
Executive Office x Corporate Services
Community Engagement Finance
Customer Service ICT
Executive Support Procurement & Fleet
Governance Property & Facilities
Human Resources x Revenue Services
Page 70 of 70