Original source · versioned page text
2022-08-09 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (15.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 AUGUST 2022
Page 36 of 71
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 AUGUST 2022
Noosa Shire Council
Guiding Principles for Tree Management
5.3. Management Outcome Decision Making and Prioritisation
An ultimate decision on remedial works required for a tree request is made by Council’s Arborist or Tree
Supervisor based on the recommendation of the consultant arborist and the determined priority. The
priority will be based on the table below:
Immediate threat to public safety. Urgent and hazardous or severe and will
require immediate action or works to be completed as soon as possible, either
the same day or at the latest within three days.
e.g. Dead trees or severely structurally damaged
Likely threat to public safety. Requires works within two weeks.
e.g. Dying trees or moderate structural damage evident
Requiring proactive action within 3 to 12 months — assign to proactive works
program and monitor tree in the interim.
MODERATE
e.g. Trees causing damage to infrastructure
Either being no works required, at Council’s discretion, programmed
maintenance or within 12 to 24 months.
e.g. Trees with a short Useful Life Expectancy (ULE) or invasive
plant species
Tree Removal:
A decision is made to remove a tree when one of the following has been determined via the tree assessment
and arborist report recommendation:
e The subject tree is dead;
e The subject tree is dying (i.e. displaying evidence of rapid or severe decline);
e The subject tree is dangerous (i.e. displaying structural damage, presence of bracket fungal fruiting
bodies or movement at the base of the trunk);
e The subject tree has evidence of causing damage to infrastructure, and the infrastructure cannot
be repaired without the tree being removed from the location;
e The subject tree has a short Useful Life Expectancy;
e The subject tree is an invasive plant species.
When assessing root intrusion and damage, the priority risk assessed would be deemed as ‘Low’ toa
person, and this risk score of ‘Low’ usually prescribes either no works required, further investigation or
works at Council’s discretion e.g. programmed maintenance. Root intrusion or damage caused by roots
does not usually require urgent attention and works can be scheduled according to an annual program.
Regarding trees that have been determined to have a short Useful Life Expectancy (ULE), these could be
retained for the remainder of their lifespan, however often this requires additional, increased and ongoing
maintenance activities and costs which are not reasonable or a sustainable use of Council resources. In
addition, often the tree will continue to decline regardless, which presents increased risk of failure. Subject
to budget, trees in this situation should be removed and replaced with a tree of a more suitable species or
in a more suitable location.
For trees not determined to have a risk rating of High or Extreme, other management options exist and are
outlined in Appendix B. Most of these options involve some form of re-engineering the surrounding
infrastructure and therefore can be cost-prohibitive.
Noosa Shire Council 6
Page 36 of 71See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.