Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Response to Submissions and Minor Change - Noosa Council

of 19

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

    “Adamson Town Planning, specialising in providing higher order town planning
    advice”




                                                      accommodation is to be promoted and managed,
                                                      there is no restriction on the number of units being
                                                      used for permanent residential living 8 . Under the
                                                      planning scheme the “Parkridge Noosa” development
                                                      is located within the TAZ and is intended for visitor
                                                      accommodation, which now is unlikely to be realised.

                                                      In contrast, the proposed development is for purely
                                                      visitor accommodation, to the exclusion of
                                                      permanent residential living, which will provide
                                                      substantial community benefit for reasons already
                                                      explained. The proposed development is for a
                                                      different      development     providing     visitor
                                                      accommodation and does not amount to “double
                                                      dipping”.

A reduction in the number of tennis                   The changes made to the proposal plans include an
courts being currently available                      additional tennis court to maintain the status quo, all
                                                      of which are located within the ROSZ, and a
                                                      consistent Sport and Recreation use. Further, the
                                                      existing tennis pavilion has also been replaced.

A lack of sustainability and energy                   A Sustainability Design Report has been provided as
efficiency                                            Attachment 4 in the application material. The changes
                                                      made to the proposal plans in terms of reducing the
                                                      height of Buildings 4 & 5 has provided areas for
                                                      additional solar panels, which substantially increase
                                                      the amount of solar power (50kVA PV System) able to
                                                      be generated as stated in the advice provided (refer
                                                      Attachment 8).

                                                      A number of sustainability and other energy
                                                      efficiency measures are being adopted for the
                                                      development as explained in the Superior Design
                                                      Outcomes Report (Attachment 8). The applicant is
                                                      committed to providing a high level of sustainability,
                                                      which reduces cost in the long term, by achieving a
                                                      high stand of energy efficiency.

The development does not accord                       It is not agreed that the proposed development does
with reasonable community                             not accord with reasonable community expectations.
expectations for the site                             The subject land was partly included within the TAZ


8
    Refer condition 4 of the development approval issued 23 June 2020

                                                                                                 18 | P a g e
16022 – Noosa Springs “Boutique Hotel”


[OCR of page images]
y

“Adamson Town Planning, specialising in providing higher order town planning

on Adamson
advice

Town Planning

 

accommodation is to be promoted and managed,
there is no restriction on the number of units being
used for permanent residential living®. Under the
planning scheme the “Parkridge Noosa” development
is located within the TAZ and is intended for visitor
accommodation, which now is unlikely to be realised.

In contrast, the proposed development is for purely
visitor accommodation, to the exclusion § of
permanent residential living, which will provide
substantial community benefit for reasons already
explained. The proposed development is for a

different development providing visitor
accommodation and does not amount to “double
dipping’.

 

A reduction in the number of tennis | The changes made to the proposal plans include an
courts being currently available additional tennis court to maintain the status quo, all
of which are located within the ROSZ, and a
consistent Sport and Recreation use. Further, the
existing tennis pavilion has also been replaced.

 

A lack of sustainability and energy A Sustainability Design Report has been provided as
efficiency Attachment 4 in the application material. The changes
made to the proposal plans in terms of reducing the
height of Buildings 4 & 5 has provided areas for
additional solar panels, which substantially increase
the amount of solar power (SO0kVA PV System) able to
be generated as stated in the advice provided (refer
Attachment 8).

A number of sustainability and other energy
efficiency measures are being adopted for the
development as explained in the Superior Design
Outcomes Report (Attachment 8). The applicant is
committed to providing a high level of sustainability,
which reduces cost in the long term, by achieving a
high stand of energy efficiency.

 

 

 

 

The development does not accord It is not agreed that the proposed development does
with reasonable community not accord with reasonable community expectations.
expectations for the site The subject land was partly included within the TAZ

 

8 Refer condition 4 of the development approval issued 23 June 2020

18|Page
16022 — Noosa Springs "Boutique Hotel”

Log in to download the original (Response to Submissions and Minor Change - Noosa Council.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.