Original source · versioned page text
2015-11-10 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (15.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 NOVEMBER 2015
Our Customers
The total number of customer requests received by Council remains on a slight upward trend
in the long term with slightly more customer requests per month in July and August than at
the corresponding time last year.
Council will recall that in previous KPI reports, the level of sign off of completed CRMs
(customer request management system) was quite low. More work has been done at the
management level in “drilling down” within the overall statistics. What was found was that:
(i) our system had some target dates for response to customers as zero days meaning that
even if the customer request was finalised in 1 day, it was shown as not being
completed within target date;
(ii) there are a significant number of CRMs which have been completed but were “signed
off” in the system meaning that they were being reported as overdue even though they
were completed; and
(iii) some of the system reporting was extracting the initial response date to the customer as
the date upon which a request had to be resolved (for example, we require same day
initial response to a dog attack but it may take longer to investigate, take statements and
issue a prosecution).
The Executive Officer is working through the above issues to improve customer response
reporting. My expectation is that the reported statistical result will improve significantly in the
second quarter.
Both the Director Planning and Infrastructure and Director Community Services have
reported to Council about actions to improve the timing of responses to CRMs particularly in
relation to dogs, waste bins, road/traffic issues and trees.
The average wait time for our customers when phoning Council continues to improve over
time and our month to month performance is better than last year. However there continues
to be some months where the target of an average of 1 minute is exceeded (rates, kerbside
pickup and dog registration calls were high in August and September). The month of July
saw our best phone performance since we began keeping statistics. Our frontline customer
service staff continue to provide exceptionally good service.
Customer indicators for processing times for various types of development applications have
remained constant over the 3 month period with MCUs being the type of application which
generally has the lowest percentage of completion times meeting statutory timeframes. On
average, 80% of all applications are processed within statutory timeframes.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance & Risk
Nil.
Page 173 of 201
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.