Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Minor Change Report MCU21 0156.01

of 4

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.


[Attachment: image4.png (image text)]
This request includes updated fencing plans setback 500mm from the boundary and not
strictly in accordance with the minimum 1m setback. Although not strictly complying the
proposal proposes the following design outcome:

Front fence design pushed back from the front boundary a minimum 500mm to the
outermost projection;

The fence runs perpendicular & parallel to the buildings, not the boundary,
meaning some parts of the fence are setback as far as 4.5m, 3.1m & 2.7m, well
beyond the 1m requirement.

The front fence is highly articulated, made from a combination of timber battens,
aluminium slats, rendered masonry and aluminium gates;

Should the fence run parallel with the front boundary and setback 1m, there will be
a supply of 31.9m2 of landscaping between the boundary and fence. Our stepped
fence design, setback 500mm from the boundary, provides 36.4m2 of landscaping.
The stepped fence design provides a unique breakup of mass and visual interest
and provides each street facing residence with its own sense of address.

Log in to download the original (Minor Change Report MCU21 0156.01.docx)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.