Original source · versioned page text
Request to change development approval
Attached to the e-mail Request to change a development approval - MCU14/0102.05.
2.1 Change to Decision Notice
It is requested that Council re-insert reference to ‘Retail Business Type 6 Hardware store’ in Section
2, Decision Details in the Change to an Existing Approval decision notice.
2.2 Change to Conditions
Material Change of Use Conditions
Condition 2 currently reflects the endorsed plans of development. It is requested that the condition
be amended to reflect the new proposal plans as follows:
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
DA-01-01 V Site layout, prepared by Powe 17/02/2017
Architects
DA-01-02 J Site – Roof & Signage Location Plan, 25/02/2016
prepared by Powe Architects
DA-02-01 G Floor Plans, prepared by Powe 25/02/2016
Architects
DA-02-02 E Floor Plans, prepared by Powe 17/02/2017
Architects
DA-03-01 G Elevations, prepared by Powe 15/11/2016
Architects
DA-03-02 G Sections, prepared by Powe Architects 15/11/2016
SD-01 F Landscape Concept Plan and Section, 05/08/2015
prepared by DFS Group
SD-02 F Landscape Concept Plan and 05/08/2015
Elevation, prepared by DFS Group
SD-03 F Design Intent & Suggested Plan 05/08/2015
Palette, prepared by DFS Group
SK07 P8 Prop. Building Elevations & 22/02/2016
Perspectives, prepared by Verve
Building Design & Concepts
3.0 Sustainable Planning Act 2009
The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 permits an assessment manager to consider a change to an
approval where the change is a “permissible change”. The definition of "permissible change" is as
follows:
“1) A permissible change for a development approval, is a change to the approval that would not-
(a) result in a substantially different development; or
(b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change-
(i) require referral to additional concurrence agencies;
(ii) for an approval for assessable development that previously did not require impact assessment
- require impact assessment; or
(c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact assessment - be likely,
in the responsible entity’s opinion, to cause a person to make a properly made submission
objecting to the proposed change, it the circumstances allowed; or
(d) cause development to which the approval relates to include prohibited development”
In relation to the above definition, it is relevant to note the following:
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.