Original source · versioned page text
Appendix F - Bushfire Hazard Assessment
Bushfire Hazard Assessment v1 NCES REF: J000207 Lot 9 on RP131369 – 216 Black Mountain Road, Black Mountain 3 BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT 3.1 Hazard Assessment Methodology The Noosa Plan’s Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code requires that a site-specific bushfire hazard assessment be prepared to assess the degree of bushfire hazard on a site captured within a mapped Designated Bushfire Hazard Area. The SPP Bushfire Prone Area mapping prevails over the Noosa Bushfire Hazard Area mapping with respect to trigger for assessment under the Noosa Plan’s Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code. Therefore, the site-specific hazard mapping is to be prepared consistent with the methodology adopted to prepare the SPP mapping. The method used to prepare the SPP mapping is described in A new methodology for State-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas in Queensland (Leonard et al., 2014) which is also referenced in the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning’s State Planning Policy – Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience – Technical Manual – A ‘fit for purpose’ approach in undertaking natural hazard studies and risk assessments. The preparation of site specific hazard maps is described in these documents and is referenced as a Local Hazard Area Map. Preparation of a Local Hazard Area Map has been undertaken using a combination of methodologies from the following sources: • A new methodology for State-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas in Queensland (Leonard et al., 2014) for: o Attribution of Vegetation Hazard Classes; o Calculation of Potential Bushfire Intensity; and o Patch and corridor filtering. • State Planning Policy Guideline – Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide (June, 2003) which was used as a guide for undertaking natural hazard assessment on a site-specific scale; and • The Noosa Plan’s Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code. 3.1.1 Local Hazard Area Map A Local Hazard Area Map was prepared using the following methodology: • Categorizing the vegetation within the site in accordance with the vegetation hazard classes derived from Leonard et al. (2014); • Subdividing the identified vegetation hazard classes into bushfire hazard sub-units based on slope differences and vegetation hazard classes (refer to the sub-unit mapping presented as Figure 2); • Using the patch and corridor filtering process identified in Leonard et al. (2014) to amend the bushfire hazard sub-units1; and • Applying 100m potential intensity buffers to the amended bushfire hazard sub-units to derive an overall Local Hazard Map. 1 The patch and corridor filtering process to remove or downgrade hazard levels of small patches and narrow corridors involves the following three stages: • Merging small patches of a single Vegetation Hazard Class less than 0.5 ha; • Merging small Vegetation Hazard Class patches between 0.5 and 1 ha with higher or moderate fuel loads (greater than 8 tonnes/ha); and • Removing narrow corridors of vegetation less than 100m wide through a process of patch erosion and dilation. These small patches are merged with surrounding vegetation by allocating a patch to the Vegetation Hazard Class that is most common to the patch boundary (Leonard et al., 2014). © 2018 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.