Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix F - Bushfire Hazard Assessment

of 26

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 

 

=

 

State Planning Policy — Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience — Localised Bushfire

Hazard Area Map

Assessment Methodology:
Undertaken in accordance with methodology detailed in the State Planning Policy —

State interest Technical Manual Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience (April, 2016).

* From: Leonard, J., Newnham, G., Opie, K., and Blanchi, R. (2014) A new methodology for state-
wide mapping of bushfire prone areas in Queensland. CSIRO, Australia.

Sub Unit 1 — Slope has been set to zero commiserate with the dominant upslope/across
slope position of the vegetation

 

 

 

 

 

 

communities

Vegetation Potential Fire Maximum | Potential Potential
Hazard Class Fuel Weather Landscape Fireline Bushfire
Load Severity Slope Intensity Intensity*
(t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) (kw/m) *
VHC 16 — |
Mixture of urban 3 50 0 n/a Low
classes
Sub Unit 2
Potential Fire Maximum Potential
Vegetation Fuel Weather Landscape Fireline eae
Hazard Class Load Severity Slope Intensity Intensity*
(t/ha) (FFDI) (degrees) (kw/m) *
VHC 12 —
Mixture of rural -
eee erat 5 50 20 n/a Grassfire Prone
grassland
Sub Unit 3 -
Fire Maximum Potential
Vegetation eotental Weather Landscape Fireline eee
Hazard Class (vha) Severity Slope Intensity Intensity"
(FFDI) (degrees) (kw/m) *
ia cae 10 50 20 12,322 Medium

 

Sub Unit 4— Slope has been set to zero commiserate with the dominant upslope/across
slope position of the vegetation

 

 

 

 

Vegetation Potential Fire Maximum Potential Potential
Hazard Class Fuel Weather Landscape Fireline Bushfire
Load Severity Slope Intensity Intensity*
(tha) (FFDI) (degrees) (kw/m) *
NOC i 1 50 0 nla Low
Rainforest

 

 

 

 

Sub Unit 5 — Slope has been set to zero commiserate with the dominant upslope/across
slope position of the vegetation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vegetation Potential Fire Maximum Potential Potential
Hazard Class Fuel Weather Landscape Fireline Bushfire
Load Severity Slope Intensity Intensity*
(Vha) (FFDI) (degrees) (kw/m) *
NHGIG = facia 10 50 0 3,100 Low
communities
Sub Unit 6
Potential Fire Maximum Potential
Vegetation Fuel Weather Landscape Fireline Fotential
: Bushfire
Hazard Class Load Severity Slope Intensity Intensity*
(tha) (FFDI) (degrees) (kw/m) *
VHC 12 — Mixture
of rural classes — 5 50 0 n/a Grassfire Prone
mainly grassland
PO Box 9586 Pacific Paradise, OLD 4564 BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN _ | KEY SUBJECT SITE M@) MEDIUM POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY AREA FIGURED DIMENSIONS TO. | SCALE: SEE INSERT DRAWN: CV. FIGURE 2
ce me ssl Lot @ en RP131969 100M TO SUBJECT SITE fll GRASSFIRE POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY AREA BE READ IN PREFERENCE
ABN: 44851 168 122. aoe LOW POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY AREA TO SCALING DATE: 04.05.2018 SHEET NO: 2 OF 3 | TITLE: SUB UNITS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Log in to download the original file

Appendix F - Bushfire Hazard Assessment.pdf · 3.6 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.