Original source · versioned page text
Appendix H. Planning Scheme Code Responses
Attached to the e-mail Retail Bus Type 5 & Type 2 & Op Works Economic Report & PScheme Code Response - MCU17/0572 & OPW17/0611.
Appendix H Planning Scheme Code Response [OCR of page images] Appendix H Planning Scheme Code Response
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 68 pages
Page 2
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Division 17—Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Noosaville Locality
11.9 Effects of use
Amenity Complies with Specific Outcome
O1 While redevelopment of the site from a produce store to
Uses are located, designed and operated No solution provided a service station will invariably alter the existing site
to avoid significant adverse changes to the conditions, operation of the proposed service station will
light, air quality, noise, accessibility or be commensurate with the industrial zoning intentions
other conditions enjoyed by users of expressed for the locality.
associated, adjoining or nearby uses.
Major Road Network Complies with Specific Outcome
O2 The proposed service station is intended to cater to the
Through traffic in Noosaville uses Gibson No solution provided existing traffic volumes on Eumundi Noosa Road and
Road or Eenie Creek Road, ensuring the will not encourage any deviation for through traffic that
visual amenity of Gympie Terrace is would otherwise use Eenie Creek Road.
protected with a consequent enhancement
of visitor and recreation opportunities and
benefit to businesses along Gympie
Terrace.
Visual amenity Complies with Specific Outcome
O3 The visual appearance of the proposed use is consistent
The visual amenity and character No solution provided with emerging forms of industrial development in this
surrounding the major road network is area of Noosaville. While the existing site conditions are
protected and enhances the recognisable not characterised by native vegetation along the
entrance to Noosaville through— frontage, landscaping works are proposed for those
a) retaining and enhancing the visual and parts of the frontage not utilised for access, as illustrated
physical separation of Noosaville from by the landscape plans provided at Appendix E.
other localities; and
b) ensuring development does not
encroach upon existing native
vegetation along the road frontage
other than for accessways.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 1
Page 3
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Neighbourhood identities N/A Not applicable
O4 As the proposed use is located within the Industrial
The separate identities of the various No solution provided zone, there will not be any impact on the identity of the
residential neighbourhoods remain various residential neighbourhoods within the locality.
important and distinct elements of the
residential character of Noosaville.
Airport N/A Not applicable
O5 The subject site is not located within close proximity to
Development and use of premises within No solution provided the airport.
750m of the airport do not cause an
obstruction or other potential hazard to Figure 11.1—Airport traffic area
aircraft movement associated with the
airport by the way of—
a) the physical intrusion of buildings or
other structures into aircraft take-off
and approach flight paths;
b) attracting birds or bats to the area,
which could cause or contribute to bird-
strike hazard;
c) providing very bright lighting or lighting
similar to runway lighting, which can
distract or confuse aircraft pilots;
d) interfering with navigation or
communication facilities;
e) emissions that may affect pilot visibility
or aircraft operations; and
f) transient intrusions into the airport’s
operational airspace.
See Figure 11.1 – Airport traffic area
11.10 Built form
Density Complies with Specific Outcome
O6 The density of the proposed development is compatible
The density of development within the site No solution provided with the surrounding forms of industrial development.
area—
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 2
Page 4
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
a) is compatible with surrounding
development; and
b) does not exceed—
i. for the Semi-Attached Housing
Zone:
A. for sites between 500m2 and
599m2 inclusive—4.8 persons
B. for sites 600m2 or more — 6.6
persons or 100 persons per
hectare
ii. for the Attached Housing and
Business Centre Zones—a
maximum population density of 100
persons per hectare with the
exception of the following sites
which have an allowable population
density of 320 persons per hectare
exclusively for the purpose of a
visitor hostel—
A. Lots 3 & 4 on RP122928
situated at 14-16 Mary Street;
and
B. Lot 21 on RP815864 situated at
11-13 William Street;
iii. For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone—
160 persons per hectare; and
c) has a low site impact to enhance the
opportunity to maintain natural site
characteristics, including native
vegetation and natural landforms.
Height Complies with Specific Outcome
O7 S7.1 With reference to the Architectural Plans provided at
Buildings and other structures— Buildings and other structures have a Appendix C, the height of the building will not exceed the
a) are low rise and have a visual bulk and maximum building height of— maximum height limit of 10m attributed to the Industry
an architectural scale consistent with a) if in the Attached Housing Zone – 8m, zone. The plans demonstrate a nominal height of circa
structures on adjoining or nearby land; with the exception of those properties 5.45m, measured from the altered ground level (n.b.
b) do not exceed a building height of — with frontage to the following streets: - only a minor change to the existing ground level is
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 3
Page 5
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
i. for the Attached Housing Zone 2 Russell St, William St and Howard St, proposed).
storeys unless located on property or Weyba Rd, James St and Albert St
with frontage to the following north of their intersections with
streets: - Russell St, William St and Elizabeth St where they have a
Howard St, or Weyba Rd, James St maximum building height of 12m;
and Albert St north of their b) if in the Visitor Mixed Use Zone – 12m;
intersections with Elizabeth St, c) if in the Business Centre or Industry
where they are not to exceed a Zones — 10m;
maximum building height of 3 d) if in the Shire Business Centre Zone –
storeys; 8m, except in Precinct E1 or E2 where
ii. for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone– 3 12m;
storeys, although present only 1-2 e) if in the Industry Zone – 10m
storey façades to Gympie Terrace; f) in all other zones—8m.
iii. for the Shire Business Centre
Zone– 2 storeys, except in Precinct
E1 and E2 where 3 storeys and
Precinct REC/MU where 1 storey;
and
iv. for all other zones— 2 storeys;
c) do not visually dominate the street or
surrounding spaces;
d) preserve the amenity of surrounding
land; ensure that development
responds to the site topography; and
e) are well articulated with strong
horizontal and vertical design elements
to provide an interesting streetscape
and to complement landform changes
and landscapes.
Setbacks Complies with Specific Outcome
O8 S8.1 The proposed development complies with the setbacks
Buildings and other structures are Buildings and structures comply with the identified in Schedule 1 - Minimum Boundary Setbacks,
appropriately designed and sited to— setbacks identified in Schedule 1 - being in excess of the 6m setback from the street
a) provide amenity for users of the Minimum Boundary Setbacks. frontage for the building component and an allowance to
premises as well as preserve the visual build to the western boundary recognising the adjoining
and acoustic amenity of adjoining and property is also situated within the Industry zone. It is
nearby land uses; recognised that the roof structure of the fuel bowsers is
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 4
Page 6
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
b) provide adequate distance from setback approximately 5.2m from the front property
adjoining land uses; boundary, however recognising this is an open structure
c) allow space for required vehicle that is setback beyond an 11 metre verge, the overall
parking; setback from the road frontage is very generous.
d) preserve any existing vegetation that
will buffer the proposed building;
e) allow for landscaping to be provided
between buildings;
f) avoid large areas of continuous wall
planes by varying the building setbacks
and using appropriate techniques to
provide visual relief; and
g) protect the natural character and visual
amenity of the Noosa River system and
other watercourses.
Site cover, gross floor area and plot Complies with Specific Outcome
ratio The scale of the proposed built form generates a site
O9 No solution provided cover and gross floor area that is compatible with
The site cover, gross floor area and plot surrounding forms of industrial development. In fact, the
ratio of buildings and other roofed overall site cover is arguably less than most forms of
structures— development in the immediate area.
a) results in a building scale that is While there is no existing vegetation that is worthy of
compatible with surrounding retention, the landscape plan provided at Appendix E
development; illustrates the intended treatment to the site frontage to
b) does not present an appearance of bulk ensure an attractive presentation to Eumundi Noosa
to adjacent properties, roads or other Road.
areas in the vicinity of the site; The proposed layout allows for appropriate stormwater
c) maximises the retention of existing management with a legal point of discharge, as well as
vegetation and allows for additional soft safe on-site vehicular movements.
landscaping between buildings;
d) allows for adequate area at ground
level for outdoor recreation,
entertainment, clothes drying and other
site facilities; and
e) facilitates onsite stormwater
management and vehicular access.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 5
Page 7
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
O10 N/A Not applicable
Site cover does not exceed—
a) for the Detached Housing Zone–50% for
a single storey building and 40% for a
double storey building;
b) for the Semi-attached Housing Zone–
40%;
c) for the Attached Housing Zone–40%;
d) for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone–35%; or
e) for the Shire Business Centre Zone in
Precincts E1, E2, E6 and E7–50%.
O11 N/A Not applicable
For Multiple Housing Type 2 buildings do
not exceed a plot ratio of—
a) 0.6:1 if in the Attached Housing Zone
with frontage to the following streets:
Russell St, William St and Howard St,
or Weyba Rd, James St and Albert St
north of their intersections with
Elizabeth St; or
b) 0.45:1 otherwise.
O12 N/A Not applicable
For Multiple housing Type 3 or 4, Visitor
accommodation Type 4 and the
accommodation unit component of an
Entertainment and dining business
Type 3—the maximum a gross floor area
is equivalent to the maximum allowable
population in persons multiplied by 40m2.
O13 N/A Not applicable
For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone, the
maximum gross floor area equals the
allowable population in persons multiplied
by 40m2, provided that the gross floor area
does not exceed 13,600m2.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 6
Page 8
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
O14 N/A Not applicable
For the Detached house Zone and
Semiattached Housing Zone—soft
landscaping is provided and retained over
a minimum of 20% of the site area.
O15 N/A Not applicable
For the Business Centre Zone, outside of
the Mary Street/Thomas Street Precinct
the maximum plot ratio is —
a) 0.8:1 for site areas up to and including
2,000m2; plus
b) 0.3:1 for the balance portion of the site
area in excess of 2000m2.
O16 N/A Not applicable
For the Business Centre Zone within the
Mary Street/Thomas Street Precinct the
maximum plot ratio is 0.5:1.
O17 N/A Not applicable
Within the Shire Business Centre Zone, the
maximum plot ratio for development within
the following precincts is —
a) Precincts B1 and B2 combined- 0.5:1;
b) Precinct B3- 0.8;
c) Precinct E1- 0.6;
d) Precinct E2- 0.6;
e) Precinct E3- 0.6;
f) Precinct E4- 0.6;
g) Precinct E5- 0.6
h) Precinct E6- 0.6;
i) Precinct E7- 0.6;
j) Precinct RES- 0.6; and
k) Precinct REC/MU- 0.1.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 7
Page 9
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Flooding and drainage Not applicable
O18 S18.1
Buildings and other works are designed Floor levels for habitable rooms are not
and sited to— less than the specified minimum floor
a) provide flood free access to premises levels and
and flood free habitable areas;
b) allow only minor, short term and S18.2 Where Council infrastructure is Complies with Acceptable Solutions
infrequent flooding of non-habitable available— For the stormwater quantity assessment, ADG has
areas; a) any drainage (including buildings and determined that the increase to impervious area is
c) ensure drainage does not adversely yards) flows to that infrastructure; and negligible due to the existing site development and as
impact upon other premises; and b) the infrastructure has the capacity to well as the increase to discharged peak flow rates. As
d) ensure filling or excavation does not accept any additional loading; and such, no on-site detention measures will be required for
adversely impact upon other premises this development.
by—
i. causing ponding on the site or Due to the greater probability of oil and petroleum
nearby land; spillage within the site special precautions will be taken
ii. increasing flooding, which to ensure integrity of the surrounding environment and
adversely affects the safety or use downstream stormwater catchment. The site has been
of any land upstream and divided into two (2) catchments, a high-risk area and a
downstream; and low-risk area. A Gross Pollutant Trap (GPT) (SPEL
iii. adversely affecting the flow of water Ecoceptor or approved equivalent) will be installed prior
in any overland flow path. to the site’s discharge to remove oils and grits commonly
encountered on surfaces trafficked by motor vehicles.
A SPEL Puraceptor unit or approved equivalent is
proposed to treat runoff from the high-risk area
before returning filtered run-off to the low risk drainage
system for further treatment.
Please refer to the Civil Engineering Report by ADG
provided at Appendix F.
S18.3 N/A Not applicable
For Detached houses and Multiple
housing—
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 8
Page 10
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
a) where slab on ground construction is
used, filling does not extend more
than 1m beyond the building footprint,
measured from the outer walls of the
building ; or
b) the design consists of a suspended
floor construction.
Sloping sites & ridgelines Complies with Specific Outcome
O19 S19.1 The site generally slopes from the north to the south at
Development on sloping sites— Buildings and associated accessways are a grade of approximately 5%.
a) is responsive to the natural topography not constructed on land with a slope
of the site and minimises cut and fill; greater than 25% (1 in 4); and
b) does not visually dominate the hill slope
or interrupt the skyline; S19.2 N/A Not applicable
c) is integrated with the natural site Buildings are of split level design that step
characteristics including vegetation; down the slope or have suspended floor
and construction; and
d) for Multiple housing, takes the form of
small separate buildings; and
S19.3 N/A Not applicable
Cut or fill is less than 1.2m in depth; and
S19.4 N/A Not applicable
The distance between the ground and the
lowest part of the floor of the building does
not exceed 3m to avoid large under
building areas; and
S19.5 Complies with Specific Outcome
Buildings present no more than 2 or 3 The proposed development is 1 storey in height, as
storeys at any one point. shown on the Architectural Plans provided at Appendix
C.
O20 S20.1 N/A Not applicable
On steep slopes or ridgelines which are No solution provided The site is not located on a steep slope or ridgeline.
visible from the major road network, areas
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 9
Page 11
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
of public open space, the Noosa River or
the beaches—
a) new buildings and structures including
outbuildings, are designed so as not to
dominate or detract from the scenic and
environmental qualities of the site and
its setting.
Roof form Complies with Specific Outcome
O21 Rooflines— S21.1 The main roof of the building has a The proposed roof design is consistent with the
a) contribute positively to the local skyline; roof pitch no less than 5 degrees and has predominant built form within the industry zone,
b) complement the character of the roof overhangs a minimum of 600mm wide; including emerging forms of development accepted by
locality; and Council elsewhere within the immediate locality.
c) are articulated, pitched or skillion;
d) avoid low pitched (eg. less than 5 S21.2 Complies with Performance Criteria
degrees) or box roof profiles/parapets; Buildings and structures do not include roof The proposal does not include a roof top terrace.
and top terraces.
e) do not create opportunities for
residents to overlook the private open
space areas of neighbouring
properties.
Materials and finishes Complies with Performance Criteria
O22 Reference is made to the building materials notated on
Buildings and other structures use No solution provided. the Architectural Plans provided at Appendix C. It
materials and finishes that complement the should be noted that the Freedom service station chain
Noosaville character and integrate with the is widely available, with each station conforming to
surrounding natural and built environment standards of design and branding, similar to the likes of
by— Bunnings Warehouse on the opposite side of Eumundi
a) using a mix of lightweight and textured Noosa Road. Recognising the dilapidated nature of
external building materials, including many of the surrounding forms of development, it is
timber finishes; and considered the redevelopment of this site as proposed
b) using masonry construction where will assist with retaining Eumundi Noosa Road as an
variation is provided in texture, detailing attractive entry to Noosaville.
and the like.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 10
Page 12
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
11.11 Environment, conservation and recreation
Environment and cultural heritage Complies with Performance Criteria
values The proposed development will not adversely impact the
O23 No solution provided surrounding development. It is important to note that
There are no significant adverse effects on there is no identified heritage value. The proposed
biodiversity, native vegetation, native Advisory note development has sufficient stormwater run-off treatment
fauna habitat, landscaped quality, water PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details infrastructure on-site. The development will be
quality or cultural heritage values, including requirements for the design and siting of connected to the reticulated sewerage network.
those related to— effluent disposal systems where located
a) changes to natural drainage; outside a sewerage service area.
b) management of fire risk; Compliance with PSP24 will be considered
c) erosion and the transport of sediments as part of Council’s assessment of the
off site; plumbing and drainage application.
d) unmanaged public access;
e) effluent disposal;
f) changes to fauna habitat and
behaviour; and
g) disturbance of buildings and features,
including natural features of cultural
heritage significance.
Open space network N/A Not applicable
O24 S24.1
An integrated open space network is Open space corridors and existing native
established throughout the locality and— vegetation in areas indicated in Schedule 5
a) allows for both passive and active – Map 4 are protected from fragmentation
recreational pursuits; and encroachment by development.
b) provides safe and convenient
connectivity for pedestrians and
cyclists to neighbourhood centres,
community services and other key
destinations such as public open
space, the Noosa River and Wallace
Estate;
c) provides habitat connectivity for
wildlife;
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 11
Page 13
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
d) protects watercourses and drainage
lines in the lowlands; and
e) forms a scenic backdrop for the
locality’s residential neighbourhoods.
and
O25 S25.1 N/A Not applicable
Physical and visual links between public No solution provided
open space areas and watercourses are
retained.
Pedestrian and bicycle pathways Complies with Specific Outcome
O26 S26.1 The proposed development will retain or rectify the
Safe and convenient pedestrian and Pedestrian and bicycle pathways are existing 2.0m wide footpath at the frontage of the site.
bicycle pathways are provided and provided and retained where indicated in
retained between and around key Schedule 5 – Map 2; and
destinations including—
a) an east-west link between the S26.2 N/A Not applicable
Tewantin & Doonan Locality and the Contributions toward a Pathways Network
Noosa Heads Locality along the are provided in accordance with PSP20.
Noosa River foreshore; and
b) a north-south link between the Shire
Business Centre and Wallace Park to
the Noosa River foreshore.
Foreshore character N/A Not applicable
O27
The natural landscape character and No solution provided.
vegetation along the foreshore areas of
the Noosa River, Lakes Doonella and
Weyba and Eenie Creek, Noosa National
Park, Keyser Island and Weyba Creek
Conservation Parks is protected.
Watercourses N/A Not applicable
O28
No solution provided.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 12
Page 14
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
The environmental, economic, amenity
and transportation values of the Noosa
River system is protected.
Division 26—Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Industry Zone
11.52 Consistent uses
O185 A/S It is recognised that the primary service station use is
The following defined uses and use No solution provided listed as a consistent use, however due to the scale of
classes are consistent uses and are the retail component associated with the primary use,
located in the Industry Zone— the ‘shop’ component is not consistent.
a) Industrial business Types 1 or 2;
b) Retail business Types 3, 5 or 6; Overall the proposed development does not hinder or
c) Retail business Type 4 if a vehicle undermine the function of the industry zoned area. The
sales premises and located with proposal will be in keeping in terms of character, scale
frontage to Lionel Donovan Drive; and height with surrounding industry type development.
d) Emergency Service Type 2;
e) Service and utility;
f) Transport Types 1, 2 or 3; and
g) Ancillary dwelling unit.
11.53 Inconsistent uses
O186 A/S As described in detail throughout the report, it is
The following defined uses and use No solution provided recognised the trigger for the Retail Business Type 2 use
classes are inconsistent uses and are not results from the size of the retail component associated
located in the Industry Zone— with the service station. While the sale of goods will
a) All Agricultural Uses; occur in an area of approximate 123m2, this scale is no
b) Commercial business; larger than service stations approved within other LGAs
c) Entertainment and dining business; and reflects a standard service station operation.
d) Home-based business;
e) Industrial business Type 3 It is important to appreciate that the shop associated
f) Retail business Types 1, 2 or 7; with the proposed service station is only ancillary in the
g) Retail business Type 4 if not a sense that it is only intended to provide an additional
vehicle sales premises located with level of convenience for customers attending the site.
frontage to Lionel Donovan Drive While the proposed service station is the primary use of
h) Education; the site, additional services/conveniences are proposed
i) Emergency Service Type 1; within the building in order to remain competitive within
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 13
Page 15
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
j) Open Space; the service station market. The inclusion of the ‘shop’
k) Wellbeing; allows for an expanded selection of goods, as opposed
l) Transport Types 4, 5 or 6; to creating a standalone store which is designed to
m) Detached house; service the surrounding businesses. The proposal also
n) Multiple housing; and encourages employees of the area to walk to the shop
o) Visitor accommodation to purchase convenience or other small items. The
ancillary shop only supports the function and operation
of the service station and is not considered as the
primary use of the site.
11.54 Effects of use
Amenity Complies with Specific Outcome
O187 The proposed development is located, designed and
Industry uses are located, designed and No solution provided. operated to minimise impacts to the surrounding
operated to avoid significantly changing development. The proposed development is in-keeping
the amenity enjoyed by users of with the amenity of the surrounding industrial forms of
surrounding premises. development.
Storage of materials Complies with Specific Outcome
O188 No solution provided There are no stored materials that will exceed half the
Materials stored outside of buildings do height of the on-site building.
not exceed half the height of the on-site
buildings; or
O189 N/A Not applicable
If there are no on-site buildings, the stored
materials do not exceed 5m; and
O190 Complies with Acceptable Solutions
Storage areas are screened from the All storage of goods will occur within the building. The
street and adjoining properties by service yard will be sufficiently screened by 1.8m high
buildings, landscaping or fencing. fencing and peripheral landscaping.
Frontages Complies with Specific Outcome
O191 S191.1 With reference to the Landscape Plans provided at
The frontage of each site contains A landscaped building setback of 10m is Appendix E, landscaping is proposed to the frontage in
landscaping without adversely screening to be provided to Walter Hay Drive, all locations not otherwise taken up by the entry/exit
the business or visitor carparking; and Eumundi Road and Eenie Creek Road, driveways. Both primary areas of landscaping at the
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 14
Page 16
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
unless this is the only frontage to the site, frontage are in excess of 6m in depth.
in which case it can be reduced to 6m;
and
O192 S191.2 N/A Not applicable
Vehicle display is focussed on and This setback area is to include a minimum
orientated towards Lionel Donovan Drive of 2m of soft landscaping behind which
rather than Walter Hay Drive, Eumundi uncovered visitor carparking may be
Road or Eenie Creek Drive; and located; and
S192.1 N/A Not applicable
There is no display of motor vehicle for
sale or hire on Walter Hay Drive, Eumundi
Road or Eenie Creek Road frontages; and
O193 S193.1 N/A Not applicable
Development fronting Walter Hay Drive, No direct vehicular access is taken off
Eumundi Road and Eenie Creek Road is Eenie Creek Road or Walter Hay Drive
sympathetic to the character of the area where the property has access to any
and suitable for its position along the entry other road.
roads to the coastal urban part of the
Shire.
Environmental Protection Complies with Performance Criteria
O194 The proposed development will be conducted in an
Industrial development is conducted in an No solution provided. environmentally responsible manner.
environmentally responsible manner,
operating without deleterious impacts on For the stormwater quantity assessment, ADG has
immediate, surrounding or downstream determined that the increase to impervious area is
communities, environments and negligible due to the existing site development and as
environmental processes. well as the increase to discharged peak flow rates. As
such, no on-site detention measures will be required for
this development.
Due to the greater probability of oil and petroleum
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 15
Page 17
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
spillage within the site special precautions will be taken
to ensure integrity of the surrounding environment and
downstream stormwater catchment. The site has been
divided into two (2) catchments, a high-risk area and a
low-risk area. A Gross Pollutant Trap (GPT) (SPEL
Ecoceptor or approved equivalent) will be installed prior
to the site’s discharge to remove oils and grits commonly
encountered on surfaces trafficked by motor vehicles.
A SPEL Puraceptor unit or approved equivalent is
proposed to treat runoff from the high-risk area
before returning filtered run-off to the low risk drainage
system for further treatment.
Please refer to the Civil Engineering Report by ADG for
further details.
It is considered appropriate conditions of approval can
be applied to ensure compliance in this regard, as
necessary.
11.55 Built form
Visual amenity and character Complies with Specific Outcomes
O195 With reference to the Architectural Plans provided at
Buildings are designed and sited to No solution provided Appendix C, the proposed built form is characterised by
provide visual interest and amenity by— a variety of materials, colours and textures, to a scale
a) providing well articulated buildings consistent with industrial forms of development in the
with strong horizontal and vertical locality.
design elements and features;
b) using a variety of external building
materials within external walls where
such walls are visible from the street;
and
c) providing for interesting and varied site
layouts and roof designs; and
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 16
Page 18
NOOSAVILE LOCALITY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
O196 The nature of the proposed service station is such that
Buildings are designed to provide for a should the site be used for an alternate use in the future,
range of potential users by allowing for extensive remediation works would be required to the
adaptable floor plans and adequate floor point where the proposed building would need to be
to ceiling heights. removed. There is therefore little point designing a
building for ‘a range of potential users’.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Page 17
Page 19
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Table 14-5 – For all Business Uses
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.17 Effects of use
Electricity infrastructure Complies with specific outcomes
O1 The development does not adversely S1.1 No solution provided. As demonstrated in the Civil Engineer Report provided
impact on existing or future electricity at Appendix F, existing electrical infrastructure is
supply infrastructure; available to the site along the Eumundi Noosaville Rd
AND frontage. Detailed design will determine the extent of
any upgrades required to the existing infrastructure to
ensure no adverse impacts.
O2 All uses and works maintain an S2.1 Development for uses adjacent to or N/A Not applicable
adequate safe distance from electrical within 50m of an existing electricity The subject site is not within 50m of an existing or future
infrastructure including substations, substation incorporates noise attenuation electricity substation.
overhead powerlines, power poles and measures to mitigate noise impacts; and
transformers. S2.2 Buildings and structures (including Complies with probable solutions
swimming pools, sheds, tennis courts and As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
outbuildings) are not constructed under at Appendix C, the built form is appropriately setback
overhead electricity transmission lines, or from the property boundaries with adequate separation
within electricity easements. from the existing electrical infrastructure located within
the verge.
14.18 Amenity
O3 Development is designed and sited to S3.1 No solution provided. Complies with specific outcomes
avoid noise emissions that unreasonably
diminish the amenity of the area or The site is zoned for industrial activities and is not
surrounding uses. located within proximity to any sensitive receiver. The
proposed form of development is therefore considered
to be designed and sited appropriately. Please refer to
the aerial image provided as Figure 6 of the submitted
town planning report and Architectural Proposal Plans at
Appendix C, providing context to the surrounding
nature and form of development.
Mechanical plant and equipment and Complies with specific outcome
storage areas
As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans at
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 1
Page 20
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
O4 Mechanical plant and equipment S4.1 Mechanical plant and equipment Appendix C, no mechanical plant equipment is located
(including air conditioning equipment) and are— within 2m of the property boundary. Furthermore,
storage areas are designed and located (a) located more than 2m from any appropriate screening is provided to the service yard
to— property boundary; ensuring any plant equipment is not visually intrusive.
(a) avoid adverse visual impacts when (b) where located at ground level,
viewed from the street and adjoining screened by fencing 1.5m in height or
properties; and dense vegetation of at least 1.5m in
(b) visually integrated with the building width incorporating grouped trees and
design. shrubs with maximum separation
distance of 1m measured from the
centre of the tree or scrub; and
(c) are visually integrated into the line and
plane of the building and roof design
and do not project beyond the height
or width of the building when viewed
from the street and adjoining
properties;
AND
S4.2 For Industrial business and Retail N/A Not applicable
business Type 3, materials stored outside The proposal does not involve an Industrial business or
of a building do not exceed 4m in height or Retail business Type 3.
half the height of the on-site buildings
whichever is the greater.
Safety and security Complies with probable solutions
O5 All property boundaries are clearly S5.1 Boundaries are identified by such As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
identifiable with public and private spaces means as - at Appendix C, 1.8m fencing to the side and rear
clearly defined. (a) fencing; or boundaries in addition to targeting landscape treatments
(b) changes in surface materials or levels; will ensure the property boundary will be easily defined.
or
(c) landscape treatments.
O6 All premises and access routes are S6.1 All premises are identified by the Complies
clearly identifiable to all persons, provision of the street number in a The proposals presentation and access from Eumundi
particularly emergency services personnel. prominent location, preferably near the site Noosa Rd ensures the premise will be easily identifiable
entry, (i.e. on the kerb or letterbox or by to emergency services. Please refer to the Architectural
signage on the building or site). Proposal Plans at Appendix C.
O7 All building entries are designed to be S7.1 The number of entrances and exits Complies with probable solutions
obvious and easily identifiable. are limited and main building
entrances/exits are located at the front of As shown on the Architectural Plan Package provided at
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 2
Page 21
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
the site, in view of the street. Where this is Appendix C, the main entrance for the proposed building
not possible, due to site or existing building has been positioned in a prominent position easily
constraints, a well defined path is provided identifiable from the Eumundi Noosa Rd frontage of the
to the entrance/exit; and site.
S7.2 All entrances/exits to buildings, are lit Complies with probable solutions
and signed, and signage includes hours of The proposed development is able to comply with S7.2
operation; and ensuring all entrances/exits will be well lit and clearly
signed. The signage will detail the hours of operation.
Please refer to the Architectural Proposal Plans
provided at Appendix C.
S7.3 Entrances/exits are located to provide Complies with probable solutions
a direct link to driveways and carparking As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
areas; and at Appendix C, direct access from the carpark to the
built form is facilitated.
S7.4 Recessed doorways are avoided NA Not applicable
where the recess is of sufficient size to No recessed doors are proposed.
conceal a person. Where recessed
doorways are unavoidable, measures are
used to enhance safety, as follows—
(a) good lighting installed;
(b) strategically placed mirrors installed;
(c) angled approaches provided; or
(d) gates which restrict access provided.
O8 Uses are arranged within buildings and S8.1 Windows and main entrances are Complies with probable solutions
on sites to enable external areas to be positioned to allow for casual surveillance. As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
monitored. at Appendix C, transparent windows located on the
primary façade ensures casual surveillance of the
carpark and bowsers is available.
O9 Communal open space, including S9.1 Communal open spaces, including Complies with probable solutions
congregation and seating areas, is located congregation and seating areas are The abovementioned provision of casual surveillance
where it can be monitored. situated where they are in the line of sight enables monitoring of outdoor areas. Please refer to the
of windows, doors and/or balconies of Architectural Proposal Plans provided at Appendix C.
buildings, or can be seen from a street or
other public space.
O10 Buildings and structures are designed S10.1 Buildings or structures that are Complies with probable solutions
to minimise opportunities for vandalism. visible from a public street or laneway— As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
at Appendix C, the proposed form of development does
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 3
Page 22
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(a) avoid the use of solid fences and blank not incorporate solid fencing or propose blank walls.
walls which attract graffiti. Where solid Toughened glass and other security measures will be
blank surfaces are unavoidable, implemented during construction and operation to deter
measures in the form of landscaping, criminal activity.
creepers, murals, vandal resistant
paint, etc are used; and
(b) use toughened glass, security screens
and other measures (but not including
security shutters that obscure the view
of shopfronts) are used in windows
which are provided at ground level, to
deter break and enters; and
(c) use hardy vandal proof materials and
anti-graffiti paint are used in the
construction of buildings.
O11 Lighting of appropriate intensities is S11.1 Lighting of appropriate intensities is Able to Comply with probable solution
provided to maximise safety. provided which satisfies the requirements Lighting for the proposed development will be of an
of Australian Standard AS1158: Public appropriate intensity in accordance with Australian
Lighting Code, unless otherwise specified Standard AS1158: Public Lighting Code.
in this Code; and
S11.2 External lighting of a graduated Able to Comply with probable solution
intensity is provided which starts at a lower Where proposed, external lighting on-site will have a
level of brightness at the perimeter of the graduated intensity that is appropriate and maximises
site and rises to a higher level at the safety. Further details will be determined in conjunction
entrance to buildings or at the centre of the with detailed design exercises.
site; and
S11.3 Lighting is directed onto the site and Able to Comply with probable solution
away from neighbouring properties; and Further details will be determined as part of detailed
design. However, lighting is intended to be directed
toward the site to ensure neighbouring properties will not
be unduly impacted by lighting on-site.
S11.4 Vandal-resistant lighting is used in Able to Comply with probable solution
public and publicly accessible areas. Further details will be determined in conjunction with
detailed design to ensure compliance in this regard.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 4
Page 23
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Site facilities Complies with probable solutions
O12 Waste storage areas, external storage S12.1 Waste storage areas, external As demonstrated on the Architectural Proposal Plans
areas and loading docks do not detract storage areas and loading docks are provided at Appendix C, the proposed loading bay is
from the visual amenity of the streetscape situated to the rear of the building or under located in the south west corner of the site and does not
or cause nuisance to adjoining properties. the ground; or detract from the Eumundi Noosa Rd streetscape.
S13.2 With the exception of the access Complies with probable solutions
way, waste storage areas, external storage As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
areas and loading docks are visually at Appendix C, the proposed loading bay is visually
screened by landscaping or fencing. screened by landscape treatment to southern boundary
and the inclusion of a 1.8m high fence to the property
boundary.
Environment & heritage values Complies with specific outcomes
O13 There are no significant adverse No solution provided There are no mapped environmental and heritage
effects on the biodiversity, natural considerations applicable to the development of the site
vegetation, native wildlife, habitats, Advisory note for the proposed land uses. Please refer to the
landscape quality, water quality or heritage PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details Architectural Proposal Plans provided at Appendix C.
values, including those related to— requirements for the design and siting of
(a) changes to natural drainage; effluent disposal systems where located
(b) disturbance to any of the wetland outside a sewerage service area.
systems; Compliance with PSP24 will be considered
(c) management of landslide and fire risk; as part of Council’s assessment of the
(d) erosion and the transport of sediments plumbing and drainage application.
off-site;
(e) unmanaged public access;
(f) effluent disposal;
(g) changes to fauna habitat and
behaviour; and
(h) disturbance of buildings and features,
including natural features, of heritage
significance.
Table 14-6– Entertainment & Dining Business or Retail Business Types 1 or 2
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 5
Page 24
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.19 Effects of use
Noise and visual amenity Complies with specific outcomes
O14 Uses maintain a satisfactory level of S14.1 For uses involving outdoor courts As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
acoustic and visual amenity for including tennis courts, half courts and at Appendix C, the proposed form of development has
surrounding uses. netball courts—the use complies with the been designed with appropriate regard to building height
requirements in Section 2 of PSP8 Tennis and mass ensuring the existing acoustic environmental
and other Courts. and visual amenity of the Industrial Zone and Eumundi
Noosa Rd is maintained.
Outdoor dining areas Complies with probable solutions
O15 Outdoor dining areas are designed S15.1 Walls to outdoor dining areas are—
and located so that— (a) if facing a roadway or other public As illustrated on the Architectural Proposal Plans
a) structures are aesthetically pleasing and area, transparent; provided at Appendix C, outside dining is proposed to
in keeping with the existing character of the (b) not made of flexible, roll-up or drop be integrated into the built form and is appropriately
area, including the architecture of the plastic sheeting; screened by the proposed landscaping shown on
associated building; (c) separated from the floor and any roof ED17230 provided at Appendix E.
b) outdoor dining adds to the landscaped by a minimum vertical gap of 500mm;
streetscape without increasing perceived and
building bulk; if detachable or collapsible, are only used
c) temporary walls or roofs are stored when during inclement weather;
not in use and secured at all times; AND
d) adequate air movement is available; and S15.2 Roof, walls or other structures do not Complies with probable solutions
e) structures do not impede the movement extend beyond the boundaries of the As demonstrated on the Architectural Proposal Plans
of pedestrians or vehicles; premises; and provided at Appendix C, no aspect of the built form
AND projects beyond the property boundary.
S15.3 The outdoor dining area complies Complies with probable solutions
with Planning Scheme Policy PSP14 As demonstrated on the Architectural Proposal Plans
Outdoor Dining; provided at Appendix C, the proposed outdoor dining
AND complies with the Planning Scheme Policy PSP14
Outdoor Dining.
O16 Adequate clearways and head S16.1 Roof structures over outdoor dining Complies with probable solutions
clearance are provided to allow safe areas have a minimum clearance height of As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
movement of users of the premises. 2.1m. at Appendix C, the roof structure achieves a clearance
height of 3.0m demonstrating compliance.
Table 14-7 Home-Based Business Types 1, 2 or 3
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 6
Page 25
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
Type 1 Limited visibility & no employees
Extent of use and residential amenity N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O17 The Home-based business is limited S17.1 Types 1, 2 or 3.
in size and scale so that— Not more than 25m2 or 10% of the total
(a) the amenity of the adjoining and gross floor area (whichever is the lesser) of
nearby premises is protected; the dwelling unit is used for the business
(b) the Home-based business remains (excluding parking areas);
ancillary to the residential use of the AND
dwelling unit; and S17.2 N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
(c) evidence of the business use is A maximum of 3 persons are on-site for Types 1, 2 or 3.
minimal. business purposes at any one time (e.g.
resident operator(s) and client(s).
Visual amenity N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O18 The activities conducted on the S18.1 There is no public display or offering Types 1, 2 or 3.
premises are appropriate to the residential for retail sale of goods on the premises or
location. on the roadside, except in the Rural Zone,
where the area used for the sale of goods
made on the site does not exceed 5m2;
AND
S18.2 No vehicle servicing is conducted N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
from the site. Types 1, 2 or 3.
Traffic and parking N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O19 Traffic impacts are no greater than S19.1 A minimum of 3 carparking spaces Types 1, 2 or 3.
that which might be expected in a are provided on-site to service both
residential location. residents and clients of the home-based
business (Visitor parking spaces may be in
tandem with garages or carports);
AND
S19.2 Commercial deliveries or collections N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
are limited to a vehicle no bigger than a Types 1, 2 or 3.
courier van and no more than 2 deliveries
or collections per day.
Services and utilities N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O20 The Home-based business does not No solution provided. Types 1, 2 or 3.
impact on the capacity of infrastructure
services and utilities.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 7
Page 26
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
Hours of operation N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O21 The hours of operation do not cause S21.1 The business does not operate Types 1, 2 or 3.
environmental nuisance to neighbouring outside the hours of 8.00am to 6.00pm,
residents. Monday to Saturday excluding public
holidays.
Signage N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O22 Signage is unobtrusive and in keeping S22.1 Not more than one sign is erected on Types 1, 2 or 3.
with the amenity of the neighbourhood. the premises and the sign is a fence sign,
wall sign or freestanding sign —
(a) with a sign face area3 not exceeding
750mm by 400mm or 0.3m2 ;
(b) with a maximum height of 3m;
(c) displaying only the name, occupier,
occupation and contact details; and
(d) is not illuminated or in motion.
Type 2 Evident
Extent of use and residential amenity N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O23 The Home-based business operates S23.1 If— Types 1, 2 or 3.
such that the level of impact of the (a) a Detached house in a town or
business is minor having regard to the village, the business is carried out in or
amenity of the area; below the house or any associated
AND building or structure; or
(b) a Detached house in any other area,
the business is carried out in or below
the house, in any associated building
or structure or elsewhere on the lot,
providing it is not within 6m of the
property boundary; or
(c) any other dwelling unit, the business is
carried out from within the dwelling
unit;
AND
O24 The Home-based business remains S24.1 In towns and villages— N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
ancillary to the residential use of the (a) a maximum of 50m2 is used for the Types 1, 2 or 3.
dwelling unit; business (excluding parking); and
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 8
Page 27
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
AND (b) a maximum of 3 persons are on-site
for business purposes at any one time
(e.g. operator, employee and client)
and not more than 1 of the 3 is an
employee;
OR
S24.2 In other areas— N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
(a) a maximum of 300m2 is used for the Types 1, 2 or 3.
business (excluding parking); and
(b) a maximum of 4 persons are on-site
for business purposes at any one time
and not more than 2 of the 4 are
employees.
O25 Evidence of the business use is S25.1 No solution provided. N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
minimal. Types 1, 2 or 3.
Visual amenity N/A The proposed development is not designated within an
O26 The activities conducted on the S26.1 Only goods which are manufactured identified residential location.
premises are appropriate to the residential on the site are offered for sale by the
location. business; and
S26.2 Vehicle servicing is not conducted N/A The proposed development is not designated within an
on the site. identified residential location.
Traffic and parking N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O27 Traffic impacts are no greater than S27.1 The business is directly accessible Types 1, 2 or 3.
that which might be expected in the zone in from a sealed road or a good standard
which the use is located. gravelled road;
AND
S27.2 A minimum of 4 carparking spaces N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
are provided on the site of the business Types 1, 2 or 3.
(Visitor parking spaces may be in tandem
with garages or carports); AND
S27.3 Commercial deliveries or N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
collections, are limited to a vehicle no Types 1, 2 or 3.
bigger than a courier van and no more than
2 deliveries or collections per day.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 9
Page 28
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
Services and utilities N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O28 The Home-based business does not S28.1 No greater load is imposed on any Types 1, 2 or 3.
impact on the capacity of infrastructure public utility than would be reasonably
services and utilities. expected from the residential use of the
Detached house.
Hours of operation N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O29 The hours of operation do not cause S29.1 The business does not operate Types 1, 2 or 3.
environmental nuisance to neighbouring outside the hours of 8.00am to 6.00pm,
residents. Monday to Saturday excluding public
holidays.
Signage N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O30 Signage is unobtrusive and in keeping S30.1 Not more than one sign is erected on Types 1, 2 or 3.
with the amenity of the neighbourhood. the premises and the sign—
(a) is a fence sign, wall sign or
freestanding sign with a sign face
area8 not exceeding 750mm by
400mm or 0.3m2 ;
(b) displays only the name, occupier,
occupation and contact details; and
(c) is not illuminated or in motion.
Type 3 Significant scale
Extent of use and residential amenity N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O31 The Home-based business does not S31.1 The business is located— Types 1, 2 or 3.
interfere with the amenity of the (a) in the Rural Zone or Rural Settlement
neighbourhood from the operation of zone; or
machinery or electrical equipment or from (b) on lots of more than 2000m2 in urban
light, vibration, smell, fumes, smoke, settlements.
vapour, steam, soot, ash, grit, oil, dust, AND
waste water, waste products, electrical
interference, traffic generation or
otherwise;
AND
O32 The scale and nature of the business S32.1 N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
is relative to the lot size and does not A maximum of 300m2 of the site is used for Types 1, 2 or 3.
dominate or conflict with the area in which business purposes;
it is situated; AND
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 10
Page 29
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
AND
O33 Evidence of the business is limited. S33.1 In urban settlements no more than 4 N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
persons associated with the business are Types 1, 2 or 3.
present on the premise at any one time
(this includes any resident living on the
premises and directly associated with the
business);
AND
S33.2 Only goods which are manufactured N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
on the site are offered for sale by the Types 1, 2 or 3.
business.
Visual impact N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O34 The use conducted on the site is not S34.1 Any vehicle, stored equipment or Types 1, 2 or 3.
visually intrusive. materials associated with the use are
located within a building or screened from
view from all public places and adjoining
properties by fencing or dense
landscaping.
Environmental risk N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O35 The risk to occupiers, employees and S35.1 Quantities of chemicals, gases or Types 1, 2 or 3.
neighbouring residents and the other hazardous materials do not exceed
environment from the storage and use of the limits normally associated with a
chemicals and hazardous substances is residential activity; and
minimised. S35.2 Storage of flammable and N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
combustible liquids complies with the Types 1, 2 or 3.
storage provisions in Section 2 of
Australian Standards AS1940 - The
Storage and Handling of Flammable and
Combustible Liquids.
Traffic and parking N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O36 Traffic impacts are no greater than S36.1 The business is directly accessible Types 1, 2 or 3.
that which might be expected in the zone in from a sealed road or a good standard
which the use is located. gravelled road;
AND
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 11
Page 30
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
S36.2 A minimum of 4 carparking spaces N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
are provided on the site of the business; Types 1, 2 or 3.
and
S36.3 Commercial deliveries or collections N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
are limited to 2 per day; Types 1, 2 or 3.
AND
S36.4 Loading and unloading activity is N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
undertaken entirely within the site. Types 1, 2 or 3.
Hours of operation N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O37 The hours of operation do not cause S37.1 The business does not operate Types 1, 2 or 3.
environmental nuisance to neighbouring outside the hours of 8.00am to 6.00pm,
residents. Monday to Saturday excluding public
holidays.
Signage N/A The proposal does not involve Home-Based Business
O38 Signage is unobtrusive and in keeping S38.1 Not more than one sign is erected on Types 1, 2 or 3.
with the amenity of the neighbourhood. the premises and the sign—
(a) is a fence sign, wall sign or
freestanding sign with a sign face area
not exceeding 750mm by 400mm or
0.3m2 ;
(b) displays only the name, occupier,
occupation and contact details; and
(c) is not illuminated or in motion.
Table 14-8–Retail - Type 1 Local (specifically a general store in a residential zone)
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.20 Effects of use
O39 The shop— S39.1 The site to be used for a shop— N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
(a) is not located within 1km of existing (a) is more than 1km radial distance from
shops selling similar products; any existing shop, any site with a
(b) is limited in scale and primarily serves current approval for a shop, or land
residents of the immediate area included in the Business Centre or
surrounding the site; Neighbourhood Centre Zones; and
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 12
Page 31
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(c) is designed and located to ensure that (b) has an area of at least 600m²;
it is compatible with the surrounding AND
neighbourhood; S39.2 The shop is used for the retail sale N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
(d) provides a buffer area to site of convenience goods only;
boundaries; and AND
(e) does not have an adverse effect on the S39.3 The gross floor area of the shop N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
safety and functioning of the major does not exceed 100m²;
road network. AND
S39.4 Site cover does not exceed— N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
(a) 30% where a stand alone use; or
(b) 50% where the development is
combined with a Detached house on
the same site;
AND
S39.5 The building and associated N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
carparking areas are set back at least 6m
from the front boundary and 2m from the
side and rear boundaries of the site;
AND
S39.6 Where adjacent dwelling units have N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
pitched roofs, the subject building also has
a pitched roof;
AND
S39.7 No more than 3 persons are N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
engaged at any one time in the operation
of the use;
AND
S39.8 The shop is on a— N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
(a) corner site; or
(b) site adjoining public open space; or
(c) site with no more than 3 adjoining
premises;
AND
S39.9 The shop is not on a road identified N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
as part of the major road network.
Table 14-9 Retail Type 1 Local (specifically a roadside stall in the Rural or Rural Settlement Zones)
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 13
Page 32
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS
(IF SELF ASSESSABLE) COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS ONLY
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE)
14.21 Effects of use
O4 The stall is limited in scale and primarily S40.1 No solution provided. N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
serves residents of the immediate area
surrounding the site;
AND
O41 The stall does not have an adverse S41.1 The stall is not on a road identified N/A The proposal does not include a Retail-Type 1 use.
effect on the safety and functioning of the as part of the major road network.
major road network.
Table 14.10 – Industrial Business
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.22 Effects of use
O42 Industrial business is conducted in No solution provided. N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
an ecologically responsible manner,
operating without deleterious impacts on
immediate, surrounding or downstream
environments and ecological processes,
including avoiding the release of pollutants
that would adversely affect the quality of
the land, air or water.
Site suitability N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
O43 Industrial business uses are S43.1 The site is connected to reticulated
established on land that has access to an water supply, sewerage, stormwater and
appropriate range of infrastructure services electricity.
and utilities;
AND
O44 Industrial activity is established on S44.1 The site is a minimum of 1000m2. N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
sites having sufficient area and dimensions
to accommodate the building or buildings,
associated parking areas, service vehicle
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 14
Page 33
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
provision, storage areas, landscaping,
vehicle access and on site movement
14.23 Amenity
Visual amenity N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
O45 The façades of industrial buildings do S45.1 Where the length of any façade
not present unbroken and continuous facing a street or residential property
blank walls; exceeds 30m, the design presents a
AND stepped building line and uses varying
colours and materials to break the building
bulk.
O46 The building design addresses the S46.1 The main entry to the building faces N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
street; the street or front customer carparking
AND area.
O47 The minimum boundary setbacks are S47.1 No solution provided. N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
landscaped, with no car parking, garbage
bins, outdoor storage areas and the like
located within the boundary setback areas.
Site security N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
O48 Suitable day and night safety and S48.1 A security fence no less than 1.8m
security measures are provided to in height encloses the rear and side
Industrial businesses to protect people boundaries of the site and prevents
and property; unauthorised access to all outdoor parts of
AND the site used for the Industrial business
use;
AND
S48.2 Any proposed office or public space N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
is sited and orientated towards the
principal frontage of the site;
AND
O49 Security fencing does not have a S49.1 Fencing on any frontage is setback N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
significant adverse impact upon the an average of 2m provided that no part of
appearance of the local streetscape. the fencing is within 1m of the property
boundary;
AND
S49.2 Landscaping is provided between N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
the fence and the frontage.
Storage N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 15
Page 34
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
O50 The storage of materials on-site does No solution provided.
not cause a public health hazard or
environmental nuisance.
Retail components N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
O51 Retail sales are ancillary to the S51.1 Only goods resulting from the
Industrial business use. Industrial business are sold on site;
AND
S51.2 The proportion of gross floor area N/A The proposal does not include an Industrial Business
used for retail sales and display of goods
for sale does not exceed 20%.
Table 14-11 Service Station
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.24 Effects of use
Siting The site is designated as the Industrial Zone with
O52 Service stations are located only S52.1 The service station is located in a immediate frontage to Eumundi Noosa Rd. In this
where they are compatible with the existing Commercial zone, on a site fronting part of regard, the proposed service station is considered a
and proposed amenity and development of the major road network; consistent land use as prescribed by the Planning
a neighbourhood and where they are OR Scheme and confirmed during prelodgement
appropriate given the existing or likely discussions dated 28/9/17 by Council Planners present.
future traffic movements in the area. Please refer to the Architectural Proposal Plans
provided at Appendix C demonstrating compliance.
S52.2 The service station is co-located Complies with specific outcomes
with, or adjoining, shopping facilities or Refer above. Further, the proposed development is
established business development. located along Eumundi Noosa Rd which comprises a
variety of commercial developments. Please refer to the
Architectural Proposal Plans provided at Appendix C
demonstrating compliance.
O53 The site is large enough to S53.1 The site has— Complies with Probable Solution
accommodate the service station and (a) an area of a least 1,500m2; As shown on Figure 4 of the submitted Town Planning
associated carparking, accessways and (b) a frontage of at least 40m; and Report, the site has a total area of 1973m2 and has
landscaping. (c) where a corner site, a frontage of at direct frontage to Eumundi Noosaville Rd for circa 48m.
least 30m to each road to which the
site has frontage.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 16
Page 35
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Neighbouring amenity Complies with specific outcomes
O54 Service stations ensure the amenity of S54.1 Where located within 150m of a
neighbouring residential areas is residential use or land included in a The subject site is located within the Industrial Zone and
protected. residential zone— is not within 150m of a residential use or land included
(a) buildings are constructed of within the residential zone. As shown on the
nonreflective material, including Architectural Proposal Plans provided at Appendix C,
concrete, brick or timber; and the built form incorporates non-reflective materials and
(b) a landscaped area , a minimum of 2m, the Eumundi Noosa Rd frontage is proposed to be
is provided along the property landscaped appropriately.
boundary to any road;
AND
S54.2 Where the site adjoins a N/A The subject site does not adjoin a residential use.
Residential Use or land included in a
residential zone—
(a) a 2m high solid screen fence is
provided along the common
boundaries; and
(b) hours of operation are limited to
between 7.00 am and 10.00 pm.
Site layout & design Complies with probable solution
O55 Buildings, structures, driveways, S55.1 Fuel pumps are not less than 8m As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
tanks and fuel bowsers are sited to— from any frontage— at Appendix C, the fuel pumps are significantly setback
(a) ensure the safe and efficient use of the AND from Eumundi Noosa Rd and achieves 8.0 separation
site; form the property boundary. The proposed setbacks
(b) maintain visual amenity and ensure the safe and efficient use of the service station
streetscape character; whilst the landscape embellishments along the property
(c) provide adequate separation to boundaries maintains the visual amenity of the
adjoining land uses; and streetscape and adequately separates the proposal from
(d) not cause an environmental nuisance adjoining land uses.
to neighbouring properties. S55.2 Inlets to bulk fuel storage tanks are Complies with probable solutions
located so tankers stand wholly within the As demonstrated on the annotated swept paths provided
site and on level ground while discharging at Appendix D, the proposed bulk fuel storage tanks are
fuel into tanks. located so tankers stand wholly within the site and on
level ground while refuelling.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 17
Page 36
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
O56 Customer air and water facilities, and S56.1 Customer air and water facilities, Complies with probable solutions
any automatic mechanical car washing and any car washing facilities are setback The proposal is not located adjacent to any residential
facilities are located such that— 5m from any residential property boundary. property. Notwithstanding, the air and water facilities are
(a) vehicles using or waiting to use such located at the rear of the site and are appropriately
facilities are standing wholly within the screened by boundary fencing and landscape
site; and treatments. Please refer to the Architectural Proposal
(b) an adequate buffer area can be Plans provided at Appendix C.
provided to any adjoining Residential
Use.
O57 The layout and design of the service S57.1 Sealed impervious surfaces are Complies with probable solutions
station ensures that on site operations do provided where potential spills of
not cause any environmental nuisance or contaminants may occur; As shown on n the Architectural Proposal Plans
harm or result in the release of untreated AND provided at Appendix C, impervious hardstand surfaces
pollutants. are proposed ensuring any potential spills are able to be
captured and managed without causing environmental
harm.
S57.2 Grease and oil arrestors or other Able to Comply with probable solutions
infrastructure is provided to prevent the The future operation of the service station will be
movement of contaminants from the site. required to operate within Australian Standard regarding
contaminates, please refer to the Architectural Proposal
Plans provided at Appendix C.
O58 The associated sale of goods, S58.1 The gross floor area used for the A/S As shown on n the Architectural Proposal Plans
including foodstuffs, is ancillary to the associated retail sale of goods is limited to provided at Appendix C. The proposed gross floor area
service station use. 15% of the gross floor area. used for the sale of ancillary goods exceeds 15%.
Notwithstanding, the proposed shop component will not
detract from any neighbouring commercial premises
within close proximity of the site.
Table 14-12 Industrial Business Type 3
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.25 Extractive Resources
O59 Resource extraction activities in No solution provided. N/A The proposal does not involve an industrial use.
proximity to the Noosa River system only
occurs where—
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 18
Page 37
BUSINESS USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(a) there is a clear demonstrated need;
(b) no feasible and prudent alternatives
are available; and
(c) it can be demonstrated that the
intrinsic natural values and resources
of the river system can be managed
and protected in an ecologically
sustainable manner.
O60 Industrial business Type 3 No solution provided. N/A The proposal does not involve an industrial use.
Extractive are designed, located and
operated to ensure—
(a) haulage routes associated with
extractive resources—
(i) are located on roads where the
haulage route will minimise
adverse impacts on residential
and urban residential amenity;
(ii) are located on roads which are of
adequate construction and which
may be upgraded as part of the
utilisation of the extractive
resource; and
(iii) are adequately maintained as a
part of the utilisation of the
extractive resource; and
(b) the utilisation of any extractive
resource does not result in adverse
visual impacts from major roads; and
(c) the rehabilitation of extractive industry
sites, prior to or in conjunction with
land use changes on the site of the
resources or within buffers to the
resource.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 19
Page 38
INDUSTRY ZONE CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Table 11.52 Industry Zone Code
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
11.52 Effects of use
Amenity Complies with specific outcomes
O190 No solution provided. The primary land use of the proposed development is for
Uses are predominantly of an industrial a service station which is considered a consistent use of
nature ordinarily expected in an industrial land for the industrial zone. Adequate economic need
estate with ancillary uses compatible with has been demonstrated by the Economic Needs
industrial businesses. Assessment provided at Appendix G to appropriately
justify the inclusion of a shop.
O191Industry business uses are located,
designed and operated to avoid
significantly changing the amenity enjoyed
by users of surrounding premises. a
Storage of Materials No solution provided. Complies with specific outcomes
O192 As shown on the Architectural Proposal Plans provided
Materials stored outside of buildings do not at Appendix C, the proposal does not include the
exceed half the height of the on-site storage of material outside of buildings.
buildings;
OR
O193 If there are no on-site buildings, the
stored materials do not exceed 5m;
AND
O194 Storage areas are screened from the
street and adjoining properties by
buildings, landscaping or fencing
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 1
Page 39
INDUSTRY ZONE CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Frontages S195.1 A landscaped building setback of Complies with specific outcomes
O195 The frontage of each site contains 10m is to be provided to Walter Hay Drive, As shown on the Architectural Plan Package provided at
landscaping without adversely screening Eumundi-Noosa Road and Eenie Creek Appendix C, the primary built form is significantly
the business or visitor carparking; Road, unless this is the only frontage to the setback form the front property boundary at 8.47m. we
AND site, in which case it can be reduced to 6m; note the fuel pumps are located a approx. 5.0m from the
O196 Vehicle display is focussed on and AND property boundary though it is considered appropriate
orientated towards Lionel Donovan Drive S195.2 This setback area is to include a considering the sites significant separation form
rather than Walter Hay Drive, Eumundi- minimum of 2m of soft landscaping behind Eumundi Noosa Rd. it is acknowledged the access
Noosa Road or Eenie Creek Drive; which uncovered visitor carparking may be occupies a majority of the sites frontage. In this regard,
AND located; landscaping is proposed at the sites peripheral frontage
O197 Development fronting Walter Hay AND and has been afforded additional depth to the purpose
Drive, Eumundi-Noosa Road and Eenie S196.1 There is no display of motor vehicle screening the built form.
Creek Road is sympathetic to the character for sale or hire on Walter Hay Drive,
of the area and suitable for its position Eumundi-Noosa Road or Eenie Creek
along the entry roads to the coastal urban Road
part of Noosa. frontages;
AND
S197.1 No direct vehicular access is taken
off Eenie Creek Road or Walter Hay Drive
where the property has access to any other
road.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 2
Page 40
INDUSTRY ZONE CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Environmental Protection No solution provided. Complies with specific outcomes
O198 Industrial development is conducted As demonstrated by the submitted Civil Engineering
in an environmentally responsible manner, Report provided at Appendix F, the proposed
operating without deleterious impacts on development is able to achieve all requirements for
immediate, surrounding or downstream Stormwater Management Plans as described in QUDM
communities, environments and 2013 standards, as well as a pollutant load reduction as
environmental processes. required by the SPP 2017 and Noosa Shire Council
standards. In this regard, the site has been divided into
two (2) catchments, a high-risk area and a low-risk area
and recommends the implementation of a SPEL
Puraceptor unit to treat runoff from the high-risk area
before returning filtered run-off to the low risk drainage
system for further treatment. ADG as consulting
engineering’s for the proposed development also
recommend the implementation of StormSack, Gross
Pooluant Traps and First Flush Devices in accordance
with the Preliminary Engineering Services Layout Plan
provided at Appendix F.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 3
Page 41
INDUSTRY ZONE CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Built form
Visual amenity and character Complies with specific outcomes
O199 Buildings are designed and sited to
provide As shown on the Architectural Plan Package provided at
visual interest and amenity by— Appendix C, the proposed development provides for an
a) providing well articulated buildings with articulated building that incorporates a variety of
strong horizontal and vertical design materials and finishes to ensure a contemporary built
elements and features; form is established when viewed from the Eumundi
b) using a variety of external building Noosa Rd streetscape.
materials within external walls where such
walls are
visible from the street; and c) providing for
interesting and varied site
layouts and roof designs;
AND
O200 Buildings are designed to provide for
a range of potential users by allowing for
adaptable floor plans and adequate floor to
ceiling heights.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 November 2017 Page 4
Page 42
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Table 14-17 – For all Infrastructure Uses
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.41 Effects of use
Location and siting N/A Not Applicable
O1 The location and siting of S1.1 For Installations and Towers, where
Infrastructure Uses— practicable, infrastructure is —
(a) maximises accessibility for (a) co-located with existing
maintenance purposes; and Infrastructure Uses; or
(b) does not disrupt access for other (b) located on or within an existing
purposes. building;
AND
S1.2 Easements for access to N/A Not Applicable
Infrastructure Uses are granted to the
Council or the beneficiary of the easement
to ensure suitable access can be gained,
where practicable.
Separation from incompatible uses Complies with specific outcomes
O2 Sufficient separation distance is No solution provided. The subject site is located within an established industry
provided between Infrastructure Uses area. There are no residential lots within proximity of the
and incompatible uses on the same site site.
and neighbouring premises to maintain
amenity for neighbouring uses.
O3 Vehicular access to the site of the S3.1 Vehicle access to the infrastructure is Complies with specific outcomes
Infrastructure Use does not adversely gained from roads other than local The subject site does not adversely impact any
impact on residential amenity. residential streets to maintain residential residential amenity given the absence of any proximal
amenity. residential land uses. The proposal is in keeping with
surrounding development.
Building siting and design Complies with specific outcomes
O4 The siting and design of buildings or No solution provided. The siting and design of buildings or other structures
other structures reflects and is compatible reflects and is compatible with the setting and character
with the setting and character of the locality of the locality.
in which the Infrastructure Use is located,
including the use of sympathetic colour
schemes.
Safety and security Complies with specific outcomes
The proposed development is positioned to promote
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 1
Page 43
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
O5 Infrastructure Uses are secure and S5.1 For Installations and Towers—the casual surveillance. The development is secure and
potential impacts from vandalism are use is fenced with security fencing; potential impacts from vandalism are minimised as far
minimised. as it is practical.
S5.2 For other Infrastructure Uses—no Complies with specific outcomes
probable solution
Artificial lighting The proposed lighting associated with the use will be
O6 The generation of spill light by S6.1 Lighting associated with the use is designed, installed, operated and maintained in
development, which gives rise to designed, installed, operated and accordance with Section 3 of AS4282 The Control of the
annoyance, discomfort, distraction or a maintained in accordance with Section 3 of Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
reduction in the ability to see essential AS4282 The Control of the Obtrusive
information, is avoided. Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Mechanical plant and equipment Complies with probable solutions
O7 Mechanical plant and equipment S7.1 Plant and equipment are— The plant equipment is located more than 2m from any
(including air conditioning equipment) (a) located more than 2m from any property boundary and is screened by sufficient
are— property boundary; and landscaping.
(a) positioned to minimise adverse (b) screened by dense vegetation or
impacts on the amenity of any fencing (i.e. 1.5m wide vegetated
residential premises; buffer area);
(b) designed and positioned to visually S7.2 Plant and equipment are located Complies with probable solutions
integrate with the building and roof within a building. The storage area is concealed inside the building. The
design; and loading area is screened by landscaping and 1.8m high
(c) appropriately screened. fencing.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 2
Page 44
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Environment & heritage values Complies with specific outcomes
O8 There are no significant adverse effects No solution provided. The proposed development will not adversely impact the
on the biodiversity, natural vegetation, environment.
native wildlife, habitats, landscape quality, Advisory note
water quality or heritage values, including PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details Due to the greater probability of oil and petroleum
those related to— requirements for the design and siting of spillage within the site special precautions will be taken
(a) changes to natural drainage; effluent disposal systems where located to ensure integrity of the surrounding environment and
(b) disturbance to any of the wetland outside a sewerage service area. downstream stormwater catchment. The site has been
systems; Compliance with PSP24 will be considered divided into two (2) catchments, a high-risk area and a
(c) management of landslide and fire as part of Council’s assessment of the low-risk area. A Gross Pollutant Trap (GPT) (SPEL
risk; plumbing and drainage application. Ecoceptor or approved equivalent) will be installed prior
(d) erosion and the transport of to the site’s discharge to remove oils and grits commonly
sediments offsite; encountered on surfaces trafficked by motor vehicles.
(e) unmanaged public access;
(f) effluent disposal; A SPEL Puraceptor unit or approved equivalent is
(g) changes to fauna habitat and proposed to treat runoff from the high-risk area before
behaviour; and returning filtered run-off to the low risk drainage system
(h) disturbance of buildings and features, for further treatment.
including natural features, of heritage
significance.
Table 14-18 – Service & Utility Type 2 - Installation
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.42 Effects of use
O9 Electricity transmission line easements S9.1 A minimum separation distance is N/A Not Applicable
are managed to ensure— maintained from the electricity
(a) the continuation of the transmission of transmission line to the closest boundary of
bulk electricity; habitable buildings and child activity areas,
(b) safety and amenity for residents, as follows—
occupiers and land uses in close (a) 20m for transmission lines up to
proximity; 132kV;
(c) natural environmental values are not (b) 30m for transmission lines between
adversely impacted upon; and 133kV and 275kV; and
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 3
Page 45
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(d) the Shire’s visual and landscape (c) 40m for transmission lines greater
qualities are not adversely impacted than 275kV;
upon. AND
S9.2 Only trees with a mature height of less N/A Not Applicable
than 4m are planted within electricity
transmission line easements.
Table 14-19 – Service & Utility Type 3 - Tower
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.43 Effects of use
Visual amenity N/A Not Applicable
O10 The tower is visually integrated with its S10.1 The tower is—
landscape or townscape setting so as not (a) not established in the Detached
to be visually dominant or obtrusive. Housing, Semi-attached Housing,
Attached Housing or Visitor Mixed Use
Zones;
(b) camouflaged through the use of
colours and materials which blend into
the surrounding landscape; and
(c) unobtrusive when viewed from any
part of the major road network;
OR
S10.2 The tower is co-located on an N/A Not Applicable
existing telecommunication tower;
AND
S10.3 The height of the tower does not N/A Not Applicable
exceed—
(a) 20 metres where on land in the
Community Services, Business
Centre or Industry Zones; or
(b) 25 metres where on land in the Rural
Zone.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 4
Page 46
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Health and safety
O11 The development avoids or effectively No solution provided.
manages any emissions of light, noise,
vibration or radiation beyond the site such
that—
(a) environmental nuisance to occupants
or users of surrounding premises is
not caused;
(b) unacceptable risks to the environment
or to personal and public safety are
unlikely to be caused; and
(c) public access is restricted to meet
workplace, health and safety
requirements.
Access to sunlight N/A Not Applicable
O12 The Tower does not cast shadows S12.1 For proposed buildings or structures
such that the amenity of surrounding having a height exceeding 8.5m above
premises or usability of public open space ground level and a cross sectional area
is unduly reduced. exceeding 20m2, shadowing does not
affect residential lots, child care centres or
public open space to the extent of more
than 20% of their site area for a period in
excess of three hours on any day of the
year.
Table 14-20—Transport Use Type 5 - Domestic marine & Transport Use Type 6 – Commercial marine
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.44 Jetties - General
Site Layout & Design N/A Not Applicable
O13 Domestic marine uses and No solution provided.
Commercial marine uses are not located
on the southern bank of the Noosa River Figure 14-1 Noosa Heads Lions Park to
and tributaries between the Noosa Heads Weyba Bridge
Lions Park and the Weyba Bridge (see
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 5
Page 47
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Figure 14-1 Noosa Heads Lions Park to
Weyba Bridge).
14.45 Jetties
Site layout & design N/A Not Applicable
O14 Jetties are constructed for the sole S14.1 Jetties are sited, designed and
purpose of providing access to a vessels constructed in accordance with PSP4 –
and are sited and designed to— Domestic Marine Uses Outside of Noosa
(a) avoid cluttering of waterways and Waters Estate;
avoid conflicts with uses on the AND
foreshore and adjoining lands; S14.2 Jetties in Noosa Waters Estate are N/A Not Applicable
(b) ensure jetties are contained within the sited designed and constructed in
prolongation of the side boundaries of accordance with PSP25 – Domestic
the property; Marine Uses in Noosa Waters Estate.
(c) ensure that when a vessel is berthed it
does not encroach over the
prolongation of any side boundary;
(d) avoid unacceptable risks to personal
and public safety;
(e) maintain a high level of visual amenity
when viewed from the watercourse
and adjoining lands;
(f) use materials that blend with the
natural surroundings;
(g) avoid extensions of on-site
recreational areas, unless there is a
clear demonstrated public benefit and
public support;
(h) avoid large jetties capable of serving
other uses (ie. recreational purposes);
(i) avoid the construction of new jetties on
public lands; and
(j) avoid the construction of new jetties on
freehold land in largely undeveloped
sections of a watercourse.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 6
Page 48
INFRASTRUCTURE USES CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.46 Boat ramps
O15 Boat ramps are designed and S15.1 Boat ramps are designed and N/A Not Applicable
constructed to— constructed in accordance with Sections
(a) allow access by a wheeled boat trailer; 2.20—2.24 of PSP4 – Domestic Marine
(b) ensure that unacceptable risks to Uses Outside of Noosa Waters Estate;
personal and public safety are unlikely AND
to be caused; S16.2 Boat ramps in Noosa Waters Estate N/A Not Applicable
(c) avoid cluttering of the waterway; are sited designed and constructed in
(d) avoid excessive traffic volumes within accordance with PSP25 – Domestic
foreshore areas and adjoining lands; Marine Uses in Noosa Waters Estate.
and
(e) ensure that visual amenity of the
foreshore is maintained.
14.47 Shelter structures on the Noosa North Shore
O16 Where all weather motor vehicle S17.1 Shelter structures are designed and N/A Not Applicable
access is not available to properties on the constructed in accordance with PSP4 –
Noosa North Shore only, timber framed Domestic Marine Uses Outside of Noosa
shelter structures are constructed— Waters Estate.
(a) to cover boats; and
(b) to reflect the setting and character of
the locality, including the use of colour
schemes compatible with surrounding
natural environment.
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1 Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 7
Page 49
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Table 14-54 - Landscaping
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
14.156 General requirements
Streetscape and amenity ✓ Complies with probable solutions
O1 Sufficient landscaped areas are S1.1 Landscaped areas, not less than the As demonstrated by the submitted Landscape Concept
provided to— minimum areas and dimensions specified Plan provided at Appendix E, the proposed landscaped
(a) enhance the visual amenity and natural in Tables 14-53 or 14-54, are provided and approach ensures accordance with the minimum areas
landscape character of the area, maintained. and dimensions specified by the planning scheme.
streetscape and local area; S1.2 Landscaping is designed, planted ✓ Complies with probable solutions
(b) retain natural landscape features, such and maintained in accordance with PSP3 With reference to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
as rock outcrops and existing large Landscaping Plants and Guidelines. at Appendix E, the proposed landscaped approach has
trees; been designed in accordance with Councils’ landscape
(c) retain existing native vegetation and design policy.
enhance buffer areas around property
boundaries;
(d) suit the relative size and nature of the
development and its setting;
(e) reduce the visual impact of large or
bulky structures and fencing along
waterways; and
(f) conceal service, carparking and
loading areas of developments;
(g) screen incompatible land uses; and
(h) h) provide privacy between any
dwelling units and accommodation
units on and adjoining the site.
Building and landscape design N/A Not applicable
O2 Site layout and building and landscape S2.1 Below ground components of
design— buildings do not extend beyond the above
(a) provides for soft landscaping to be ground footprint to allow for landscaping
established in and around the particularly within building setback areas;
development; AND
(b) maximises the retention of large S2.2 Basement carparks do not encroach N/A Not applicable
canopy trees; into building setback areas;
(c) within the Eastern Beaches Locality AND
and Noosa Heads Locality, avoids the
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 50
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
removal of heath vegetation, except S2.3 Plants are grouped in mulched beds ✓ Able to comply with probable solution
where required for internal roads and rather than planted individually to provide Further details will be provided at the Operational Works
service and infrastructure construction; for optimum growing conditions and less phase. Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan
(d) minimises the extent of impervious maintenance; provided at Appendix E.
paved areas; AND
(e) provides for suitable plant layouts and S2.4 Landscaping is designed, planted ✓ Complies with probable solutions
densities; and and maintained in accordance with PSP3 With reference to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
(f) facilitates the adoption of appropriate Landscaping Plants and Guidelines at Appendix E, the proposed landscaped approach has
planting techniques. been designed in accordance with Councils’ landscape
design policy.
Species selection ✓ Complies with probable solutions
O3 Landscaped areas include plant species S3.1 Plantings— With reference to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
that— (a) comprise plant species identified for at Appendix E, the proposed landscaped approach
(a) are appropriate to the biophysical the relevant landscape character area proposes predominately native species as informed by
conditions and landscape character of in PSP3 Landscaping Plants and Council’s landscape design policy.
the area; Guidelines; and
(b) are suitable for the space available, the (b) avoid undesirable plant species
level of visual and climatic exposure, identified in PSP3 Landscaping Plants
the functional requirements of the site and Guidelines.
and the scale of the development; OR
(c) provide for appropriate levels of shade S3.2 For landscaping around pool areas— N/A Not applicable
and sunlight to occupants of the a) no more than 30% of the landscaped
development throughout the year; area is a mixture of plants of local
(d) minimise the demand for water use; origin and exotic plant species,
(e) in road reserves, provide street trees undesirable plants identified in PSP3
with effective canopy shade having Landscaping Plants and Guidelines;
regard to the size and scale of the road and
reserve and the location of services b) palms are specifically located in group
and other structures; plantings in accordance with PSP3
(f) for street trees in towns are villages, Landscaping Plants and Guidelines;
are consistent with the existing and
streetscape character; S3.3 Root guards are utilised around N/A Not applicable
(g) do not cause potential damage to species with potentially invasive roots.
buildings or structures;
(h) are not harmful to pedestrians,
particularly around schools, childcare
centres, shopping areas and other high
pedestrian areas;
(i) in intensively used environments, can
endure high levels of activity; and
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 51
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
(j) for rural residential developments, are
best suited to less intensive
maintenance and low availability of
water for gardens.
Safety and security ✓ Complies with specific outcome
O4 Landscaping is designed and located to S4.1 No solution provided. With reference to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
maximise the safety and security of public at Appendix E, the proposed landscaped approach
and private areas by— clearly defines the property boundaries. The location of
(a) clearly defining the boundaries landscaping enables casual surveillance and
between private and public spaces; appropriate sight lines whilst separating and defining
(b) promoting casual surveillance of pedestrian and vehicular movements.
buildings and public areas from the
street and other public areas for
personal security reasons;
(c) avoiding concealment spots; and
(d) maintaining safe site distances to and
from road and building corners,
carpark entrances and driveways (see
Figure 14-17);
(e) maintain safe site distances at planting
bed ends within carparks;
(f) protecting solid fences from graffiti by
incorporating elements such as
landscaping, creepers, murals or
vandal resistant paint; and
(g) separating and defining pedestrian and
vehicle circulation routes.
Figure 14-16— Landscaping allows for
adequate
safe vision at driveways and
intersections
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 52
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
O5 The provision of landscaping is to a S5.1 Landscaping provided which allows ✓ Complies with probable solution
satisfactory standard ensuring that it does adequate visibility for casual surveillance Targeted landscaped pockets at the sites periphery
not lead to opportunities for concealment of public and semi-public spaces, including provides for adequate visibility enabling casual
and possible assault sites entrances and exits to sites and buildings, surveillance. Please refer to the Landscape Concept
by: Plan provided at Appendix E.
(a) planting trees which have clean trunks
to a height of at least 1.8 m; and
(b) appropriately spacing shrubs at 1.2m
horizontal centres, with a maximum
height of 0.75m, to avoid clumping and
to retain sightlines.
O6 Street trees and plantings in towns and S6.1 Street trees and trees in carparking ✓ Able to Comply with probable solutions
villages, carparks and other areas where areas achieve a maximum of 900mm clear Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
potential conflicts with vehicles and trunk height for a 2.0m high tree at planting at Appendix E, further details will be provided at the
pedestrians are evident, are planted so as and are able to attain a clear trunk height Operational Works phase.
to maximise vehicle and pedestrian safety. of 1900mm on maturity;
S6.2 All scrub planting to be a maximum ✓ Able to Comply with probable solution
height of 700mm from the road pavement Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
(not top of kerb). at Appendix E, demonstrating scrub plantings can
achieve compliance with S6.2
Services and utilities N/A Not applicable
O7 All landscaping works maintain S7.1 Plant species used in landscaping
adequate safe distance from services and adjacent to substations, or adjacent to or
utilities including substations, overhead on electricity transmission line easements,
powerlines, power poles and transformers, are less than 4m high at maturity and do
street lamps, stormwater catchment pits, not encroach within 3m of a substation
and underground services and utilities. boundary;
OR
S7.2 For trees higher than 4m, trees are ✓ Able to Comply with probable solution
planted at a distance from any part of an Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
electricity transmission line at least equal at Appendix E, further details will be provided at the
to the expected height of the tree at Operational Works phase
maturity (see Figure 14-17);
Figure 14-17
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 53
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
S7.3 For power lines that connect to a ✓ Able to Comply with probable solution
premises, the height of plant species at Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
maturity provides for a 2m clearance below at Appendix E, further details will be provided at the
the power line; (see Figure 14-18) Operational Works phase
Figure 14-18
S7.4 Trees and large scrubs are located a ✓ Able to Comply with probable solution
minimum of— Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
(a) 5m from electricity poles and pillars; at Appendix E, further details will be provided at the
(b) 4m from street lamps; Operational Works phase.
(c) 2m from stormwater catchment pits;
and
(d) 2m from underground services and
utilities;
AND
S7.5 Plants are located to enable ✓ Complies with probable solutions
tradespersons to access, view and inspect As illustrated on the Landscape Concept Plan provided
service meters, such as water and at Appendix E, the landscape approach has been
electricity meters; designed to facilitate unobstructed access to water and
AND electrical infrastructure.
S7.6 Root barriers are installed around ✓ Able to Comply with probable solutions if required
trees that are located within 3m of any As illustrated on the Landscape Concept Plan provided
infrastructures or that have potentially at Appendix E, the proposed landscape treatments are
invasive roots. void of any infrastructure.
Entry statements Complies with specific outcomes
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 54
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
O8 Tree and plant massing are the S8.1 No solution provided. The proposed landscape approach includes
dominant features of entry statements to embellishments to the sites entry and significantly
residential or commercial estates and are separates the built form from the road frontage. Please
integrated with the landscape theme of the refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
estate and the natural landscape character Appendix E.
of the locality, rather than the entry being
dominated by build elements such as
masonary walls, waterfalls and assembled
rock outcrops. (see Figure 14-20).
O9 Entry statements are low maintenance. S9.1 Entry statements are low ✓ Complies with probable solutions
maintenance and located entirely within As specified on the Landscape Concept Plan provided
Figure 14-19 Typical estate entrance privately owned land. at Appendix E, plant species have been chosen for the
low maintenance qualities.
14.157 Specific requirements for Multiple housing & Visitor Accommodation
Private open space N/A Not applicable
O10 Private open space is— S10.1 For Multiple housing Types 2 and
(a) provided to all dwelling units and 4, each dwelling unit provides for
accommodation units; landscaped private open space
(b) of adequate size and dimensions to comprising—
suits the needs of occupants; (a) for units at ground level, a minimum
(c) clearly set apart for private use and area of 25m2 exclusive of the clothes
separate from communal areas; drying area, with minimum dimensions
(d) directly accessible from a living area of of 4m and maximum gradient of 10%
the unit; (1:10); or
(e) located away from noise generating (b) for units above ground level, a
uses; minimum area of 12m2, with minimum
(f) capable of receiving adequate sunlight; dimensions of 2.5m; and
and S10.2 For Multiple housing Types 2 and N/A Not applicable
(g) designed to provide for the privacy of 4, the private open space area is enclosed
occupants of the premises and by side and rear fencing, screening or
adjoining premises. dense landscaping of at least 1.8m in
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 55
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
height to protect the privacy of residents;
or
S10.3 For Visitor Accommodation no N/A Not applicable
solution provided.
Communal open space N/A Not applicable
O11 Communal open space within the No solution provided.
development provides adequate area for
children to play and for socialising, and
preferably has a northern aspect.
Screening & Mounding N/A Not applicable
O12 Planting is provided between units, No solution provided.
adjacent to service and car parking areas
and around the boundary of the site to
provide for adequate screening. (see Figure
14-20).
O13 Clothes drying areas and waste N/A Not applicable
disposal areas are screened from adjoining
properties and road frontages.
Figure 14-20
O14 Mounding adjacent to units do not N/A Not applicable
extend into service corridors, cover utility
covers, obstruct overland stormwater flow,
or cause ponding on footpaths, verges or
on adjoining private property.
O15 Mounding associated with noise N/A Not applicable
barriers is designed to avoid linear shapes
and incorporates undulating shapes and
forms that vary in height and width.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 56
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Streetscape character N/A Not applicable
O16 Landscaping complements and No solution provided.
enhances the existing streetscape
character by providing plantings that match
the scale of buildings within the street. (see
Figure 14-21 and Figure 14-22).
O17 Where a podium is provided, planting N/A Not applicable
is established on the podium to soften the
bulk and appearance of the building, and
species are used that can tolerate difficult
climatic conditions.
Figure 14-21 Lack of integration with
street, unsuited to scale of buildings
Figure 14-22 Continuation of
streetscape,
scale of building and landscaping relate
well
Passive solar access and energy N/A Not applicable
efficiency No solution provided.
O18 Plantings contribute to passive solar
access, energy efficiency and amenity by
providing shade in summer, particularly to
western walls and open car parking areas,
and admitting winter sunlight to outdoor and
indoor living areas.
14.158 Specific requirements for Business Uses
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 57
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Design of commercial and retail spaces ✓ Complies with specific outcome
O19 Landscaping softens building bulk and No solution provided.
creates pleasant settings for visitors and As shown on the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
staff that function well in an intensively used Appendix E, the proposed landscaping has been sited
environment by— to ensure the appearance of the built form is softened.
(a) providing canopy trees and shade Adequate screening is provided along the periphery of
structures; the site whilst plant species have been chosen for their
(b) using shrubs and garden beds to aesthetic value, sustainability during water conscious
clearly define public spaces and periods and low maintenance qualities.
pedestrian walkways;
(c) providing areas for public art, where
appropriate;
(d) providing outdoor areas with seating
for staff and visitors;
(e) adopting landscape solutions that
reduce the visual impact of building
bulk (see Figure 14-23);
(f) using mounding and screen planting to
conceal service and loading areas;
(g) making provision for outdoor dining
areas where appropriate, that integrate
well within the streetscape (see Figure
14-24);
(h) providing adequate screening along
the perimeters of the development;
(i) avoiding the use of formal planting
design for frontage works; and
(j) providing planting design and species
selection that can endure an
intensively used environment.
Figure 14-23 Landscaping solutions that
appear
to lessen the impact of building bulk
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 58
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
Figure 14-24 Outdoor eating areas
integrate well
with the streetscape
Industrial Business N/A Not applicable
O20 Landscaping within industrial No solution provided.
developments is designed to—
a) maximise retention of existing
vegetation;
b) provide planting in mulched areas at
entrances, along boundaries and
around car parking and site facilities to
provide screening and shading;
c) lessen the impact of building bulk
though the planting of vegetation that is
in scale with the building, and by using
mounding where appropriate (see
Figure 14-25); and
d) provide outdoor areas for staff.
Figure 14-25 Appropriate species at
correct density and height effectively
screen bulky industrial buildings
14.159 Open space areas and road reserves
Active parkland N/A Not applicable
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 59
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
O21 Landscaping in and around active S21.1 Landscape works for active
parkland creates an environment that parkland include—
provides functional recreation areas and a) formation of grassed and well-drained
facilities in a landscaped setting that reflect areas for recreation;
the natural landscape character of the b) retention of existing vegetation
locality. surrounding recreation facilities;
c) the planting of shade trees around
recreation facilities, including
playfields and playgrounds;
d) provision of landscaped buffer areas to
adjacent residential development; and
e) installation of recreational facilities that
include the use of natural materials
and finishes, where appropriate, and
colours that blend with the natural
environment.
Passive parkland and reserves N/A Not applicable
O22 Landscaping within passive parkland S22.1 Landscape works within passive
and adjacent to national parks and parkland and adjacent to national parks
conservation reserves, provides for—- and conservation reserves, include—
(a) the protection and enhancement of (a) retention of existing vegetation of local
native wildlife habitat and corridors; origin, including understorey plants
(b) the replanting of disturbed areas; and surface mulch;
(c) the protection of riparian zones where (b) revegetation of cleared and disturbed
the site adjoins or includes a waterway; areas;
(d) a relaxed and pleasant environment for (c) planting food/habitat trees in areas
visitors, with low key, low impact supporting important fauna
recreation facilities; and populations and including nest boxes
(e) linkages to other open space areas, where it has been necessary to clear
where appropriate. habitat trees for development;
(d) removal of species identified as
undesirable plant species in PSP3
Landscaping Plants and Guidelines;
(e) enhancement of the area through the
provision of walking trails, picnic
tables and bridges;
(f) the provision of linkages to the Noosa
Trial Network as identified in Schedule
5 on Map 3, where appropriate;
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 60
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
(g) retention of natural ground levels and
hydrology within and around these
areas; and
(h) minimal grassed areas.
Road reserves ✓ Complies with specific outcome
O23 Landscaping within road reserves— S23.1 A minimum of 1 street tree is As shown on the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
(a) enhances the streetscape quality and provided per lot or every 8m of frontage, Appendix E, the Eumundi Noosa Rd road reserve is
natural landscape character of the whichever is the greater; proposed to be turfed and is considered to substantially
area; AND improve the existing streetscape for the frontage tf the
(b) provides buffering to adjoining uses; site.
(c) maintains the functionality of the road Figure 14-26 Allow 500mm for
reserve for vehicles, pedestrian and passenger
bicycles, including providing adequate Access
allowance for pedestrians to use the
verge;
(d) provides for the retention of existing tall
trees and remnant native vegetation;
(e) allows for the opening of car doors
along urban streets;
(f) allows for maintenance or emergency
access to service corridors and utilities;
(g) maintains site distances to and from
corners, intersections, driveways and
pedestrian crossing points; and S23.2 Where vehicles are parked parallel ✓ Complies with probable solution
(h) maintains overland stormwater flow to to the kerb, landscaping is setback a The proposed landscaping at the sites front boundary
avoid ponding on footpaths, nature minimum of 500mm from the back of the is significantly setback from the existing parallel
strips or adjoining premises. kerb to allow adequate access (see Figure parking on Eumundi Noosa Rd. Please refer to the
14-26); Landscape Concept Plan provided at Appendix E.
AND
S23.3 Street trees are planted a minimum ✓ Complies with probable solution
of 1m from the back of the kerb in the road As shown on the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
reserve verge. Appendix E, the sites landscaping is appropriately
setback from the kerb.
14.160 Environment protection and conservation
Watercourses and drainage lines N/A Not applicable
O24 Landscaping works along No solution provided.
watercourses and drainage lines—
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 61
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
(a) retains and enhances the existing
riparian vegetation including
understorey; and
(b) rehabilitates and revegetates
degraded riparian zones to filter
stormwater run-off and provide for
native wildlife habitat; and
(c) avoids slashing and turfing of
waterway edges and drainage lines;
and
(d) avoids engineering design solutions,
such as concrete drains; and
(e) use natural materials in the
construction of boardwalks, bridges
and similar structures to blend with the
natural environment.
Wildlife habitat protection N/A Not applicable
O25 Landscaping retains and enhances S25.1 For Koala Habitat Areas shown in
habitats and corridors for native wildlife Schedule 7—
by— (a) a minimum of 70% of tree species
(a) replicating adjacent remnant planted on the premises are koala
vegetation, including understorey food trees listed in PSP3 Landscaping
vegetation; Plants and Guidelines; and
(b) siting landscaped areas to complement (b) where koala access is impeded by a
and enhance existing vegetation; fence or retaining wall—
(c) retaining old trees (including dead i. climbing poles are erected at
trees) with hollows for local native regular intervals along the structure
fauna habitat; and at an approximate 45 degree angle
(d) creating or enhancing vegetation on either side of the structure;
linkages between existing habitats; ii. plant vegetation within close
(e) minimising adverse effects to koalas by proximity (branches touching) on
planting and retaining appropriate tree either side of the fence to provide a
species and facilitating koala natural ladder; and
movement in koala habitat areas27. iii. install panels or planks horizontally
along the top of the fence to
provide a walkway, where
appropriate; and
(c) choose fence materials, such as a
timber post-and-rail or chain wire, that
a koala can easily grip and climb or
leave a minimum 300mm gap
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 62
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
between ground level and the first rail
or strand of any fence; and
(d) where there is a swimming pool in the
landscape design likely to be
accessible to koalas, a rope is
provided to enable koalas to climb out
of the pool;
AND
S25.2 Vegetation of local origin is retained N/A Not applicable
and replanted in areas indicated in
Schedule 5 on Map 4 - Open Space
Networks.
Water management ✓ Complies with probable solutions
O26 Landscaping works promote the S26.1 The infiltration and conservation of As specified on the Landscape Concept Plan provided
effective use of water through appropriate water is optimised through— at Appendix E, Native plant species have been
plant selection and layout and by (a) selecting native plant species selected in accordance with Councils landscape design
maximising opportunities for water identified in PSP3 Landscaping Plants policy and selected for their water sensitive qualities.
infiltration. and Guidelines; The proposed landscape areas have been maximised
(b) grouping plants in mulched beds; where possible to ensure water infiltration is enabled.
(c) minimising impervious surfaces;
(d) using semi-pervious pavement
surfaces; such as grass cell paving, as
a alternative to pervious surfaces
(e) draining hard surfaces areas to
landscaped areas;
(f) planting microphytes along driveways
to absorb hydrocarbons; and
(g) using surface and subsurface
drainage swales.
Soil stability ✓ Able to Comply with specific outcome
O27 Landscaping works are design and No solution provided. Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
sited to ensure the stability of soils and at Appendix E. Further details will be provided at the
minimise sediment and erosion activity, Operational Works phase.
particularly on steep slopes and in landslide
hazard areas, making use of soft
landscaping rather than hard landscaping
solutions wherever possible.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 63
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
14.161 Carparking areas
Off street carparks ✓ Complies with probable solutions
O28 Landscaping of carparking areas is S28.1 One advanced canopy tree (a As shown on the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
designed to— minimum of 100 litres pot size) is Appendix E, provision for advanced trees is
(a) reduced the visual impact of the provided— accommodated in the design.
development; (a) in towns and villages, shopping
(b) provide for advanced canopy trees to centres or commercial areas— for
shade vehicles and to reduce reflected every 4 carparking spaces; or
radiation; (b) otherwise—for every 6 carparking
(c) ensure canopy trees are protected spaces;
from vehicle damage by providing AND
adequate sized garden beds; S28.2 ✓ Able to Comply with probable solution
(d) maximise opportunities for infiltration of A minimum area of 5m2 is provided round Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
rainwater on-site; and each canopy tree, which is mulched and at Appendix E. Further details will be provided at the
(e) minimise contaminated runoff entering treated; Operational Works phase.
the stormwater system and waterways. AND
S28.3 ✓ Able to Comply with probable solution
Plants are grouped in mulched beds rather Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
than using individual, evenly spaced trees at Appendix E. Further details will be provided at the
and scrubs; Operational Works phase.
AND
S28.4 Semi-pervious pavement surfaces ✓ Complies with probable solution
are used, such as grass cell paving, to Please refer to the Landscape Concept Plan provided
increase infiltration of rainwater and at Appendix E. Provision for pervious surfaces are
minimise contaminated runoff, including proposed for landscaped areas and are able to be
hydrocarbons, entering the stormwater implemented without compromising the sites
system and waterways; stormwater management strategy.
AND
S28.5 Runoff from carparking areas is ✓ Complies with probable solution
directed to landscaped areas to minimize As above.
contaminate runoff, including
hydrocarbons, entering the stormwater
system and waterways;
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 64
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
AND
S28.6 Garden mounding is incorporated N/A Not applicable
into carparking areas adjacent to
frontages;
AND
S28.7 Surface and subsurface drainage ✓ Complies with probable solution
swales are used to maximise stormwater Please refer to the Civil Engineer Report provided at
infiltration; Appendix F for greater details regarding stormwater
AND management and proposed proprietary systems.
S28.8 A planting bed of at least 1m width N/A Not applicable
with screen fencing and dense planting is The site is not adjacent to residential development.
provided to any property boundary with an
adjacent residential development.
On-street car parks ✓ Complies with probable solution
O29 Edges to parking and turning spaces S29.1 Where vehicles are parked parallel The proposed landscaping at the sites front boundary
for on street parking are landscaped to to the kerb, landscaping is setback a is significantly setback from the existing parallel
provide shade and screening, while minimum of 500mm from the back of the parking on Eumundi Noosa Rd. Please refer to the
ensuring adequate access to vehicles. kerb to allow adequate access (see Figure Landscape Concept Plan provided at Appendix E.
14-28).
S29.2 Street trees are planted a minimum N/A Not applicable
of 1m from the back of the kerb in the road
reserve verge.
Figure 14-27 Allow 500mm for
passenger
access
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 65
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
MINIMUM DIMENSIONS, AREAS COUNCIL USE
ZONE SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
AND WORKS ONLY
Table 14-55—Standard minimum landscaped areas, dimensions and works for zones
Visitor Mixed Use Zone Minimum area – 10% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
Minimum dimensions-
(a) Frontage – average width of 2m; and
(b) Side or rear boundaries – 3m width
along all boundaries that adjoin land in
a residential zone.
Village Mix Zone Minimum area – 10% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
Minimum dimensions-
(a) Frontage – 0.0m; and
(b) Side or rear boundaries – 3m width
along all boundaries that adjoin land in
a residential zone.
Neighbourhood Centre Zone Minimum area – 10% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
Minimum dimensions-
(a) Frontage –
i. Standard – average width of 2m;
or
ii. Exception – Peregian Beach
0.0m; and
(b) Side or rear boundaries – 3m width
along all boundaries that adjoin land in
a residential zone.
Business Centre Zone Minimum area – 10% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
Minimum dimensions-
(c) Frontage –
i. Standard – average width of 2m;
or
ii. Exception – Poinciana Ave,
Tewantin 0.0m; and
Side or rear boundaries – 3m width along
all boundaries that adjoin land in a
residential zone.
Shire Business Centre Zone Minimum area – 10% of the area of any N/A Not applicable
development site within the Precinct
provided that the Precinct has an overall
minimum landscaped area of 15%.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 66
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
MINIMUM DIMENSIONS, AREAS COUNCIL USE
ZONE SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
AND WORKS ONLY
Minimum frontage dimensions – 6m width
to the internal loop road.
Community Services Zone Minimum area – 15% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
Minimum dimensions-
(c) Frontage – average frontage width
2m; and
Side or rear boundaries – 3m width along
all boundaries that adjoin land in a
residential zone.
Industry Zone Minimum area—15% of the site area. ✓ Complies with probable solutions
Minimum dimensions—
a) Frontage— As shown on the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
iii) Standard—6m width; and Appendix E, the proposed landscaping achieves 15%
iv) Exceptions— of the total site area.
A) 4.5m for secondary road
frontages where the premises
has frontage to more than 1
road; and
B) 2m width for frontage adjacent
to uncovered visitor car
parking; and
b) Side boundaries—
v) Standard—3m width; or
vi) Exceptions—
A) 6m width along all boundaries
that adjoin premises in the
Rural Settlement Zone and
10m width along all boundaries
that adjoin premises in any
other residential zone; and
B) No requirement for boundaries
that adjoin land in the Industry
Zone.
Table 14-56—Exceptions for specific uses and other development
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 67
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
USE OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Business Uses
Commercial business where located on Minimum area—10% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
the western side of David Low Way, Minimum dimensions—
Peregian Beach between Woodland Drive (a) Frontage—average width of 2m of soft
and Peregian Beach Caravan Park landscaping; and
(b) Side or rear boundaries—3m width
along all boundaries that adjoin land in
a residential zone.
Retail business— Minimum dimensions— N/A Not applicable
Type 1 Local (excluding a road side stall) (a) Frontage—
Type 4 Showroom (i) Standard—6m width; or
Type 6 Hardware Store (ii) Exception—2m width for vehicle
Type 7 Garden Centre parking and manoeuvring areas;
and
(b) Side and rear boundaries—
(iii) Standard—2m width; or
(iv) Exception—5m width along all
boundaries that adjoin land in a
residential zone.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 68
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
USE OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Retail business Type 5 Vehicle Uses Minimum area—10% of the site area. A/S Complies with probable solutions
Minimum dimensions— As shown on the Landscape Concept Plan provided at
(a) Frontage—3m width except for Appendix E the proposed landscaping exceeds
vehicular entrances and exits; and covering 10% of the total site area whilst the frontage
(b) Side boundaries— width exceeds 3m.
(i) Standard—3m width to a
minimum depth of 10m measured As discussed with Council during prelodgement
from the road frontage; or discussions, the proposed building is built to the western
(ii) Exception—5m width to a boundary, so a 3m width cannot be achieved. Rather
minimum depth of 10m measured the overall approach achieves a 15% landscape
from the road frontage for coverage of the site.
boundaries that adjoin land in a
residential zone; and The subject site does not adjoin land within the
(c) Rear boundaries—5m width for residential zone.
boundaries that adjoin land in a
residential zone.
Community Uses
Education use Type 1 Childcare Minimum dimensions— N/A Not applicable
(a) Frontage—
(i) Standard—6m width; or
(ii) Exception—2m width for vehicle
parking and manoeuvring areas;
and
(b) Side and rear boundaries—2m width.
Residential Uses
Multiple housing— Minimum area- N/A Not applicable
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1
Page 69
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
USE OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Type 2 Duplex (a) Standard— the proposed population
Type 3 Retirement and special needs multiplied by 40m2, provided that a
Type 4 Conventional minimum of 60% of this is soft
landscaping; or
Visitor accommodation— (b) Exception—if in the Attached Housing
Type 3 Rural Zone or Visitor Mixed Use Zone—
Type 4 Conventional proposed population multiplied by
30m2, providing that 60% of this is soft
landscaping.
Minimum dimensions—
(a) Frontage—
(i) Standard—6m width with a
minimum average of 3m width
consisting of soft landscaping; or
(ii) Exception—2m width for frontage
adjacent to uncovered visitor
carparking.
(b) Rear boundaries—2m width.
Multiple housing Type 6 Relocatable Minimum area—30% of the site area (with N/A Not applicable
Visitor Accommodation Type 2 Caravan a minimum of 30m2 of private open space
Park for relocatable homes.
Minimum dimensions—
(a) Frontage—12m width; and
(b) Side boundaries—5m width.
Transport Type 2 Carpark Minimum area—5% of the site area. N/A Not applicable
Minimum dimensions—
(a) Frontage—2m width; and
(b) Side and rear boundaries—1m width.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution Appendix H
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
PR137996-1