Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

07/2399 - Representations received [As Published] · 132007.2399

of 12

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Page 7 of 9

 

 
 

Giri

 

 

 

EES

   

 

Permit for Operational Works.

 

64

A registered practicing Geotechnical Engineer shall
test the existing ground conditions for suitability of
placing additional fill, prior to such fill being placed.

 

Filling works shall be restricted to the subject
itself, and the finishing fill levels are to taper to the
existing levels prior to the rear boundary of the
property. Batters shall be at a maximum grade of 1:4
unless retained by a wall.

Any existing fill or natural materials on the site or with
the extent of approved works external to the site
which do not satisfy the Manager — Land
Development's or a Geotechnical Engineer's
requirements shail be removed and replaced with
suitable material.

Delete the second paragraph.

Earthworks are proposed around the perimeter of
most allotments so that they integrate with the golf
course topography. The Engineering Report of Tate
Professional Engineers described the extent of the
works. Where necessary, the finished fill levels are
proposed to coordinate seamlessly with the adjacent
golf course works.

 

 

73

 

Monetary contributions shall be paid to Noosa Council
towards the cost of providing and/or upgrading
various infrastructure at the rates applicable at the
time of payment. An estimate only of the contribution
amounts under the current Council policies and
requirements is outlined in the table below: [Table]

 

 

Delete ‘PSP12 — Public Open Space
Contributions (Park) - total $84,412’

 

The contribution for Public Open Space (Park) should
not apply to the development. Before construction of
the Noosa Springs project began, the issue of open
space park contributions for the whole Noosa Springs
development was addressed during the ‘3B approval’
process for the golf course. It was acknowledged that
the substantial initial capital cost and large ongoing
maintenance costs satisfies the need for a parkland
contribution for the development. The overall
development yield approved under the Plan of
Development is not being exceeded, and accordingly,
there is no basis for a further contribution.

Apart from the fact the development is surrounded by
the golf course, it is also noted that almost all
allotments have frontage to the golf course, and so
haves an open character. Furthermore, there is a small
park of approximately 300 m2 proposed to the north
of Lot 7 that will provide more parkland amenity to
the residents of the development.

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.5 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2399 - Representations received [As Published].pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.