Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

20517 App N.pdf [As Published] · 132007.1259

of 33

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (10.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

 

SECTION 5 - COMMENTS

5.1 Assessment Criteria for Acid Sulfate Soils

ASS in Queensland are assessed in accordance with the Queensland Acid Sulfate Soils Investigation Team
(QASSIT) Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) in Queensland 1998
(QASSIT Guidelines) and the State Planning Policy 2/02 Guideline Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils. The State Planning Policy 2/02 Guideline provides Action Criteria for assessing the
results of laboratory testing quantifying the acid producing effects based on the sum of existing plus potential
acidity. These action criteria are presented in Table 4.

Table 4: Action Criteria Based on ASS Analysis for Three Broad Texture Categories

 

 

 

Action Criteria Action Criteria
Type of Material (1.- 1000 tonnes disturbed) (> 1000 tonnes disturbed)
Existing + Potential Acidity Existing + Potential Acidity

 

Equivalent Equivalent Acidity Equivalent Equivalent Acidity
Sulfur (%S) (mol H*/tonne) Sulfur (%S) (mol H*/tonne)
{oven-dry basis) | (oven-dry basis) | (oven-dry basis) | (oven-dry basis) _

Texture Range Approx. Clay
McDonald et al. (1990) Content (%)

Coarse Texture

 

 

 

Sands to loamy sands oe 9.03 18 0.03 18
Medium Texture
Sandy loams to light clays 5-40 0.06 36 0.03 18 ;
Fine Texture

 

 

 

 

 

_Medium to heavy clays, sity clays | __ 7° 2 oe i a

 

As the amount of natural soil to be disturbed during the proposed works is anticipated to exceed 1,000 tonnes of
soil, the ‘greater than 1000 tonne’ Action Criteria of 0.03 %S from Table 4 has been used as the basis for
assessment of site soils.

5.2 Acid Sulfate Soils

Samples tested from within the fill material and natural sands/silty sands reported net acidity levels less than
0.03% and these materials are therefore not considered to be ASS.

Samples tested from within the natural silty clays indicated levels of actual acidity below laboratory reporting
limits, with one exception. The silty clays are therefore considered to include an apparently limited amount of
ASS, potentially at isolated locations. Whilst the amount of ASS in the silty clay soils appears to be relatively
low, under State Planning Policy 2/02 they will nevertheless require management and treatment to neutralise
any net acidity, if they are to be disturbed. As such, an Acid Sulphate Soil Management Plan (ASSMP) is
required and a draft ASSMP is presented in Appendix C for consideration.

 

Residential Development Page 9 of 10
215-219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
Project No. 07160 18 June 2007

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.4 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

20517 App N.pdf [As Published].pdf · 10.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.