Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object - Paul MaloneM MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 16

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

             For the attention of:
             Mr Patrick Murphy,
             The Assessment Officer,
             Noosa Shire Council
             [email protected]

             Dear Mr Murphy,

                                       Submission in opposition to the Development Application
                                                     MCU 16/0153 & REC16/0041

             EFFECTIVE PLANNING POINTS THAT DEFEND THE INTEGRITY OF THE NOOSA PLAN

             I strongly object to the inclusion of the housing estate in this proposal, but in particular, the lack
             of visitor accommodation being provided as required by the Noosa Plan.

             The proposed development significantly conflicts with the Noosa Plan for the following reasons:
                 The proposed development being located within the Open Space Recreation Zone does
                    not contribute to the desired lifestyle of residents because it does not offer a variety of
                    passive and active recreational experiences that are conducive to community interaction
                    and wellbeing;

                   The proposed development seeks to provide a small lot housing development and, in
                    particular, Multiple Housing Type 4 – Conventional which is not a consistent use in the
                    Open Space Recreation Zone;

                   The proposed development seeks to provide Visitor Accommodation Type 4, but not in
                    association with Visitor Accommodation Type 2, and therefore is not consistent with the
                    Open Space Recreation Zone;

                   The proposed application appears to reflect an incorrect site cover percentage where
                    some structures have not been included in the calculation. An example of this is the stair
                    and entry for the Reed Beach Houses (refer pages SD12 and SD23). This is a clear omission
                    and indicates that either the developer is seeking to misrepresent the proposed site cover
                    or they have been inaccurate in their calculations by error. In either case the Noosa
                    Council has an absolute duty to reject the application until all inaccuracies have been
                    identified and included in the Council’s deliberations on whether this DA should be
                    accepted.

                   The proposed development does not protect the Peregian Beach caravan park site for low
                    cost visitor accommodation;

                   Visitor Accommodation Type 4 is being proposed on the land, but is not integrated as part
                    of a caravan park use or other form of budget accommodation;

                   The proposed buildings and structures are not designed and sited to be attractive,
                    comfortable and accessible to the public or provide suitable landscape treatments and
                    amenities, conducive to community interaction and convenience and public safety;


Document Set ID: 20307255
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Paul MaloneM MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.