Original source · versioned page text
2311-37593 SRA - Response with conditions
Attached to the e-mail MCU23/0135 - SRA application correspondence - Referral agency response – with conditions.
2311-37593 SRA Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response (Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016) The reasons for the SARA’s decision are: The application is for a development permit for a material change of use a shopping centre (extension to existing – food and drink outlets and shop). The development is located at 28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville, also known as Lot 1 on SP322201, and has frontage to Eenie Creek Road. The proposed development seeks to increase the existing shopping centre by an additional 6,500m2 gross floor area for retail uses which exceeds the thresholds outlined in Schedule 20 (Item 9, Column 3) of the Planning Regulation 2017. SARA has assessed the development application against the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP), version 3.0, specifically, State code 6: Protection of State transport networks. SARA finds that the development can comply with State code 6, subject to conditions to: o ensure pedestrian access within the development meets the applicable standards. o ensure wayfinding signage is provided for public passenger transport and meets current standards. Material used in the assessment of the application: the development application material and submitted plans Planning Act 2016 Planning Regulation 2017 the SDAP (version 3.0), as published by SARA the Development Assessment Rules SARA DA Mapping system section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019 Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response provisions (page left intentionally blank) State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original