Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Not Properly Made submission (no address, object) Judith McQuaker - MCU12/0023

of 1

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                         SCRC CORRESPONDENCE



                                        Il"l l l l "IIIll"lIl l l l l"l lIlI ll l 1"\        CD
                                                    80486096



 The Assessment Manager


 Sunshine Coast Regional Council


 locked Bag 72    Sur.!tH/’I1I1E;. Cc.."’Flsrr Me                1+>60


 [email protected]
 Re: Objection- Material change of use (DevelopmentPermit)Application No: MCU 12/0023


 I wish to lodge an objection against the above application, lodged by the Scanlon
                                                                                                                        Property
 Group for the proposed development at 215-219 David low Way,Peregain Beach (lot 77 on SP
 231615.


 Council’s original refusal for outdoor dining space was on the grounds of noise nuisance to the

 neighbourhood and this condition was accepted by the developer in order to gain initial
 approval.The developer is now seeking to vary this agreement and as such has little regard to
the Council’s and the Court’s rulings.The developer already has had approval for indoor dining

 space as agreed in his original application.These extra dining spaces will generate noise, and will
 add to the noise that will be generated from the other commercial premises proposed for the
 site.


 "Juliette" balconies were never part of the original plan so were never assessed for potential
 noise levels.The low cost budget accommodation( "flashpackers")has now been changed to

 motel accommodation.Balconies generate noise and I object to the addition of these, whatever
their size.


These extra dining spaces and commercial premises will seriously impact on similar businesses
that operate within the Peregian Beach Village.


 I ask the Council to please regard the impact that this MCU will have on the residents,

businesses and general amenity of the Peregian Beach community and refuse approval to both
the extra outdoor dining space and the "Juliette" balconies.




~M.CJvOl~~)
Address:
                                                                                        ’Iq~        ___




..Dk
   E...
                                                                     ~’1:
                                                                L...--.-
                                                                            .....?:(p/.t;"     L.   ...~............I
                                                                                                          V

Used in these records

About this file

File size
543 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Not Properly Made submission (no address, object) Judith McQuaker - MCU12_0023.pdf · 543 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.