Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0056 - Attachment I -Environmental Report

of 92

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (12.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

               environmental management
             ecological assessment report

Protected Vegetation Overlay
Specific outcomes                                                                   Probable solutions      Assessment

 Clearing protected vegetation in the prescribed Caloundra area, prescribed Maroochy area and prescribed Noosa area of the protected
 vegetation overlay area

 O1 Clearing protected vegetation does not involve the following—                   No solution provided.   The site is located within the prescribed Noosa area of
     (a) vegetation listed or referred to in the National Trust of                                          the protected vegetation overlay.
          Queensland Heritage Register or in a Heritage Register of the
          local government in a planning scheme policy;                                                     Site surveys did not identify the presence of threatened
     (b) vegetation identified or referred to in State or                                                   flora species protected by State or Federal legislation.
          Commonwealth legislation;                                                                         The proposed development will require the clearing of
     (c) habitat for an animal or plant identified in State or                                              some native flora species along the project area
          Commonwealth legislation;                                                                         boundaries. These species are not protected under
     (d) vegetation located on a prominent hillside, slope or ridgeline;                                    State or Federal legislation and have been identified by
       (e) vegetation the clearing of which may cause or contribute                                         site survey as containing limited habitat value. The
             to erosion or slippage;                                                                        project proposes the removal of environmental weeds
       (f) riparian vegetation;                                                                             and declared plants around the site boundaries and the
       (g) vegetation the clearing of which may have an adverse impact on                                   planting of native flora species to provide a visual and
             the hydrology of an area or upon a hydrologically-sensitive plant                              acoustic buffer. The project is anticipated to have a
             community such as heathland, sedgeland, melaleuca forest or                                    positive impact on visual and landscape amenity of the
             mangrove forest;                                                                               area.
       (h) vegetation which is or is capable of forming or contributing to a
             buffer between different land uses;                                                            The proposed development does not require the
       (i) vegetation which is or is capable of forming or contributing to                                  clearing of riparian vegetation. Existing vegetation is to
             a visual buffer or a buffer against pollution, light spillage or                               be retained and protected by a 10 m exclusion buffer
             noise;                                                                                         between the existing tree drip line and proposed
 (j) vegetation which contributes to visual amenity or landscape quality.                                   development area.

Clearing protected vegetation in the prescribed Noosa area of the protected vegetation overlay area

 O2 Clearing protected vegetation does not involve the following—                   No solution provided.   The proposed works does not involve clearing of
     (a) vegetation within 400 metres of the full level of ponded                                           vegetation protected under the VMA. The proposed
          water within Lake Macdonald;                                                                      development proposes no further clearing within the
           (b) vegetation the clearing of which is likely to increase the risk of                           riparian zone and the retention of existing riparian
           erosion;                                                                                         vegetation. Edge effects from the proposed

   saunders havill group
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0056 - Attachment I -Environmental Report.pdf · 12.3 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.