Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0056 - Attachment I -Environmental Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (12.3 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
environmental management
ecological assessment report
Protected Vegetation Overlay
Specific outcomes Probable solutions Assessment
Clearing protected vegetation in the prescribed Caloundra area, prescribed Maroochy area and prescribed Noosa area of the protected
vegetation overlay area
O1 Clearing protected vegetation does not involve the following— No solution provided. The site is located within the prescribed Noosa area of
(a) vegetation listed or referred to in the National Trust of the protected vegetation overlay.
Queensland Heritage Register or in a Heritage Register of the
local government in a planning scheme policy; Site surveys did not identify the presence of threatened
(b) vegetation identified or referred to in State or flora species protected by State or Federal legislation.
Commonwealth legislation; The proposed development will require the clearing of
(c) habitat for an animal or plant identified in State or some native flora species along the project area
Commonwealth legislation; boundaries. These species are not protected under
(d) vegetation located on a prominent hillside, slope or ridgeline; State or Federal legislation and have been identified by
(e) vegetation the clearing of which may cause or contribute site survey as containing limited habitat value. The
to erosion or slippage; project proposes the removal of environmental weeds
(f) riparian vegetation; and declared plants around the site boundaries and the
(g) vegetation the clearing of which may have an adverse impact on planting of native flora species to provide a visual and
the hydrology of an area or upon a hydrologically-sensitive plant acoustic buffer. The project is anticipated to have a
community such as heathland, sedgeland, melaleuca forest or positive impact on visual and landscape amenity of the
mangrove forest; area.
(h) vegetation which is or is capable of forming or contributing to a
buffer between different land uses; The proposed development does not require the
(i) vegetation which is or is capable of forming or contributing to clearing of riparian vegetation. Existing vegetation is to
a visual buffer or a buffer against pollution, light spillage or be retained and protected by a 10 m exclusion buffer
noise; between the existing tree drip line and proposed
(j) vegetation which contributes to visual amenity or landscape quality. development area.
Clearing protected vegetation in the prescribed Noosa area of the protected vegetation overlay area
O2 Clearing protected vegetation does not involve the following— No solution provided. The proposed works does not involve clearing of
(a) vegetation within 400 metres of the full level of ponded vegetation protected under the VMA. The proposed
water within Lake Macdonald; development proposes no further clearing within the
(b) vegetation the clearing of which is likely to increase the risk of riparian zone and the retention of existing riparian
erosion; vegetation. Edge effects from the proposed
saunders havill group
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.