Council archive · source document
ADAMS+SPARKES MCU Permissible Change Request (David Low Way) 160105 · MCU13/0251
Attached to the e-mail Request for change to approval MCU13/0251.03.
Our ref: 160105 Permissible Change 261016 amg
Council's ref: MCU13/0251
24 October 2016
The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN
Attention: Glen Conforti
Via Email: [email protected]
Dear Glen,
Re: Request for a Permissible Change to an Approved Development Permit
Material Change of Use (Retail business Type 2 - Shop, Entertainment &
dining business - Type 1 Food & beverages, Commercial Type 1 Office)
215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
Lot 77 on SP231615
Council ref: MCU13/0251
In accordance with Section 369(1)(e) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA), please find
enclosed a Permissible Change request in relation to the above referenced approved Material
Change of Use (Council ref: MCU13/0251). This request is made on behalf of the owner of the
subject site, Thomco (No.2087) Pty Ltd.
Please find attached the relevant IDAS Form for a change to an existing approval. Payment of
the relevant fee of $1,656.00 accordance with the fees and charges schedule 2016/17, will be
made directly by the applicant upon receipt of Council’s request for payment.
BACKGROUND
A development permit was issued by Council on 30 May 2014 (Council ref: MCU13/0251) for a
Material Change of Use (Retail business Type 2 - Shop, Entertainment & dining business -
Type 1 Food & beverages, Commercial Type 1 Office). Following this, a request for a
Permissible Change (Council ref: MCU13/0251.01) to amend Condition 4 was approved on 11
October 2016. The project has now been competed, and at plan sealing stage it was
determined by Council that the required access easement as per condition 35, to the dedicated
parcel of land could not form part of the decision notice due to registration difficulties with the
titles office.
PERMISSIBLE CHANGE
The wording of each condition subject to this permissible change has been provided below,
along with the applicant’s representations. Where proposed changes to the condition have
been provided, any new words proposed to be included are highlighted in bold, while any
words to be deleted are shown as struck out.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 7 pages
Page 2
Proposed Amendment to Development Condition 35
The requirement for a 5 metre wide access easement to the rear parcel of dedicated land is no longer necessary, and it
is requested that Condition 35 is deleted. Please delete Condition 35 which states:
35. A 5 metre wide easement for access purposes must be registered against the title of the property in favour
of Council over the land area from the stub road to the park dedication area on the subject site. The easement
must be granted at no cost to Council.
Permissible Change under Section 367
The proposed changes to the original Development Permit and associated conditions, comply with the definition of a
Permissible Change as defined in Section 367 of the SPA. The Act permits an assessment manager to consider a
change to an approval where the change is a Permissible Change. The definition of Permissible Change is as follows:
1) A permissible change for a development approval, is a change to the approval that would
not-
(a) result in a substantially different development; or
(b) if the application for the approval were remade including the change-
(i) require referral to additional concurrence agencies;
(ii) for an approval for assessable development that previously did not require impact
assessment; or
(c) for an approval for assessable development that previously required impact
assessment- be likely, in the responsible entity's opinion, to cause a person to make a
properly made submission objecting to the proposed change, it the circumstances
allowed; or
(d) cause development to which the approval relates to include prohibited development"
In relation to the above definition, we make the following comments:
The proposed change to the conditions will not result in a substantially different development to that,
which was approved;
The proposed Permissible Change does not result in a significant change to conditions within the
approval;
The proposed changes would not require any additional referrals to the State Assessment Referral
Agency; and,
The proposed changes do not involve prohibited development.
For these reasons outlined above, it is considered that the proposed changes constitute a Permissible Change to the
approved development. On this basis, it is considered that the request should be dealt with pursuant to provisions
outlined within Sections 369 and 377 of the SPA.
We trust the information provides you with sufficient information in relation to the proposal and we look forward to
receiving a positive decision from Council at your earliest convenience.
Should you have any further questions in relation to this matter, please feel free to contact me direct.
Page 3
Yours faithfully, ADAMS + SPARKES TOWN PLANNING + DEVELOPMENT Cameron Adams MANAGING DIRECTOR CC: Sara Encl: Attachment I Request to Change an Existing Approval form
Page 4
Request to change an existing approval template
(Sustainable Planning Act 2009 version 1.1 effective March 2010)
This template may be used for giving a written notice asking the responsible entity to make a permissible
change to a development approval under section 369 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA). It should
be noted that if the responsible entity for the request has a form for the request, the request must made
using that form.
This template must be lodged with the following entity (the responsible entity) as applicable:
if the change is to a condition imposed by a Minister under chapter 6, part 11, division 1 of SPA the
template must be lodged with the Minister that imposed the condition
if the approval was given by a Minister under chapter 6, part 11, division 2 of SPA the template must
be lodged with the Minister that gave the approval
if the change is to a condition of the approval imposed by a concurrence agency the template must be
lodged with the concurrence agency
if the approval was given by the Planning and Environment Court the template must be lodged with the
Planning and Environment Court
in all other cases the template must be lodged with the assessment manager for the original development
application.
Attach extra pages if there is insufficient space on this template. Terms used in this template having the
meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.
1. Who is making the request?
Name/s (individual or company name in full) Thomco (No.2087) Pty Ltd c/ ADAMS + SPARKES
For companies, contact name Cameron Adams
Postal address PO Box 1000
BUDDINA QLD 4575
Contact phone number (07) 5313 7705
Mobile number (non-mandatory)
Fax number (non-mandatory)
e-mail address (non-mandatory) ashleigh
astpd.com.au
Page 5
2. What are the details of the existing approval sought to be changed?
Type of approval Identification number Date decision notice Name of entity that issued the approval
or negotiated or imposed the condition sought to be
decision notice changed
issued
X Development MCU13/0251 30 May 2014 Noosa Shire Council
permit
Preliminary
approval
3. Is the approval for a mobile and temporary environmentally relevant activity (ERA)?
X No
Yes—complete table A and then go to question 5
Table A—name of each local government area in which the mobile and temporary ERA is proposed to operate/ is operating
4. Location of the premises (complete table B and/or table C as applicable. Identify each lot in a separate row)
Table B—street address/lot for the premises or street address/lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent
to the premises
X street address/lot on the plan
street address/lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises (appropriate for development
in water e.g. jetty, pontoon)
Street address Lot on plan description Local government
area (e.g. Logan,
Unit Street Street name and official Post- Lot no. Plan type Cairns)
no. no. suburb/ locality name code and plan no.
David Low Way,
215 Peregian Beach 4573 77 SP231615 Noosa Shire Council
Request to change existing approval template -2-
Page 6
Table C—premises coordinates (appropriate for development in remote areas, over part of a lot or in water e.g.
channel dredging in Moreton Bay)
Coordinates Zone Datum Local government
(note: place each set of coordinates in a separate row) reference area (if applicable)
Easting Northing Latitude Longitude
GDA94
WGS84
Other
5. Details of the proposed change
Change to Condition 35 - refer to letter
6. Is owner’s consent required for this request? (refer to notes at the end of this form for more information)
X No
Yes—complete either table D or table E as applicable
Table D
Name of owner of the land
I, the above-mentioned owner of the land, consent to the making of this request.
Signature of owner of the land
Date
Table E
Name of owner of the land
The owner’s written consent is attached
Request to change existing approval template -3-
Page 7
7. Does the request involve a state resource prescribed under the Sustainable Planning Regulation
2009, schedule 14? (e.g. the application involves state land, or taking quarry materials. Refer to the notes
at the end of this form for more information)
X No Yes—the written agreement of the chief executive from whom evidence would need to
be obtained under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, section 254(1) must be attached.
8. Has a pre-request response notice been given for this request?
X No
Yes—a copy of the pre-request response notice must be attached to this request
9. Is a copy of this request required to be given to another entity under section 372 of the Sustainable
Planning Act 2009? (refer to notes at the end of this form for more information)
No
X Yes—complete Table F
Table F
A copy of this request has been provided to the entities identified below (provide details for each entity given a
copy of the request and the date the copy was given)
Assessment manager for
the original application
x Concurrence agencies for
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government & Planning
the original application
Any other entity prescribed
by a regulation
10. Provide details of any other supporting information attached to this request
Permissible Change Request letter
Notes for completing this template
This template is not an approved form under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. The entity responsible for
deciding the request may have their own form for the purpose of making a written request to change an
existing development approval. A change to an existing development approval may involve:
o a change to an approval given by the assessment manager
o a change to a condition imposed by a concurrence agency
o a change to an approval given by the Minister under a Ministerial call in
o a change to a condition imposed by the Minister under a Ministerial direction
o a change to an approval given by the Planning and Environment Court
Request to change existing approval template -4-
Page 8
Question 6:
Under section 371 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, if the person making the request is not the owner
of the land to which the approval relates, the request must be accompanied by the owner’s consent.
However, owner’s consent is not required if the approval:
o relates to land that was acquisition land to which section 263(2)(d) of the Sustainable Planning Act
2009 applied when the application for the approval was made
o is for building work or operational work for the supply of community infrastructure on land
designated for the community infrastructure, or
o the consent of the owner would not be required under section 263(1) of the Sustainable Planning
Act 2009 if a development application were made for the requested change
Also, owners’ consent is not required if the responsible entity is satisfied that:
o the number of owners of the land make it impracticable to obtain owners’ consent, and the requested
change does not materially affect the owners’ land, or
o having regard to the nature of the proposed change, the owner has unreasonably withheld
consent and the requested change does not materially affect the owner’s land.
Question 7:
Section 370(3) and (4) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 requires that if an application for the development
approval were made at the time of making this request and evidence under section 264(1) of the Sustainable
Planning Act 2009 would be required to support the application, this request must be accompanied by the
written agreement of the chief executive from whom evidence would be required under section 264(1).
(Section 264 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 provides that if a development involves a State resource,
a regulation may require the application to be supported by certain evidence prescribed under the regulation.
Schedule 14 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 prescribes the State resources for which evidence
is required to be given, and the evidence required, to support the application.)
Question 9:
Section 372 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 requires that a copy of the request be given to:
o the assessment manager for the original application, if the request is made to a concurrence agency, the
Minister, or the court
o any concurrence agencies for the original application, if the request is made to the assessment
manager for the original application, the Minister or the court
o any other entity prescribed by a regulation.
However, a copy of the request is not required to be given to an entity that has given a pre-request response
notice for the request.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date received Reference numbers
Request to change existing approval template -5-
Used in these records
ADAMS+SPARKES MCU Permissible Change Request (David Low Way) 160105.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 573 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.