Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Reference Document - RAL23/0013.02 - Part 2 (As Published)

of 63

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (10.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 21, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

1.4.       Further Advice
Further advice was received from Noosa Council, dated 7 November 2023, regarding the development
application (RAL23/0013). The further advice letter asks for the proposal to comply with the Noosa Plan for
stormwater items listed below.

Issue - Stormwater Quality
It is unclear how compliance with the pollutant load reduction targets has been calculated. The scheme requires
an 80%/60%/45% reduction in TSS/TP/TN for the unmitigated development site loads. Since the bioretention
device receives flows from areas outside the development, a manual calculation of compliance with this target is
required, based on the MUSIC model results.

This is achieved by:

1.   Extracting the development site (current and original developments) source loads from the model
2.   Calculating the required pollutant load removal by multiplying (1) by 80%/60%/45%
3.   Comparing the required load removal (kg/yr) to the actual load removal achieved by the device

This does not appear to have been done.

Response:

The SMP demonstrates an 80%/60%/45% reduction in TSS/TP/TN for the unmitigated development site
loads according to the scheme as summarized in Table 3-7 and Table 3-8.

The information provided in the SMP-V2 has been reformatted as per the above request:

1.   The source loads of the current and original developments were extracted from the model (refer
     Figure 1-3) and are summarized in the “Unmitigated (kg/yr)” column of Table 1-1.
     Note that there is a minor difference between Figure 1-3 and Table 3-7 as MUSIC is a stochastic model, with
     randomness resulting in minor changes in results between model runs.
2.   The required pollutant load removal (2) was calculated by multiplying (1) by 80%/60%/45%. This
     information is provided in Table 1-1.
3.   The actual load removal (3) achieved by the device exceeds the required load removal (2) and therefore
     meets the target reductions as per the scheme.




23-0167SMP01-V3 | Stormwater Management Plan | 33 Pavilion Street, Pomona                                Page 13
Log in to download the original file

Reference Document - RAL23_0013.02 - Part 2 (As Published).pdf · 10.7 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.