Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

Reference Document - Geotechnical Investigation Report MCU25/0053 & OPW25/0074

of 47

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

                                                                                                                                          PTG/01608 – 0001 – Rev0

            Table 7: Ultimate Geotechnical Design Parameters for Bored or Driven Piles
                            Material Type                               Ultimate Skin Friction (kPa)                        Ultimate Base Bearing (kPa)
                       Loose sand/silty sand                                  Not Recommended                                   Not Recommended
                 Medium dense sand/silty sand                                              2                                           500
                       Dense sand/silty sand                                               4                                           1000
            Notes: Assuming pile is founded to a minimum depth of 1.5 m and top 1 m of pile is ignored for skin friction.

            As with the high-level foundations, bearing capacity in sands increases with depth. If bearing capacities at deeper
            depths are required, they can be provided.

            The above parameters are only suitable where the excavation of piled foundations are supervised and at a minimum
            inspected by a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer to confirm the founding conditions and materials encountered
            in the side walls.

            The design of piled foundations should be undertaken in accordance with:
            » AS 2159-2009: Piling - Design and installation;
            » Any other relevant design standards (Australian or international); and
            » Engineering Principles.

            The piled foundation design should also consider:
            » Piles should be founded a minimum of two pile diameters into the nominated strata and have a minimum pile
                length of four times the pile diameter;
            » The upper 1 m of pile length should be ignored due to pile load development and shrink swell effects; and
            » Settlement of properly designed and constructed footings should be less than 1% to 2% of the pile diameter.

            To calculate the design geotechnical strength (Rd,g), the ultimate geotechnical strength should be multiplied by a
            suitable geotechnical strength reduction factor (фg) as per Section 4 of AS 2159–2009. The geotechnical strength
            reduction factor (фg) is based on:
            » фgb = The basic geotechnical strength reduction factor, calculated using a risk assessment procedure;
            » фtf = Intrinsic testing factor, based on the type of pile testing adopted; and
            » K = The testing benefit factor, based on a percentage of the piles that are tested.

            Typically, where no pile testing is undertaken and the piles have a low redundancy, the assessed risk rating would be
            high and a фg value of 0.45 would apply. It should be noted this assessment has been undertaken by PTG to assist
            with the design of the foundations, however as assessment of each risk rating and factors must be undertaken by the
            designer of the piles for the final design.

            Specialist piling contractors should be consulted when selecting and installing piles.


                        RETAINING WALL PARAMETERS
            It is understood that retaining walls will be required for the development. Retaining wall type and height are unknown
            at the time of writing this report.

            Any retaining structures at the site should be designed in accordance with AS4678-2002 ‘Earth Retaining Structures’.
            Retaining wall design should consider the below:
            » The distance from the crest and magnitude of any surcharge loads (ie buildings, roads);
            » Whether the selected wall type is suitable for the proposed loading conditions;
            » Wall geometry and the presence of any slopes at the crest or toe of the wall; and
            » Type of backfill to be used behind the wall, and whether compaction will exert additional forces onto the wall.

            Table 8: Geotechnical Parameters for Retaining Wall Design
                                                              Bulk Unit Weight                       Drained Cohesion              Effective Friction Angle
                       Material Type
                                                                    (kN/m )   3
                                                                                                            (c’ kPa)                         (φ’ °)
                  Loose sand/silty sand                                  17                                     0                             28
                Medium dense sand/silty
                                                                         18                                     0                             30
                        sand
                  Dense sand/silty sand                                  19                                     0                             32
               Very dense sand/silty sand                                20                                     0                             35

                                                                                                                                                              13
Document Set ID: 24149758
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/09/2025

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Reference Document - Geotechnical Investigation Report MCU25_0053 & OPW25_0074.pdf · 5.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.