Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendices 9,10,11,12 & 13 Email 4 of 4 - MCU16/0153 REC16/0041

of 48

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                          PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                          COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS

overlook the private open space areas of neighbouring
properties.
Sloping sites
O13 Development on sloping sites—                         S13.1 Buildings and associated accessways are not               N/A       Please refer to the Proposal Plans prepared
a) is responsive to the natural topography of the site    constructed on land with a slope greater than 1 in 4                      by Sprout Architects (Appendix 1).
and minimises cut and fill;                               (25%);
b) does not visually dominate the hill slope or           AND
interrupt the skyline;                                    S13.2 Buildings are of split level design that step down        N/A
c) is integrated with the natural site characteristics    the slope or have suspended floor construction;
including vegetation; and                                 AND
d) for Multiple housing, takes the form of small          S13.3 Cut or fill is less than 2m in depth;                     N/A
separate buildings.                                       AND
                                                          S13.4 The distance between the ground and the lowest            N/A
                                                          part of the floor of the building does not exceed 3m to
                                                          avoid large under-building areas;
                                                          AND
                                                          S13.5 Buildings present no more than—                           YES       Please refer to the Proposal Plans prepared
                                                          a) if in the Visitor Mixed Use Zone – 3 storeys at any one                by Sprout Architects (Appendix 1).
                                                          point when viewed from the street; or
                                                          b) if in any other Zone - 2 storeys at any one point when
                                                          viewed from the street.
7.10 ENVIRONMENT, CONSERVATION AND RECREATION
Environment and cultural heritage values
O14 There are no significant adverse effects on           No solution provided                                            YES       Please refer to the Engineering Services
biodiversity, natural vegetation, native fauna habitat,                                                                             Report prepared by Covey & Associates
landscape quality, water quality or cultural heritage     Advisory note                                                             (Appendix 6).
values, including those related to—                       PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details requirements for the
a) changes to natural drainage;                           design and siting of effluent disposal systems where
b) changes to natural coastal processes;                  located outside a sewerage service area.
Log in to download the original file

Appendices 9,10,11,12 & 13 Email 4 of 4 - MCU16_0153 REC16_0041.pdf · 6.2 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.