07/2448 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2448

(MTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1957,
Ono
ttn, is sry ERA an itor 20 ERA (extracting rock or other material) intanded Io be located outside
waters?
0 _ No- Unlecs 2 2podcetion is consistont with any property develonrnent pion eppina tothe land, ond the
‘eppscation rs accorepented dy an aliccaton nokco, ho Ascassnent Manager oxi reluse (0 eocote &.
({Conmase Pact C) This appicakon requins assessment by the Adnsnisiering Authority tor De
pupases of bath ina Enviorrnental Protecdon Aci 1994 and the Wid Rivers Act 2005, tbo
‘Adtminéstanng Authorty is not the Assessment Manager lor tha appicanan, the agency has jursciction
as ConcuTonce Agony.
O ves
Nyos, docs the ERA meet the folowing?
«the activity is leated Inskie a food management area anda (No  [) Yes
borrow pil off not mora than 10,000? for -
+ specified works under the WAd Rivers Act 2005 07
+ residential complexes, a5 defined under the
Enutronmentay Protaction Act 1994

© the actviy is located ovfelde a flood management area QNo (Yes

   

yas fo ether = Unless the appication s consistent win any property developmnart pian apyiyg to tho
: Jenn, ard tha appscation is eccomperied by an eZocaton native. ine Assassmart anager
magi retyse wm recave & {Compleie Pai G| Thus appkcation requires assessment dy thy
y Authorky fr the purpasas of Botk Ohe Environmental Protection Act 1904
‘ard, subject 19 the ralovant declaration for Ihe will river aroa, Ure Ws Revers Act 2005.
thn Adrahistenng Authonty §s not the Assessment Monager for the gppicaton, the agency
‘hs purislction as Concurrence Agancy.

ne (0 both - An eppication fo she ERA would ba fakon to be not propamty made and the Assessrmctd
mmannger must refuse fo receive

 

 

1.4 | fs any pert of the premises with the frit of @ port under he Transport infrastructure Act 1996?

Ht No
Yoo
Ayes, is that part of the premises below bigh water mark?

QO tw
Yes Wanswars lo questions in other sachons oF ths checkist indicate thatthe proposed development s assessable under IPA,

schedule B— Answ {9} !9(ch Dclew This appkcalion requies assessment by ihe Port Aithorty for tha tand, it you
‘axisio° m0 40a), (0) and (c} Dolow, the Pan Authanty for he Port has jusdicton as Aavice Agony.

(a) Is ory pat of the propos within 200m of a shipping channel or an eriry and axk shipping corridor for the Port?
QO Na
[BD Yes - the Post Austonty for tho Port has jutciction as Concurrence Agency.

0) Is ary part ofthe proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wha, 2 mooring, anchorage or
spol grounds?
O No
LB Yes me Port Authonty Jor the Port fas jxicdicton as Concurence Agency.

(ch Is any past of the propasal within 4,000m of a planned port fadity identiied in a tand use plan?
0 to
(Bo Yes - The Port Autnonty ler tne Port has jisdiction az Concurence Agency.

 

   

   

SMTEGRATED PLANING ACT 1900. OAS Assessmery Chacha, Varson 21.0.3 Soptors ber 2007

   
 

 

Yes —n answors to questions in other sections of ths checktst indicate Wrst fhe proposed devoipment is assessable under IPA,
schedule & tis application requires assessment by the Depesizent of Primary hndveries avd Fisheries {OPIEF), ¥ DICE fs rot
fha Assessment Monager for the applica, the agency hss jiscicion as Advice Agency.

    

 

    
 
 
  
  
  
   
   
  

   
   

63
iG

Repay rte bt aR?

[Does the proposal involve the establishment or expansion of a westa water disposal system?

tyes, is the community irate Intended th be provided by a public sector entity?

O
O Yes :
yes, is the land owned by or on bohatt of the State?
(] Yes
O
tina, is the development for the folowing?
© For the designated purpose Ono (Yes
© Contted oxt by, or on behalf of, the designator On Oye
¥no to alther ar both, is the proposed development essessable under tha planning scheme’?
O wt

1D Yes. mis application must be referred to the Gueenstand Government deportinent administering (0 Act
auttodsing tha develypmont lor the designation 83 Concurrence Agendy.

  
 

No.
Yes
Hf yes, is any part of the disposal system proposed to d¢ located in an area dediared to be a catchment area under the
Wator Act 20007
D No
(J Yes
Hf yes, is the proposed wasta wator disposal system an andronmentaly relevant actly (ERA) under the Envronmocta!
Protection Act 19947
OQ Yes
O
tf mo, is the proposed development involving the waste water disposal systarn assessable under the planning
schema?
QO
(__ Yes- mie eppicaton nqures assessment by the Departmera of Nebirat Resources and Wetor (NRW) as
Coreuniance Agency. |

 

ID Iepedoien, vere) Une d aT

e