07/2448 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132007.2448

INTEGRATED PLANOWNG ACT 1887 SOAS Aanatsmnerd Crock bet, Vorsion 21 0, 3 Septonber 2007

REMOVAL, DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF A MARINE PLANT ~ ~ this question only appkes for applications nex atso seeking
approval fp carry out opertional work.

20 10 of marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994?

fy Yea

tyes, indicate whit the propased operational work Is reasonably necessary ber {7 Tick eppacabic ksi}

© The removal, destruction or damage of dead marine wood on unallocated Stata tend, other C1] No Ors
thon in 2 wild river ara, Ko eco or commerce

«The mainlenence of axisfing structures, including, for exempte, the folowing stucturas, F Cito [Yes
Ihe structures worn constructed in compliance with afl the requirements, under any Act,
relating fo a structure of thal type -
+ baat ramps, boorwais, dais, fences, jets, rads, Safty Sons, swimming

© Educationet or research purposes or for monitoring the impact of development on marine Dn Ores
shonts
© Other purposes Om Ores
Hye to “other purposes’, dons # development permit axist for that proposed operational work?
Yes
No
‘a separa'e appicstion?

Non This appkeaion mst eo be or apereone! wrt Kr rev. esto cari mee IE et
thw Fisheries ACI 199, {Conplath Secter: 4 3th checti)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(INTEGRATED PLAMPONG ACT 1907 TAS Asasument Chpck bet Version 21.0, 3 Sepecen ber 2007
SECTION 3 Sacton 3 mast be complet won te aptcaon sorts approve reeset att
mabe £ nays SSP
[STAYE-CONTROLLED ROAD
1 any part of the promises within 100m of a Stato-controted road, or part of a future State-controfied roed?
J No
{ro, is he proposed reconfiguration fisted in intagrated Planning Reyudation 1898, schedule § and does ft exound the Preshald?
CO no
oO ‘Yes - Tne apofeation must be referred to tre Departvent of Main Rowds (ONR) os Concurrence Agency
(OO Yes
IV yes, wil he proposed reconfiguration resut in the kelowing?
© Anincrease in the total number of lots On (CyYes
¢ Anincreese in the total number of lots abutting the State-controtied road Dw Ores

toe be ater or beth 4s the reconfiguration proposes in a future State-controfied mad defined by route?

 

= Reategory |, 20r 3 arta shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) fio (Yes
‘© tf there fs ao PMAV for 8 lot, remnant vegetation Pro) Yes

Ht yes to etther or both, ere 2 or more lots proposed lo be created?

tyes, fs any lot, belore the proposer! recortSguraion, 2ha or lanyer?
0

Heb den ot nyt oped toe crete, 25ha or smotier?

O Ne

1 Yes: iCommpate Per J} This application met be referred to the Dopartment of Netix: rad Rasouces ond Water (NRW)
#8 Concurrence Agency.