MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - John Connor

Code Objective                   Developer's Assessment            Objectors' Assessment

DRIVEWAYS & CAR PARKING CODE

01 Vehicular access does not     S1.1- S1.3 Complies               Does not Comply
adversely impact on safety,      Vehicle access is considered to   The Applicant fails to provide
capacity and operations of       be compliant with the relevant    objective evidence or verification of
the existing or planned road     requirements. The                 the source of its "considered" opinion
network, the proposed            development will comply           that vehicle access is compliant.
driveway, cycleways or           where applicable.                 In the contrary, the proposed
pedestrian pathway systems.                                        Development's vehicular access
                                                                   adversely impacts on safety of
                                                                   children using the pedestrian pathway
                                                                   to and from the School. The proposed
                                                                   Development wili significantly
                                                                   increase the amount of traffic using
                                                                   the access easement.
                                                                   The Applicant fails to consider or
                                                                   address how children will be able to
                                                                   safely cross the access way to the
                                                                   service station in a safe manner.

04 Vehicular access does not     S4.1 Complies                     Does not Comply
adversely impact on the          The development will comply       The current proposal will have a
capacity, operations and         as required.                      significant adverse impact on the
maintenance of the existing                                        operation of the existing road
infrastructure;                                                    network in and around the School.

07 Sufficient carparking is      07 Complies                       Does not Comply
provided to accommodate          The proposed development          The qualification "technically" is an
the number and type of           will provide 10 car parking       obfuscation. The proposed
vehicles likely to be            spaces. Technically this is       Development does not comply with
generated by the                 below the minimum according       the minimum requirements according
deveiopment having regard        to Table 14-51 Vehicle Parking    to Table 14-51 Vehicle Parking
to the specifics of the use...   Requirements.    However, it is   Requirements.
                                 considered that 10 spaces are
                                 suitable given the ancillary      It is the Applicant's responsibility to
                                 nature of the proposed petrol     design a compliant solution in all
                                 building. The likely number of    respects, including provision of
                                 users of the service will be      required car parking spaces to comply
                                 there to refuel their vehicles,   with the planning scheme.
                                 which comprises leaving the       Council has determined by way of the
                                 vehicle at the fuel dispenser.    planning scheme what is 'suitable'.
                                 The amount of users               The Applicant provides no
                                 specifically using the site for   qualification, expert opinion or
                                 the ancillary shop component      justification to allow a conclusion that
                                 is considered to be low. It is    the amount proposed is "suitable."



                                                                                                             21