Original source · versioned page text
RFI - Attachment 4A - Response by Native Foresters
TABLE 1: Assessment of Project against State Governments Supported Infrastructure Koala Policy 2017
Column 1: Column 2: Column 3:
Requirements that apply to all Government RESPONSE Government Supported Infrastructure RESPONSE Self-Assessment Criteria SELF –
Supported Infrastructure development in SEQ development in a KHA that is exempt from the ASSESSMENT
Self-Assessment Criteria of Column RESPONSE
1. Where possible, development avoids Complies 1. Development in a State Development N/A Development in an area that is both a KPA and a KHA See Table 2
fragmenting KHA within the land to The clearing is on the edge of Area. 1. Where interfering with koala habitat, occurs, public assessment
which the development applies. retained vegetation and sector entities, in addition to any relevant criteria of below.
cleared areas. Column 1, must also self-assess against the
requirements in Table 2.
2. Where possible, development does Complies 2. Development for a Coordinated N/A Development in an area that is a KHA outside a KPA N/A
not impede or restrict the movement The vegetation is an area Project. 2. Where interfering with koala habitat is unavoidable,
of koalas within the land to which the 1.02ha which is “jutting” into development in a KHA, in addition to any relevant
development applies and provides the landfill site; and currently criteria of Column 1, must:
safe koala movement measures does not provide a corridor or a. minimise interfering with koala habitat; and
between highly connected patches of link from the remaining
retained KHA. vegetation on site (to the east
of the landfill) to another
patch of vegetation.
3. Clearing of koala habitat trees must Complies 3. Development in a declared Priority N/A b. where possible, mitigate any impacts that N/A
be carried out in a way that complies Council will clear from the Development Area or a declared Provisional interfere with koala habitat values; and
with sequential clearing conditions. landfill towards the retained Priority Development Area.
vegetation.
4. Development must ensure that: Complies 4. Development that involves interfering with N/A c. where interfering with koala habitat results in N/A
a. measures are taken in A Wildlife Spotter Catcher koala habitat to: Proposed a significant residual impact, deliver an
construction practices to not experienced in koala spotting a. a total area of 500m2 or less; or clearing is offset:
increase the risk of death or and relocating, will be b. a total of 12 non juvenile koala 1.02ha i. in accordance with the requirements
injury to koalas; and required during all clearing habitat trees or less on the land to of the current Queensland
b. native vegetation in an area works. which the development applies. Environmental Offsets Policy or
identified by a proponent to be Works will also be
retained as a safe koala undertaken in accordance
movement measure is with a CEMP.
progressively restored if it must
be impacted during site
operations. N/A
Noosa Landfill & RRC – Response to RFI – Environmental Items (Dec 2023) 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.