ASTP-Rspns_To_RFI

Information Request Item No.                                                             Response
                                                                                         onsite and site/streetscape context has not been taken into account when assessing
                                                                                         the application. Overall, the proposal complies in full with PO17 given that the front
                                                                                         fence is compatible with the existing streetscape character of the site, as
                                                                                         demonstrated above. Further comments regarding the proposal’s compliance with
                                                                                         PO17 of the Code is available within the lodged Town Planning Report.
9. Sustainable Building Design                                                           Refer to the Engineer’s response letter prepared by ingeniir in Attachment 3 and the
The application does not include detail in regard to Acceptable outcome AO2.1 of         revised Stormwater Management Plan prepared by ingeniir in Attachment 4, which
the Sustainable Building Design Code - a minimum 3,000 litres of rain water storage      address Item 9 of the Information Request.
is provided per dwelling and reused for non-potable purposes and incorporated into
a stormwater management plan for the development.

Information Request
Provide an amended stormwater management plan that demonstrates compliance
with the above Acceptable outcome. The amended stormwater management plan
must be certified by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland).
10. Landscaping discrepancies in plans                                                   All design sets enclosed within this Information Request response have been
The Landscaping Plan provided by Bird Landscaping Design and conceptual                  reviewed for consistency.
landscaping plan prepared by Icon Building Design do not align with one another.
Bird Landscaping Design’s plans show greater soft landscaping than Icon.

Information Required
Provide revised plans to rectify discrepancies or identify the higher order plan and
confirm correct landscaping calculations for total landscaping and soft landscaping.
11-13. Landscape species                                                                 Please refer to the revised Landscape Plans in Attachment 5. Further, the Landscape
Species selected do not meet the Landscaping Works Code PO10 as some are                 Architects, Bird Landscape Design, have provided the following comments in
inappropriate for the locality and landscape character of the area. Species identified   response to Items 11-13:
as potentially inappropriate include:
• HOWEA forsteriana - Kentia Palm – endemic to Lord Howe Island not Noosa



  Our ref: 220417                                                                                                                                             Page 10 of 15